►
From YouTube: SIG Node Sidecar WG 2023-03-14
Description
Meeting notes and agenda: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1E1guvFJ5KBQIGcjCrQqFywU9_cBQHRtHvjuqcVbCXvU/edit#heading=h.m8xoiv5t6qma
GMT20230314-160421_Recording_1656x1120.mp4
A
Hello,
hello,
it's
Tuesday,
March,
14
2023,
it's
signaled,
sidecar
working
group
I,
welcome
everybody.
A
Let's
get
going
so
I
think
we
are
at
Finish
Line
and
we
need
to
decide
I
think
at
this
meeting,
whether
we
trying
to
shoot
for
this
really
so,
but
we
will
be
able
to
do
that.
Who
wants
to
ganja?
Do
you
want
to
say
what's
going
on
with
this
PR.
B
A
And
so
for
topology
manager,
I
think
we
handled
first
part
told
change
like
changes,
how
they
calculate
total
size.
I,
don't
think
we
handled
second
part
I,
think
topology
and
CPU
manager
has
special
logic.
You
need
containers
that
we
may
need
to
modify.
B
A
Am
I
making
sense
like?
Is
it
you
updated
the
topology
manager
total
size
right
calculation.
C
I
believe
so
obviously
check
yeah
I'm
not
familiar
with
their
their
other
logic,
but
yeah
well.
I
can
verify
that.
A
Okay,
and
did
you
try
this
idea
with
chickens
and
tacos
for
the
next
container
to
understand
where
the
sidecar
was
already
started
before.
B
D
A
I'm
trying
to
find
it
anyway,
okay,
so
you
already
looked
at
it
and
Test
passing
I
assume
right.
B
B
This
job
is,
if,
if
you
use
a
part
with
restart
policy
on
failure
and
the
sidecar
container
is
continuously
failing,
then,
when
the
main
container
completed
with
Mexico
general,
we
should
Mark
this
part
to
succeed,
but
the
the
sidecar
container
is
in
Waiting
state.
So
in
my
logic,
we
can
I
I
can't
Mark
that
part
to
succeed,
so
I
think
I
think
I
can
change.
I
can
fix
it
easily.
A
Yeah
I
think
we
catching
a
lot
of
good
issues
with
with
the
test
have
I
think
I
mean
it
would
make
sense
to
succeed
the
port
right
when
a
sidecar
is
failing.
A
Do
you
want
to
know
that
login
container
failed
or
you
want
to
know
that,
like
main
logic,
succeeded,
so
I
think
main
logic
succeeded
is
more
important
right,
I.
A
Yeah
I
guess
it's.
It
was
interesting
challenge
because
when
main
container
stops
and
you
started
terminating
sidecar,
if
you
were
lucky
and
the
side
car
was
running,
then
you
will
succeed.
The
port,
if
you
wasn't
like
in
sidecar,
was
just
crashed
like
then
you
will
fail
the
port
right
and
I
think
it.
This
inconsistency
is
not
ideal.
B
B
A
Okay,
so
we
have
some
life
cycle
issues
that
needs
to
be
addressed,
thought
you
just
posted
something
in
the
chat.
I
will
post
it
here.
A
A
All
right
for
this
logic
right
for
this
part,
yeah.
A
A
A
What
about
limiter
name,
you.
C
The
limit
Ranger
yeah
that
should
be
done
so
I
ended
up
just
copying
the
code
and
changing
the
type
from
the
core
type
or
API
tap
to
the
core
type.
Basically,
I
couldn't
find
any
other
elegant
way
to
actually
make
it
work.
A
A
In
here,
in
this
big
car
or
separately
yeah,
it.
A
Yeah
I'm
just
thinking,
maybe
we
can
merge
it
separately.
It
shouldn't
be
a
problem.
B
D
A
A
A
Okay,
great
I
will
review
that
this,
so
we
have
end
to
end
so
Almighty
is
what's
the
status
of
props
and
pre-stop
hooks.
Is
it
something
you
worked
on?
You
said
it's
a
very
small
change
in
logic,
right.
D
Yes,
so
it's
it's
merged
in
your
branch.
The
unit
test,
but
I
haven't
done
an
end-to-end
test,
but
I
I
think
it
was
covered
by
some
of
the
work
from
gunjuno.
D
Okay,
I
I
need
to
look
further
yeah,
otherwise
I
will
check
to
edit
tomorrow.
B
A
Yeah
there
is
a
still
to
do.
I
I
put
this
to
do
for
the
case
of
when
we
will
introduce
site,
oh
by
the
way
I'm
going
to.
What
did
you
say,
is
not
working
with
bad
image.
