►
Description
[SIG ContribEx] KCSEU 2022 Bi-WeeklyPlanning for 20220425
A
A
D
C
E
C
C
G
A
D
Yeah
sort
of
a
follow-up
thing
where
you
know
we'd
also
ask
them
for
ideas
around
on
conference
sessions
and
and
other
stuff,
and
that
would
give
us
a
better
signal,
the
at
least
among
the
people
who
answered
it.
I
also
want
to
follow
up
on
the
social
thing
to
make
sure
that
people
know
well
ahead
of
time
that
the
social
is
some
distance
and
will
require
transportation.
E
G
H
A
B
D
G
E
G
G
D
Well,
one
of
things
is,
you
know,
I
think,
as
I
said
this,
I
think
we
should
do
some
kind
of
a
final
attendee
survey
asking
for
additional
information.
It's
not
a
gating
factor
right
if
people
show
up
without
having
filled
it
in
we're
not
going
to
stop
them,
but
it
will
give
us
extra
signal.
My
question
is:
should
we
do
a
couple
of
different
ones
that
should
I
send
one
out
about
the
party
and
nigel
sends
a
separate
one
out
about
the
day
in
the
unconference,
or
should
we
do
one
big
one.
G
F
A
D
F
E
A
E
A
F
I
G
D
B
B
G
A
B
Move
on
to
giveaways,
I'm
waiting
to
hear
back
from
pinnacle
if
there's
still
time
to
ship
the
shirts
that
are
made
and
just
sitting
in
their
warehouse.
So
I
will
let
you
all
know
once
that
con,
that's
confirmed
with
shipping
delays
and
things
like
that,
though
I
don't
have
a
ton
of
confidence
in
it.
B
Bingo
card
I
saw
roger
if
he
said,
he'd
have
it
by
wednesday.
We
have
to
have
it
by
wednesday,
otherwise
we're
not
gonna
be
able
to
have
the
design
team
turn
it
around
in
time.
So
we'll
wait
for
that
plan
is
to
have
three
winners:
a
first
horizontal
row,
the
first
vertical
row
in
the
first
blackout
row,
we've
got
a
mug
from
josh
and
then
two
cncf
gift
cards
as
the
prizes.
D
C
A
D
Good,
okay,
that
is
awesome.
That
was
what
we
wanted
to
know.
We
may
need
a
printout
for
that,
but
it's
not
going
to
be
complicated.
Like
the
bingo
cards,
it
will
be
a
sheet
of
paper,
so
we
should
be
able
to
produce
it
at
any
copy
shop,
including
here,
possibly
I'll,
just
print
out
25
of
them
and
bring
them
with
me.
The.
B
B
B
G
H
B
I
B
D
B
C
D
A
G
D
G
E
D
I
D
G
D
G
G
B
D
D
E
E
Staff
channel
and
paris
pointed
out
a
different
model
that
might
be
better
at
engaging
folks
that
aren't
in
attendance,
which
is
posting
a
github
issue,
essentially,
and
then
folks,
commenting
and
reacting
that
way,
so
that
for
folks
that
weren't
there
you
know
we
would
be
able
to
figure
out.
You
know
what
topics
are
of
general
importance
to
the
community.
The
downside
is
that,
like
you
know,
if
they're
not
there,
then
they
won't
be
participating
to
this
discussion.
E
So
let's
say
a
couple:
dozen
people
are
super
interested
in
a
topic
and
upvote
it,
and
then
nobody
there
is
prepared
to
have
that
conversation.
So
that's
one
thing
to
be
aware
of
with
that
method,
but
yeah,
I
am
basically,
I
don't
know,
add
a
bit
of
a
fork
on
the
road
with
figuring
out.
How
do
we
solicit
ideas.
E
Right
so
the
hope
was
that,
with
the
form,
at
least,
we
would
have
an
idea
of
what
sorts
of
things
were
interested
in,
and
at
least
start
like
chunking
or
grouping
topics,
and
like
have
some
sort
of
like
preparation
ahead
of
time
and
then
even
be
able
to.
You
know,
seed
some
ideas
and
not
like
totally
astral
turf,
the
whole
thing,
but
like
figure
out
what
what
we
can
do,
that
would
still
have
like
some
engagement
so
that
if
there
are
pockets,
we
can
still
feel
fill
stuff
in.
D
E
I
I
I
think
there
can
be.
I
think
there
can
be
like
a
pre
form
yeah,
where,
like
we
have
it
right
now
and
like
kind
of
getting
ideas
and
then,
like
actual
like
day
of
form,
perhaps
that
would
have
the
extra
social
stuff
on
it.
I
guess
like
what?
What
are
you
trying
to
accomplish?
Josh
was
having
the
social
stuff
on
the
topic.
Submission
form.
D
E
E
Okay,
but
yeah
to
the
more
specific
point
of
of
the
unconference
stuff.
I
think
that
it
may
be
good
to
keep
that
like
focused
and
then
have
some
other
way
of
communicating
to
folks,
hey
the
socials,
not
where
you
might
assume
it
might
be.
You
know,
and
I
guess
right
now,
what
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
is
from
the
folks
that
are
here.
What
are
your
thoughts
about?
Google
form
versus
this
github
issue
idea.
