►
From YouTube: 20191204 SIG Arch Prod Readiness
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Looks
like
we
have
a
light
attendance
today,
so
I
think
this
will
be
a
quick
meeting.
I
didn't
have
much
agenda
other
than
go
over
the
things
that
were
in
flight,
given
that
this
time
of
year,
everybody's
busy
and
let's
just
try
and
keep
the
ball
rolling
at
least
a
little
bit
so
for
me,
I
the
the
sub-project.
This
will
be
a
sub
project
that
was
approved.
I
have
another
PR
out
to
actually
add
it
to
the
SIG's
yanil
and
all
that
business
I
never
did
follow.
Up
with
on
the
cap.
A
I
was
going
to
follow
up
on
as
far
as
getting
those
answers
done,
I'll,
try
and
ping
him
today
and
see.
If
we
have
any
progress,
I
did
hear
from
Jorge
about
the
field
research.
He
put
the
information
in
the
dock
here
he
said
he
couldn't
make
it,
but
basically
he
and
Valerie
have
put
together
some
questions
and,
as
he
says
here,
they're
gonna
meet
and
put
those
together
for
fun
approval.
A
Apparently
there's
the
LTS
working
group
has
done
a
survey
about
some
of
these
things
and
so
they're
gonna,
try
and
sync
up
on
that
as
well.
I,
do
still
think
that
the
two
things
we
need
here
are
a
sort
of
survey
like
a
Google,
Form
type
of
thing
and
then
also
more
more
freeform
interview
to
get
you
know
elicit
things
people
won't
put
down
on
a
form
necessarily,
it
looks
like
David
and
Jordan
are
not
here.
A
B
B
I
think
I
was
mostly
focusing
on
like
the
answers
to
existing
questions,
not
really
drinking
what
other
things
we
should
be
asking
for,
which
is
like
another
thing
that
I
would
like
to
do,
but
regarding
the
existing
questions,
it
seems
that
I
have
a
bunch
of
thoughts
like
about
how
those
should
be
formulated
to
better
reflect
what
we
are
actually
asking
for,
and
I
will
try
to
to
to
send
me
a
PR
with
like
how
I
how
I
think
we
should
try
to
modify
them.
Probably
I!
A
C
A
But
what
we'd
like
to
do
is
make
it
part
of
the
chem
process
that
people
have
to
answer
these
questions
and
I
think
that
one
of
the
things
we
haven't
talked
about
is
how
we
might
refine
those
questions
based
on
the
stage
of
the
cap
made
an
alpha
cap
and
a
half,
maybe
a
little
bit
different
they're
not
gonna,
have
as
much
depth,
but
you
know
for
a
ga
cap
something
moving
to
GA.
We
want
to
know
that
stuff
ain't
broke
so
yes
to
make
to
be
short.
The
answer
gotcha.
C
And
then
another
thing
is
I,
don't
know
if
this
is
on
topic,
but
you
know
I'm
part
of
the
the
CRE
team
here
at
VMware
and
we
recently
developed
a
reliability
review.
It's
kind
of
analogous
to
what
the
Google
Cloud
series
do
for
an
application,
but
it's
kubernetes
specific,
so
I
wasn't
sure
if
you'd
be
interested
in
seeing
some
of
the
questions
that
we
ask
they're
much
more
kind
of
operator
focus
but
I'm
not
sure
if
they
would
be
helpful
for
this.
That.
A
Would
be
wonderful,
I'm,
something
that
would
be
helpful
either
a
doc
that
you
can
share
with
the
group,
although
there's
no
mailing
list
for
the
group,
so
it
would
be
the
holistic
architecture
or
you
can
put
a
PR
out,
which
would
be
fine
and
say
here
are
some
questions
and
we
can
discuss
it
on
the
PR.
That
would
be
awesome.
Yes,
that's
exactly
the
kind
of
thing
I'm
hoping
to
see.
Okay,
awesome.
C
A
Excellent,
okay,
so
I
don't
know
much
else
right
now,
like
I
said
with
Q
Khan
and
Thanksgiving
I
was
out
all
last
week.
So
but
yes,
let's
plan
I'll
decide
later
whether
we
want
to
have
this
meeting
next
week
based
upon
whether
it
seems
like
people
are
around
and
I,
don't
know
if
the
people
on
the
call
now
don't
be
here
next
week,
but
but
I
will,
and
otherwise
we
can
potentially
just
update
via
email
and
yeah.
That's
all
for
today.
I
guess!
Thank
you.