►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
A
Far
with
we
have
had
two
meetings
so
far
and
we've
talked
about
blockage,
we've
made
a
list
of
blockers
and
wish
list
and
I
wish
list
and
I
I
just
pasted
those
ab
document
in
the
chat,
and
so
that's
that
one
document
we
should
like
go
through
and
talk
about
what?
What
should
we
pry
prioritize
for
which
release?
When
do
we
have
any
volunteers
like
working
it
at
the
tree
cetera
then
we
have
like.
A
We
should
discuss
the
cubed
and
face
command
and
how
stable
we
think
it
is
right
now
and
we
could
do
to
make
it
more
stable
and
also
there's
a
proposal
for
a
better
API
group
for
cubed
M.
That's
not
going
to
make
one
eight,
but
hopefully
one
nine.
Let's
see
try
to
pull
that
up
before,
but
yeah
feel
free
to
like
if
anyone
has
something
to
talk
to
share
or
whatever
feel
feel
free
to
wake
up
anytime.
A
C
A
This
is
improved
in
1:8,
where
we
have
a
timeout.
We
have
some
suggestions
to
I,
try
to
PS
and
check
if
the
cubelet,
actually
it's
running
off,
half
a
minute
offer
and
like
fail
fail
fast.
If,
if
it
isn't
running
and
all
we
could
like
talk
to
the
cubelets
API
endpoint
in
some
way
or
things
like
that,.
D
D
So
I
think
that
would
be
a
more
robust
sort
of
prop
to
to
more
reliable
posture
to
fix
this
problem.
So
we
wouldn't
have
to
wait
and
go
look
in
every
place.
We
could
possibly
look.
We
just
have
a
direct
channel
back
to
us
where,
where
we
get
a
big
terrible,
ie
child
start
Falls,
yeah
I,
don't
know
where
that
pot
API
proposal
Hank
is
that
happened.
E
E
D
D
A
D
You
know
what
I
was
trying
to
like
I
mean
the
people.
It
has
some
kind
of
cult
status,
API
right
now,
which
is
kind
of
mad,
and
it
you
know
it
can
where's
the
API
sore.
Oh,
is
that
the
case
now
that
that
actually
qiblah
doesn't
want
them
to
either
the
case
that
cube
latavia
currently
doesn't
expose
any
statuses
for
any
buds
before
we
table
talks
of
a
geyser,
because
both
cubelets
both
status
api
is
like
a
mirror
of
the
api
server
lately.
So
the
case
so.
A
A
So,
basically,
if
we
try
to
get
to
the,
if
we
hit
the
cubelet
api,
which
is
secured,
it
will
try
to
call
the
API
server
for
like
is
this
person
authorized
to
access
my
API
and
that's
kind
of
annoying
I
think
boot
cube
has
worked
around
this
in
some
way,
if
I
recall
correctly,
but
I,
don't
know
how
they.
How
did
it
work
around
that
specific
issue?
D
F
D
I'm
pretty
good
another
suggestion,
but
you
could
all
become
really
because
we
really
carry
when
we
talk
about
expanding
key,
but
they
say
hi
pops.
If
you
consider
that
that
people
could
write
some
files.
Today's
cookies
me,
like
you,
know
next
to
the
static
bulb
definition,
you
would
write
but
I
what
name
the
sale
or
whatever
and
we
agreed
as
far
I
think.
D
D
E
D
Shared
a
huge
mess
and
and
I
don't
know,
I
would
know
they're
trying
that
and
then
another
option
is
like
to
look
at
PSA
what
all
these
diggers
and
they
can
adjacent
former
sedation
version
of
typist.
Oh
because,
like
there
will
be
all
sorts
of
things
that
would
be
hard
to
match
those
projects
and
well
actually
static.
Both
them
have
anyone
in
power
to
the
memorize
that
have
a
looks
pretty
pretty
nice.
So
now
you
guys
until
done.
Okay,.
D
D
B
A
D
D
That
yeah
I
mean
it
just
it
just
the
problem
of
detecting
a
fellow
earlier
right
and
communicating
the
communicating
to
the
use
of
why
it's
red,
and
so
I
donno.
Perhaps
we
could
just
sort
of
like
okay
here
is
in
this
particular
case,
which
will
be
sent
the
time
the
buffer.
So
we
can
look
at
both
yes
and
if
there
is
occasion
used
we'll
just
before
back
to
like,
but
long
fall
in
life.
A
A
A
This
is
the
first
time
we
have
a
chance
to
do
this
or
like
for
me
something
is
1/8
now
when,
basically,
all
the
sizes
refactoring
is
done
so
now
we
basically
CMD
cube
ATM,
flash
app
flash
faces
and
all
different
sizes
that
Cuban
execute
in
order
are
all
there
and
have
their
public
method,
which
cubed
em
in
it
is
just
like
just
cause
all
these
functions
in
order.
