►
From YouTube: 20190402 sig arch conformance subproject
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Hello
today
is
Tuesday
April,
2nd
2019.
This
is
the
conformance
sub-project
of
SiC
architecture.
We
have
a
pretty
light
agenda,
so
it
was
recommended
that
we
kind
of
walk
through
the
backlog
because
there's
a
lot
of
things
in
there
today,
but
before
I
went
through
that
I
wanted
to
kind
of
talk
about
some
of
the
acronyms.
For
last
time,
you
just
gave
a
brief
update
for
folks
who
are
we're
following
along
either
with
the
meetings
or
in
the
meeting
notes.
A
I
still
have
yet
to
walk
through
the
whole
process
of
how
we
kind
of
groove
things.
I
was
planning
on
doing
that
this
week,
I
was
busy
and
overloaded.
So
if
anyone
else
wants
to
do
that
with
me,
you're
happy
to
take
along
it's
basically
my
family
TPS
reports,
but
the
objective
there
is
to
squeeze
efficiency
out
of
it,
so
that
makes
it
faster
for
everyone
to
get
reviews
of
the
whole
process
to
flow.
So,
if
folks
want
to
take
a
long,
just
please
feel
free
to.
A
B
A
C
C
So,
basically,
the
image
would
take
care
of
such
differences
between
Windows
Linux
and
basically,
you
would
only
have
to
create
no
continuous
image
and
passing
different
herbs,
whichever
will
be
adding
dates
in
this
case
as
argument
DNS
suffix
and
it
will
return
you,
the
the
containers
or
anyone
s
so
fix
lists
inside
their
Windows
or
Linux,
and
I've
also
tried
it
on
both
hosts.
You
can
see
my
last
comment.
A
A
D
We
have
all
the
people
I
think
we
should
figure
out
the
recommended
solution
for
doing
this
type
of
thing
and
document
that
I
don't
know.
If
we
need
someone
from
testing
and
there's
some
DNS
specific
details
which
maybe
John
could
take
a
look
at.
But
you
know
as
far
as
images
that
span
both
windows
and
let
it
I
don't
know
if
we
have
other
examples
of
that.
E
A
C
F
G
F
A
G
C
E
Splitting
into
two
tests,
one
for
Windows
one
for
well,
maybe
this
will
eliminate
the
need
the
general
question
I
have
is
these
aren't
actually
the
promotion
pages
honestly
they're
working
with
the
structure
of
the
Indian
tests
and
then
each
of
those
will
individually
go
into
promotion
confinement.
So
what
I'm
wondering
is?
Do
we
really
need
the
confinements
approvers
to
even
look
at
those
until
they're,
actually
going
to
promotion
type
conformance
but
they're?
Really
if.
D
D
E
C
I
can
test
it
without
having
published
having
it
published
or
GCR,
because
a
few
seconds
ago
we
actually
merge
the
poo
pourri
quest,
which
allows
you
to
configure
your
own
registries
at
the
moment.
All
of
our
registries
are
on
docker
hub,
so
we
can
use
that
for
testing.
But
if
we
want
to
make
the
tests,
be,
you
know
working
on
all
OSS
it
will
have.
It
will
have
to
be
pushed
to
to
juice
your
as
well
right.
A
D
F
We've
definitely
removed
several
so
far,
so
I
did
in
all
the
cases
we've
done
it
before
it's
been
making
sure
all
the
reviewers
are
we're
getting
mistake
leads
by
n
just
to
make
sure.
So
it's
somewhat
of
an
informal,
you
know,
lazy
consensus
on
making
sure
that
everyone
was
aware
and
that
no
one,
everyone
agreed
with
the
reasoning
for
removal
yeah.
D
C
A
C
They're
quite
a
lot
of
tests,
which
conformance,
but
they
are
not
at
all
viable
on
Windows.
