►
From YouTube: 20200409 SIG Arch Community Meeting
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
A
A
B
A
What
we've
learned
since
we
started
doing
it
and
adding
some
more
context
in
there
around
some
of
the
yeast
cases,
we're
trying
to
solve.
There's
a
cap
out,
there's
a
PR
out
there
for
that,
then
the
next
step
of
that
is
to
add
in
some
additional
the
actual
solutions
or
work
product
that
we're
gonna
produce
in
order
to
resolve
those
these
cases,
so
that
that
part
is
not
there
yet,
but
if
anyone's
interested
would
love
to
have
them
review
that
there's
a
second
tab
out
there.
A
One
of
the
things
we've
were
working
on
now
is
the
profiles
concept.
So
this
is
something
that
I
think,
because
before
I
was
involved,
I
think
two
years
ago
there
was
an
agreement
about
doing
this
concept
for
profiles,
but
we
never
actually
commented
it
and
because
it
never
just
rose
to
the
level
of
primary.
B
A
Canonical
example
might
be
TVs
of
PVCs.
You
want
to
be
able
to
have
persistent
storage
as
part
of
the
conformance
program,
but
it
you
know
it
requires
some
different
setup,
and
maybe
there
may
be
vendors
in
particular.
Use
cases
like
say
edge
that
are
ever
going
to
have
it.
I
don't
want
it,
and
so
we
don't
want
to
say
they
can't
be
conforming.
A
So
we
need
a
way
to
say:
okay,
here's
a
set
of
profiles
that
the
providers
or
vendors
can
have
performing
kubernetes
still,
even
if
they
don't
provide
persistent
storage,
but
they
wouldn't
conform
to
that
profile.
So,
there's
a
camp
out
there
right
now
for
that
for
just
the
motivation
and
goals
non
goals,
summary
that
sort
of
thing
and
we'll
be
iterating
on
that
too.
So
I'll
put
those
in
the
agenda
after
the
call
and
if
anybody
is
interested
with
local
feedback
on
that,
that's
that's
it
for
performance.
A
A
B
Sure
so
we
dug
into
the
read
his
reviews.
We
decided
on
some
next
steps,
one
most
important
ones
they
came
back
and
talked
about
was
stopping
Parma
beta
so
requiring
transition
to
either
another
beta
or
to
the
GA.
We
have
gone
ahead
and
there's
now
a
PR
to
generate
this
information
so
that
we
can,
you
know,
use
it
to
inform
future
enforcement
of
the
policy
we
we've
merged
back
a
couple
weeks
ago
now
we
are
also
going
to
follow
up
on
interviews
for
for
the
production
readiness
review
survey.
B
Once
we
figure
out
exactly
what
we
would
do
with
the
information
and
how
we
would
use
it.
So
we
can
ask
the
right
questions.
There
are
some
follow-ups
that
we
know
that
we
want,
and
then
there
is
a
Kemp
open
that
is
talking
about
adding
the
the
production,
readiness
review.
Questions
to
the
cap,
template
and
I
would
encourage
you
to
have
a
look.
We've
tried
to
refine
it
to
be
easier
to
follow
in
many
cases,
providing
some
examples
so
that
you
can
see
what
other
people
have
done
to
solve.
A
C
Was
straightening
my
hair,
but
I
just
need
to
say
so.
I
know
that
there
was
a
cap
reading
group
that
was
or
the
idea
of
a
kept
reading
group
that
was
being
formed.
I
find
that
in
actually
not
just
to
say,
but
in
most
SIG's
like
you
know,
I
mean
the
meetings
don't
actually
over
for
hours,
so
I'm
wondering
if
it
would
be
helpful
if
every
year,
sig
meaning
whatever
time's
left,
we
just
go
through
all
the
heads
together.
Would
that
be
a
good
use
of
our
time?
A
Think
this
meeting
can
be
to
be
really
short
or
really
long.
That's
been
my
experience,
but
one
of
the
things
so
we've
been
we've
been
meeting
for
that
group
and
we
want
to
make
that
more
for
the
formal.
But
what
we
ran
into
were
problems
around
discoverability
of
taps
around
trying
to
figure
out
which
caps
were
things
we
would
want
to
review
and
I.
Think
there's.
Also.
A
Changes
to
the
cap
process
and
I
hope
that
once
we
do
that
and
then
something
like
what
you're
talking
about
will
become
easier
either
in
this
form
or
like
as
a
separate,
we
a
separate
you
know
breakout
or
something
I,
don't
know
exactly
what
the
format
would
be
but
like,
even
when
we
try
to
meet
often
it's
sort
of
like
unless
one
of
us
that's
involved,
like
has
a
particular
kept
in
mind.
For
you
know,
that's
come
to
our
attention
somehow,
usually
from
somebody
poking
at
us.
A
So
anyway,
in
short,
I,
don't
know
that
that's
gonna
be
valuable.
Yet,
unless,
if
there's
things
that
you
find,
though,
that
you're
like
this
is
something
that's
hard
should
talk
about,
because
it's
gonna
have
one
of
you
know:
it's
gonna
have
this
wide-ranging
impact,
then
you
know
put
it
in
the
agenda
ahead
of
time:
I!
Don't
what
happened
to
talk
about
it
but
I
as
far
as
doing
that
as
a
group
I'm,
not
sure
that
that's
the
right
form,
yet
until
we
have
better
totally.