I
know
my
cutter.
Do
you
want
to
bring
that
up
here
as
well,
like
the
execution?
E
E
A
It's
a
block
Copeland
cubicle
I'm
available,
not
trying
to
use
the
exact
model
I'm,
not
sure
if,
if
they
I
mean
cops,
is
cube
atom
in
a
very
lightweight
manner.
Right
now,
in
the
fourth
level
it
will
in
now
in
one
eighth,
it
will
when,
when
like
now
that
all
the
phases
are
I,
suppose
that's
the
Li
level
cops
will
use
Cuban,
metl
eye
level
side.
Don't
think
it
looks
oh
right
after
literally,
but
it's.
E
B
A
This
is
basically
why
I
felt
part
of
like
the
cubed
M
proposed
cubed
M
API
that
we
could
use
instead
of
what
we
have
now
I,
a
part
of
that
I
added
an
image
field
for
per
API
control,
plane
component.
So
basically,
you
can
specify
one
image
for
the
API
server
and
totally
different
image
for
controller
manager,
but
still
it
defaults
like
it,
so
it
always
happening
this
was
on
on
the
CNCs
cross
cloud
wish
list
on
blocker
list.
There
I
definitely
think
it's
reasonable
to
expose
it
at
API
level.
A
E
A
E
A
E
Code
question
what
they
are
doing
before
we
implement
this
and
make
sure
that
it's
sane
in
the
same
request
and
I
worry
about
exploding.
The
number
of
configuration
always
so
I
want
to
be
really
skeptical.
Whenever
we
introduce
new
configuration
because
it
only
increases
configuration
only
increases
in
size.
A
A
Don't
know
like
cloud
provider
out
of
three
o'clock:
oils
are
all
fine
one,
eight
one,
seven
I,
don't
know
what
the
status
exactly
it's
going
to
be
in
one
eight,
but
basically
the
tend
to
CSI
work.
So
probably
gonna
take
some
time
and
we
had
some
August
from
Justin
in
it
joint
replacement
where
he
basically
wanted
to
have
one
template.
A
If
you
want
the
worker,
that's
probably
what
it's
going
to
look
like
when
we
implement
AJ
support,
and
he
said
that
was
somehow
not
enough
hook
up
as
it's
hard
script
like
this.
Only
one
should
go
first
and
then,
like
the
others,
should
follow.
I
suggested
that
it's
probably
pretty
easy
to
do
this
out
of
cubed
M
just
make
a
simple,
lock.
A
A
E
A
Yes,
I
mean
well,
that's
that's
working
well,
but
the
problem
is
when
we
have.
We
want
to
initialize
three
masters
using
the
same
same
terraform
configuration
and
then
we
don't
know
it.
We
come
from
cuban
aminute
on
all
three
like
in
the
same
template
and
we
come
from
qvm
during
Dash's
master
on
all
three.
So
that
was
his
problem.
But
what
I
think.
E
A
E
B
A
My
mini
proposal
here
was
like
well.
If
you
want
this
function
as
a
and
AJ
and
all
this
stuff
here
we
can
assume
you
have
an
external
HDD
cluster.
So
then
we
can
use.
You
can
use
Q
beta
minutes
on
all
ones
on
in
in
the
templates
right
and
the
five
similar
to
D
and
like
lock
on
a
CD
or
whatever
coordinate
yourself
and
then
whoever
is
then
they
all
three
masters
race.
For
that
lock
on
a
CD.
D
That's
definitely
think
I'm
the
Woodford
I
wanted
to
add
that
good
I
think
the
bit,
because
we
aren't
considering
care
is
also
that
in
in
many
kind
of
production
performance,
you
actually
don't
want
to
create
the
certificates
on
the
fly.
When
you
provision
of
these
machines,
you'd
rather
have
this
skin
checked
in
to
get
with
them,
supply
that,
for
example,
or
s3,
but
super
super
normal,
and
that
that
it
makes
things
much
easier
them
have
to
you
kind
of.
If
you
think
of
it
that
way,
then,
then
you
actually
will
supply
in
this
problem.
I'd.
A
Most
of
the
problem,
so
that's
working
since
since
one
six
and
Nick
is
also
working
on
a
twist
of
this,
where
we
don't
even
want
to
like
you,
can
generate
them
in
the
forehand
and
just
make
you
then
reuse
them,
and
but
in
some
cases
you
don't
want
to
have
the
see
a
key
touch.
The
master
masters
at
all.
So
that's
going
to
be
possible
in
180.
Faux
Nick
Nick
is
working
on
that
one.
A
So,
basically,
if
you're,
if
you
have
generated
all
sets
and
cube
config
files
yourself,
like
somewhere
else,
check
them
into
a
git
repo
or
whatever
and
then
copy
them
to
all
masters.
