►
From YouTube: 20190910 sig cluster lifecycle
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Hello
today
is
Tuesday,
September,
10th
and
2019.
This
is
the
standard
sequester
lifecycle
call
I
am
going
to
share
my
screen.
A
A
Everyone
who
submitted
a
maintainers
track
talk
should
have
gotten
an
email,
so
I
submitted
all
of
those
talks,
so
I
do
know
that
some
folks
have
gotten
their
emails.
But
if
you
haven't
gotten
yours-
and
you
requested
me
to
submit
the
meteor's
track
talk,
please
let
me
know
and
I
will
try
it
forked
Condor
up
these.
Let
me
know
and
I'll
try
to
follow
up
there.
A
The
second
thing
is
that
there
is
during
the
contributor
summit
we
may
or
may
not
have
a
session
for
face-to-face
talks.
I
will
PSA
once
I
find
out
more
details.
I
do
know
that
I
submitted
a
request
to
have
a
face-to-face
session
during
the
khajur
design,
but
I
do
not
know
what
the
what
the
current
state
is
from
the
contributor.
So
that's
an
action
for
me
to
do.
B
A
B
C
Have
appear
up
for
TCP,
B
1,
alpha
2,
and
this
a
large
rewrite
of
like
what
we
had
acne
went
out
for
one
there's
also
like
another
PRF
to
get
some
world
permissions
to
Mosley,
to
create
the
release.
0
one
branch
for
the
cadets
in
there
today
and
mostly
wanted
to
book
just
in
today
to
see
like
his
feedback
and
you.
C
E
C
E
A
F
A
Straight
through
of
removing
the
cluster
directory
and
using
the
GCD
provider,
because
I
know,
Google
has
a
bunch
of
tests
that
is
very
specific
to
Google
to
test
things
like
graphics
card
integration.
The
scale
tests
are
all
done
at
Google.
All
the
other
stuff
tests
are
done
as
Google,
and
ideally
we'd
like
to
enable
the
GCP
provider
to
just
be
the
replacement
for
Kubb
up
over
time
via
foster
justin.
E
Yeah
I
think
kudos
to
you
all
for
doing
this.
I
think
it's
I
think
there
was
a
question
about
like.
Would
we
want
to
do
it
on
AWS
if
we
could
and
I
don't
think
we
have
any
objection
to
doing
that
other
than
we
don't
have
as
much
as
many
credits
on
AWS
and
it
will
probably
more
work
support
it
to
AWS,
so
I
think
getting
it
working
on
GCP
is
a
great
tactical
choice.
E
It
will
probably
take
and
I
think
we
we
don't
want
to
lose
coverage
of
important
scenarios.
The
other
one
I
think
there's
some
unimportant
scenarios
and
I
agree
with
you.
It
will
take
time
to
do
that,
but
you
know
it
would
be
great
to
have
GPU
support
tested
and
not
just
on
GCP,
but
laundry
CP
and
they'd
have
us
or
whatever
else,
and
one
wants
to
submit,
but
yeah
it'll
be
great
to
get
this
going.
A
Do
you
know
if
Google
is
gonna,
have
any
resources
at
all
to
help
with
this,
or
is
it
gonna
be
kind
of
like
you
know
what
I
wrote,
I'm
kind
of
looking
for
is
is
some
cohort
who
can
at
least
review
the
PRS
that
are
gonna
go
into
slash
Buster?
Are
you
the
owner
of
that
now
since
since
won't
be
as
fun
I,
probably.
E
E
I,
don't
think
Google
is
going
to
object
to
removing
the
to
removing
that
code.
I,
don't
think
we
reference
it
any
longer
in
gke,
for
example,
and
if
we
do,
we
could
fix
it,
I
guess
the
question
is:
are
we
gonna
put
more
stuff
into
cluster
or
where
are
we
gonna,
where
we
gonna
build
these
up?
That's.
A
A
good
question
we
need
to
evaluate
where
we
can
do
it.
I
think
first
step
is
enumerate.
What's
all
there
there's
a
bunch
of
tests
that
exists
and
I
don't
think
everybody
has
a
shared
understanding
of
what
what's
required.
What's
needed
and
what's
detritus
and
yes,
that's
the
actual
way
you
pronounce
that
I've
been
reprimanded
by
my
wife
several
times
so
least
always
say
Tetris,
so
the
first
step
is
enumerate.
A
The
second
step
is
to
build
up
the
corpus
and
make
sure
that
GC
provider,
as
has
parity
because
I,
do
know
for
things
like
the
scale
tests,
we're
going
to
need
to
have
some
solution
for
auto
scaling,
grips
I,
don't
see
how
we
could
get
around
it.
Otherwise
it
might
take
eternity
for
us
to
be
able
to
spin
up
many
nodes.