So
those
would
be
my
my
targets,
but
some
of
them
could
actually
be
applied
for
general
purposes,
for
example,
and
so
in
the
conformance
guidelines,
which
should
be
respected
back
of
Orestes
is
that
they
should
require
privileged
privileged
access,
and
there
are
few
of
them
which
are
requiring
privileged
access.
C
D
A
Somebody
take
an
action
item
there
two
documents,
because
right
now
patrick,
has
a
PR
to
do
an
update
to
that
list.
I
think
we
should
probably
assign
someone
to
take
a
look
in
and
to
enumerate
what
is
the
current
list
of
privileged
tests
that
we
consider
to
be
kind
of
an
exception
for
the
time
being
or
what
we're
what
the
plans
are
for
the
future,
so
at
least
it's
written
in
the
document,
or
else
you
go
back
to
your
reference.
C
G
A
Can
take
an
action
to
review,
seeing
urban
areas,
Patrick's
documents
to
updates
to
the
main
document
and
also
take
a
look
at
the
the
list.
That's
currently
there
with
privileged
tests
and
see
if
we
need
to
add
any
thing
to
that
main
document
that
outlines
the
cases
are
known
or
the
exceptions
around
privileged.
H
Actually,
this
is
part
of
probably
your
review
stuff,
but
anyway,
basically
proxying.
What
lovin
for
globin
folks
are
working
right
now
and
they
figure
out
that
some
of
these
are
not
covered
so
they're
trying
to
write
new
ETA
test
cases,
one
of
the
things
that
this
PR
is
talking
about
is
we
already
cover
exact
and
on
the
HTTP
for
the
other
probes,
loudness
and
readiness
probes.
But
we
don't
cover
the
TCP
socket.
They
want
to
add
an
ETA
test
and
probably
push
it
to
conference.
Is
that
something
that
we
should
do
or.
H
G
E
The
graduation
criteria,
then,
would
be
obviously
the
things
that
make
it
make
it
a
good
test,
but
the
conform,
the
list
in
the
document
about
what
what
Constitution
forms
to
us.
But
when
it's
a
new
test,
are
you
saying
that
we
just
need
to
make
sure
it's
not
flaky?
Is
that
the
only
thing
we're
looking.
H
D
D
H
The
reason
why
why
I'm
asking
is
they
they
are
basically
working
on
components,
but
they
see
that
there
are
some
gaps
and
if
we
give
them
green
signal,
they'll
start
writing
the
ETS
and
I
don't
want
their
cycles
to
be
wasted.
If,
if
you
think
that
this
is
a
that's,
why
I
asked
them
to
open
the
issues
first,
and
that
seems
like
a
good
candidate
for
components.
Then,
unfortunately,
I
have
to
tag
the
issue
as
area
comments,
because
even
though
it
is
just
an
idiot,
yes,
yeah.
G
D
D
I
D
H
G
A
C
C
C
J
A
A
J
F
B
D
B
B
F
B
A
You
add
that
to
the
document,
please
Patrick
for
your
updates
for
conformance
that,
if
you,
if
we're,
if
it's
gonna,
be
part
of
the
test,
it's
gonna
be
part
of
the
document
that
outlines
how
we
do
promotion
and
what
type
of
tests
get
promoted.
We
should
best
practices
which
would
include
that
specific
command
line
for
the
bot
to
kick
the
test
before
before
approvers
go
ahead
and
yeah.
F
F
A
Okay,
so
we've
assigned
Clayton,
let's
keep
on,
let's
keep
on
truckin
here
yep,
so
we
need
to
update
the
doc
with
more
windows
details
to
make
sure
that
before
we
promote
the
test,
otherwise
try
to
promote
the
tests.
At
the
end
of
your
day
as
we
learn
from
last
night
from
updating
so
testing
for
stuff,
you
wanna
make
everything
break
and
then
go
have
dinner
with
your
kids
right.
It
looks
like
you're
already
assigned
here.
A
D
C
A
F
Saw
the
comment
about
Windows
no
supporting
medium.
