►
From YouTube: ContribEx: Bi-Weekly Update 20200212
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
A
A
D
We're
all
set
for
four
going
next
week,
I'll
be
sending
a
reminder,
the
biggest
change
that
I
want
to.
Let
the
group
know
is:
we
are
trying
the
West
Coast
Edition
as
well.
We've
got
all
new
panelists
and
all
that
good
stuff,
so
hoping
to
kind
of
energize
the
program
there
a
little
bit
so
I'll
report
back
how
that
goes.
D
D
E
And
to
that,
yes,
everybody
confirmed
and
everybody
come
from
that
they'll
be
there
with
the
multi
cluster,
art
and
windows,
except
the
one
sake
that
we
are
trying
to
replace
from
code
of
conduct
to
the
steering.
We
are
just
waiting
on
that
response
and
other
than
that
I've
been
following
up
on
the
slides
and
everything.
So
we
are
all
right.
F
B
C
B
A
Says
going
for
another
semester
for
the
contributor
site
and
she's
looking
for
ideas
for
projects,
so
that's
coming
up.
Let
her
know
if
you
have
any
ideas
on
that
front:
dropping
into
community
management
the
need
to
know
email
for
technical,
leads
and
chairs.
There's
no
chair
email
this
week
as
their
meetings
and.
A
A
F
F
Some
of
the
tasks
in
there
probably
aren't
elephant
anymore,
like
burning
old
users
and
were
like
I,
think
90,000.
Some
odd
users
there's
no
way
we
can
like
go
back
and
do
an
audit
on
those
reasonably
same
thing
as
sort
of
the
unused
channels.
We
don't
have
a
good
way
of
getting
like,
but
information
on
that,
like
most
of
the
archives
that
have
been
coming
up,
I've
been
like
people
that
start
the
channel
have
like
hey.
This
project
has
closed,
but
we're
just
gonna
go
ahead
and
close
the
slack
channel.
G
We
have
like
a
few
ongoing
things
like
the
move,
from
incubator
to
cigs,
that's
kind
of
an
ass
last
leg
and
some
audit
tasks,
but
we
we
kind
of
ended
up
losing
traction
and
that's
my
fault,
because
we
didn't
set
up
a
recurring
meeting
so
I
fixed
that
we
have
a
meeting.
That's
going
out
an
invite!
That's
already
gone
out.
Sorry
for
the
last
Thursday
of
the
month
is
going
to
be
our
our
kind
of
regular
attendance.
F
Sure
so
we're
still
working
on
revising
the
contributor
guide.
If
people
want
to
go
through
that
and
just
start
sprucing
it
up
I'd
be
super
awesome.
That's
the
one
of
the
big
things
we
want
to
surface
on
the
contributors
site,
so
this
is
like
going
through
and
just
pretend
you're
your
new
contributor
going
through
it
for
the
first
time.
Does
this
make
sense?
Do
the
links
still
work
things
like
that
then
going
down
to
like
the
developer
guide?
F
That
is
that's
a
the
next
like
big
thing
and
just
going
through
all
that,
there's
a
lot
of
stuff.
That's
very
much
out
of
date.
One
thing
I
stumbled
across
over
the
weekend.
I
would
just
wouldn't
like
a
knack
on
this
is
like
we
have
the
vagrant
instructions
in
there
that
haven't
worked
supposedly
since,
like
1.10
I,
don't
has
like
or
history
or
background
info
on
that
I
think
it's
be
safe
to
remove
it.
Just
that,
like
people,
don't
try
use
it
again.
G
F
Other
than
that
like,
if
like
the
developer
guide,
is
probably
the
next
big
thing
is
it's
a
development
D
that
goes
over
the
install
instructions,
there's
a
few
things
in
there
that
might
be
out
of
date
and
there's
a
couple
issues
about
updating
some
of
the
some
stuff
like
sort
of
all
over
the
place.
No
recent
one
was
like
changing
I
think
it
was
like
hack,
slash
II.
Do
we
not
go
to
cube
test?
B
C
B
F
F
Blink
in
chat
and
there's
a
link
in
the
agenda
no
surprise
were
Perish
a
patchy
across
the
board,
except
for
some
Creative
Commons
I'm,
not
so
sure
about
the
other
ones.
Those
might
be
worth
looking
at
and
then
the
next
thing
is:
we've
had
a
long
sort
of
outstanding
task
of
sort
of
mapping
repos
to
repo
groups.
F
H
Would
think
so
Bob,
you
know
I
I
participate
in
the
club
for
their
meetings.
So
if
there
are
specific
repos
I
can
bring
it
to
the
meeting
which
we
have
littered
today
at
I
think
4:00
p.m.
est
but
yeah.
That's
the
effort
going
on
to
remove
all
individual
cloud
for
their
seek
references
and
whatnot
right.
Just
keep
it
everything
under
cloud
provider.
F
Really
an
open
issue
about
is
just
something
I
noticed
when
going
through.
The
list
is
that
there
are
still
a
bunch
of
repo
groups
for
likes
again
either
us
sig
GCP
and
the
only
real
reason
I
could
think
of
to
keep
those
around
be
for
historical
reasons.
But
at
this
point
you
know
that
does
make
these
stats
for
cloud
providers
seen
funky
as
well,
so
I
kind
of
lean
towards
just
dumping.
Everything
in
the
cloud
Rider
gosh.
H
I
mean
there's
after
going
up
for
this
thing,
called
entry
and
out
of
tree
kind
of
things.
So
in
a
moving
all
this
you
know,
sort
of
old
repose
to
out
of
key
word
is
repose,
so
it
might
be
sort
of
you
know,
removed
as
part
of
that
move,
but
if
not
I
think
that
that
changing
them
makes
sense
is
that
in
the
the
dashboard
link
you
sent
that's
what
did
you
find
it?
F
G
D
H
G
G
Might
work
at
square
but
that
place
is
not
square
but
okay,
I'll
see
myself
out.