Is
it
not
stopping,
or
is
it.
A
C
So
I
didn't
see
your
PR
and
then
I
also
did
that
test
I
just
pasted
the
commit.
So
it's
yes,
I've
done
the
same
thing.
So
if
the
sidecar
has
a
bad
image,
basically
attack
or
it
goes
into
image,
pulled
back
off
and
then
side
chord
never
starts
and
then
the
regular
container
never
starts
it's
sort
of
the
two
tests
I
had.
So
if
you
want
to
look
at
mine,
see.
A
I
was
thinking,
oh
wait,
nice,
so
new
weight
method,
I
think
it
would
be
wise
to
make
it
here,
so
I
can
merge
it
faster.
Otherwise,
we
need
sick
testing
to
be
involved.
A
A
A
Okay,
so
what
else
we
have
to
do?
It
feels
that
we
covered
plenty.
A
So
topology
manager-
maybe
we
can
work
around
it
by
saying
we're
not
supporting
this
limit.
Ranger
is
done,
okay,
so
the
only
thing
left
is
to
make
sure
that
success
status
quote
will
be
success
when
a
sidecar
failed,
even
when
sidecar
failed,
and
we
need
to
have
end-to-end
tests
for
probes
and
hooks.
D
A
Yeah
I'm
gonna
bring
it
up
on
the
next
music
agenda,
asking
the
opinion.
The
problem
right
now
is
I
got
heavily
involved
in
this
in
place
vertical
pot
skating,
because
people
want
to
and
reported
so
like
removed
from
the
T
and
like
it's
a
big
change.
So
that's
why
and
most
what
it
broke
it
broke.
The
Standalone
mode,
Standalone
mode
is
apparently
heavily
used,
but
we
never
tested.
A
So
it
was
Zero
tests
in
open
source
repository,
but
we
people
heavily
use
it
and
it's
considered
GA
feature
so
I
was
involved
into
fixing
that
and
making
sure
we
are
testing
it.
So
yeah
I
think
this
will
be
done
by
this
music
and
then
my
question
to
everybody
will
be
how
comfortable
they
have
is
engaging
this
targeted,
but
significant
change.
So
I
think
what
the
reviewers
will
look
for
is
how
well
we
protect
every
single
chord
change
like.
Is
it
unguarded
by
feature
gate?
A
A
Let's
see
how
it
goes.
People
really
want
sidecar,
it's
it's
not
like
nobody
wants
it.
It
just
made
it
harder
that
Bruno
wasn't
around
to
help
us
run
faster.
A
That's
true,
but
nobody
wants
to
take
anything
at
quote:
freeze
time,
but
yeah
you're
right.
That
is
theoretically.
A
Okay,
so
I
think
this
two:
what
we
need.
A
I
didn't
at
least
any
pass
for
pre-stop
I,
don't
know
how
important
it
is.
I,
don't
think
it's
critical
important,
but
you
may
be
interested
to
add
those.
What
I
really
want
to
test
is
startup
logic
like
when
startup,
if
startup
probes
never
succeed
like
how
we
behave
or.
A
Yeah
just
logic
massage:
it
could
be
useful
to
have
okay.
A
Left
to
do
right
so
and
ganji,
you
said
you
will
fix
this
one
and
my
TSU
plan
to
write
the
test
like
tomorrow.
Okay,.
C
A
C
I
can
try
to
update
the
CPU
manager
and
then
really
look
at
the
topology
manner
manager
if
it
will
help
with
the
merge.
I,
don't
know
if
it's
more,
if
it
helps
make
it
more
or
less
likely
to
go
in
if
it
works.
But
it's
it's
also
more
code
to
review
if
it
goes
in
so.
A
Yeah
I
think
we
may
get
more
success
if
we
will
just
polish
logic
we
have
rather
than
trying
to
expand
into
this
area.
I
would
expect
a
lot
of
I
mean
we'll
need
people
will
be
hesitant
to
reuse
as
part.
Of
course
it's
not
that,
like
we
have
like
two
or
three
reviewers
and
one
approver
who
are
dedicated
to
the
space,
so
I,
don't
I,
don't
want
to
complicate
this
PR
emerge.
A
C
A
To
me,
okay
and
yeah,
if
you,
if
you
have
some
PRS
that
can
be
moved
into
main
tree
and
we
can
merge
them
faster.
Let's
do
that,
because
smaller
PR
will
be
easier.
It
will
be
to
review
and
emergence.
A
Okay,
I
think
we've
done
for
now.
Let's
get
another
half
an
hour
and
then
we'll
have
signal
meeting.
Thank
you,
everybody.
Thank
you.
Thank.