►
From YouTube: kubeadm office hours 2020-05-20
A
Okay,
I
wanted
to
mention
that
they'd
see
the
image
moved
to
this
release,
I
believe
yesterday
and
now
our
see
a
signal
is
fine,
because
from
my
understanding
they
are
keeping
the
silica
refinery
as
part
of
the
image
for
now
something
else
that
they
are
doing.
Is
they
added
some
copy
binary
solution,
also
a
Bosch
static
implementation
so
that
they
don't
have
to
depend
on
the
other
line
operating
system,
digital,
so
I.
A
A
Okay,
these
are
a
PSA.
We
I
think
we
managed
to
solve
the
open,
RC
problem
at
this
point,
the
church
that
we
require
we
require
three
key
idea
was
to
move
the
cupola
star
face
later
in
the
world
fall.
This
is
potentially
affecting
the
change
cause
like
I
did
with
nadir,
where
we
retry
some
phases
in
quad
in
it.
But
the
story
there
is
that,
if
you
are
using
system
delete
does
not
matter
when
you
start
the
coolant.
A
As
long
as
you
write
the
berryfest
to
disk,
it's
only
critical
in
the
case
of
paparazzi,
because
they
apparently
openers
he
does
not
support
the
restart
yet
so
you
have
to
start
the
system.
Only
after
the
service,
the
complete
service
configuration
files
are
written
on
disk
and
the
service
is
ready
to
start
properly
without
errors.
A
B
A
A
B
To
preserve
the
aux,
so
in
this
case
we
move
at
a
phase,
which
is
a
strange
case,
but
the
let's
assume
that
we
want
to
deprecate.
So
we
can.
We
can
duplicate
a
face
or
empty
the
face,
but
leave
it
in
the
sequence
for
some
time
and
then
move
it.
Okay,
this
make
easier
the
change,
because
for
some
time
you
you
basically
they
all
do
Co
to
continue
to
wars
without
breaking.
C
The
my
understanding,
at
least
like
moving
the
place
of
a
face,
is
not
that
much
of
a
big
difference,
simple
because
so
you
can
basically
either
invoke
each
different
face
by
yourself,
for
example
like
a
single
common
line
and
basically
in
that
way,
the
order
of
phase
execution
is
up
to
the
user
or
the
other
ways
to
just
like
disable
specific
phases
just
to
bait
him
disabled
in
specific
ways.
In
that
case,
like
in
both
keys,
like
changing
the
place
of
base,
is
not
that
big
of
a
deal
like
what
is
a
like.
C
A
bigger
of
a
deal
for
me
is
probably
introducing
in
your
face
and
having
enabled
my
folk
simply
because
folks
that
actually
just
take
the
list
of
bases
and
invoke
them
in
a
specific
order.
All
by
themselves
may
actually
get
surprised
the
next
time
they
update,
cube
alien
by
basically
not
invoking
a
new
face
somewhere.
C
So
probably,
we
should
at
least
have
an
action
required
to
like
mark
these
new
faces
to
at
least
get
tension
on
them,
especially
if
they
actually
fix
some
issues.
For
us
and
of
course,
deleting
a
base
is
practical.
Deleting
part
of
the
common
line
interface,
this
will
sure
get
noticed
and
probably
needs
to
be
governed
by
the
command
line.
Interface
policy.
A
One
benefit
is
that
if
we
introduce
a
new
face,
this
can
potentially
be
some
sort
of
a
security
fix
or
something
so.
The
cursor
is
going
to
be
operational
because
the
new
face
fixes
or
add
something
without
this
face
is
still
going
to
work.
But
if
it's
a
security
fix,
they
have
to
apply
it
in
any
way.
A
B
A
A
Just
wanted
to
it
also
function
required,
which
I
don't
know
if
you
know,
but
this
release
was
supposed
to
be
a
stabilization
quote-unquote
release
and
we
we
have
four
action
required
items,
but
you
know
I
think
we,
we
might
have
another
one
so
yeah,
but
it's
it's
appropriate.
We
have
to
get
some
of
this
stuff
going,
especially
in
all
the
couplet
flags.
What
are
what
are
the
other.
A
A
A
Okay,
this
is
this
a
kept.
It's
spawned
a
discussion
that
is
now
in
the
cigar,
Google
Group,
so
basically
sick
of
wanted
to
a
mold
from
B
we're
worried
to
implement
new
feature
that
you
can
use
to
dynamically
specify
what
types
of
authentication
they
pass
several
sports.
Currently,
this
is
only
supported
via
flags,
so
we
have
to
start
a
pair
server,
specify
some
flags
and
it
supports
a
meta
to
fortification.
A
So
David
is
created
this
email
thread.
Basically,
people
started
discussing
what
how
how
is
supposed
to
reconfigure
components
in
a
running
question.
