►
From YouTube: Kubernetes SIG Multicluster 2019 Oct 22
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
Disinterested
for
some
reason
and
like
a
cute
community
level,
Multi
cluster
versus
interested
versus
I've
played
around
with
X
or
Y
thing.
A
little
bit
versus
I
have
a
dependency
on
it,
so
that
we
can
assess,
like
the
impact
of
decisions
that
we
make
about
those
things
right.
So
that's.
Basically,
the
sole
item
on
the
agenda
today
is
to
just
finalize
the
language
or
at
that
around
that
thing
in
so
that
we
can
get
it
shipped
off
to
the
CN
CF
survey
team
and
have
some
data
before
it
Yukon.
Okay,.
C
B
Yeah
I,
don't
have
a
lot
like
I'd
know
very
little
about
cube,
fed
because
I
haven't
been
involved
in
that
project.
I.
Don't
so
I,
don't
really
have
strong
opinions
about
what
you
go
in
the
survey
other
than
that
as
much
as
manage
it
ask
like
things
like.
Why
are
you
using
multiple
clusters
like?
Is
it
for
localization?
Is
it
for
blast
radius
reduction?
Is
it
for
you
know,
yeah,
that's.
A
B
C
C
B
Ironically,
with
my
work
on
multi,
closer
I've,
actually
at
multi-tenancy
I've,
actually
started
using
it
or
clusters.
These
I'm
now
deploying
to
multiple
places
and
on
keep
thinking
of
it
as
oh
would
be
really
nice
when
I
said
cube
cuddle
cluster
info.
If
it
would
tell
me
the
name
of
the
cluster
I'm
talking
to
which
of
course
is
the
whole
idea
behind
the
design
proposal,
but
I
was
writing
about
cluster
identity.
So
perhaps
why
not?
The
stuff
I'm
working
on
now
starts
to
die
down
a
little
bit.
A
Okay,
I
think
that,
like
one,
oh
so
so
just
to
be
like
transparent
as
possible,
I
personally
am
not
really
happy
with
the
state
that
the
cig
is
in
like
and
I
would
like
to
establish
exactly
what
the
SIG's
shared
mission
is
in
the
community.
So.
C
A
B
D
A
A
What
would
the
effect
be
and
I
hope
to
use
data
from
the
survey
like
in
the
sig
timeslot
at
Q
Khan,
to
try
to
like
establish
that
we
need
to
identify
shared
goals
similar
to
what
you're,
like
doc,
that
you
put
out
a
little
while
ago
is
is
aiming
towards
him.
So
I
was
just
saying,
like
I
would
consider
it
great
success
if
we
went
into
2020
with
like
a
plan
to
have
a
face-to-face
or
like
ritual,
face
to
face
to
hash
out
what
those
goals
are
similar
to.
A
D
With
that
and
I
think
having
a
face-to-face
ish
thing
in
early
20
would
be
a
really
wonderful
way
to
light
the
fuse
on
this
yeah
I
definitely
think
we
need
to
do
it.
You
see
a
people
couple
of
people
coming
in
my
room
here.
We've
got
some
people
now.
This
is
Jeremy
again,
okay,
starting
to
think
about,
though,.
D
D
A
C
D
C
C
B
I
shouldn't
have
to
answer
once
on
behalf
of,
say,
Google
and
say
like
this
is
my
understanding
of
the
very
most
Multi
cluster
ish
of
our
customers
should
be
able
to
say
something
like
you
should
be
able
to
take
this
everyone's
for
every
sort
of
class
of
customers
and
maybe
have
a
way
to
indicate
like
this
is
roughly
how
many
customers
I
think
fit
into
this
category
rated
by
some
metric
I.
Don't
know
number
of
clusters
number
of
developers
number
of
users
whatever
something
like
that.
Does
that
match
what
you
were
thinking
Tim
I
mean.
D
B
A
So
I
think
it
would
be
fine
if
I,
you
know,
I
I
think
that
we
could
probably
account
for
that
concept
if
we
allowed
multiple
responses
from
the
same
email
address
and
there's
a
forum
on
there
that
says
what
your
organization
or
there's
a
field
on
the
forum
for
organization
type,
do
we
and
and
for
organizations
so
I
think
between
those.
You
could
probably
just
engineer
some
response
that
was
like
this
is,
for
you
know
these
types
of
organizations,
yeah.
D
B
C
A
Cube
con
because
I
I
would
like
to
make
the
theme
of
like,
let's
establish
shared
goals
that
we
can
cooperate
on
in
the
community
like
I
would
like
that
to
be
the
theme
of
the
sig
session
at
cube
con.
So
if
we
have
some
data
by
then
that'll
be
great,
we
can.
We
can
keep
the
survey
up
or
have
another
round
of
it
and
also
hand
out
paper.
If
people
want
to
do
that
and
just
like
write
something
down
and
have
some
winky
toes
in
yeah.
D
C
D
B
A
D
A
B
C
D
C
D
D
B
C
B
A
D
D
B
D
B
D
B
B
B
I'm
wondering
about
this
one
you're
like
how
many
additional
clusters
like
these
are
both
numbers
and
I'm
wondering
if
there
should
be
something
about
topology
as
well
like.
Are
they
you
know?
Are
they
all
in
the
same
availability
like?
How
many
do
you
have
in
different
availability
zones?
Are
they
completely
independent?
You
have
failover
I
mean
I.
Guess
we
kind
of
have
some
of
that
I.
C
B
B
B
C
C
D
D
A
D
So
I'm
talking
at
the
rejects,
rejects
over
the
weekend
so
I'll
be
there.
I'll
be
arriving
Friday
night.
If
anybody's
in
for
the
weekend
drop
me
a
note
and
we
can
get
a
meal
or
something
or
a
beer,
and
my
talk
it
rejects
is
as
I'm
writing.
The
outline
starts
to
wander
into
multikill
cluster
space,
so
I'm
gonna
leave
you
all
hanging
with
that.
Can
State
I'm
think
they've
published
a
schedule
yet
but
Paul.
You
know
the
topic
we
talked
about
this
before.