This
test
doesn't
use
medium
memory
correct.
This
is
just
regular.
We
probably
that
like
this,
would
be
a
good
one,
where
I
think
we
should
spawn
an
issue
too
I'm
supposed
to
test
for
medium
memory
and
then
document
the
Windows
behavior
in
the
other
direction.
Since
it
there
are
certainly
a
large
number
people
out
there
whose
fault
allows.
F
A
E
E
A
C
A
D
E
Two
things
that
one
this
is
probably
ready
actually
should
be
in
the
needs:
approval
the
the
yes
to
your
question.
Brian
I
mean
I,
think
this
group
here
right.
We
have
a
bunch
of
people
who
are
willing
to
review
these
conformance
tests,
but
but
don't
have
that
key
that
we
should
trust
if
any
of
us
should
be
able
to
pick
up
one
of
those
and
go
to
the
right
people
as
opposed
to
having
to
have
that
knowledge.
E
D
A
E
A
Haven't
gone
through
it
yet
so
I
can
I
can
I
said
in
the
backlog.
I
said
last
week:
I
would
go
through
the
backlog
and
try
to
see
how
the
process
worked
and
to
see
if
we
can
automate
some
of
this
and
make
it
a
little
bit
cleaner
and
easier
for
us,
but
I
haven't
done
that.
Yet
I
should
probably
do
that
ahead
of
time
before
we
have
our
next
meeting
so
I'm
just
kind
of
skipping
ahead.
So
we
can
go
through
the
use
case
that
Brian
had
mentioned
earlier.
A
D
A
What
I
was
going
to
do
is
take
a
look
at
the
specific
test
in
default,
deciding
right
now.
His
parent
and
I
don't
know
how
much
he's
going
to
review
it's
an
example
of
where
we
can
have
a
assignment
a
person
who
wants
to
review
this
particular
one
so
promote
pause
that
should
be
submitted.
Remover
in
Tintin
s
case
working
for
Lawrence
I
can
take
it
who's,
I
Trini.
A
B
A
One
of
the
things
I'm
gonna
try
to
do
is
list
as
projects
when
they
try
to
give
things
a
milestone
to
to
try
and
get
things
in
early
that
we
start
to
go
through
and
as
we
triage
things
as
a
group,
we
can
eventually
decide
whether
or
not
we
want
to
punt
out
to
them
up.
Another
milestone
is
that
seem
fair.
A
D
H
A
D
C
A
A
E
E
Yeah
like
right,
we
should
be
going
to
the
criteria
for
that
for
a
conformance
test
and
validating
against
that
those
criteria,
I
guess
going
to
the
project
board
or
the
history
test,
history
making
sure
it's
not
flaky
like.
Should
we
actually
go
through
the
mechanics
of
a
review
here
instead
of
just
assigning.
K
I
think
that's
I,
think
that's
a
great
idea.
One
thing
I
was
also
wondering
is
a
for
people
that
are
taking
on
reviews
that
are
well
experienced
medic.
They
could
paired
with
people
who
are
new,
maybe
just
like
a
15
minute
session,
so
they
could
actually
have
that
one-on-one
slash
review,
so
we
get
it
and
accelerate
stuff.
I
don't
do
that
internally
here
and
it
helps
to
virally,
spread
the
knowledge
and
increase
speed.
A
Should
put
these
at
the
top
of
the
doctor,
somebody
wants
to
put
these
links
at
the
top.
That
would
be
helpful,
so
the
the
two
are
conformance
test
requirements
and
the
other
one
is
promoting
of
test.
Two
conformance
I
know
that
there's
still
do
it
want
to
walk
through
this
real,
quick
and
see
if
there's
any
ambiguity
and
then
walk
through
the
motion
blur
I.
