►
From YouTube: ContribEx Bi-Weekly Issue Triage Update 20200129
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
B
B
A
Alright,
that
is
up
I
will
put.
Everybody
should
have
that,
but
I'll
put
a
lazy
links.
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
A
So
do
you
know
who's
actually
working
on
this,
so
one
of
the
things
that
we
were,
let
me
pop
fiction
for
a
second
in
part
of
triaging.
It's
to
understand
who's
actually
going
to
own
the
a
giving
issue.
So,
for
example,
this
one
we
know
is
open
and
it's
not
assigned
to
anyone.
So
that
is
something
part
of
triaging.
When
we
do
a
session,
the
session
will
be.
These
are
some
of
the
things
you
have
to
look
at
it.
Is
it
open?
A
C
A
C
C
Content
that
is
external
to
the
controller
site
repo.
It
pulls
it
in
adjusts
all
the
links
that
way,
it
will
actually
work
on
the
contributor
site.
So
things
like
the
contributor
guy
didn't
have
a
bunch
of
links
and
all
those
links
would
break
if
we
pulled
that
content
in.
So
this
is
like
a
whole
slew
of
regular
expressions
and
some
other
magic
fix.
The
links.
A
C
C
A
C
A
A
To
really
kind
of
have
to
convert
this
and
to
go
and
I
can
do
that
I'm,
not
afraid
of
that.
Let's
see
home
page
needs
content,
I.
A
A
D
D
D
A
A
C
A
A
A
A
B
F
D
This
is
just
an
issue
that
needs
to
be
trimmed
into
features
so
that
this
is
like
I
guess.
Maybe
if
we
I
don't
know
any
anything
that
says,
content
with
the
brackets
means
that
it
needs
to
be
trimmed
into
features
and
pages.
Pretty
much
because,
like
all
the
stuff
in
the
brackets,
is
from
focus
groups
and
strategy
sessions
and
stuff
like
that,
like
base
off
persona
building,
remember
marquee!
That's
why
I
was
like.
D
So,
like
that's,
why
that's
where
this
issue
needs
these?
Some
love
is:
how
can
we
pull
some
of
this
out
and
start
putting
it
on
like
parking
lots
and
like
next
iterations
of
the
website,
and
things
like
that?
This
is
where
I
personally
also
need
some
help
as
well
like
I'm,
not
that
I'm
not
alone,
like
I'm,
not
that
experienced
with
like
advanced
project
management
for
web
development.
Here
like
this,
is
where,
like.
F
C
D
A
C
So
all
that
is
currently
being
done
in
the
getting
broken
out
and
the
contributor
got
itself
like
the
readme
is
getting
broken
out
into
different
sections
with,
like
you
know,
getting
started
and
some
of
the
other
things
there.
So
as
long
as
long
as
the
guide
itself
is
updated,
like
do
you
have
this
information
and
I'll
sinking
over
the
country
tour
guide,
it
should
knock
like
most
of
those
out
and
I.
Think
like
in
a
computer
guide
itself.
There
is
a
thing
for
help
wanted
the
other
thing.
C
I've
talked
with
the
vision
about
this
is,
like
you
know,
outside
of
surfacing
the
contributor
guide
itself
and
improving
the
work
that
you
know
like
breaking
up
breaking
apart.
That
they
agreed
me
is
that
we
can
have
our
own
sort
of
persona
driven
page
addition
to
the
contributor
guide
on
the
site.
So
that
way,
it's
just
like
you
know,
I
am
a
you
know.
New
contributor
I
want
to
get
started
with.
Writing
you
know.
Documentation
here
is
the
link
to
this.
I
want
to
get
started
with
know.
C
I
want
to
do
a
PR
to
take
a
here's.
The
upper
guide
right.
You
can
have
both
of
those
that's
not
too
hard,
I
think
like
at
least
in
the
know
interim.
As
long
as
we
beef
up
and
sort
out
the
contributor
guide
itself
make
the
readme,
instead
of
being,
you
know
the
one
big
long
page,
that
sort
of
being
you
know,
you're
interested
in
this-
go
here
interests
in
this
go
here
and
link
to
like
everything
that
should
cover
most
of
our
stuff.
D
That,
like
this
needs,
believe
them
mentoring
pieces
need
to
be
a
page.
So
this
is
what
I'm
saying
like
this
needs
to
come
out
and
make
a
new
issue
like
I.
In
my
opinion,
we
should
keep
all
the
cut.
You
keep
all
of
this
research
and
then
I,
don't
know
if
you
want
to
like
freeze
it
or
whatever,
but
I
would
keep
it
and
then
once
the
contributor
guide,
stuff
is
done,
see
make
sure
that
you
go
back
to
this
issue
and
say:
okay,
is
it
clear
from
the
contributor
guide
that
we've
covered?
A
Rin,
if
you'd,
like
I,
can
put
myself
as
an
assignee
on
this
and
then
I
kind
of
have
an
understanding
of
what
we
need
to
do.
I
could
do
it
from
the
mentoring
part,
and
then
we
could
pair.
You
could
watch
me
and
then
we
compare
to
do
from
this
top
part
and
that
way
we're
both
sort
of
helping
each
other
get
it
done.
Would
that
make
sense
that.
F
D
D
That's
exactly
what
I
think
should
happen
like
I
only
want
a
surface
like
and
that
I
can
go
in
and
actually
I'm
gonna
take
an
AI
for
this.
This
is
my
I'm
gonna
clean
it
up.
I'm
gonna
take
an
AI
and
say
that
I'm
gonna
make
a
new
issue
for
the
mentoring
one
marki
I'll
sign
it
to
you
and
ran
as
well
a
clean
up.
The
issue
for
the
mentoring
read
me
page,
but
really
I
think
all
that
needs
to
happen.
There
is
the
actual
readme
itself
inside
of
K.
D
A
A
C
C
C
Is
this?
Do
you
if
you
want
to
keep
this
open
when
it
needs
to
be
merged,
quick
and
then
put
it
over
to
caps,
because
we
plan
on
moving,
we
design
proposals
over
to
K
enhancements?
Otherwise
you
know
we
just
need
to
close
it
out.
There
are
also
a
slew
of
issues
that
are
essentially
the
same
sort
of
thing
and
people
updating
the
design
proposals.
C
D
C
A
B
Bob
I'm
sorry
I
missed
something.
You
said
those
PS
with
kind
design
where
they
will
be
moved
if
they're
not.
C
Our
plan
is
to
move
all
the
design
proposals
to
you,
the
enhancements
repo
which
will
live
with
the
caps.
Essentially,
what
design
proposals
have
become
so
we'd
like
to
hit
all
the
open,
PRS
and
issues
and
be
like
you
know
this.
This
needs
to
be
either
merged
now
or
closed.
So
we
can
move
all
the
design
proposals
over.
That's.
C
A
D
D
Do
you
know
anyone,
and
if
you
talk
about
what
that
looks
like
I,
don't
want
it
I'm,
not
saying
that
it
has
to
be
anything
extensive
or
dramatic
or
even
like
templated.
Just
like
a
quick
and
dirty
of
like
maybe
like
a
couple
links
to
the
boards
and
like
some
stuff,
you
all
are
working
on
that
you're,
proud
of
yeah.