►
From YouTube: Kubernetes SIG Contributor Experience 20170503
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Thank
you
and
then,
if
we
want
to
I'll
quickly,
go
around
and
introduce
ourselves
since
there
are
so
few
of
us,
I,
don't
know
critic
a
ton
of
time.
My
name
is
Elsie
I'm.
The
other
contributor
experience
lead
I've
been
gone
for
the
last
two
weeks
because
of
crazy
travel,
but
you
should
be
seeing
me
of
this
more
this
month
because
I'll
be
leaving
the
meetings
this
month,
I
work
at
kourosh
and
I'm.
A
community
manager.
C
B
Jorge
Castro
I
started
to
have
to
you
a
few
weeks
ago,
so
I'm
pretty
new
here,
still
kind
of
learning
the
ropes
and
sitting
in
silly
ideas
and
things
like
that.
I'm,
a
community
manager
as
well
you'll.
A
A
D
E
E
E
E
A
All
right,
let's
get
going.
C
D
A
Received
an
email
from
Garrett
that
he
was
was
going
to
be
presenting,
but
we'll
we'll
figure
that.
A
Week
and
another
week,
ok,
so
then
the
next
thing
on
our
agenda
is
organizing
the
design
proposals.
Folder
did
we
finish
introductions
for
anybody
else.
F
I'm
a
ruler
for
Red
Hat,
an
engineer
I'm
involve
this
Federation
on
the
technical
side
and
also
helping
out
as
tests
the
last
cycle
and
lovely
this
cycle
and
also
interested
in
trying
to
make
interior
experience
bit
better
kind
of
limited
Oliver
perspective.
I'm,
definitely
interested
in
mentoring.
It's
a
great
idea.
G
I'm
late
I've
never
actually
managed
to
attend
one
of
these
but
I
met
I.
Think
LC
in
Austin
and
I've
always
been
interested
in
you
know:
hey
I
want
my
contributor
experience
to
be
better
and
D
I
want
to
help
everybody
else.
Experience
be
better
and
I.
Just
haven't
ever
been
able
to
make
this
meeting
for
I
guess
a
couple
of
months
he's
actually
been
having
it.
Oh
sorry
about
that
I
was
the
IBM
and
I
work
on
the
Service
Catalog
and
I.
D
A
B
E
Well
consonant
this
proposal:
I
also
posted
a
link
to
any
other
one,
because
I
was
discussing
some
plants
so
that
I
the
same
Pisco
a
in
row,
because
it's
currently
most
a
shell
base
and
wait.
B
E
What
sets
this
tool
aside,
that
it
can
easily
start
multi
node
clusters
that
pass
conformance
and
trend
tests,
and
it
does
it
very
quickly
it
can
build
a
Burnett
is
from
source
and
also
it
can
utilize
remote
doctrine
genes.
So,
if
you
look
at
this
proposal,
link
is
the
second
one
I
put
face
it
Mitch
at
it.
E
It
describes
some
use
cases
for
this
project.
Also,
unlike
say,
mini
cube.
It
can
be
used
in
CI
for
projects
that
depend
on
kubernetes,
say
some
people
notice
extensions,
be
it's
Tara,
implementations
and
so
on,
because
it
can
run
say
on
Travis
without
much
problems
and
it
does
not
require
method
visualization.
E
So
some
folks
on
the
cross,
the
lifecycle
agree
that
this
tool
can
be
of
great
utility
for
people,
Metis
developers
and
also
people
who
work
on
projects
that
extensive
good
Metis.
For
instance,
we
had
mere
aunties
use
it
for
epic
controller
project
and
got
a
project
that,
for
example,
is
a
Syrah
implementation
that
makes
it
possible
to
run
beams
on
kubernetes
and
we
can
run
it's
here,
it's
their
infrared
sense
to
this
kinda
project.
E
A
E
B
The
community
meeting
not
like
a
chime
in
here
is
a
advocate
of
this
thing.
So
I
tried
this
last
week
and
I'm
coming
over
from
a
different
tools
that
I
told
myself.
I
was
good,
you
know
not
used
to
specific
tools,
so
I
was
using
mini
cube
and
that
worked
and
fine
and
everything
but
like
the
vm
overhead
was
just
killing
me
as
opposed
to
just
having
containers
and
then
Joe
Beda
I
was
on
site.
