►
From YouTube: [SIG ContribEx] Contributor Comms Meeting for 20230623
Description
[SIG ContribEx] Contributor Comms Meeting for 20230623
A
Hello
all
and
welcome
to
the
June
23rd
contributor
comms
team
meeting
I
am
Chris
short
co-lead
of
these
sub
projects.
We
have
a
lot
of
people
out
today,
but
Frederico
and
I
are
here
to
discuss
all
the
things.
Federico
I'll
remind
you
that
we
follow
the
cncf
code
of
conduct
here.
B
A
If
you're,
if
you're
in
the
dock,
like
me,
you
want
to
add
anything,
go
ahead
but
yeah
the
Castle
is
out
today
she's
on
a
plane
at
the
moment,
so
I'm
running
the
show
at
the
moment.
So
yes,
my
updates
at
least,
are
well
I'll
wait
for
art,
but
since
he's
joining
and
there's
only
two
of
us
AR,
but
so
my
big
updates
are
zapier.
A
Things
are
moving
Nigel's,
taking
a
look
at
things
and
trying
to
get
the
right
access,
so
he
can
verify
everything's
working
right
and
we
think
there's
a
G
Drive
component,
that's
broken
and
then
it'll
be
working,
hopefully
also
the.
If
you
were
in
the
contribex
meeting
this
week,
you
heard
from
Peter
yes
that
the
code
spaces
contributor,
Workshop
stuff
is
almost
done.
It's
literally
a
PR
away.
A
Sure
Jay
is
working
on
the
slackbot.
He
dropped
that
in
chat
and
Avinash
said
he
would
report
and
chat
later
anything
he
needed.
So
this
is
it
for
this
meeting
folks
feel
free
to
include
things
and
unmute
and
discuss.
B
Yeah
I've
added
a
couple
of
them
I've
actually
also
made
this
change
in
the
board,
but
I
think
this
is
useful.
The
updates
big
win
one
is
actually
useful
for
us
to
to
make
any
change
in
states
of
things
more
visible
right.
So.
A
B
Yeah,
so
you
you
will
see
that
in
the
it's.
A
Like
we,
we
have
to
be
like
everyone
in
the
world
has
to
be
better
about
cleaning
up
after
software
right
like
it's
just
a
thing
all
right.
So
this
is
the
right
one.
Yeah.
B
Yeah
awesome:
you
will
see
that
there's.
B
Entry
in
in
one
in
one
fix
is
the
spotlight
on
the
book.
Reading
club.
A
B
I've
I've
talked
with
with
girls
on
this,
and
it
told
me
that
the
activity
itself
is
building
down
so,
okay,
it
doesn't
really
make
sense
to
to
go
to
spotlights
about
that.
So.
B
Other
one
it's
in
the
ready
for
review.
Actually
the
belts
are
the
same
thing.
I
just
left
the
draft
in
in
there,
but
I've
since
I've
also
opened
the
pr
that's
the
initial,
very
simple
readme
just
linking
to
the
existing
files.
B
There
I
actually
didn't
delete
the
draft
because
there
was
a
comment
there
around
images
which
I'm
not
sure
if
I've
completely
addressed
it,
because
there's
not
one
image
related
document,
but
but
that's
the
the
information
about
images
is
included
in
one
of
the
documents
there,
but
so
I
think
it's
it's
it's
that
so
that's
open
for
review.
So
we
can
obviously
now
do
any
suggestions
and
editing
there.
I
I
just
did
some
mild
spell
tracking
Etc.
B
So
even
on
that
front,
I
I'm
I'm
sure
that
there
are
suggestions
but
I've
kept
it
as
simple
as
possible.
Just
to
be
sure
that
people
that
land.
A
B
This
also
was
a
new
useful
exercise,
because
I
think
the
different
documents
there
have
different
were
done
at
different
points
in
time
suddenly
and
maybe
having
this
will
help
us
in
in
in
knowing
that
we
perhaps
we
need
to
update
some
of
them,
for
example,
the
multi-channel
communications,
with
the
recent
advances
in
terms
of
Mastodon
and
stuff,
like
that,
maybe
that's
a
good
place
to
to
reflect
that
so
I
guess.