So
the
reason
I
bring
this
to
baby
a
meeting,
because
we
have
several
problems.
How
do
we
reconfigure
a
running
cluster
so
for
the
couplet
from
what
I've
seen
people
are
telling
me
that
the
dynamic
couplet
configuration
doesn't
work
either
it's
very
tricky
or
we
are
not
doing
something
properly,
I
think.
If
I,
we
should
probably
remove
our
office
support
for
deprecated
for
release
and
remove
it
and.
B
A
A
Then
api
server,
I
would
see
that
maybe
definitely
needs
it.
This
crosses
the
boundary
between
dynamic
and
static
configuration
other
administrator.
Do
you
want
to
configure
this
api
server
in
a
secure
way
and
then
potentially
at
some
point,
change
this
dynamically
or
should
should
the
whole
configuration
the
study
can
require
restart?
It
is
act
like
questions
here.
C
Probably
about
dynamic
configuration
should
probably
speak
with
Mike
Dalton
and
see
what
the
word
folks
started
on
this
I
get
somewhat.
The
perception
of
the
it's
somewhat
abandoned
at
this
point
as
far
as
the
API
server
is
consumed
depends
on
who
does
not
have
even
component
config
right
now,
it's
it
relies
solely
on
my
parts
and
until
they
actually
get
this
tree
going,
they
probably
won't
have
like
anything
to
do
with
convicts.
B
B
A
A
Auto
authorisation,
sorry
authentication,
reconfiguration
they're,
trying
to
add
this,
but
the
API
server
doesn't
have
a
corporate
coffee
in
the
first
place,
so
they
are
trying
to
avoid
the
flags
per
diem
skipping.
The
part
where
the
company
doesn't
have
a
config,
so
I
kinda
agree
with
roasted.
Maybe
that's
the
first
step
to
take,
but
no
people
might.
A
B
B
But
your
point
in
my
practice
is
different.
Is
that,
basically,
if
you
think
that
the
API
server
today,
you
can
already
extend
the
list
of
runtime
groups,
the
API
server
supports
not
using
flaga,
but
using
OCR
these
today
you
can
add
admission
controllers
or
validation
web
books,
not
using
fair
players,
but
using.
B
B
B
Don't
see
a
strict
the
dependence
on
on
component
config
for
this,
because
otherwise
also
sealer.
These
should
be
wait
for
component
country,
so
the
mman
type
of
configuration
they
are
different.
Meaning
of
configuration
in
my
opinion
is
interesting,
because
if
we
go
this,
this
could
be
an
interesting
alternative
to
component
configure.
So
we
we
start
minimizing
the
components
who
faces
to
a
minimal
set
of
flags
that
allows
the
the
component
to
start,
and
then
we
everything
else
is
driven
by
the
API
object.
A
Yes,
you're
correct:
this
is
a
different
direction.
Right
now,
it's
not
possible
to
configure
some
types
of
authentication
like
Oh,
IDC
IDC,
it's
not
possible
to
dynamically
change
it.
Oh
it's
also
not
present
in
corporate
coffee
just
a
flag
at
this
point,
so
the
corporate
coffee
scene
is
necessary
in
jet
in
general,
because
the
we
have
to
remove
the
flags
from
all
the
corporates
like.
No,
that
is
the
goal
of
the
project,
but
then
this
dynamic
reconfiguration
that
is
proposed
here
will
allow
reconfiguring
the
local
component
config
on
disk
with
this
API
object.
A
This
is
going
to
be
the
new
part
here
that
is
proposed,
but
the
proposal
is
static,
completely
ignoring
the
fact
that
you
know
the
API
server
doesn't
have
corporate
coffee
at
this
point,
I
think
they
are
skipping
an
evolutional
step
in
a
way.
But
this
is
you
know
it's
my
opinion.
Only
it
I
don't
know
what
the
outcome
of
this
discussion
is
going
to
be
in
general,
but
related
to
our
use
case.
A
B
A
C
Yeah,
if
you
can
open
just
the
link
here
so
like
this,
is
this
PR
has
been
sitting
here
for
several
months
now
and
with
the
kept
update,
much
I
want
to
just
get
the
the
annotation
name
like
the
correct,
augmentation
name:
I
personally,
don't
have
any
opinions
of
County
sanitation
should
be
cold.
I
think
that
over
the
like
the
long
time,
this
PR
has
been
open.
I
I
think
I've
got
something
like
a
couple
of
different
proposals
from
to
so
we
should
probably
try
and
settle
on
something
other
than
that.
C
A
So
the
topic
of
hash
versus
chicken
I
did
some.
You
know
five-minute
research
of
what
is
the
difference.
