►
From YouTube: Kubernetes SIG Docs 20190226
Description
Meeting notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1zg6By77SGg90EVUrhDIhopjZlSDg2jCebU-Ks9cYx0w/edit#
The Kubernetes special interest group for documentation (SIG Docs) meets weekly to discuss improving Kubernetes documentation. This video is the meeting for 26 February 2019.
https://github.com/kubernetes/website
--
19:10:58 From Brad Topol : I have started working on https://github.com/kubernetes/website/issues/12333
19:11:17 From Brad Topol : Will submit a PR soon and will need feedback
B
B
A
B
Actually,
don't
use
translate
so
we're
using
the
I'm
actually
thinking
to
using
transfix.
The
way
is
because
to
reduce
the
air
force
and
increase
more
collaborations,
because,
right
now
how
the
fluid
works
is
one
big
issue
and
New
York
should
appoint
ups
solely
as
possible
together
initial
draft
and
you
get
a
feedback
from
the
team
and
then
you
improve
on
the
iteration
saying
it's
actually,
if
you
sing
it
from
for
like
a
hundred
lines,
that's
not
a
big
deal
by
your
face
like
a
southern
line
as
actually
tremendous
baffles,
yeah,
so
I'm.
B
A
B
A
I
would
love
to
see
@wc
a
proof
of
concept.
I'd
love
to
see
I
would
love
to
see
a
demo
of
I
mean
I.
Would
love
to
see
a
demo
of
like
the
of
the
sto
process
and
like
how
what
that
looks
like
for
kubernetes
I
know
like
last
week.
I
think
you've
prepared
a
demo
and
I
was
like
no
don't
do
that
here,
but
I
think
it
would
actually
be
really
helpful
to
see
a
demo
I
guess
we
can
find
a
time
when
that
makes
sense
when
that
makes
sense
to
do.
A
If
that's
something
that
you'd
be
interested
in
doing
right.
Well,
it
is
7:04,
so
I'm
gonna
score
dingy.
It's
a
someone
I
think
forgot,
flip
the
switch
to
auto
record
when
we
start
and
I
guess
the
for
the
first
five
minutes
of
this
meeting
will
be
us
gabbing,
so
hello
Internet.
This
is
what
we
do
at
their
time.
A
All
right
today
is
Tuesday
February
26th,
and
this
is
the
weekly
meeting
of
kubernetes
sig
docs.
We
are
meeting
at
7:00
p.m.
because
it's
a
fourth
Tuesday,
and
we
are.
We
do
that
specifically
to
make
it
easier
for
folks
in
asia-pacific
regions
to
join
us
and
contribute
juni
I
see
you
there,
hello,
always
good
to
see
you.
A
A
Let's
see,
let's
go
to
the
agenda
so
when
we
met
at
our
end
of
year
planning
session
at
KU
Khan
in
Seattle
in
December
of
last
year,
we
decided
that
we
would
meet
on
a
quarterly
basis
going
forward
and
I
wanted
to
make
sure
that
folks,
in
this
meeting
time
saw
that
we
are
going
to
meet
on
March
28th
from
6
to
9
p.m.
Pacific
time
to
specifically
to
make
it
a
little
easier
for
folks
to
join.
A
A
A
There
is
a
proposal
sort
of
in
the
works
right
now
for
kubernetes
projects,
the
kubernetes
related
projects
like
kind
to
host
their
documentation
as
sub
domains
off
of
kubernetes
io,
and
in
order
to
do
that,
there's
sort
of
there's
an
open
question
about
what
the
workflow
for
that
should
look
like
what
sub
domain
hosting
should
look
like
how
much
of
that
sigdoc
should
own.
How
much
of
that
we
could
be
involved
in
how
much
we
should
be
involved
in,
and
that
is
proceeding
pretty
well.
A
A
B
A
A
A
So
things
look
to
be
running
very
well
I'm,
not
aware
of
anything
that
looks
out
of
order
and
when
I
checked
in
with
Jim
things
need
to
be
going
well,
like
the
release,
shadows
are
all
I,
see
them
all
out.
Working
Cody,
actually
I
know
you're
a
shadow.
This
release.
Do
you
want
to
say
anything
about
1.14,
yeah.
C
Everything
seems
to
be
going
on
track.
All
of
the
shadows
now
have
access
to
the
tracking
scheana
was
a
little
bit
of
a
blocker
earlier,
but
we
all
have
access
to
where
at
least
I've
been
updating
of
what
I
can
out
of
the
seven
that
I
originally
had.
It
looks
like
two
won't
be
making
it
to
the
release
stage.
One
already
has
Doc's
completed.
One
has
dogs
up
here
in
and
then
two
more
have
to
get
back
to
me
regarding
that.
