►
From YouTube: Kubernetes SIG Docs monthly APAC meeting 20200225
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
B
A
A
You
know
I'm,
sorry
that
was
completely
my
fault.
Juni
I
added
you
into
the
rotation
without
thinking
about
whether
or
not
that
would
be
the
most
appropriate
thing
to
do.
You
yeah,
you're
right.
Your
approval.
Permissions
are
there
to
help
you
wrangle,
localization
related
stuff,
so
yeah
I'm.
Sorry.
For
that,
let
me
we
will
need
to
find
a
Wrangler
for
next
week
as
well,
but
thank
you
for
raising
visibility
on
that
now.
It
gives
us
time
to
find
someone
else
in
advance.
So
sorry
and
thank
you
I'm
sorry
Nathan
KC
issue
late.
A
A
A
A
A
So
it's
important
with
long-running
branches,
so
prowl
the
CIA
for
keeping
Eddie's
prow
it's
possible
to
apply
a
method
for
a
particular
pole
request
and
it's
a
tied
label
tied
is
the
actual
plugin
of
prowl
that
checks
PRS
for
a
merge
ability
checks,
whether
the
a
PR
can
be
merged,
and
it's
a
comes
in
and
out
like
the
tide,
just
periodic
checks
and
when
you
manually
merge
a
PR.
Even
if
the
correct
tied
label
is
on
a
pull
request.
When
you
manually
merge
it
the
default
repository
strategy
for
that
manual
merges
what
actually
happens.
A
So,
in
the
case
of
last
week,
we
had
a
couple
of
merge
requests
that
either
merged
with
the
label
or
without
the
label
and
the
the
wrong
strategy
was
applied
and
it
created
quite
a
mess,
took
Gemini's
several
days
to
get
things
back
in
good
health,
so
make
sure
that
you
are
working
with
prowl
use.
The
use,
proud
commands,
don't
don't
manually
work
with
a
PR,
especially
not
to
approve
and
yeah,
make
sure
make
sure
that
your
commits
are
nice
and
healthy.
Make
sure
that
you
commit
history
or
their
PR
history.
A
A
It's
moving
slowly,
but
it's
moving.
I
spoke
with
the
contractor
last
week
and
he
and
his
team
are
working
on
it.
So
I'm
hopeful
to
see
more
results
soon
and
not
just
more
results,
but
maybe
all
of
the
results,
so
things
are
happening.
They're
happening
slowly
all
right.
Let's
talk
about
diagrams
dated
so
Isak,
a
bunch
of
wrangling.
Looking
for
contractors
to
apply
for
this
and
whatnot
it
looks
like
between.
A
It
was
quite
a
find,
like
I,
didn't
know
that
these
architectural
icons
existed.
We
found
somebody
tweeted
about
architectural
icons
that
already
do
titties
yeah.
D
D
We
went
from
a
really
small
scope
to
addressing
some
of
the
imagery
and
icons
on
the
site
to
a
lot
of
really
good
feedback
from
Celeste
and
from
Steve,
Perry
and
I
kind
of
feel
like
we're
at
the
point
now,
where
and
Tim
that
we
could
do
a
lot
just
as
a
collective
group.
I
just
don't
know
how
to
organize
us,
maybe
to
focus
on
this
and
not
like
tie
up
a
call
like
this
or
a
zoom
call,
because
it
could
eat
up
the
whole
time.
D
Just
talking
about
this
and
like
actively
working
on
it
together,
but
I
feel
like
we.
We
have
enough
of
an
idea
of
what
we're
looking
for
now.
If
we
just
use
the
ISTE
o
as
a
guide.
That's
that
covers
like
70
to
80
percent
of
what
we're
trying
to
do.
I
think
and
then
I
reached
out
to
Seth,
McCombs
and
Z
part
Parnell,
and
he
didn't
get
back
to
me.
A
Yeah
I
think
that's
where
I
would
start
just
open
an
issue
to
describe
it
like
the
specific
one
or
two
diagrams
that
you
want
to
work
on
just
to
get
like
a
proof
of
concept
out
there
and
then
ask
in
sig
ducts
and
say:
hey.
Is
anybody
interested
in
working
on
these
particular
diagrams?
And
if
you
get
a
good
response.
A
C
We
could
find
sorry,
I
was
gonna,
say
I
just
found
it
is,
is
in
community
and
I
found
a
area
here
where
it's
breaks
down
exactly
what
you
need
to
do
to
request
a
channel
I
put
it
in
the
zoom
I'll
put
in
the
agenda
sweet.
D
A
Hopefully
that
gets
hopefully
that's
like
all
of
the
all
the
process
stuff
to
solve
and
you
can
like
get
get
to
the
fun
part
of
creating
diagrams
right
away.
A
A
C
A
A
B
A
A
Okay,
blog
updates,
no
blog
update
that
I
am
aware
of
administration,
nothing
in
particular
to
talk
about
there,
but
press
or
actually
it's
not
really
a
process
piece.
It's
an
administration
piece,
so
technical
leads
I
boosted.
The
I
put
a
call
in
to
the
sigdoc
slack
channel
asking
for
folks
who
are
interested
in
if
you're
interested
in
being
a
technical
lead
for
cig
docks,
please
reach
out
to
Mike,
Kaitlyn
or
Jim
or
myself,
one
of
the
chairs
and.