►
From YouTube: Kubernetes SIG Node CI 20230906
Description
SIG Node CI weekly meeting. Agenda and notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1fb-ugvgdSVIkkuJ388_nhp2pBTy_4HEVg5848Xy7n5U/edit#heading=h.2v8vzknys4nk
GMT20230906-170716_Recording_1572x1018.mp4
A
B
C
A
A
Don't
have
anybody
signing
up
for
hosting
test
or
bug
part
of
this
meeting,
so
I
will
be
watching
that
and
I
looked
briefly
on
test
grid.
It
seems
the
same
so
all
the
same
errors
there.
So
I
don't
want
to
spend
time
there,
especially
when
we
have
like
24
items
that
they
are
here.
I
really
appreciate
people
start
working
on
different
aspects
of
tests,
so
let's
jump
right
into
it.
I
pre-opened
a
few
bugs.
A
So
let's
take
a
look
okay,
so
this
is
modifying
some.
This
definition
to
me,
I
think
it's
fair,
okay,
I
will
take
a
look
later.
A
So
we're
trying
to
test
sidecars-
and
these
are
all
sorts
of
definitions:
okay,
fix,
multi-normal
test
for
topology
management
memory,
manager,
okay,.
A
D
Okay,
yeah
so
This
Is
Us,
trying
to
fix
the
topology
manager
and
memory
manager,
jobs
that
are
fulfilling
there
was
a
contribute
tutor
who
tried
to
fix
the
CPU
manager
jobs
and
he
essentially
identified
the
issue
that
we
had
previously
so
I've
and
because
his
change
was
focused
specifically
on
CPU
manager,
jobs
I
tried
to
have
a
follow-up
PR
for
technology
manager
and
memory
manager
jobs.
A
D
A
A
A
Those
life
cycle
tests
that
we
added
last
release
when
we've
been
working
on
sidecars
facing
General
life
cycle
of
how
they,
when
post
start
starts
and
was
it,
runs
through
the
everything
foreign.
E
E
A
Was
it
me
a
reviewer
or
somebody
else?
Oh
somebody
else.
Okay
I
actually
find
to
keep
approval
here.
A
Whinge
again,
sidecars
I
think
this
is
work
in
progress,
and
this
is
yeah.
This
Dash
is
a
like
a
code
of
product.
Did
you
have
a
chance
to
take
a
look
or
yes.
E
I
I,
actually,
don't
you
find
found
a
bug
in
Project's
API,
which
is
relevant
in
this
context,
because
he
was
trying
to
use
the
producers
API
tool
for
the
end-to-end
test,
which
is
a
good
idea
by,
in
my
opinion,
so
I
suggested
him.
Okay
feel
free
to
rewrite
the
test.
It's
a
way.
You
don't
you're,
not
blocked
on
that
and
I
think
that
we
should
fix
the
API.
But
it's
not
too
urgent.
E
It's
not
something
it's
needed
now,
which
could
be,
for
example,
a
better
item,
better
blocker
or
whatever
other
than
that
for
the
product
code
itself.
Yes,
I
will
be
reviewing
most
likely
tomorrow,
but
yeah
I'm
on
it,
and
even
if
I'm,
not
this
I
know,
I
am
assigned
so
okay
I
was
about
to
say,
feel
free
to
send
me
thanks.
A
B
Yeah
so
I'm
not
so
this
one's
just
skips
the
reason
check
only
on
container
D,
with
a
link
to
the
containerdy
issue
that
hopefully,
when
it's
fixed,
we
can
sort
of
undo
this
whole
change.
Basically,.
B
B
Other
one
was
just
the
linters
wanted
me
to
change
the
bill.
Mega
expect
I,
didn't
I,
couldn't
find
a
good
way
to
detect
containerdy
other
than
seeing
the
container
deep
binary
binary
is
running.
B
But
get
a
validated
against
one
of
my
nodes
for
uncontinently.
B
Because,
if
you're
yeah,
if
you're
in
the
continuity
binary,
this
will
feel
like
ice
technically,
we
can't
tell
that
Cube.
Let's
talk
in
the
continuity
binary,
I
didn't
know.
If
there's
any
method
to
detect
that
well,
I
didn't
I
started
to
do
this
earlier
and
then
Paco
said
hey.
This
is
really
flicking
a
lot.
So
I
submitted
this
just
to
sort
of
get
some
discussion
on.
Is
there
a
better
way
to
just
detect
container-d,
because
this
is
causing
a
bunch
of
failures
at
the
moment.
A
C
C
So
we
do
hit
this,
but
we
do
hit
failures
in
the
pass
and
there
is
a
fix
that
we
are
tracking
in
run
C.
That
will
allow
us
to
fix
this.
That
I,
don't
actually
remember
where
it's
at
now,
but.
B
Yes,
I
guess:
I'm
I
noticed
it
a
lot
more
on
the
containerd,
but
it
might
just
be
that
there
are
more
containerity
tests
running
I'm.