D
A
Well,
we've
already
have
a
PR
pending
against
this
criteria
or
what
performance
requirements
are
I
know
that
Patrick
has
two
peers
against
it,
so
we've
kind
of
ferreted
that
out
from
the
last
conversation
you're
looking
at
the
details,
so
what
why
don't
I
take
a
look
at
specifically
promoting
test
two
components
right
and
verify
that
meets
all
the
details
there,
so
is
title,
promote
ball
ticket
formats
and
I?
Pretty
much
can
guarantee
you
that
most
of
them
don't
actually
say
that.
A
A
So,
let's
take
a
look
at.
We
already
had
John
signs
of
this
woman.
Let's
take
a
look
at
one
that
doesn't
follow
the
criteria
right
off
the
bat,
so
add
description
for
validation
of
sweets.
I'll
close
this
one
I
can't
really
share
split
window,
so
I
got
to
go
back
and
forth,
so
is
title:
promote
xxs,
it's
as
sweet
of
hormuz,
so
right
out
of
the
gate,
the
answer
is
no,
so.
D
D
A
I
L
D
L
D
A
A
H
H
A
D
I
mean
the
original
reason,
for
it
was
as
a
tombstone.
You
know,
as
people
get
asynchronously
pings
if
someone
goes
to
look
at
the
board
and
they
don't
find
the
thing
that
were
pained
about
maps
go
hunting
for
it
just
sitting
there
in
the
done
column,
because
someone
else
dealt
with
it.
It's
just
quicker.
She
resolved
yeah.
L
A
It's
up
to
other
people,
I
don't
have
strong
opinions,
usually
I
prefer
just
lists
inside
of
the
inquiries,
but
that's
me
there
was
one
that
we
skipped
over
in
that
extra
default
assignee,
which
was
the
promote
container
run
time.
Each
me
having
no
default
termination
pass
set.
It
currently
does
not
have
an
assignee
here.
D
L
A
E
D
E
D
A
Thing
that
what
we
have
everybody
here,
which
would
help
probably
for
people
who
want
to
pick
up
new
items
going
into
to
try
and
create
new
tests,
is
we
have
a
backlog
here,
but
it's
clearly
not
prioritized.
There's
a
lot
of
issues
to
triage
and
a
couple
that
are
sorted
in
backlog.
They
quote-unquote
sorted,
but
we
don't
actually
have
priority
listed
as
what.
What
is
the
most
important
things
for
folks
to
address?
First,
so
if
we
can
direct
concentrated
fire,
we
want
to
do
it
in
a
priority
order.
A
H
E
A
Yes,
I
would
use
as
a
document,
but
we
should
probably
put
that
document
up
at
the
top
and
maybe
review
it
next
time.
One
of
the
key
things
we
do
in
most
sub
projects
is,
we
basically
have
the
priority
list
of
what
is
that?
What
are
the
content
areas
of
your
focus
on
for
the
quarter
so
like,
as
is
a
concrete
example
for
cue
medium?
We
did
this
like
last
week
or
two
weeks
ago.
A
Yes,
here's
the
prioritization,
so
we
basically
marked
what
are
the
p0
s?
What's
the
p1?
What's
the
p2
and
then
we
kind
of
estimate,
you
know
what
what
what
are
the
overall
priorities
or
the
other
things
we
are
going
to
do,
and
maybe,
as
a
next
action
item
for
next
time,
does
someone
want
to
take
Brian's
documentation
and
potentially
paste
it
up
here
at
the
top,
as
well
as
give
a
concise,
just
version
of
what
the
priority
should
be
is
write
about
it
next
time
yeah
we
can
do
that.
A
C
C
A
C
A
But
we
are,
we
are
nearing
time
so
I
wanted
to
quickly
review
the
action
items
we
currently
had.
I
think
that
Patrick
had
a
bunch
a
couple
PRS
to
the
main
document
and
I
was
going
to
take
a
look
at
that.
If
anyone
else
wants
to,
please
take
a
look
at
those
two
as
well.
There
was
a
couple
of
other
window
specific
was
that
John
and
I
said
we
take
a
look
at.