Without
the
see
a
key,
you
don't
expose
that
on
the
Masters
cubed
M
in
it.
Well
we'll
just
proceed
as
usual,
but
that
will
not
like
enable
the
certificates
controller.
You
have
to
do
that,
billfold,
which.
D
Stupid
because
it
doesn't
have
the
key
yeah
I
excitement.
Sorry,
you
have
to
wrong
that
somewhere,
where
you
have
the
key
okay.
Well,
maybe
maybe
we
should
be
looking
at
an
option
where
we
we
can
enable
this
ticket
signing
controller
and
oddly
key
to
this
configuration
essentially
whatever
what
I'm
saying
is
that
you
know
the
your
biggest
problem
was
having
one
master
being
at
the
master
number
one
running
cube
in
it,
and
the
other
masters
running
being
masters
number
one,
one
plus
and
and
running
cubic
a
cube,
joined
master.
D
So
the
problem
here
is
that
the
first
master
has
to
create
the
certificates
and
all
those
things
if
you
supply
the
certificates
and
all
those
things
to
teach
of
the
Masters
beforehand-
and
you
could
just
start
them
up
and
you'd,
be
ok,
so
I
think
if
we
kind
of
forget
the
problem
of
securing
that
key,
we
can.
You
can
solve
this
this
problem.
D
That
way
and
on
the
indicate,
of
course,
there
is
a
there's,
the
cops
command
that
that
the
user
runs
on
their
machine
to
create
the
costs
of
that
process,
to
create
these
tickets
and
upload
them.
To
let's
say
three
I
think
that's
roughly
with
coughs,
and
then
you
supply
this
certificate
of
a
there's,
a
three
buckets
or
the
master,
and
they
starting
Bennigan's
I.
D
D
A
B
A
E
Bottlebrush
flash
community,
oh
I,
think
like
there
I
just
pop
the
link
in
the
chat.
I'm
Jordan
is
out
on
vacation
I'm
waiting
for
him
to
get
back.
It's
just
a
super
short
short
design,
but
I
think
it
addresses
the
concerns
about
the
serving
certificates
yeah,
but
I
can
client
and
certificates
is
highest
priority.
E
A
E
Without
the
work
and
this
proposal
we
can
enable
this.
What
we
get
is
we
can
start
to
verify
execs
and
proxies
to
the
cubelet,
and
you
can't
middleman
in
exec.
What
you
lose
is
there's,
there's
two
there's
an
attack
that
is
described
in
that
design,
doc,
specifically
getting
access
to
arbitrary
serving
certificates.
So
that's
that's
the
attack
that
I
was
concerned
about,
and
yes,
so
it's
it's
really
up
to
the
deployer
to
decide
which
which
security
concern
is
greatest
to
them,
and
hopefully,
after
9/11
a
proposal
is
merged
and
implemented
where
you
can
have
both.
E
A
A
A
Okay,
let's
queue
Betemit
into
town
repo.
We
have
that
glass
in
our
wishlist
and
it's
in
the
works
after
keeps
detail
which
going
to
be
moved,
111
or
112
I,
don't
remember
Jacob,
but
some
something
like
that
anyway.
So
that's
that's!
In
tracking
IDI
testing
for
clubs,
I
mean
that
fq
Batum
issue
Percy
anyway,
will
coordinate
with
Chris
I'm
brother
Nick,
maybe
to
get
things
working
better
on
AWS,
like
automated
testing
and
so
forth,
racket
is
coming,
hopefully
soon
cube.
A
A
A
Okay,
so
just
let
me
see
if
I
can
share
my
screen
here,
just
a
quick
walkthrough
on
the
current
cubit
and
face
command
to
see
like
are.
We
are
we
happy
with
the
status
here,
Oh.
A
A
There
we
go
and
we
have
only
one
subcommander
q
beta
alpha
and
it's
keeping
a
local
face
and
yeah.
So
here
we
have
the
most
current
shake
both
the
first
one
is
set,
and
that
has
a
couple
of
months
we
can
generate
the
TA
of
the
CA.
Normally
the
API
server
serving
set
is
generated
after
that
one
API,
so
the
cubelet
flame
is
generated.
Then
the
service
account
and
then
we
have
for
api
aggregation.
We
have
to
make
a
from
proxy
CA
and
client
as
well.
A
B
I'm
not
actually
a
consumer
of
this,
but
one
thing
that
comes
to
mind
is
just
a
mental
exercise
if,
if
I
want
all,
but
one
I
have
to
enumerate
a
lot
of
things
and
then
as
soon
as
cube
admin
supports
one
more
thing
and
I've
forgotten
to
manually
run.