Looking
now
and
it
looks
like
there's
a
cryo
test
failing
as
well
the.
C
B
Let's
see
any,
is
there
an
issue
against
Ron
seeks
that
I
think
continuity
was
still
trying
to
investigate
this
thinking.
It
was
a
problem
off
their
end,
but
if
it's
a
race
with
system,
D
I'm
trying
to
look
at
the
all
the.
C
Yeah,
so
if
you
this
is
here's
I'll
post
it
in
chat
the
1.1
cherry
pick
to
the
pr
that
fixes
this.
So
if
you
vendor
one
dot
or
if
you
have
the
I
think
it
would
be,
it
would
have
to
have
the
binary
on
the
Node
be
run
C
1.1.8.
Then
you
can
remove
the
inactive
or
failed
and
then.
B
Not
for
the
goggle
I'll
go
read
that
after
a
meeting,
so
let's
CR
may
not
be
necessary
unless
we
want
to
skip
the
reason
check
entirely
for
now,
I'm
not
sure
just
to
deflect
things
or
try
to
fix
it
quickly.
A
Yeah
I'll
just
add
a
link
here,
so
we
won't
forget,
for
this
part,
I
think
we
need
to
just
keep
it
all
together
without
check
for
continuity,
yeah
like
quite
a
lot
and
who
just
explicitly
add
a
skip
there.
It
will
be
better
yeah
I'll
do
that
yeah
maybe
even
have
a
check
performed
and
if
check
fails,
don't
skip
so
it
will
run
at
least
sometimes
most
of
the
time.
Yeah.
A
If
you
have
the
same
time
like
bug
tracking
it
for
cryov
I
would
appreciate,
if
you
share
it,
we
can
just
type
it
together.
E
C
Failures
but
I,
you
should
have
an
issue
it'd
be
better
if
we
did
yeah
yeah
and
you
tagged
me
on
that
bus,
so
I
can
find
that.
A
A
A
A
Similar
cleanup
yeah
this
oops
okay.
B
Yeah
as
well
yeah
I
guess
you
might
as
well,
because
if
you
happen
to
touch
a
test
that
modifies
one
of
those
lines,
the
lint
fails
so
yeah.
A
Foreign
yeah
I
hate
this
one.
We
get
PR
like
that,
every
now
and
then
I'll
just
archive
it
out.
It
never
succeeded.
So
people
don't
really
like
comparisons
like
wooden
competitions
with
like
equal,
equal,
true
and
send
this
PRS
and
it
never
been
merged.
Like
I
haven't
seen
once
it
will
be.
What
was
successful.
B
E
A
A
A
Okay,
so
person
saying
that
some
warnings
needs
to
be
updated.
A
Okay,
I
am
confused.
Let
me
archive
it
out
from
here.
If
anybody's
interested,
to
take
a
look,
please
do
it
seems
to
be
a
just
a
debugability
Improvement.
A
Okay,
next
one
is,
we
can
go
into,
wants
to
switch
test
or
something
else.
B
Yeah
so
we
were
using
the
termination
log,
but
he
has
some
like
longer
running
tests
and
wanted
to
just
pull
it
from
the
container
log
itself.
So
he
didn't
have
to
wait
for
the
container
to
actually
exit
coach
seats
gone.
B
Actually
uses
that
I
actually
use
the
logs
API,
you
can
get
it
from
a
container
log.
So.
A
A
And
as
well
only
for
nodes
so
yeah,
they
probably
won't
approver
origin
in
here.
So.
D
B
So
I
think
I
fix
this.
One
I
didn't
notice
issues
there.
The
I
had
a
change
merged
in
yesterday,
I
think
where
the
someone
updated
a
node
problem.
Detector
image
in
the
arm.
64
version
was
not
an
arm64
version.
A
A
That
is
fine,
okay,
we
done
reviewing
like
crash
on
this
board
and
we
already
half
an
hour
past
the
hour
so
yeah
at
some
point.
We
need
to
really
use
this
in
progress
and
issues
to
do
to
make
sure
we
not
forget
anything
here,
yeah
for
now,
let's
switch
the
box
today.
A
A
A
A
A
A
B
C
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
So
I
think
it
may
be
related
to
container
runtime.
D
B
B
At
this,
one
I
think
it's
as
expected
yeah,
so
he
was
in
his
test
he's
using
nginx
which
handles
the
Sig
term,
gracefully
and
exits
with
a
status
of
zero,
which
then
costs
the
job
to
be
completed
successfully.
If
you
swap
it
out
for
something
like
bash
sleep,
that's
exactly
like
anything.
It'll
reliably
have
a
failure
status.
Basically,.
B
B
Regression
you're
saying
I
think
it
was
intentional
trying
to
find
the
the
notes
from
the
sigma
code
reading.
A
A
And
another
box.