►
From YouTube: KCSNA 2022 Planning for 20220718
Description
KCSNA 2022 Planning for 20220718
A
Hello,
everyone
and
welcome
to
the
first
meeting
of
the
2022
north
america
contributor
summit
planning
meetings.
I
am
your
host
today,
bob
killen,
okay,
mr
robbie
tables.
As
a
general
reminder,
these
calls
are
recorded
and
we'll
be
posting
internet.
Sometime
later
we
abide
by
the
scenes
of
code
connect
which
essentially
boils
down
to
please
be
excellent
to
each
other
with
that
and
with
this
being
the
first
meeting.
Actually,
let's
do
a
quick
round
of
introductions
because
there's
some
new
people
on
the
calls.
A
Well,
this
is
the
first
one
for
the
contributor
summit
anyway,
so
I
will
kick
it
off
the
hot
potato
game
and
toss
it
over
to
nebrun.
B
Hey
everyone
hi,
I'm
navarro.
B
This
is
not
the
first
time
I'm
involved
with
the
contributor
summit
was
doing
registrations
shattered
bob
actually
during
contributor
summit,
san
diego
three
years
back
and
then
late
registrations
for
the
cancelled
amsterdam,
contributor
summit
and
now.
B
Again
to
the
team
and
in
the.
B
Hi
I'm
robert
kilty-
I
I
may
not
be
attending
this,
this
kubecon
and
this
contributor
so
much
I've
yet
to
decide.
But
I
said
I
would
attend
the
meetings
and
because
I'd
like
to
participate
in
the
next
kubecon
europe,
I've
attended
a
few
contributor
summits
and
gave
a
talk
on
onpro,
which
I'm
revisiting
now
at
the
moment,
and
I
will
pass
over
to
josh
burkus.
D
Hi
I'm
josh
burkus.
I
was
on
the
last
contributor
summit
team
I'll,
probably
be
helping
out
with
some
incidental
things
for
this
contributor
summit,
but
we'll
will
not
be
taking
a
lead
role,
barring
emergencies,
the
and.
D
B
Hi,
my
name
is
hano
like
josh,
I
was
part
of
the
previous
team
for
contributing
summit
of
europe.
So
this
time
I'm
really
just
basically
trying
to
shadow
the
baron
for
the
registration
staff.
If
anyone
else
don't
step
up
for
this
role,
I
will
pass
the
potato
to
noah.
E
Hi
everybody
I'm
noah,
I've
been
involved
in
several
of
these
in
the
past,
in
u.s
europe
and
shanghai,
I
tend
to
end
up
doing
a
lot
of
the
day
of
logistics
stuff
and
I
haven't
been
involved
for
the
past
few.
E
I
don't
know
how
many
of
them
have
actually
happened,
but
I'm
happy
to
be
back.
I'm
going
to
pass
it
over
to
xander.
B
Hey
everyone,
I'm
xander,
I
I've
attended
a
few
of
the
contributor
summits
now
and
it's
it
always
just
ends
up
being
my
my
favorite
part
of
the
week
of
kubecon
so
figured
it
would
be
a
a
good
thing
to
join
and
and
see.
If
there's
anywhere
that
I
can
help
out
with
the
planning
yeah,
I
will
pass
it
over
to
gp.
F
Hello,
my
name
is
jeffrey
zika,
also
known
as
gifi.
I
have
been
to
many
contributor
summits
and
helped
out
with
them.
I
don't
know
why
I'm
talking
like
this,
yes
looking
to
contribute
to
the
contributor
summit,
especially
considering
for
all,
but
one
year
of
my
life,
I
lived
within
20
minutes
of
the
venue
so
yeah.
Let's
do
this.
C
C
B
So
everyone
this
is
avinesh.
This
is
first
time
me
involving
in
contributor
summit,
I'm
also
part
of
contributor
comms,
mainly
doing
the
promotion
and
all
kind
of
crazy
stuff.
So
yeah
happy
to
be
here
to
help
you
guys
and
I'll,
I'm
not
sure
who
is
still
left
to
say.
So
if
anyone
can
volunteer
themselves,
it
would
be
great.
C
B
G
Oh
yeah,
my
vpn
cut
out
on
me
right
as
I
did
that
so,
yes,
jason
detebros.
I've
helped
out
with
various
contributor
summits
in
the
past,
mostly
day
of,
but
I've
also
helped
organize
the
sig
meeting
great
in
the
past
as
a
shadow
and
I'm
looking
forward
to
contributing
a
bit
more
this
time
around.