This
also
helps
in
in
providing
us
with
more
visibility,
because
one
thing
is
to
have
a
folder
full
of
Markland
files.
B
B
Sorry,
let
me
let
me
think
well,
not
in
terms
of
updates.
I
do
have
some
couple
of
status
updates
on
other
board
stuff,
like
this
Sig
architecture,
Spotlight
article
I've,
updated
the
actual
issue
with
with
the
lists
of
projects
that
have
replied.
I
have
two
full
replies
right
now:
I
have
one
partial
one
which
I
didn't
indicate
because
it
wasn't
ready,
but
it's
still
the
best
content
and
I
have
two
to
go.
So
that's
this.
B
The
status
of
it
I
think
to
everyone
this
week
got
some
in
general
I'm
getting
feedback.
If,
while
that
doesn't
necessarily
translate
to
having
answers
there
at
least
having
feedback
saying,
I
need
a
couple
a
week,
more
Etc
I
think
that
that's
that's
still
useful
and
well,
and
that's
that's
it
for,
for
that,
not
not
another
one
I've
we
have
the
Spotlight
on
the
contributor.
B
Maybe
this
is
a
good
time
and
maybe
or
maybe
it
isn't
so
yeah-
that's
it
I'm
working
on
feedback
on
that
one,
but
I
might
have
got
feedback
that
I've
asked
in
this
morning.
So
it's
it's
still
up
to
us
cool
and
then
then,
for
me,
that's
I
think
everything.
C
Yeah,
so
I
have
actually
drafted
the
first
draft
of
the
six
Eli
blog.
It
is
not
updated
with
the
links
or
something
but
like
it's
a
very
very
initial
version
of
the
blog,
so
I
have
done
it
on
hey.
C
B
Exactly
that's
what
I
was
going
to
say.
Please
remind
me,
remember
me
remind
me:
we
already
did
you
already
share
this
and
or
because
I
sometimes
I
forget
things
right.
Apologies
for
that!
So
I
I
think
I,
remember
discussing
this
and
having
an
initial
conversation
right,
but
now
it's
on
yeah.
C
I
am
also
late
in
drafting
this
due
to
I
am
traveling
Mumbai
and
all
so
yeah
from
my
side
for
the
delay,
but
like
I
have
drafted
this
yesterday
and
like
it
is
a
very
initial
version.
I
have
not
updated
the
links
yet
like,
like
the
speakers,
link
their
profiles.
B
C
Can
add
something
on
the
feedback
so
like
I
thought
to
share
it
with
you
and
actually
I
cannot
find
I
want
to
DM
you
regarding
this,
but
I
cannot.
B
C
You
on
Flex,
like
there
are
two
or
three
or
folks
of
the
same
name,
so
I
am
like
confused
of
so
okay.
B
Foreign
yeah,
but
anyway,
let's
focus
on
things.
I
think
this
looks
structure-wise
fine
I
will
take
an
additional
look.
If
you
agree
what
I
will
do
is
I'll.
Add
a
link
to
this
in
the
sequence
of
X
comms
Channel
as
well,
so
that
people
can
join
in
and
and
and
do
it
share
some
thoughts.
You
can
reflect
them
there
and
then
we
can
well.
We
give
it
a
couple
of
days,
a
weak
tops
and
then
we'll
open.
B
The
pr
and
that's
it
I
mean
the
the
most
difficult
part
of
this
is
to
getting
the
the
answers
you
you
have
that
so
and
actually
you,
you
are
interviewing
two
different
persons
right.
C
Yeah,
actually
one
is
Katrina
and
the
other
one
is
so
yeah.
So
actually
there
I
did
an
asynchronous
interview
and
I
give
them
the
Google
docs
to
write
down
seven.
C
Written
that
so
I
have
converted
them
into
the
blog,
so
I
think
these
answers
need
some
grammatical
refinement.