You
know
that
phase
or
this
phase
with
that
it
would
be
nice
to
have
an
explicit
opt
out
instead
of
all
or
opting
I.
Think
our
runtime
configures
kind
of
like
this,
like
you
can
say,
I,
want
to
enable
star,
but
then
exclude
these
things.
A
B
B
E
That
was
in
a
youth.
Kiss
I
was
thinking
about
with
the
dagger
executors
to
make
to
to
opt
in
to
making
certain
steps,
no
ops
or
to
figure
out
what
that
API
would
look
like,
but
yeah
I
think
that's.
That
is
a
real
use
case
that
not
just
you
other
people
have
brought
that
up
as
part
of
the
phase
refactoring.
A
You
can
turn
at
the
admin
of
it.
Keep
config
with
a
client
certificate
control,
Amanda,
keyword,
scheduler
and
cubelet
is
only
for
bootstrapping
purposes.
I
mean
this
is
the
only
all
the
time
we
have
to
make
a
dedicated
cubelet
cert
before
we
actually
have
a
CFL,
API
up
and
running,
and
also
a
user
command.
A
Basically
stand
out
like
this,
so
it
has
a
couple
of
more
like
Generic
I
mean
these
are
profiled
profile,
weird,
like
system
masters
as
the
organization
of
the
third
at
the
draft.
It
says
system
controlling
to
control
manager
and
such
things
and
this
user
is
small
generic,
which
now
created
a
certificate
to
stand
up.
A
A
B
A
That's
just
well
static
pod
with
a
TD
little
bit
of
local
hope
in
the
future.
This
will
probably
change.
I
mean
we'll
probably
add
some
more
add.
Some
more
options
for
the
Pawnee
city,
I,
don't
know
depends
on
like
the
general
movement
in
the
second,
the
community,
how
to
manage
it
to
be,
but
so
thus
these
two
commands
seem
reasonable.
A
B
Yeah
at
first
glance
it
seems
okay,
it
seems
a
little
odd,
so
I
haven't
really
thought
this
through
that.
If
I
want
like-
let's
say
the
controller
manager
I
want
it
to
start,
but
I
also
want
the
queue
config
for
it.
So
I
wonder
if
we
should
actually
merge
these
things
to
have
a
different
flag.
That
says
like
not
only
do
I
want
the
manifest
to
start
this
component,
but
I
also
want
to
generate
the
cube
config
for
it,
but
I
don't
know
otherwise.
B
A
A
B
A
Still
have
to
provide
the
node
name,
because
I
mean
it's
more
like
this
general
utility.
If
you
want
to
I,
don't
know
graduate
your
master
bar
to
gamma,
where
your
node
bar
so
master
it
you
can
mark
it.
With
this
hey
I,
don't
know
we
could
be
more
intelligent,
probably
like
try
to
order
that
the
tech
things,
but
at
the
same
time
we've
had
issues
on
AWS,
quite
a
no-name
and
hopefully
I'm
different
yeah.
B
So
I
guess
what
I
would
be
looking
for.
Putting
myself
in
the
mindset
of
like
a
cops
developer,
cubic
corn
developer
is
looking
at
these
phases.
It's
not
immediately
obvious
what
the
prerequisites
for
every
phase
are
like
I
assume
I
could
run
mark
master
from
anywhere
like
any
client
as
long
as
I
have
a
queue
config,
that's
pointed
to
the
API
server
I,
don't
know
if
that's
necessarily
true
at
first
glance,
I
might
assume
that
I
should
run
it
on
the
master
and
say
this
is
marketing
myself
as
a
master.
B
A
A
A
Well,
okay,
okay,
so
I
mean
that's
basically
it
and
then
we
have
like
self
holding.
This
should
be
renamed
with
somewhere
right
now,
it's
default
stood
to
upload,
like
TLS
dietrich
secrets,
but
it
shouldn't
default
to
that
one
to
that
setting
that
will
be
changed
in
today
or
tomorrow,
something
to
default
enough.
Upload
secrets
certificates
the
secret,
but
otherwise
it
just
converts
any
static.
Pod
cluster
plus
alpha
one
generate
minor.
It
reads
manifest
from
disk
upload,
both
that
type,
the
API
server
and
like
wait
for
it,
but.
B
G
So
this
is
Pat
I'm,
actually,
the
one
with
people
on
the
Kraken
provider.
I
will
say
this
was
awesome,
I'm
not
really
familiar
with
cube
ATM,
so
something
that
we're
looking
to
start
converting
over
to
in
the
next
three
to
six
months,
but
this
gift
statement.
So
this
looks
great
and
I
really
appreciate
it
like
we're
to
do
in
the
budget
is
but
I'm
happy
to
just
check
all
the
stuff
that
we're
doing
and
start
using
it.
So
thank
you.