►
From YouTube: kubeadm office hours 2019-09-25
A
A
D
Our
intent
test
for
this
they're,
not
mister
the
Canadian
Mint
ten
tests,
I
know
that
the
person
from
Eric
said
because
I
reviewed
some
of
those
changes
it
went
through.
So
there
should
be
intent
tests
that
do
the
dual
stack
checking
because
I
remember
there
is
contention
on
how
they
were
doing
that
detection
process
and
then
verifying
the
behavior.
So
I,
don't
I.
Think
it's
really
a
very
nice
use
case
currently
of
people
that
really
care
about
it.
Like
obviously,
a
telco
vendor
is
super
interested.
D
C
E
A
A
A
G
D
G
D
A
B
G
Some
parts
of
it
are
talking
so
basically
getting
rid
of
the
internal
taxes,
walking
fully
moving
out
effort,
but
this
is
pay
a
relatively
stand-alone
change
and
it
only
requires
two
in
the
right.
The
top
defaulting
change
valuation
pace
and
we
didn't
do
any
migrations
in
the
past
because
we
don't
have
to
so.
Basically,
we
are
not
losing
collectively
a
feature
here.
F
G
Yes,
if
we,
if
you
are
going
to
use
customize,
that's
precisely
what
you
need
to
do,
but
this
proposal,
in
its
current
form,
does
not
actually
duplicate
a
full-blown
cubelet
content
config
your
incubate,
and
this
is
going
to
be
treated
as
user
supplied
config
and
it's
going
to
be
stored
in
a
map
in
the
coastal
pretty
much
in
the
way
it
says
done,
and
this
is
going
to
be
like
propagated
to
all
the
nodes
when
they're
joined
or
upgraded.
So
this
doesn't
change
pretty
much
how
we
are
doing
things
right
now.
G
G
Well,
customize
pattern
can
be
actually
reduced
by
splitting
the
coffee
beans
twice,
but
I'm
not
sure
that
customized
can
be
actually
gotten
rid
of.
In,
like
every
single
case,
I
mean
customize
is
used
just
for
the
patch
capabilities
and
arch
is
always
good
and
like
the
solution
to
go
for
when
doing
something.
That's
basically
non-standard.
F
A
C
A
D
D
D
H
D
D
I
think
that's
the
only
other
thing
that's
fully
out
of
tree
or
close
to
fully
on
a
tree.
That
would
somehow
have
to
be
bundled
with
a
release,
so
we
should
talk
with
the
not
just
a
release
team,
but
the
Kate's
in
foregrip,
so
you
can
chat
with
dims
and
other
folks.
So
let
me
start
a
conversation
on
the
case
in
/
no,
but
we
should
definitely
like
open
up
an
issue
to
track
this
particular
set
of
problems.
There's
many
of
them.
The
entire
debt
graph
of
things
is
the
problem.
D
A
D
D
Think
that
my
it's
pretty
much
the
way
people
test
things
and
communities
I
think
that
might
be
not
in
our
best
interests,
at
least
for
the
time
being
until
people
have
it.
So
we've
developed
like
a
asynchronous
release
mechanism
and
people
have
adopted
it,
but
I
think
people
are
used
to
getting
it.
Release
kicking
the
tires
with
comedian
figure
out
what
the
problems
are
and
determining
whether
or
not
they
want
to
adopt
that
version
of
communities
or
not.
A
H
A
D
A
A
All
right,
salanio
issue
report,
so
I
have
seen
a
pile
of
Flannery
reports.
Recently,
some
of
war
in
the
qpm
repository
I,
close
them.
It's
a
flannel
problem
and
I
were
to
ask
if
somebody
wants
to
take
an
action
item
to
update
our
create
a
single
control,
plane
coaster
with
qadian
document,
to
point
to
a
certain
flannel
commit
because
our
committees
out,
let
me
check
actually.
A
A
D
So
right
now,
github
repositories
are
not
directly
indexed
via
google
searches,
so
you'd
have
to
do
a
separate
search.
So
when
you
do
committee
and
kubernetes
Docs,
that's
the
first
thing
that
pops
up
I
know
it's
a
pain
in
the
butt,
but
at
the
same
time,
like
discoverability
is
one
of
the
primary
reasons
why
we
have
gained
such
traction
in
the
community.
So
I,
don't
necessarily
know
if
I
want
we'd
have
to
think
of
a
strategy
there.