B
B
So
I
tried
it
and
I
really
think
like,
like
I,
think
a
lot
of
people
are
going
to
kind
of
get
bent
around
the
axle
because
you're
doing
doctor
and
doctor
and
some
people
thinks
it's
like
way
too
many
turtles
and
all
my
work
or
doesn't
it
okay?
It
works.
It
works.
So
I
filed
a
bug
basically
saying
it
would
be
great
if
you
had
an
example,
and
you
told
people,
we
get
a
pull
request
using
VMs
and
it
took
ten
minutes
right
and
then
we
do
a
beat.
We
do
another
poll
record.
B
This
might
even
be
evil
demo
and
then
do
it.
Do
it
with
this
tool
and
just
for
my
playing
around
this
tool
is
at
least
twice
as
fast
as
doing
it
on
VMs,
so
I
was
kind
of
telling
people
who
are
so
get
around
the
axle
about
it.
I
was
like
look
man
if
it
works
and
it's
saving
you
10
minutes
or
whatever
every
pull
request.
Yeah.
G
I'm
I,
like
the
way
the
speed
sounds:
I'm
I'm
more
interested
in
having
being
able
to
do
dev
dev
stuff
because
he
doesn't
I,
don't
know
why
I
would
with
them
dad
and
fill
that
need.
So
that's
the
niche
I
want
local
up.
Cluster
works
most
of
the
time,
but
if,
if
this
works
better
than
I
want
to
see,
I
need
to
try.
I
haven't.
F
Run
I'm
not
sure
that
I
would
say
it
works
better,
it's
an
alternative
and
it
has
its
pros
and
it's
cons
like
I
doing
multi
no
development,
it's
a
really
good
option,
but
if
you're
doing
anything
single
node,
the
overhead,
a
cube,
a
DM
and
darker
and
darker
is
actually
considerable.
I'm
hoping
that
we're
going
to
pursue
at
some
point
something
like
I
work
on
open
shifts.
F
We
have
something
called
OC
cluster
up
which
basically
provides
you
a
single
node,
saying
kind
of
like
mini
cube,
except
that
it
can
run
directly
against
the
local
dock,
for
instance,
which
kind
of
saved
like
mini
cube,
is
I,
don't
know
why
they
made
that
decision,
but
I
think
we
need
kind
of
like
a
couple
options
and
the
idea
that
cube
ATM
needs
to
work
for
everybody.
I
think
is
kind
of
a
little
bit
ridiculous.
F
I
think
it's
great
for
deploying
multi
node,
but
it's
never
going
to
be
as
fast
as
just
bringing
up
like
Corral
he's
running
on
docker.
So
that's
just
the
caddy
like.
Do
me
wrong,
I
love,
it
I've
done
darker
and
darker
for
a
while.
It
serves
most
most
people
except
people
who
need
hardcore
like
like
reality
when
it
comes
to
things
like
C
groups,
if
you're
running
in
a
container
that
gets
a
bit
funky
but
but
yeah
don't
you're
on
great
tool.
Just
let's
not
make
that's
not
throw
everything
away.
Hopefully
other
tools,
I,
don't.
B
Want
to
imply
that
I
want
to
say
that,
for
like
you
know
it's
your
first
day
and
your
dev
team
has
a
bunch
of
max.
How
do
I
get
started
will
be
great,
but
then
like
people
who
need
to
do
hardcore,
networking
and
stuff
yeah
really
good
for
that.
Alright,
alright,
just
Signet
work,
you
know
Pascoe
or
anything,
but
I
found
that,
like
I,
think
even
if
it
ends
up,
if
people
find
bugs
in
it
or
whatever
and
don't
like
the
approach,
at
least
it
will
get.
People
started
with
the
conversation
as
far
as
yeah.
F
I
mean
hopefully,
this
would
encourage
people
to
actually
play
with
real
multi-node
I
mean
I,
have
kind
of
a
background
working
in
networking
and
we
needed
something
similar
on
open
shift,
because
you
can't
do
networking
with
one
coat
but
but
but
then
my
other
observation
is
that
we
were
the
only
team
that
actually
wanted
it
like.
It
was
available
to
everybody
else.
They
were
like
and
fun
with
a
single
node
I'm
just
doing
like
storage
or
something
and
having
multiple
nodes.
Just
overhead
I
don't
need,
even
if
it's
true.
E
Sorry
I
did
a
couple
of
points
see,
for
instance,
if
you
have
some
project
that
extends
Copernicus
is
practical
to
use
a
local
cluster
for
CI
too,
but
it
will
take
building
kubernetes
in
your
CI,
despite
your
not
really
needing
to
build
it.