So
I
am
going
to
do
that,
as
do
that
too,
as
well
in
this,
but
like
do
I
need
to
change
the
structure
or
something
like
what
I
did
is
here:
I
divide
the
blogs
or
the
interview
sections
into
the
parts
like
originally.
What
I
did
with
the
questions
like
these
questions
are
about
the
six
CLI.
C
These
questions
are
about
the
challenges
and
the
other,
and
the
last
part
is
of
the
contribution.
So
do
I
need
to
divide
these
or
should
I
remove
the
sections
or
anything
else.
Okay,.
B
Okay,
I
mean
looks
great,
let's
I'll
take
a
look
as
well.
You
also
add
your
the
refinements
that
you
have
already
identified
I'll.
Add
the
first
step
link
to
the
contrabx.com
so
that
anyone
can
take
a
look
and
then
we
will
just
take
it
from
there
and
and
proceed
naturally.
I
would
I
would
move
this
into
ready
for
reviewing
the
board
if
it
isn't
there
already
I.
C
A
A
Here
we
go
all
right,
cool
put
that
in
the
notes.
A
Okay,
cool
I
already
did
anything
else
today.
Folks.
A
A
I
know
I.
What
did
I
do
last
time?
I
did
comms
last
time.
I
did
not
actually
go
to
the
event
right,
so
it's
possible
for
you
to
be
like
a
shadow
for
comms,
but
that
also
means
you
want
to
take
over
as
a
lead
for
comms
too.
So
just
keep
that
in
mind
right
like
if
you
volunteer
for
a
shadow
this
this
go
out
the
next
time
you
might
be
asked
to
leave.
So
just
keep
that
in
mind.
A
I
led
comms
last
time
and
went
great
all
Shadow
this
time.
Just
to
make
sure
you
know,
people
have
help.
That's
the
one
thing.
I
couldn't
necessarily
lie
on
everybody
that
volunteered
to
help
me
wasn't.
C
B
A
Think
it's
very
useful
because,
because
like
being
a
single
person
like
this
is
just
me
right,
like
I,
think
like
Chris,
is
highly
confident
right.
Even
I
hesitate
before
I
hit,
send
to
the
entire
Community
right.
B
B
So
I'll
I'll
go
there
to
the
to
your
question.
Last
time.
I
only
participated
last
time
and
I
was
I.
I
was
reading
the
the
events
theme
and
that
was
marked
as
strictly
on
location,
right,
yeah.
A
B
Site
yeah,
so
there
were
at
the
at
the
Europe
kubecon
different
teams
had
different
requirements,
which
means
that
some
of
them
actually
welcome
welcomed
virtual
participants
I'm,
but
but
this
was
then
I
haven't
since
I'm,
not
going
to
the
North
America
kubecon
I
haven't
taken
taken
a
deep
Loop
there.
B
I
might
do
so
now,
because
what
Chris
mentioned,
maybe
that's
something
I
can
help
with,
but
I
would
take,
and
maybe
you
already
did
this
sandipan
take
a
look
into
the
issue
that
was
open
for
this
and
check
if
they
have
updated
information
on
the
teams
that
are
looking
for
Shadows.
If
there's
any
documented
on-site
virtual
requirements
there,
if
there
isn't,
then
maybe
they've
moved
to
an
on-site
only
thing
I
I,
but
I'm
not
aware
of
that.
A
Yeah,
there's
a
if
you
mention
in
Sig
control.
X
I
should
like
to
be
a
part
of
the
next
contributor
Summit
planning
they'll
pull
like
there's
going
to
be
a
PR
or
an
issue
where
you
volunteer
for
Stuff,
and
you
know
you
can
kind
of
go
from
there
once
it
starts.
A
B
Right
now,
let
me
see
if
I
can
actually,
yes
and
Sandy
pan
already
he's
already
there
so
yeah
I'm.
Seeing
on
my
email,
notifications,
okay,
let
me
so
let
me
I'll
add
the
the
link
here.
Thank.
A
B
What
is
it's
in
here,
but
it's
shot.
B
Right
this
is
it
okay
and
actually.