That's
beyond
the
scope
of
just
logistics
on
writing,
documentation
with
the
docs
curve,
I.
D
You
do
a
search
for
it.
You
will
be
woefully
disappointed
with
regards
to
the
results.
So
if
there
is
a
crawler
like
I've,
not
seen
like,
if
you
just
do
standard
text,
searches
for
most
things,
you'll
you'll
find
yourself
willfully
disappointed.
Now
there
might
be
an
escape
hatch
here
with
auto-generated
things
that
do
go
doc
generation,
but
I'm
not
100%
certain
there,
but
I
think
we
should
absolutely
talk
with
other
people,
such
as
COO
builder,
to
figure
out
if
they've
had
good
success,
they're
in
it
to
do
some
tests
on
our
own.
A
F
D
D
A
D
I
saw
the
change
I'm,
not
as
long
as
we
point
to
the
other
instructions
and
not
or
listed
as
prerequisites
I'm.
Okay,
with
some
of
them
we'll
have
to
figure
out
the
details
there
I've
been.
We
stopped
them
from
doing
any
more
changes
and
they
need
to
go
to
steering
to
get
buy-in
because
they're
they're,
basically
PRN
stuff
without
people
reviewing
the
contents
of
the
changes.
That's
that's
a
problem
there
that
they
should
not
be
doing
that
in
general,
so
that
should
stop
and
we'll
try
to
figure
out
a
happy
path
forward
with
them.
D
A
D
A
D
E
A
C
E
E
A
E
Yeah,
if
you
take
that
I
mean
if
that
happens
there
we
can
point
to
the
new
commit.
There
is
another
comment:
I
put
that
on
the
chat
where
it
links
to
a
scene,
I
version
all
three
one,
but
I,
don't
really
know
how
the
difference
between
now.
201
of
you
want.
So
in
any
case,
we
we
should
look
at
the
upstream,
commit
and
then
bomb
documentation,
I,
don't.
E
E
A
E
I
will
monitor
when
in
cats
merits
and
bump
that
version.
A
F
F
F
One
is
a
dual
stack
support
that
we
already
talked
before
that
we
want
to
get
it
that
we
want
to
keep
up
with
the
rest
of
the
community
on
this
effort,
and
there
is
also
we
would
like
also
to
make
the
status
with
regard
to
with
the
support,
because
I
saw
announcement
that
an
out
is
a
user,
can
use
it.
I
I,
don't
have
the
feedback
from
a
new
loop.
Remember
the
you
are
following
this,
this
effort,
so
I
added
a
line
or
they
we
added
a
line
for
the
window,
support
I,
don't.
D
Know
if
we're
gonna
want
to
bug
that
priority
up
or
not
all
four
windows
yeah
in
part,
because
if,
if
people
are
they
have
a
lot
of
the
testing
now
actually
in
place
and
its
proper,
so
they
can
actually
validate
and
they
fix
a
bunch
of
the
bugs
that
existed
and
if
they're
trying
to
do
PR
or
like
not
P
up,
not
pull
request,
but
actually
like
marketing
PR
to
the
wild.
In
that
we
can't
support
it
in
Cuba
TM.
That
is
generally
not
a
good
visibility.
D
A
With
increasing
the
priorities
that
it's
technically
the
people
who
are
going
to
take
action
on
these
people
who
do
not
participate
in
this
group,
these
are
CB,
Windows
and
Microsoft.
Folks,
and
this
is
like
work
on
the
side
for
them,
they
are
not
keep
adn
developers
and
also
the
cube
ADM
work
is
like
almost
complete.
It's
it's
already
working
the
work
that
has
to
be
done
for
this
psycho
I
guess
is
enabled
test
with
eBay
diem.
They
also
want
to
potentially
enable
worker
node
upgrades
using
the
medium
upgrade
command,
but
there's
no
action
for
us.
F
A
D
H
D
A
A
A
A
D
A
D
What
the
yeah?
Let's,
let's
get
the
CI
signal
in
place?
Let
me
link
up
with
them
and
figure
out
where
they're
at
and
what
they
want
to
announce.
I
just
have
general
concern
with
like
it
doesn't
look
good
and
the
both
of
Kubb
ATM
in
community
and
everyone
else.