But
with
this
one
you
can
pull
a
prebuilt
image
as
an
option.
You
can
look
around
people
native
binaries,
Oracle,
pretty
cool
other
prepared
image
and
this
way
just
much
faster
than
local
of
cluster.
E
Besides,
as
of
the
speed,
it
has
some
built-in
sensors
in
mechanism
sense
to
which
it
can
take
about
maybe
a
soldier
of
30
or
40
seconds
to
restart
the
cluster
plus
the
time
to
rebuild
binaries,
and
you
can
generate
quickly
when
you
need
to
make
a
quick
change
and
for
some
development
tasks.
For
instance,
if
you're
working
on
some
stuff,
like
both
affinity
or
another
things
that
were
entering
best,
require
multiple
modes.
So
you
are
out
of
luck
with
local
of
cluster.
F
A
C
The
short
answer,
news
answer
is,
you
can
say:
yeah
I
want
to
do
this
for
the
community
and
we'll
put
you
on
we'll
put
you
on
a
list
or
you
can
go
to
the
topics,
documents
and
add
yourself
to
the
demo
list
at
the
top
right
now
it
looks
like
June
to
do.
'none
is
going
to
be
the
next
open
space,
but
that
work
for
you,
oh
yeah,.
H
Hello,
dear
speaking,
hi
I
haven't
put
the
certain
to
the
agenda,
but
I
heard
several
discussions
that
it's
going
to
be
put
somewhere,
because
some
people
had
some
concerns.
The
design
proposal
should
be
relayed:
the
community,
the
community,
repo
okay.
So
probably
we
may
find
a
different
place
for
them.
This
discussion,
right
for
mine
from
my
memory
test,
has
been
initiated
when
we
have
discussed
in
new
teacher
template
at
the
6:00
p.m.
meeting
and
yeah.
H
So
the
question
was:
why
do
we
require
people
to
put
some
design
proposal
to
the
feature
that
art
read
under
the
features
ripple,
but
the
design
proposals
under
the
different
Draper?
So
some
some
person
I,
don't
remember
exactly
who
is
proposed
to
move
design
proposals
to
the
features
triple
or
to
move
them
somewhere.
So
that
is
at
the
same
time
like
personal
and
myself
is
absolutely
good
with
the
current
placement
or
presenting
the
community
folder,
but
probably
means
like
some.
What
someone
may
or
mind
us?
H
C
A
B
So
I
don't
know
if
we
should
table
this
or
not
until
next
week,
this
specific
part,
but
going
through
the
contribu,
so
we're
hiring
a
bunch
of
Engineers
at
FTO,
and
it's
like
hello,
welcome,
you're,
smart,
here's,
how
you
get
started
with
kubernetes
and
we
give
them
the
developer
guide
and
they're
like
oh,
it's
like
really
long
and
there's
like
all
these,
like
it's
really
thorough
right.
There's!
B
No,
like
you
know,
here's
the
TLDR
guide,
you
know
Pope,
so
we
were
thinking
of
things
like
you
know:
public
github
repository
shove,
this
in
your
batch
RC
and
then
you
know
we'll
walk
through
it.
We'll
show
you
what
you
kind
of
have
to
do
and
like
that,
but
the
idea
is
like.
Can
we
get?
Can
we
get
an
engineer
up
and
running
in
like
an
hour
to
instead
of
kind
of
like
here's
it?
B
Here's
an
encyclopedia
have
a
good
time
and
then
I
feel,
like
I've,
been
getting
some
feedback
from
other
new
developers
this
week,
which
I
need
to
add
to
the
agenda,
and
it
feels
like
a
lot
of
people
are
like
I
know
what
to
do.
I
pulled,
but
then,
like
I,
don't
know
the
list
of
labels
that
I
need
in
order
to
get
my
thing
in
the
right
workflow.
B
So
what
I
was
thinking
is
as
part
of
on
ramping.
Like
my
company
needs
to
have
this
like
we
don't
have,
we
don't
have
time
to
sit
down
everyone
with
Joe
and,
like
figure
out
how
to
do
kubernetes,
so
we
wanted
to
work
on
something
like
a
one
or
two
page
like
the
absolute
shortest
that
could
be.
Even
if
it's
like
all
this,
you
know,
here's
barely
what
you
need
to
understand
and
then
reference
this
bit
of
the
documentation
later
and
I
was
wondering
if
people
see
value
in
that.