I
do
know
that
the
current
scale
tests
take
on
the
order
of
11
hours,
but
I
don't
know
if
that's
because
of
some
scale
factor
in
pushing
out
machines
and
getting
them
updated.
A
E
A
Yes,
I
agree,
so
there
is
a
separate
issue
which
I'll
have
to
link
into
this
area
that
is
related
to
that
or
a
part
I
put
up
on
top
I
do
know
that
we
started
to
enumerate
our
action
plan
up
above,
but
we'll
have
to
watch
the
link
that
PR
so
I
Lumiere.
If
you
have
it,
if
you
could
put
it
here
on
the
top
that
we
have
all
yeah.
A
Depending
upon
where
we're
at
with
Covidien
in
117
timeframe,
we
might
be
able
to
help
them
so
yeah
enumerate
in
the
state
spaces
order.
One
okay,.
A
B
G
G
G
A
H
G
A
G
A
So,
for
for
planning
would
have
not
been
through
sort
of
like
obedience,
town
planning
session,
I
highly
recommend
you
go
to
it
even
if
you're,
just
a
by
standard
like
we
have
a
modus
operandi
that
has
worked
across
several
cycles
because
because
pure
medium
is,
is
time
boxed
to
how
to
the
kubernetes
release.
We
forces
ourselves
to
make
tough
choices
and
to
force
people
to
actually
stand
up
and
be
accounted
for
yeah.
I
F
F
So,
basically
there
there
should
only
be
one
source
of
truth
when
it
comes
to
like
how
do
you
install
mini
cube,
and
so
we've
done
some
discussions
with
the
docks
folks
on
on
which
docks
stay
and
which
ones
go.
So
we've
started
discussing
the
2020
roadmap
for
mini
cube.
Some
of
the
more
interesting
things
are.
Ideas
that
have
been
floated
is
a
menu
bar
UI
for
Mac
OS,
Windows,
similar
to
like
docker
for
desktop
where
you
can
stop
and
start
kubernetes
clusters,
but
supporting
resource
exhaustion.
F
F
A
A
And
a
single
host
yeah
right,
so
the
question
I
kind
of
have
is
that
there's
there's
a
currently
occurring
at
ease
in
docker
or
kind
ish
cluster
API
provider,
which
allows
folks
to
declaratively
manage
you
know
multiple
clusters.
Well,
I,
don't
know
whether
or
not
there's
demand
for
it,
but
I
would
use
it
personally.
If
there
was
a
cluster
API
provider
for
for
mini
cube.
F
C
A
F
F
Me
look
into
that
and
I'll
have
something
to
report
for
the
next
meeting
cool,
so
one
of
the
other
things
follow
up
from
something
I
mentioned
a
couple
of
weeks
ago
about
triage
tooling,
so
I
started
getting
annoyed
about
lack
of
options
for
triage
drilling,
so
I
went
ahead
and
wrote
a
tool.
You
can
click
on
the
example
there
I'm
working
on
getting
approvals
to
open-source
it
one
of
the
I
guess
some
of
the
interesting
things
about
this
tool
is
that
it
tracks
conversational
state.
F
F
So
we
have
things
like
that:
basic
and
basically
trying
to
codify
what
our
long
triage
document
is
into
something
that
people
can
use
and
one
of
the
other
features
on
that
is
there's
a
multiplayer
mode
for
the
triage,
where,
if
you
have
a
meeting
where
you're
trying
to
triage
a
large
amount
of
items
like,
for
instance,
reviewing
doing
a
quarterly
review
of
all
of
your
open
items
that
you
can
shard
it
across
all
the
people
who
are
participating.
So
we've
actually
been
doing
that
for
our
weekly
triage.
For
a
couple
of
weeks
now,.
A
A
A
A
J
I
How
it
should
look
and
then
Justin
continues
to
report
a
progress
on
who
builder
in
the
details
of
implementing
a
ton
operators
in
the
simpler
fashion,
using
the
scaffolding
available
through
the
project,
then,
regarding
component
config?
Actually,
don't
really
have
updates,
specifically
about
that.
I
A
I
With
regard
to
add-ons
I
think
the
we
need
to
get
a
base
set
up
for
people
to
be
able
to
contribute,
and
with
component
config
we
did
have
a
few
contributors.
Stick
around
and
I
have
somebody
in
IBM's
right
now
who
is
chasing
down
some
multi
dog
support,
stuff
Alex
might
be
on
this
call
yeah,
and
then
we
had
somebody
who
did
legacy
flag
support
for
coop,
Roxy
I
haven't
been
able
to
devote
enough
time
to
the
component
standard
project
or
working.
A
So
the
question
I
have
is,
if
you
need
help
manage
it,
there
cuz
I,
know:
Lucas
is
going
to
college
and
you're
stepping
you're
having
troubles
with
time
is
Michael
too
often
able
to
run
the
show
there.
Or
do
you
guys
need
more
help
with
regards
to
sort
of
funneling
and
getting
getting
the
ball
rolling.