But
as
far
as
my
part
goes,
it's
going
well.
A
A
A
So
I
have
applied
for
a
main
track
time
slots
for
time
to
do
an
intro
and
a
deep
dive,
so
that
will
give
us
I
think
a
combined
total
of
80
minutes,
which
may
not
be
enough
time
to
get
into
our
usual
level
of
deep
dive.
So
I
guess
that's
a
that's
an
open
question
is:
do
we
want
to
do
it?
That's
combo,
intro
and
deep
dive
session
and,
like
a
community
day
like
we
did
last
year,
or
do
we
want
to
just
do
one?
A
B
I
think
they
are
there
work.
They
were
happy
to
have
I.
Think
right.
Now
we're
actually
sorting
out
how
to
how
do
you
sort
out
the
issues?
Fracking,
that's
our
main
focus,
because
the
right
I
think
they're
they're.
Probably
you
know
that
before
we
actually
have
a
separate
vehicle
right
now
migrate
to
using
a
central
website
repo
and
the
counting
actually
I
lost,
so
that
section
needs
to
be
sorted
out
before
jumping
to
that
the
topic,
but
they
want
to
have
one
more
engagement.
Well,
that's
for
sure.
A
B
Exact
the
format
more
just
like
a
casually
race.
These
options,
like
from
the
actually
prioritized
low
versus
like
Connie,
Hawkins
it
like
her.
So
there
are
sort
of
other
contributions.
Right
now
is
sort
of
like
a
more
qualified.
The
count
work
right
now,
there's
no
there's
no
good
communication
like
like
inside
this
inside.
It's
good,
like
people
contribute,
and
then
they
slack,
and
then
they
don't
feel
like
they
get
involved.
It
seems
like
that
are
actually
more
important
than
you
know.
It's
a
more
like
engaging
a
cargo
carrier
group.
B
A
B
A
D
So
I've
just
been
trying
to
beef
up
the
actual
section
that
says
what
is
kubernetes
and
then
I'm
gonna
try
and
pull
work
on
the
other
piece.
There's
like
three
pieces
that
are
outlined
in
the
issue,
probably
the
one
that
I'm
not
gonna,
get
to
as
much
as
maybe
the
one
that
I
think
was
more
on
the
Andrew
flavour,
which
was
how
you
somehow
start
pulling
that
pulling
the
modeling
stuff
that
one's
a
little
that
parts
a
little
tricky
for
me.
D
So
you
know
my
current
thought
process
was
well,
let's
see
if
we
can
improve
the
what
is
kubernetes
improve
the?
What
does
it
mean
and
the
d
as
a
service
piece
or
what
have
you
and
then
submit
something
as
a
work-in-progress
and
see
if
people
can
throw
tomatoes
at
it
and
suggest
where
I
could
improve
that
that's
kind
of
what
I
was
thinking,
Zack
I
just
wanted
to
get
people's
input.
D
A
D
Yeah
I
figured
it's
gonna,
be
iterative
to
get
it
right,
because
I
think
different
people
potentially
had
different
views
of
what
needs
to
go
in
there
to
make
C
what
is
kubernetes
better
and
I.
Hopefully,
I
felt
like
we
had
the
flexibility
to
do
it.
That
way,
as
opposed
to
I'm,
just
gonna
show
up
with
something
magical
and
think
it's
ready
to
merge.
I
I
really
felt
it
was
going
to
be
iterative.
So
I
will
probably
tomorrow
I,
get
that
PR
pushed
up
for
people
to
to
give
their
wonderful
and
kind
and
put
on.
D
I'm,
looking
for
lots
of
feedback,
I
really
do
want
to
make
it
better,
but
but
I
just
want
to
make
sure
I
get
lots
of
feedback
to
make
sure
I
am
hitting
the
mark.
Whatever
the
issues
were,
I
mean
I
see
like
I,
see
my
view
of
oh,
it
really
needs
to
have
XY
and
Z,
but
but
there
may
be,
other
people
were
like
well
yeah,
but
what
we
really
meant.
A
A
D
And
then,
on
the
other
issue
that
I
picked
up
and
owned,
which
was
I,
can't
remember
the
exact
topic,
but
it
was.
We
thought
there
was
some
other
people
that
would
work
on
and
I
just
had
to
go
nagging
I'm
thinking,
I'm
gonna
get
stuck
with
that
one,
which
is
fine,
because
I
wanted
to
learn
that
stuff
anyway.
So
one
of
the
folks
promised
to
review,
which
was
really
good
but
but
I.
Think
after
I
do
this.
D
One
I
was
interested
in
the
topic
anyway
and
since
nobody
else
was
really
stepping
up
I'm
gonna
try
and
write
that
piece,
even
though
I'm
not
an
expert
on
it,
but
I
wanted
to
learn
it
anyway.