B
B
We
have
a
strong
preference
that
participants
as
lead
Shadows
volunteers,
be
present
at
a
contributed
Summit
to
help
on
site.
This
does
not
mean
that
you
cannot
help
virtually.
There
will
be
opportunities
and
we
encourage
you
to
come
to
planning
meetings
in
order
to
find
virtual
opportunities
when
I
pass.
This
is
that
I
mean
they
are
not
saying
no,
but
they
are
not
saying
yes,
either
I
I.
A
B
That's
a
strong
preference
and
you
can
still
help
for
me
means
if
you
want
to
be
a
shadow
you
should
be
on
site.
If
not,
you
will
not
be
a
shadow,
but
you
can.
You
can
assist
in
other,
in
other
words,
exactly
yeah.
A
So
I
intend
to
be
on
site
this
time,
so
yeah,
that's
gonna
work
for
me
very
well,
I.
B
A
That's
what
happens
when
you're
running
your
company's
Day,
Zero
virtual,
hybrid
event,
thingy
so
yeah?
No!
This
is
awesome.
Yeah
I
think
I
mean
having
been
in
the
meeting
this
this
week,
so
like
shadow
in
general
and
we've
had
this
discussion
in
this
meeting.
I.
Think
shadow
in
general
is
a
bladder
system
right
like
that's
how
it's
originally
intended.
A
So
if
you
volunteer
to
Shadow
something
eventually,
the
expectation
will
be
you'll
lead
that
something
or
co-lead
that
something
right
so
I
think
that's
how
I
got
involved
in
leadership
here,
because
you
know
I
just
started
showing
up
at
the
meetings
and
doing
things
and
then
eventually
it
was
like
Shadow
this
and
then
now
you're
a
co-lead,
so
yeah
there
needs
to
be
just
the
same
kind
of
ladder
system
that
we
have
here
right
across
the
project
we
have
to.
A
We
have
to
remind
folks
of
that
I
think
was
the
big
takeaway
from
the
meeting,
because
volunteering
for
shadow
and
not
showing
up
to
help
ever
is
a
very
routine
thing
for
this
stuff.
So,
like
I
get
it
there's
time
offsets,
but
I
totally
had
it
set
up
to
where
I
could
work.
Asynchronously
with
my
team
and
I
just
didn't
get
much
feedback
or
help
so
towards
the.
C
B
Because
it,
if
you
know
that
you
will
do
it,
then
you
prepare
for
it,
but
otherwise
yeah
absolutely
I
had
most
of
the
people
that
ended
up
helping,
but
I
also
had
some
that,
for
completely
understandable
reasons,.
B
But
after
yeah,
but
you
have
everything
plans
like
slots
and
stuff
and
suddenly
you
have
to
do
the
corporate,
so
yeah
I
I,
understand
why
the
on-site
thing
is
also
there
and
I
actually
add
this
at
on
on-site
with
people
on
site.
So
I
can
imagine
that
for
virtual
it
will
be
even
worse
because
there's
less
engagement,
let's
be
honest
right.
One
thing
is
to
be
there
with
people.
The
other
is
to
be
remote,
yeah,
so
Sandy
pan
to
make
a
long
story
short
I.
B
Think
that's
strictly
speaking,
foreshadowing
the
North
America
contributor
Summit
the
way
that
I'm
reading
this
is
that.
Well,
you
can
help,
but
not
necessarily
in
the
same
way
that
Shadows
were
on
onboarded.
Previously
that's
my
reading
on
this
yeah,
but
I
mean
you
can
I
think
that
the
meeting
itself
is
open.
So
maybe
you
can
ask.
A
B
Application
together
nicely
I
spoke
with
Natalie
and
she
took
over
actually
a
good
one,
because
Natalie,
for
example,
was
a
shadow
that
goes
into
your
leather
or
leather
comment.
Right.
A
A
I
guess
I
should
Google
it
before
I.
Ask
you
all,
but.
A
But
yeah
anything
else
for
this
particular
meeting
nope.
Oh
all
right!
Well,
let's
wrap
it
up
by
whopping
30
three
minute.