H
I
can
jump
in
hi,
I'm
deb.
I
work
for
the
linux
foundation
cncf
on
the
events
team.
We're
here
to
help
support
you
all
and
make
your
dreams
come
true.
The
best
way
we
can
possibly
do
it.
So
if
you
need
anything,
let
us
know-
and
I
also
have
an
addition-
this
event,
which
I'm
very
excited
about
so
I'll,
pass
it
to
brianne
to
introduce
herself
hi,
I'm
brienne.
As
deb
said,
I
am
going
to
be
working
with
her.
H
I'm
really
excited
to
kind
of
jump
in
learn
everything
and
meet
everybody.
I
was
in
spain,
so
I
did
kind
of
get.
B
Hey
I'm
joseph's
animal
and
I've
been
an
attendee
at
contributor
summits
in
the
past
and
this
past
one
in
valencia.
I
kind
of
helped
drive
the
sig
release
session
that
we
did.
I
know
the
underneath
the
larger
event,
so
looking
forward
to
continuing
that
and
finding
ways
to
support
this
great
event.
A
Well,
I
think
that
is
everyone
that
thank
you
and
welcome
all
looking
forward
to
working
with
you
over
the
next
few
months,
a
quick
reminder
for
those
that
might
have
missed
it.
We
have
an
open
thread
in
k
community,
where
we're
asking
people
if
they're
interested
in
volunteering,
and
if
you
can
ex
please
like
call
out
the
roles
that
you
want
to
potentially
either
lead
or
shadow
for,
especially
as
we
start
ramping
up.
This
will
just
really
help
sort
of
separate
all
the
responsibilities
and
let
people
sort
of
execute
independently.
A
A
I
think
the
only
role
at
this
point
that
we
actually
don't
have
a
lead
for
paris
did
volunteer
to
run
awards.
A
Okay,
so
if
you
are
interested
in
potentially
shadowing
any
of
the
other
roles,
please
chime
in
explicitly
on
that
thread
right
now,
our
leads
are
nebrun
for
registration,
castling
for
coms,
jason
for
content
and
paris
for
awards.
A
H
F
A
Okay,
so
I
would
say
that
the
top
priorities
at
this
point
would
be
getting
the
site
live,
and
then
scaffolding
out
reg
as
the
next
two
major
deadlines.
F
I
would
the
only
other
thing
that
I
would
be
curious
about
is
around
when
we're
gonna
know
the
celebration
venue
and
like
what
choices
we're
gonna
have.
H
So
we're
starting
that
venue
searched
now.
We
should
have
some
information
beginning
of
august
and
the
motown
museum
is
on
the
list.
It
will
be
open
by
then
I
don't
know
what
pricing
looks
like.
I
don't
know
what
anything
looks
like,
but
it
has
made
the
we
need
to
look
into
it
options,
so
they
open
again
august
10th.
A
A
Yeah
I've.
I
honestly
I've
not
taken
any,
not
looked
at
any
pieces
of
what
it
looks
like
post
renovation.
A
Okay,
so
with
with
that
and
going
back
to
our
set
of
of
deadlines,
does
the
f
first
make
sense
august
1st
makes
sense
for
a
go,
live
for
the
website
and
potentially
registration.
H
Yeah,
if
we
can
get
some
we'll
share
the
reged
form
today,
like
the
doc
for
you
all
to
make
updates
in
and
then,
if
we
can
get
that
back
in
the
next
few
days
and
we'll
get
that
reg
form
started.
B
A
One
other
thing
related
to
the
site.
I
know
josh,
you
have
seen
this
issue
and
I
think
someone
else
in
this
call
is
also
chimed
in
on
it
on
reorganizing
the
contributor
site,
to
make
it
more
at
least
the
event
section,
the
contributor
site,
to
make
it.
D
A
D
As
well
as
exactly
who
was
that
atharvo
was
supposedly
going
to
take
that
on,
so
it
might
be
worth
pinging
him
to
find
out
whether
or
not
he
actually
started
doing
all
of
the
text.
On
that
you
know,
if
not
no
problem,
then
we
can
just
tackle
it.
You
can
see
the
there's
an
issue
there
and
yes,
absolutely.
We
should
clean
that
up
before,
starting
yet
another
contributor
or
something
because
it's
getting
a
little
silly.
