►
From YouTube: 20200422 SIG Arch Prod Readiness
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
A
You
know
sort
of
discuss
what
the
process
is.
It's
very,
it's
very
terse
when
we
put
in,
but
what
we
have
to
get
comments
on
that
and
Jeremy.
There's
work
for
the
enhancements
team
that
comes
in
so
I
think
that
it
needs
to
be
more
detailing
here.
What
this
is
sort
of
a
quick
overview
then
we'll
have
to
actually
have
to
write
up
a
document.
I
mean
when
we
have
a
little
more
detail
in
here
and
probably
about
like
who
does
what
I
had
a
few
questions
for
this
Crillon
on
that
as
well.
A
B
A
A
How
do
we
do
a
bigger
pool
if
we're
gonna
have
a
bigger
pool,
or
even
for
people
who
want
the
things
proved?
We
need
a
guide
sort
of
to
give
some
credence
about.
What's
a
good
answer
and
what's
a
bad
answer
to
the
questions
and
finally
and
one
checks
back
here,
ticular:
do
we
need
specific
areas
be
approved
by
specific
people
or
cigs,
or
do
we
just
have
sufficient
training
for
the
there
are
Clippers
that
they
don't
need
that
so
thoughts.
B
C
But
since
we
switched
to
using
like
a
Hamel
file
for
how
our
for
for
the
cap
process
I
wonder
if
we
have
the
ability
to
put
things
in
there
like
these
are
my
metric
URLs
right
are
these
my
metric
names
and
if
we
structured
it
like
that,
would
we
be
able
to
reduce
review
Berg
right
because
honestly,
I'm,
basically
gonna,
look
at
what
this
guy
says
and
if
he
says
this
metric
works,
I'm
not
gonna.
Look
to
see
if
that
metric
is
actually
pear.
I'm
gonna
trust
the
man
very
much.
If
it
works
ya
know.
A
C
C
C
I
mean
I
mean
like,
but
if
you
look,
there
are
the
community
prometheus
repos.
That
say,
like
hey,
put
your
alerts
in
here
and
and
well
well.
That
would
be
awesome
for
me
personally.
If
everyone
put
their
alerts
in
there
to
give
me
a
good
starting
point,
thinking
about
what
your
problem
we've
never
asked
for
before,
I,
don't
even
know
how
many
members
of
the
community
are
aware
that
there's
a
thing
or
how
to
use
that
thing
right.
C
A
A
C
Yeah
but
I'm
thinking,
if
we
go
through
and
confine
things
we're
like,
we
actually
just
want
this
in
the
form
and
if
you
do
it
in
the
quote
normal
way,
the
review
gets
streamlined.
People
get
more
inclined
to
do
it
and
if
you
train
them
by
BOTS-
and
they
don't
get
angry
at
a
person,
it's
like
it's
a
social
hack,
the
social
hack,
but
like
people,
they
get
angry
at
a
bot.
But
if
there's
just
nothing,
I
could
do
so
so
they
deal
with
and
trying
to
streamline
it.
C
C
A
A
B
A
A
A
C
C
Start
by
trying
to
like
automate
the
little
pieces
that
we
can
and
then
like
can
we
automate
other
signals
that
make
it
so
like?
Oh,
this
one
definitely
needs
to
be
looked
at
because,
like
every
piece
of
automation,
we
expect
is
missing
right,
that
they
don't
have
a
feature
flag
listed
or
they
don't
have
an
an
API
and
API
status
level
listed
in
their
metadata,
and
so
we
know
like
okay,
you
look
like
high-risk
now,.
C
A
A
A
So
did
we
decide
the
way
I
wrote
this?
There
was,
and
it's
required
or
forbidding
to
big
milestone
release,
but
we
do
have
different
levels
of
completeness.
It's
required
based
on
whether
you're
alpha
beta
or
G
any
and
maybe
I'm,
not
sure,
we've
captured
that.