So
so
that's
what
I
think
what's
gonna
happen
to
the
second
one,
that
of
my
two
issues
that
I
promise
to
work
on
cool.
A
And
if
that
issue,
if
that
second
issue
like
ends
up
getting
unwieldy
for
whatever
reason,
you
of
course
feel
free
to
ask
for
help
and
I
know
that
there
are
folks
who
would
love
to
contribute,
especially
like
if
they
have
someone
to
bounce
ideas
off
over,
get
like
kind
of
direct
one-to-one
feedback.
I
know
that
you
could
find
help
right,
even
if
you
wanted
to
like,
take
the
back
seat
on
it
and
you
provide
feedback
on
someone
else.
While
they
drive
yeah.
D
Yeah,
that
would
be
great
too,
when
I,
when
I
did
go
nag,
everybody
the
best
I
got,
was
oh
I'm
really
busy,
but
I
would
be
willing
to
review
it.
So
I
was
like
well
I'll.
Take
that
you
know
so,
but
yeah
so
yeah
well
I'm
worried
about
that
one.
Maybe
I'll
do
another
round
of
nagging
before
I
go
kick
it
off
and
see.
If
there's
anybody
who
can
can
contribute
a
little
more
on
it,
but
I
want
to
get
the
first
one
done
anyway.
D
D
A
A
Cj
I
will
say:
let's
ask
for
contributors
again
next
week
and
see
see
what
folks
say:
I
think
the
attendance
will
may
be
a
little
higher
next
week
and
I
know
that
I
know
there
are
a
couple
folks
who
are
like
really
eager
for
like
release
like
specific
projects
like
Oh
JD,
Palomino,
fantastic,
who
did
really
good
work
on
that
replica
set
PR
that
he
took
on
so
I
know.
There
are
folks
who
are
interested
in
willing
to
help.
So
if
you
don't
hear
anything
back,
I
would
say:
let's
ask
again
next
week,
yeah.
E
B
F
In
the
previous
meetings
that
I
was
trying
to
join
this
morning,
but
I
know
cube,
ATM
is
something
that
people
are
updating
and
I.
Don't
know
if
I've
mentioned
it,
but
I'm
at
we've
work
so
Lucas,
hallström
and
then
soon
Capelli
will
be
joining
well.
Lucas
has
been
on
our
team,
but
we
will
be
joining
our
team,
so
I've
just
been
kind
of
lurking,
mostly
around
that
to
see.
F
If
you
know,
everybody
needs
sort
of
like
a
little
push
around
cube
ATM,
because
that
was
one
of
the
first
things
that
I
mentioned
when
I
kind
of
moved
from
IC
to
managing
the
developer.
Experience
team
at
weave
works,
as
I
said:
hey
Lucas,
there's
a
lot
of
like
how
to
get
started
with
cube.
Atm
and
I
can't
even
find
like
what
it
is
or
like
how
one
would
sort
of
get
more
broad
information.
Oh
yeah
I
never
thought
about
that.
F
So
he
did
some
of
that,
but
I
know
there's
definitely
much
more
to
do
so.
I'm
excited
that
that
topic
came
up
and
then,
since
the
last
contributor
summit,
I've
just
been
kind
of
lurking,
because
I
was
interested
in
the
area
where
people
talked
about
accessibility
and
docks
and
just
in
general,
have
an
interest
in
that.
I
have
no
background
in
it.
So
I
don't
think
that's
come
up
as
much
but
I
connected
with
the
people
who
said
they
would
own
that.
There's
a
Oracle
woman
in
India
and
I
can't.
A
F
F
We
met
at
the
conference,
okay,
that
cute
con
and
I
said
she
said
she'd
sort
of
take
the
lead.
I
said:
okay,
I
have
a
lot
on
my
plate.
I'm,
you
know
managing
a
distributed
team,
but
it
you
know
I'm,
just
kind
of
learning
about
dog,
sighs,
I
actually
tagged
along
with
her,
but
then
I've
been
joining.
These
calls,
but
I
haven't
seen
her
or
haven't
seen
anything
about
the
accessibility
goals
come
up
at
least
unless
I
miss
something.
A
Thank
you.
No,
you
haven't
missed
anything,
no
accessibility
developments,
but
that
does
remind
me
that
that's
a
conversation
to
follow
up
on
so
I
I
will
take
an
action
item
to
follow
up
with
Rajee
this
week
and
find
out
sort
of
where
she
is
with
it,
because
it
is,
it
does
matter,
and
it's
something
that
I
would
like
to
see
a
strike
forward
on
so
I
tell
you
what
I
will
I
will
invite
quick.