E
B
C
Okay,
I
see
I,
see
two
things,
one
being
the
QuickStart
guide
that
you
and
I
talked
about
that
sort
of
synthesizes
and
is
still
just
getting
started
decreasing
time
to
dopamine
as
I've
talked
about
a
number
of
times
and
then
there's
the
larger.
The
larger
rationalization
of
the
contributor
Docs
that
we
have
just
slowly
check,
chunking
away
at
that,
as
the
QuickStart
guide
shows
that
it
wasn't
clear
or
we
to
referring
to
this.
But
there
isn't
is
this
etc.
F
So
separate
from
documentation
which
is
kind
of
like
necessary,
but
I,
don't
think
it's
sufficient
and
there's
a
mention
of
like
mentorship,
which
I
think
is
maybe
a
good
strategy
for
doing
some
of
the
other
stuff
because,
like
there's
technical
aspects
to
getting
up
and
running,
but
then
there's
like
how
do
I
get
tied
into
the
culture?
How
do
I
have
people
to
contact?
My
own
trouble
I
mean
things
like
labels.
F
I
mean
the
way
that
they've
been
evolving
the
membership
in
the
kubernetes,
where
it's
like
really
complicated
just
to
get
membership,
which
means
it
can't
be
assigned
to
issues
which
means
you
don't
get
notification
like
there's
all
kinds
of
crap
where
you
basically
need
someone
to
front
end.
I
like
to
be
here
point
of
contact
with
the
rest
of
the
community,
I'm,
not
sure
that
yeah
I
think
that's
a
problem
on
its
own.
C
So
knows:
there's
you
know,
nosed
escalation
path,
system,
much
like
our
shattered
and
champion
kind
of
models,
and
then
having
that
group
that
first
say
on-boarded
cohort,
then
be
potential
mentors
and
teachers
for
ongoing,
ongoing
and
next
classes
of
new
people.
But
it
gives
it
a
nice
anchor
point
through,
say:
mailing
lists,
slack
channels
that
are
about
being
new,
as
well
as
these
collected
groups
that
might
meet
regularly
and
have
their
own
mini
community
inside
our
community.
I.
Think
that
that
this
bootstraps
the
mentoring
process,
mentoring,
is
very
intensive.
C
A
I
B
Sorry
I
just
realized
if
I
propose
things
I,
probably
shouldn't
volunteer
to
take
notes.
At
the
same
time,
the
next
one
I
thought.
So
this
was
like
an
example,
and
then
we
have
this
like
brains
out
like
on
the
mailing
list.
You
know
with
someone
ask
questions
and
I
always
like
I
mentioned
this
last
month,
and
it's
like
the
same
or
something
I
find
incredibly
difficult,
something
about
what
each
label
does
and
it's
hard
for
me
to
search,
because
label
is
everywhere
in
github.
So
like
is
there
like
a
magic
page?
B
A
Don't
even
have
standard
labels
across
all
Mario's,
so
another
ID
is.
A
A
B
Okay,
awesome
next
yeah
I
like
losing
my
breath,
so
we're
talking
so
fast,
yeah,
I,
know
and
I'm
a
mechanical
keyboard.
So
it's
like
really
in
my
face
and
loud
I
know
it's
in
December
I
wanted
to
start
thinking
about
a
proposal
for
a
cube.
Con
talk
and
I
was
thinking.
B
Something
like
sort
of
a
I
didn't
want
to
submit
it
without
the
backing
of
this
group,
because
kind
of
like
I
feel
like
this
is
a
team
effort
and
we
should
like
have
common
beliefs,
I
guess
that
we're
kind
of
trying
to
impart
on
other
people,
so
I
have
a
talk
proposal
that
I
don't
want
to
talk
about
too
much
here,
because
this
is
recorded
right
like
and
I.
Don't
wanna
give
away
the
surprise
yeah.
B
So
the
idea
is
basically
like
kind
of
like
a
motivational
talk
on
how
working
on
the
little
things
in
the
project,
whether
they're,
important
or
not,
and
doing
things
as
a
team
and
I
have
some
ideas
like
it's
sort
of
like
the
Avengers
or
like
a
small
team.
Look
like
anyway.
I
have
a
whole
bunch
of
ideas
in
there
it's
kind
of
really
open-ended.
B
It's
basically
like
just
a
snapshot
of
my
brain
and
I
was
wondering
if,
if
you
guys
would
be
happy
like
giving
me
comments
on
it,
is
it
a
good
idea
that
sort
of
thing
see
if
it's
appropriate
if
you're
like?