Well,
you
think
that's
gonna
be
there
for
how
long
like
which
of
these
metrics.
C
A
C
And
so,
if
we
can
find
a
way
to
prioritize
what
we
think
needs
a
second
look:
let's
do
that
right.
So
yeah
I
would
not
worry
much
about
alpha
things,
except
that
they
list
a
feature
game
inside
of
the
right
beta
thing
that
our
newly
beta
probably
care
about
them.
Having
a
feature
gate
and
telling
me
they're
metric
right,
because
without
the
metric
it's
hard
to
know
when
you
can
go
da
in
then
we
get
CGA
going
into
the
more
in-depth
level.
C
What
is
the
judgment
on
scalability
there
it's
on
by
default
in
the
cluster,
but
there's
a
significant
pleasant
factor.
You'd,
look
at
server
side
apply
right
that
had
severe
scalability
impacts,
my
first
built
in
what
is
the
judgment
about
whether
it
can
be
beta
and
that
one
was
a
we
complex
negotiation
me
Daniel,
employed
I,
agree.
B
C
I
mean
like
do
you?
Do
you
need
to
read
it
like
I
expected
that
it's
like
api's
they're
gonna
end
up
in
both
because
people
are
going
to
talk
about
their
api's
well,
I.
Think
telling
someone
to
put
their
api
names
in
in
a
camel
is
pretty
fair
right.
Like
I
introduced
these
api's
metrics,
you
probably
aren't
even
gonna
discuss
in
the
enhancement
itself,
but
you
know
when
you,
when
the
little
check
box
goes
red
and
says
for
beta,
you
should
have
a
metric.
B
C
Want
to
do
it
so,
but
for
things
not
going
GA
strongly
recommended,
because
when
you
go
J
you're
gonna
have
to
do
this.
It
seems
like
a
position.
We
kissed
it's
more,
it's
right,
great
right
where
it's
like
well,
we've
identified
at
things
to
go
to
you,
you
have
their
answers.
Looked
at,
you
can't
always
turn
them
off
and
you
need
to
think
about
what
happens
when
something
that
can't
be
turned
off.
B
B
C
Yeah
I
mean
I'm
just
I'm,
going
through
this
deprecation
stuff
that
the
last
big
thing
that,
like
we're,
still
go
on
going
cuz.
It's
just
taken
some
time
and
we're
working
through
it
with
Jordan
and
I'm.
Just
imagining
the
pitch
works
that
come
out
when,
when
api's
auto
stop
being
served,
which
is
the
thing
that
can
be
done
with
metadata
down,
bot
enforcement
is
real
and
yeah.
C
A
C
C
C
C
A
C
So
if
Jordans
warnings
show
up
in
119
and
that
looks
likely
right
like
the
amount
of
code-
is
not
large
and
then
I
complete,
actually
plumbing
in
every
little
piece
of
metadata,
because
that's
some
force
that
has
to
go
through
all
the
existing
ones
and
write
all
that
metadata
out,
then
we
say
that
nothing
actually
gets
removed
for
another
three
releases,
so
even
things
that
are
deprecated
and
should
be
removed.
Now
we
push
out
another
three
releases.
It
gives
some
traditional
warning.
C
Jordan
and
I
have
been
debating
back
and
forth
the
value
of
in
that
final
release
when
they
actually
get
removed.
Whether
there
should
be
a
kick
the
can
down
the
road
flag.
That
says
for
one
release:
if
you
upgrade
it
and
did
not
pay
attention,
and
these
things
are
gone,
you
can
turn
them
all
back
on
from
one
release.
C
While
you
fix
yourself
fixer,
stills
and
then
the
next
one,
so
you
can
see
whether
it
works
dude
without
your
eyes
on
that
you
can
upgrade
downgrade
upgrade
downgrade
upgrade
downgrade
as
you
try
to
deal
with
the
actors,
in
my
experience,
upgrade
downgrade
upgrade,
doesn't
always
been
happily
we're
debating
here.
No
firm.