D
Oh,
I
I
was
thinking
more
that
if
we
make
this
more
approachable
things,
people
with
things
like,
if
a
kcd
has
a
community
thing
at
it,
they
might
want
to
list
that
as
an
event
etc,
in
other
words,
sort
of
planning
for
the
future.
In
terms
of
of
that,
but
there's
no
reason
why
you
know
if
you're
more
comfortable,
that
way,
there's
no
reason
why
we
can't
have
everything
under
the
year
instead
of
having
summits
and
other
events
separate.
F
A
So
I
think
those
are
the
immediate
things
that
need
to
happen
as
far
as
content
and
themes
for
this
set
for
this
summit.
The
big
change
from
for
this
summer
that
we
haven't
done
in
summits
past
that
there'll
be
no
new
contributor
workshop.
A
Honestly,
it
we've
talked
about
in
past
meetings,
but
it
has
not
panned
out
for
us
in
general
as
well
as
like.
We
have
no
idea
what
actual
infrastructure
will
be
like
there,
because
even
when
we've
been
told
we
get
like
really
good,
wi-fi
or
really
good
internet.
It
hasn't
quite
ever
panned
out.
A
So
the
big
thing
is
we,
the
people
there
will
be
our
contributors
like
the
the
people
that
have
already
made
some
commitment
to
the
project
already,
and
there
definitely
is
a
large
desire,
for
you
know,
potential
structured
content
and
things
on
you
know
how,
to
you
know,
like
aldo,
was
proposing
their
day
to
do
a
deep
dive
into
how
finalizers
work
and
cover
some
of
them
the
larger
area,
the
things
in
the
project
that
haven't
been
necessarily
documented.
A
Well
to
help
you
know
people
become
better
contributors,
so
this
would
feed
into
like
the
general.
You
know
we
probably
want
to
do
a
general
cfp
and
potentially
reach
out
to
individuals
that
we
know
might
be
able
to
either
present
something
again
or
might
have
good
stuff
that
that
would
be
useful
to
propose
the
other
thing
that
I
don't
know
if
we
want
to
do.
This
is
any
sort
of
unconferency
type
things.
D
I
was
going
to
say
just
just:
feedback
from
eu
was
most
people
like
the
unconferency
things.
Even
the
people
who
wanted
more
pre-planned
content
still
wanted
unconference
sessions.
They
just
wanted.
They
just
wanted
a
slightly
different
balance.
F
So
the
one
thing
I
was
going
to
point
out
with
eu
this
year
was
the
unconference
sessions
were
popular,
but
they
were
also
incredibly
active
and
I
wasn't
sure
if
that
was
because
it
was
an
unconference
session
or
if
it
was
because
multiple
unconference
sessions
turned
into
more
of
a
moderated
group.
Discussion
and
yeah
see.
F
Let's
hear
him
josh
and
realistically
you
know
we
we
can
have
these
kinds
of
discussions
on
zoom,
but
one
thing
that
I
have
absolutely
found
is
the
bandwidth
for
communication
is
still
limited,
even
when
you
were
on
a
video
call
and
having
that
like
increased
bandwidth
in
person
is
certainly
helpful
for
collaboration
so
again
unconference
or
do
we
want
or
in
addition
to
unconference,
do
we
also
have
like
a
cfp
type
for
a
moderated
discussion
on
topic
x.
D
Okay,
the
I
would
say
there
were
two
reasons
why
the
unconference
sessions
were
relatively
active
for
this.
I
one
was
that
yeah
that
most
of
them
were
simply
pitched
as
discussion
sessions
that
was
kind
of
how
people
conceived
to
them.
We
encourage
that
in
in
when
we
wrote
up
how
to
submit
a
session,
etc,
I
you
know,
encourage
people
to
think
of
them
as
discussion
sessions
and
because
we
literally
decided
the
unconference
sessions
the
morning
of
the
contributor
summit.
D
It
meant
that
everything
was
extremely
topical
as
if
nobody
was
pitching
anything
that
had
already
been
resolved
before
the
contributor
summit
started,
and,
and
so
those
were
sort
of
the
advantages
there.
The
other
reason
why
I
think
they
were
very
active
compared
to
say
san
diego
was
because
we
only
effectively
had
two
concurrent
sessions
in
each
time.
Slot
people
had
an
incentive
to
find
something
to
be
in.
H
Yeah
so
we're
making
a
few
adjustments.
The
cncf
team
did
a
site
visit
last
week,
but
so
we've
got
the
general
session
room.
The
workshop
room,
two
meeting
rooms,
a
doc's
room
and
a
hangout
meals,
room.