So
if
you
have
a
chicken
I
hope,
I
see
a
checksum
might
not
be
a
good
hash,
so
we
give
away
using
something
like
sha-256
I,
think
it's
probably
better
to
use,
shut
and
also
give
it
the
fact
we
also
in
you
already
use
Shah
in
more
places
compared
to
chicken
incubation.
A
B
Is
my
comment?
I
mean
using
coop
admin
until
we
got
complain
for
ashed
checksum
I
suggested
problem.
I
do
remember
in
this
PR
and
some
other
PR,
just
for
consistency's,
with
faster
API
and
I
use
ash
for
every
senior
to
run
the
object
and
they
do
the
same.
They.
Basically
they
ash
the
objects
and
save
the
C
network.
So
they
understand
what
the
object
is
changing
and
so
the
meaning
is
the
same.
I
find
it.
Nice
is
the
same
Terramax,
but
is
not
a
big
deal.
C
A
C
C
A
C
C
Yeah
seems
okay,
probably
the
like
a
slight
pointer
from
where
and
for
what
this
hash
is
used
by
chose
to
repent,
also
how
Jen,
so
that
users
won't
be
coming
up
around
and
saying:
hey,
I
supplied
the
de
Polan
cryptic
to
qadian
and
I
see
that
I'm
using
this
particular
lamentation
on
my
coffee
mug.
But
it's
present
on
the
other
one
which.
A
C
A
A
So
across
this
PR,
because
me
and
said
acute
I
guess
every
saw
so
here
is
one.
We
agreed
that
this
should
be
fixed
in
a
CD
basic
client
that
we
vendor
in
Radium
is
not
allowing
us
to
specify
that
there
was
two
levels.
So
we
also
have
an
unrelated
change
that
I'm
going
to
hopefully
reach
later,
but
this
is
spitting
a
warning
that
it
cannot
remove
the
last
eight
CD
member
because
of
lack
of
consensus.
B
A
Yeah
we
have
a
PR
I,
think
that
actually
is
already
merged.
So
k
walk
is
updating
to
veto
I'm,
not
sure
you
know
what
is
the
state
of
cost
API
in
the
answer
projects
I
haven't
checked.
It
pulls
a
bunch
of
dependencies,
so
at
this
PRS
I
mean
it
has
been
sitting
there
for
so
much
time.
So
since
April
are
pretty
sure
that
deems
updated.
This
PR,
like
a
hundred
times
already,
okay
hidin
items
and
I,
asked
a
simple
question.
A
Like
hey
I
know
that
it's
important
the
the
v2
of
k,
what
is
changing
the
API
FK
mode
is
slightly
changing.
So
it's
a
breaking
change.
Okay,
but
given
everything
in
cooperate,
this
is
just
importing
a
logger.
They
don't
really
care
about
morality
as
long
as
they
are
no.
They
are
not
using
this
extra
braking
functionality.
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
C
A
A
So
this
I'm
going
to
take
said
the
new
PR,
because
this
is
my
mo
mo,
is
busy
asked
yesterday
for
some
reason,
the
kubernetes
website
documentation
is
changing
tamo
to
a
Unicode
character,
and
you
can
imagine
what
happens
with
people
copy
paste
this
line.
It
includes
flags
with
broken,
basically
broken
flies.
A
So
I
spent
a
couple
of
hours
yesterday,
debugging
the
user
issue,
try
to
figure
out
why
our
let
her
solid,
not
read
cut
but
RPM
packages
do
not
work
and
I
I.
Remember
that
somebody
not
distich
in
a
couple
of
days
ago,
so
yeah
time,
well-spent
I'm
asking
to
like
what
should
we
do
here
and
maybe
I
have
to
follow
up
here
instead
of
more
try
to
fix
all
the
complaints.
The
cuban
changes
only
in
the
alpha
commands.
A
A
C
A
C
A
A
A
The
cherry-picks
have
not
merged
sheets
for
the
flakes.
One
of
them
is
not
passed
yet.
I
guess
so.
This
is
energy
TM
approved.
So
I
think
this
is
the
right
thing
to
do.
If
there
are
not
enough
fight
city
members,
we
can
just
skip
this
face.
I
guess
what
they
take
for
it.
Should
we
remove
the
hold
here
at
this
point.
B
A
B
B
A
B
B
B
B
C
It's
in
the
fingers
like
more
interesting
to
me
is
whether
we
actually
do
any
form
of
cleanup
after
that,
because
this
is
like
resetting
the
last
etc.
Even
if
it's
like
stuck
it's
the
escape
we're
going
to
end
up
with
like
some
sort
of
stay
at
City,
and
probably
just
at
least
ensuring
that
we
actually
delete
its
data
directory
right
basic
just
up
it's
the
instance
and
deleted
stated
I
just
copy
come
to
work
here
and
just
ignore
the
small,
basically
just
trying
to
dispose
of
the
poster.