When
we
announce
like
general
availability
of
Windows,
no
one
can
use
it,
except
for
when
they
run
the
Shuar,
there's
no
community
facing
thing
it's
just
generally
brokaw.
So
let
me
let
me
try
to
close
that
loop
on
your
side.
A
Yeah,
basically,
the
the
docs
are
merged,
but
I
don't
have
the
latest
PR
and
the
dogs
only
operates
using
this
repository
the
tools
using
from
this
repository.
So
if
somebody
for
some
reason,
reports
stuff
to
keep
a
DM
like
I
said
earlier,
we
should
just
delegate
to
sig
Windows
anything.
The
users
ask
because
Q
barium
itself
is
Windows
ready.
We
are
just
being
leveraged
in
terms
of
worker,
not
support
or
even
its,
that
we
are
only
being
regulated
for
the
booster
talking
capabilities.
F
D
D
I'm,
not
sure
I'm,
not
sure,
technically,
know
if
you
actually
look
at
the
is
less
we've
marked
it
as
deprecated
indented,
a
notion
that
it
is,
if
you
actually
looked
at
API
machinery,
they
only
recently
deprecated
the
extensions
flag.
So
if
you
actually
looked
at
this
was
this
is
Wonderland
of
API
magic.
D
If
you
actually
had
an
old
version
of
the
the
API
and
group,
it
would
do
four
levels
of
conversion
for
you
on
the
back
end,
to
get
you
up
to
speed
with
the
latest
version
so
that,
even
though
you
had
things
like
I
think
it
was
extensions
API,
it
actually
did
the
auto
conversion
to
the
latest.
So
technically
we
don't,
unless
we've
actually
specified
it
as
I
deprecated,
where
we
it
doesn't
have
to
be
removed.
I
can't.
A
H
A
A
F
A
A
C
G
A
F
F
Okay
and
then
there
is
a
block
which
is
42.5,
which
is
work
on
that
dawn
and
part
of
it
includes
integration
with
the
tone
operator
and
make
up
a
proxy
optional.
But
we
discussed
this
a
little
bit
with
Lake
Rick
and
it
really
depends
by
if
and
how
they
are
ready
to
do
the
integration
or
not.
So
it
is
in
our
mind
somehow
it
crosses
the
work
that
Rosa
has
to
do
for
component
confit.
Somehow
it
crosses
the
work
that
we
are
going
to
do
in
v1
beta3,
but
it
is
having
that
done.
A
F
A
So
appear
in
the
the
kubernetes
web
sites
like
yesterday,
that
somebody
wanted
to
add
notes
about
the
fact
like
hey.
You
can
now
skip
proxy.
If
you,
you
know,
skip
the
queue
proxy
face
and
then
join
is
going
to
support
it,
but
I
immediately
said
okay,
but
upgrade
the
source
for
it.
So
we
should
not
recommend
this
even.
F
I
totally
agree:
this
is
not
supported
by
cubed
mean
now,
and
there
is
the
rest
way
to
make
it
work.
One
is
to
implement
faces
in
upgrades,
which
is
which
are
not
in
the,
but
not
for
this
iPod
and
the
other
is
to
have
a
configuration
that
keep
track
of
what
the
user
is
doing,
which
probably
my
opinion
but
currently
is
not
supported.
F
D
D
F
This
is
the
idea,
because,
behind
the
basically
behind
one
of
the
possibility
that
that
add-on
installer
introduced
and
that
we
want
to
watch
to
to
act
is
to
express
a
list
of
advanced,
so
you
tend
in
that
case,
you
can
choose
if
to
add
by
default,
to
by
proxy
accordion
s
or
if
to
have
to
skip
a
couple
proxy
so
to
have
old,
accordion
s
or
12,
Cooper,
Ruta
and
cooter.
Only
so
as
soon
as
we
change
our
config,
letting
the
user
Express.
The
list
of.
F
F
F
C
F
A
F
F
A
F
A
F
But
but
I
think
that
he
and
then
I
have
to
dropper
to
to
move
to
the
sickness,
recycle
meeting.
I
think
that
a
good
approach
there
will
be
to
start
only
a
replacing
binary,
which
is,
let
me
say,
destroy
agnostics,
but
these
are
all
mostly
distance,
this
from
Gnostic
and
say
we
support
visa.
That
means
that,
if
component
as
a
some
updated
dependencies,
we
are
not
managing
with
the
operator
in
these
various.