J
But
I
would
agree,
it's
no
harm
to
put
them
into
a
form
and
and
just
just
to
try
and
focus
people's
minds
on
things
that
they'll
talk
about
on
the
day
and
but
but
so
what
I'm
kind
of
saying
is:
is
that
yeah,
having
a
form
to
get
conversations
going,
might
be
a
good
idea,
but
but
be
aware
that
there
are
specific
issues
ready
and
waiting
for
us
already
present
on
github?
You
know.
E
Right
and
it's
not
so
much
like
superseding
the
issues
that
are
already
there
but
yeah
when
we,
when
we
schedule
time
slots
and
breakouts
for
the
unconference
with
deciding
what
the
topics
are
gonna,
be.
You
know
we
would
have
like
one
umbrella
issue
to
say
you
know
kubecon
summit,
whatever,
whatever
ideas.
C
E
E
Yeah
yeah
yeah,
that's
that's
great,
so
either
I
guess
in
perhaps
either
way
we
find
some
way
to
keep
track
of
conversation.
I
think
like
having
a
note
taker
for
each
breakout
is
going
to
be
a
lot
to
ask,
but
we
could
attempt
it
perhaps
but
yeah
if,
if
we
are
talking
about
github
issues
and
like
at
least
some
summary
of
conversations
or
I
don't
want
to
say
decisions,
but
you
know
at
least
like
a
local
consensus
to
be
able
to
share
that's
a
really
good
idea.
E
E
D
D
D
A
E
Right,
okay,
so
it
sounds
like
we're.
Gonna
have
a
github
umbrella
issue
and
I
will
get
started
on
that
and
have
it
out
and
perhaps
we
can
start
circulating
and
communicating
that,
and
I
guess
I
will
work
with
you
all-
to
figure
out
a
template
for
like
what
folks
should
post,
because
essentially
we
want
to
figure
out
if
there,
if
the
person
is
suggesting
it
is
also
comfortable,
moderating
it
and
then
also
I
don't
know
how
well
and
I'm
pretty
sure
it's
pretty
bad.
E
C
D
E
J
Think
having
one
place
to
go,
whether
it's
the
umbrella
issue
or
the
forum
having
you
know
one
issue
to
at
least
collate
them
all,
maybe
not
rule
them
all,
and
I
I
I
I
would.
I
wouldn't
worry
too
much
about
the
structure
of
the
umbrella
as
you,
I
think,
just
get
a
conversation
going
and
and
bear
in
mind
that
other
issues
can
be
referenced.
I
D
D
Yeah
I
mean
it's:
not
people
are
going
to
be
late
about
this
because
they
have
to
actually
coordinate
inside
their
sig
and
say:
hey.
Do
we
want
to
have
a
meeting
who's
going
to
be
in
valencia,
et
cetera,
I
think
I'll,
kristen
and
caslin?
I
think
I'll
bug
you
again
about
doing
an
additional
message
for
that.
E
G
G
J
J
A
A
B
Yeah
to
close
on
up
some
things
above
sig
pins:
yes,
we
have
those
those
have
been
ordered,
cncf,
just
confirmed,
they're
fine
with
the
plus
ones.
They
do
have
to
follow
the
health
and
safety
measures
and
pass
the
health
and
safety
check
when
they
walk
into
the
menu.
But
that's
fine
there
will
not
be
plus
ones
allowed
at
the
all
attendee
party,
though
so
just
wanted
to
note
that
n
a
space.
E
A
E
E
A
E
G
C
G
D
D
I'm
trying
to
remember
so
this
is
outside
of
contributor
summit
discussions,
but
possibly
something
for
deb
one
of
the
kubecons
because
of
the
weird
conference
hall
we
had
it
in
that
particular
conference
call
had
like
these
big
alcoves,
and
so
we
actually
let
people
schedule
those
alcoves
for
meetings
was
that
seattle.
I
think
it
might
have
been
seattle.
G
D
The
configuration
of
the
conference
hall
but
yeah
because
one
of
the
problems
with
sigs
is
that
even
if
we
give
them
tuesday
to
also
schedule
for
sick
meetings,
a
bunch
of
them
are
going
to
say.
Oh,
my
people
are
only
here
during
wednesday
to
friday.
Is
there
somewhere?
I
can
schedule
the,
but
that's
really
going
to
be
dependent
on
facilities.
B
C
B
C
B
D
D
G
E
D
G
G
E
E
D
D
B
D
B
You
all,
as
a
group,
decide
that
you're,
okay
with
plus
ones
we
can
have
them
at
the
contributor
summit
party.
They
have
to
pass
all
the
same
health
and
safety
requirements
that
the
rest
of
you
are
passing.
We
will
do
a
test
at
the
door.
Show
proof
of
vaccine
temperature
check,
wear
masks
all
the
things
like
that.
But
if
you
all
are
okay,
as
a
group
with
it,
then
that's
fine.
The
cmcf
in
general
is
not
allowing
them
at
the
all
attendee
party
just
to
ensure
that
there's
no
confusion
between
those.
J
D
Yeah,
so
okay
good
cause
that
that
actually
is
a
reason
why
I
need
to
do
a
social
event
survey,
because
if
people
want
to
bring
a
plus
one,
I
need
to
get
that
information
the
good.
So
I
have
a
pretext
now
I'll
follow
up
with
you
deb
about
what
information
we
would
need
about
their
plus
one
other
than
a
name.