B
A
A
H
Okay,
so
again
the
room
numbers
are
changing
at
the
moment,
but
we've
got
so
general
session.
A
workshop
room,
two
meeting
rooms
which
you
have
on
both
monday
and
tuesday,
a
doc's
room
and
a
hangout
room.
A
And
by
hangout,
how
big
is
that
then.
H
B
H
H
So
these
meeting
rooms,
depending
on
what
set
right
now,
you
have
u-shaped
so
to
be
around
the
17
mark.
B
B
H
So,
based
on
reg,
we
would
keep
that
combined
for
the
first
and
then
we
could
separate
it.
So
you
did
the
general
section
in
the
work
workshop
room
later,
because
if
you're
trying
to
do
like
a
keynotes
like
a
joint
session
and
then
break
it
up
depending
on
how
many
people
register,
obviously
or
you
could
do
theater
if
you
want
to
fit
more
people
in.
A
B
A
A
I
would
think
so,
especially
if
we
weren't
doing
unconference
stuff.
We
can
also
play
it
by
ear,
depending
on
how
much
content
is
submitted.
Who
is
the
person
room
docs
that
asked
for
50
round
tables.
H
A
A
H
H
Yeah,
it's
linked
on
the
it's
the
cncf
tracking
sheet
here
in
the
meeting
note
stock.
A
C
H
H
H
G
A
B
G
So
in
general,
or
the
cfp
will
probably
go
for
that
targeted
content,
the
deep
dive
type
technical
content,
the
workshops
we'll
have
the
unconfident
we
can
potentially
do
the
unconferency
stuff
day
of
in
the
past
we've
made
space
for
like
sig
meetings
is.
I
think
somebody
expressed
that
the
cluster
api
folks
were
interested
in
something
like
that
is.
Is
that
something
that
we're
interested
in
doing
again
or.
A
G
A
A
Those
largely
get
are
like
if
there's
a
over
overwhelming
amount
of
cfp
content,
all
the
six
specific
meetings
essentially
get
punted
to
tuesday,
and
if
not,
then
we
can
take
like
a
lot
of
the
like
the
larger
sick
ones
and
make
it.
You
know
the
day
of.
G
All
right
is
there
any
other
type
of
broad
classified
content.
We've
done
in
the
past,
for.
D
Workshops
sort
of
general
information
sessions,
because
I
expect
the,
for
example,
the
contextual
log
is
probably
there's
probably
still
going
to
want
a
general
information
session.
For
that.
The
and.
D
I
guess
that's
kind
of
it
because
it's
either
going
to
be
a
workshop.
It's
going
to
be
so.
The
information
session,
for
example,
is
from
the
log
folks.
Is
they
want
to
have
a
session
saying
hey?
This
is
something
that
everybody
who
programs
kubernetes
any
component
that
might
create
a
log
needs
to
know
about.
D
D
I
think
we
need
to
call
those
out
as
discussion
sessions.
You
know
and
those
are
going
to
generally,
but
a
lot
of
those
will
end
up
waiting
for
unconference
if
we're
going
to
have
an
unconference
component,
because
there's
no
point
in
booking
a
discussion
session,
you
know
two
months
ahead
of
time
and
then
having
the
discussion
be
resolved
on
github
before
the
contributor
summit
starts.
B
D
B
D
One
thing
I
was
gonna
say
about
the
sig
meeting
is
one
of
the
things
we
did
for
eu
was
basically
put
up
a
time
grid
and
let
the
sigs
pick
their
own
time
slots
because
often
they're
trying
to
get
a
group
of
specific
people
there
and
I'm
suggesting
that
you
at
least
consider
that
approach.
D
Even
if
you
decide
not
to
do
it
for
north
america,.
G
Yeah,
the
other
thing
is,
is,
I
know
in
the
past,
we've
done
like
the
lightning
talks
as
well.
A
I
personally
wouldn't
bother
with
lightning
talks.
D
I'd
say
that
lightning
talks
makes
sense
if
there's
a
plenary
session
for
them.
That
is,
if
you
have
a
time
slot,
because
we
actually
consider
them
for
europe
too.
Specifically
the
circumstances
where
we
have
a
time
slot,
where
we
don't
want
to
do
breakouts
for
whatever
reason,
but
we
have
an
hour
free
in
the
calendar,
and
that
would
be
the
main
reason
to
do
lightning
talks.
If,
if
there's,
if
lightning
talks
are
competing
with
breakouts,
I
don't
think
they'll
compete
successfully.