Yeah.
I
I
mean
I
like
if
I'm
gonna
be
honest,
like
the
past
few
weeks
have
felt
pretty
business
as
usual.
Right
we've
done
some
code
walkthroughs
and
things
like
that.
But
as
far
as
yeah
real
work,
materializing
and
some
of
that's
on
me,
but
I
can't
I
can't
speak
for
Mike's
commitments
and
that
kind
of
thing.
But
he
does
put
in
effort
to
make
sure
that
we
remain
organized.
G
I
A
E
E
So
it's
a
good
step
forwards
and
the
restraint
keeps
on
rolling
and
we
might
even
catch
up
by
116
again,
our
goal
is
not
to
have
the
stable
cops
reset
the
Cooper
news10
released,
but
rather
to
have
an
alpha
available
at
the
dot
zero
release,
and
if
we
don't
quite
have
that
in
time,
we're
not
going
to
be
too
far
behind
so
we've
come
down
from
about
180
days,
delay
to
about
zero
days
delay,
so
that
is
a
an
improvement
other
than
that
just
business
as
usual.
It's
a.
A
A
Put
this
item
here
just
for
broader
employment
there's
been
a
long-standing
PR
and
a
set
of
patches
that
we've
kind
of
weirdly
maintained
for
CentOS,
which
have
been
fixing
the
cloud
minute
package
that
exists
there
Andy.
You
can
correct
me
if
I'm
wrong,
but
the
understanding
is
that
CentOS
7
7
should
contain
the
fix
for
cloud
in
it
for
CentOS.
So
that
way
we
no
longer
need
to
have
this
weird
patch
set
library.
Is
that
correct,
yeah.
A
So
my
plan
currently
is
to
cut
a
tag
for
there's
no
actually
build
artifacts
for
the
image
builder,
but
to
cut
a
tag
to
cut
a
tag
for
the
1
alpha
2
based
image,
support
for
that
repo.
Just
so
we
have
some
reference
point
to
look
at
in
to
submit
patches
to.
If
you
learn
same
pans,
I
would
do
that
after
seven
seven
lands
which
I
don't
have
an
ETA
on
other
than
it's
supposed
to
be
soon.
G
So
we
had
a
discussion
me,
Fabrice
friend
Daniel,
only
the
three
of
us
about
how
are
we
going
to
integrate
this
idiom
with
qadian?
So
there's
a
video
recording
of
the
meeting,
and
also
we
have
a
document
that,
with
the
original
proposal
that
mean
Fabrizio,
credit
I
don't
have
context
from
the
PR
that
is
adjusting
these
priorities,
but
there
are
players
appear,
is
probably
about
how
HCDA
diem
has
to
eventually
support
static
pots
at
the
point,
EDD
is
a
static
pot.
G
Only
currently
it
only
supports
system
D
and
also
me
and
Daniel,
had
a
private
meeting
discussing
like
how
are
we
going
to
do
in
24h,
CDM
and
I
explained
some
of
them
the
aspects
that
we
should
know
about
related
to
prowl
and
testing
for
changes.
So
that's
how
I
know
about
ready
to
dissipate
Oh
any.
K
K
Qa
is
a
big
consumer
of
Cuba
DM
and
many.
You
know
other
components.
Of
course,
one
big
update
is
that
we
are
ready
for
amaze
116.
K
It's
amazing
losing
the
the
API
deprecation,
of
course,
is
always
fun
a
lot
of
string
replacements
everyone's
probably
already
done
that
on
their
side,
some
whole
new
functionality
is
we've
added
the
Calico
native
kubernetes
annotation
support
and
rewrote
the
retroreflector
logic.
So
you
can,
you
know,
add
route
reflectors
or
disable
about
reflecting
or
whatever
it
was
kind
of
a
bunch
of
ugly
yeah,
moles
and
bash
commands,
but
now
it's
kind
of
more
native
llamo.
K
G
K
A
The
intent
would
be
to
potentially
have
Kubb
spray
as
a
least
right,
not
right
away,
but
eventually
as
a
release,
Bocking
job
for
part
of
the
career
days
release.
So
that
way,
you
could
verify
that
everything
was
working
on
your
end,
all
the
way
through
and
do
you
know
that
there's
a
large
swath
of
folks
that
use
it
so
I
can.
K
H
A
There
any
other
questions
comments
with
regards
to
a
lot
of
the
stuff
we
talked
about.
I
do
know
that
Ben
is
on
the
call
and
I've
been,
or
he
wasn't,
the
call
of
listeners
yeah
I
seen
there
and
in
the
fullness
of
time,
I'd
love
to
see
some
programmatic
API
coverage
or
deduplication
from
the
ability
to
spin
a
versus
B
versus
in
mini
cute,
to
kind
of
like
unite
the
clans
and
I
mentioned
it
many
times.