As
long
as
you
don't
mention
my
name,
you
can
do
it
that
sort
of
thing
so
I'm
working
on
that
and
I'd
be
happy
to
share
that
document
with
anybody.
B
You
got
lucky
so
we
you
know
something
I
was
thinking
was
wouldn't
be
cool
if
that
session
was
so
big
full
length
of
cube
con
a
little
bit
more
structured,
so
Sarah
and
I
were
thinking
something
like
a
community
lounge
where
it's
like.
If
you're
new
here
and
you
get
locked,
go
there
and
then
we
could
get
people
to
chip
in
and
be
like
hey
if
you're,
if
you're
a
committed
contributor
want
to
help
new
people,
you
would
like
hang
out
there
and
you
know
like
help
new
people.
B
We
could
help
organize
people
into
kind
of
like
all
right.
You,
five
people
just
started
and
like
who
you
know
and
have
Kelsey
sit
down
with
them.
Do
that
one
too
many
kind
of
thing
basically,
and
in
pepper,
voles
I'll,
put
like
a
little
structure.
What
a
schedule
looks
like.
So
it's
not
all
you
know.
Just
you
know
a
little
drinking
party
or
something,
but
I
was
thinking
what
you,
what
you
guys
thought
about
something
like
that.
We
could
break
it
up
with
like
talks.
B
You
know
what
your
first
pull
request
looks
like
and
a
little
canoe
contributor
kind
of
things
and
then
like
each
like,
you
know
just
get
like
each
company
or
whatever
to
be
like
hey.
You
know
we
can
dedicate
two
engineers
and
said
three
hours
there
to
help
me
do
contributors.
You
know
that
sort
of
thing
so
I
was
so
I
want
to
write
that
up
and
propose
it.
I
wanted
to
kind
of
pitch
it.
First
I
guess.
H
Rlz
just
learned
knowledge
about
the
top
proposal.
I
would
suggest
not
having
the
like.
The
correct
presentation
would
have
something
like
a
panel
where's,
multiple
people
who
appear
on
the
stage
and
well
will
speak
to
the
moderator.
Answering
these
prepared
questions
and
also
discuss
with
the
audience.
I
can
surround
the
audience
questions
for
the
better.
H
It
will
have
like
three
or
four
people
with
some
notable
experience
in
this
area
or
make
sure
like
their
their
suits
like
from
the
multiple
angles
on
this
question,
and
it
wouldn't
be
better
than
simply
like
I
go
to
the
street.
Share
some
presentation
go
away,
so
your
presentation
would
be
like
and
a
kind
of
move
warrant
for
this
community
stuff,
because
we're
speaking
about
community,
it's
more
people,
interaction
and
panel
isn't
made
in
sample
of
ethical
interaction
and
speaking
about
the
chat
proposal,
and
that
sounds
great.
C
B
C
B
C
B
And
then
the
last
one
I
thought
this
one
might
be
a
no-brainer
I
was
hoping
it'd
be
quick,
I
was
thinking
of.
Do
we
have
any
plan,
I,
don't
know
if
this
exists.
We
have
a
place
where
community
community
people
put
like
their
presentations
like
okay,
I
got
pulled
in
to
do
a
talk
at
a
meetup
group
tomorrow,
Oh
like
does
anyone
have
any
slides,
I
can
steal
and
stuff
and
I
feel
like
people
are
doing.
B
H
Some
some
Alexia,
so
I
would
I
would
extend
this
proposal
not
only
to
presentations
but
also
some
people
may
submit
some
demos,
some
codes,
some
code
cook
stop
for
dinner
and
so
on.
So
when
I
was
thinking
about
the
presentations
of
the
slides,
but
about
the
complex
solutions
for
people
at
the
different
little
groups
around
the
world
can
can
Knox
tu
but
can
use
this
content
for
the
presentation
and
countenance
modify
head
and
contribute
that
triple.
J
C
J
J
B
C
D
B
That
a
panel
is
a
great
idea
and
then
that
kicks
off
into
a
maybe
you
know
in
the
mornings,
there'll
be
a
dedicated
room
and
it
was
like
hey
if
you
get
lost
at
any
time
or
if
your
company
can
only
afford
to
send
one
person,
send
that
one
person
here
and
then
we'll
arm
them
with
everything
they
need
to
like
learn
how
to
contribute
to
kubernetes
and
we
can
do
mentorship
and
all
that
stuff.
It's
just
it's
December,
but
I
figured.