D
Okay,
I
could
be
wrong,
but
but
I
don't
quite
think
so.
The
other
question
is
whether
or
not
you
get
enough
lightning
talk
submissions
for
it
to
be
viable
and
obviously
there's
one
way
to
determine
that
yeah.
A
The
the
one
the
one
general
like
idea
like
we
can
also
go
fairly
late
and
see
submissions
with
just
like
session
submission,
or
you
know,
discussion
and
stuff
like
that,
and
then,
if
we
want
to
break
them
out
into
separate
themes
later
based
on
the
amount
of
content
we
get,
we
can
basically
create
a
track
around
like
architecture
or
you
know,
sustainability
and
some
of
those
things
just
based
on
the
types
of
submissions
we
get
yep.
I
think.
D
A
D
Based
on
experience,
one
person
needs
to
be
in
charge
of
the
social
okay.
I
I
had
a
lot
of
questions
from
deb
on
on
various
details
to
the
social,
including
last-minute
ones,
okay
and
and
dev
and
brienne
need
to
know
who
to
bring
that
to,
rather
than
it
being
a
committee
decision.
B
B
Yeah
I'd
definitely
be
interested
in
helping
out
there.
I
don't,
I
don't
think
I'd
feel
comfortable
leading
it,
but
I'm
happy
to
shadow
for
that
role
if,
if
there's
others
that
are
interested
in
in
working
on
that.
A
A
A
We
will
have
the
cfp
messaging
that
we
will
also
want
to
send
out
the
one
big
thing
we
do
want
to
try
and
do
for
this
summit
and
to
recycle
for
summits
in
future
is
actually
firm
up
our
like
templates,
because
we
have
a
bunch
of
like
toms
documents
that
outline
the
stuff
that
we've
done
in
the
past,
but
they're
all
kind
of
scattered
about
so
that'd,
be
like
a
great
thing
to
potentially,
you
know,
modify
them
to
be
a
bit
more
mad
libs
fill
in
the
blank
for
future
events.
D
I
actually
was
gonna,
say
one
thing
and
let
me
post
a
link
in
there
for
anybody
who
didn't
attend
the
retro
for
eu.
Please
do
read
the
retro
document.
D
Just
for
the
parts
of
hey
these
are
things
we
had
problems
with
that
we
weren't
expecting
to
have
problems
with
things
like
people,
thinking
that
registration
was
not
required
for
the
social.
So
please
do
read
that
whatever
your
role
is
read
that
over
for
things
to
look
out
for
for
this
contributor,
summon.
E
So
I
do
have
one
thing
but
related
to
content:
I'm
not
sure
how
to
approach
it.
E
A
Outside
of
people
just
resubmitting
it,
no,
we
we
do
not
have
like
well.
There
is
like
elf
event,
staff
on
here.
We,
we
technically
don't
have
like
any
formal
relationship
with
kubecon
proper.
In
terms
of
like
specific
content,
I
would.
D
A
Summit,
it's
it,
it
really
depends
on
the
audience
like.
If
it
is
kubernetes
focused,
then
it
makes
you
know
sense
to
be
more
contributory
summit,
most
of
the
main
trainer
maintainer
track
stuff
itself.
Like
you
know,
the
cigs
get
the
explicit
sorry
explicit,
explicit
sessions
can't
talk
and,
like
that
sort
of
you
know
their
stuff.
A
Yeah,
if
it
is
very
I'd,
say
kubernetes
focused,
then
that
it
would
make
more
sense
for
for
contributor
summit.
E
It's
not
necessarily
something
we
need
to
solve
today,
but
I
think
if
we
had
some
form
of
pipeline
to
say
these,
these
got
rejected
because
people
said
they
would
be
better
somewhere
else,
but
then
there's
no
actual
way
for
them
to
get
to
that
somewhere
else
right.
It
might
be
a
good
pipeline
to
have
in
place.
D
A
The
outside
of
like
emailing,
the
kubecon
chairs,
probably
the
follow-up
action
on
their
side,
be
to
actually
instead
of
telling
us
as
the
summit
who
they
are
in
their
session,
be
like
hey.
You
know
your
content
might
be
more
appropriate
here.
Here's
the
you
know
who
to
reach
out
to
if
you're
interested
in
presenting
here.
H
A
B
A
Well,
cool:
I
will
see
you
all
around
slack,
github,
zoom
and
looking
forward
to
you
know
working
with
you
over
the
next
few
months
later.