►
From YouTube: Kubernetes 1.17 Release Team Meeting 20191122
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Okay,
I
think
I'm
recording,
so
we
with
that
good
morning
afternoon
and
evening,
everyone
hey
welcome
to
the
today's
version
of
the
release
team
meeting.
I.
Think
I
have
to
mention
on
the
beginning
on
which
cult
that
there
is
a
code
of
conduct
which
essentially
boils
down
to
be
nice
to
everyone,
don't
be
a
jerk
and
with
that
I
guess
we
can
just
get
started
enhancements.
Is
there
anyone
that
can
tell
us
what's
going
on
in
that
world.
A
B
B
Nice,
okay,
so
we
are
green,
I!
Think
no,
really
we're
green.
We
have
some
failing
jobs,
but
on
mastery
for
me
also
one
in
117
performing
and
in
some
miscellaneous
stuff,
but
the
general
status
looks
good
in
master
blocking.
We
have
11
jobs
passing
for
flaking,
although
known
as
the
flakes
look
like
ongoing
issues,
they
might
have
been
liking
for
very
punctual
stuff,
so
yeah,
nothing
wrong
in
that,
then
I
must
say
informing.
We
have
11
passing
9
flaking
3
failing
the
failing
stuff
is
mostly
Asher
and
Windows,
which
is
a
terrible
coincidence.
B
The
the
things
failing
and
actually
have
only
been
addressed.
Lee
mentioned
something
about
marking
it
against
the
correct
milestone.
But
steel
is
failing
that
really
really
bad,
so
I'm
going
to
follow
up
on,
but
other
than
that
everything
else
looks
good.
The
flakes
are
also
nothing
to
be
concerned
about
then
on
117
blocky.
We
have
ten
passing
through
flaking
and
informing.
We
have
three
three
six
flaking
three
passing
and
failing
for
now.
I.
B
Don't
think
that
anything
is
son
address
right
now
and
the
boy
we
still
have
a
sure
thing,
as
the
free
didn't
have
any
response
yet,
but
it
has
been.
There
has
been
an
ongoing
conversation,
so
it's
just
like
Miss
miss
but
other
than
that
everything
has
been
addressed
or
is
under
embassy,
though
so
we're
good.
Okay,.
A
That's
good
to
hear
it
just
just
a
couple
of
questions
to
get
to
get
a
better
picture.
Some
look
at
some
good
at
estimate
right
now,
and
one
of
the
way
one
of
the
jobs
that
you
mentioned
is
a
Windows
Master
and
that
one
seems
to
be
failing
from
a
cube,
a
cube,
coral
effect.
Oh
I,
don't
know
what
to
call
it.
Client
gets
booked
application
and
I
saw
that
over
a
couple
issues
related
to
I
want
it
did
you
know?
What
exactly
is
there
on
a
clear
idea
of
what
the
issue
is
with
that?
A
B
A
B
B
C
D
B
A
D
A
B
B
It
is
my
only
source
of
concern
because
it
has
been
failing
like
really
bad
and
consistently,
and
there
hasn't
been
a
single
green
run
like
we
have
I
think
something
around
97%
of
breadcrumbs.
So
yeah,
no
one
knows
what's
going
on
and
it
has
been
ongoing
for
for
for
a
while,
but
I'll
definitely
follow
up
on
Monday.
A
B
A
Yes,
yeah
definitely
looking
at
it
has,
has
been
failing
consistently
since
since
14
of
the
14
of
this
month
and
just
thinking
out
loud.
So
this
is
a
kak
s.
If
you
don't
remember
any
twin
runs,
then
there's
a
very
good
chance
that
it
has
you
broken
for
a
while
and
since
the
EQ
seems
to
be
with
the
cluster
coming
up
and
no
other
another
job
is
having
the
same
issue.
We
will
it
be
reasonable
to
say
that
this
is
an
aks
specific
issue
when
that
occur.
Burnett
is
one
oh
yeah.
B
A
E
A
C
Actions
so
for
bug
triage,
our
current
status
is
yellow
for
open
non-test
flakes
five
us
down
from
one
from
Wednesday
for
priority
critical
urgent.
We
are
at
three
which
is
holding
steady
or
priority
important.
Soon
we
are
one
which
is
holding
steady
for
open,
KK
repo
we
for
117.
We
are
at
eight,
which
is
up
from
two
priority.
Critical
non
urgent
pr's
is
three
that
is
holding
steady
priority
important
soon,
PRS
we're
at
four
that's
up
from
two
and
for
all
open
KK
issues
for
117
release,
including
testing
plates.
C
A
C
C
A
D
Today
is
the
dogs
deadline
final
deadline,
so
we
still
have
five
open
PS,
where
three
seem
to
be
bootable.
They're
done
with
the
review.
Did
they
just
need
approval,
and
one
of
one
of
the
PR
actually
needs
a
lot
of
work
to
be
done.
There
is
not
much
update
of
the
file,
so
I
will
follow
up
with
their
premature
or
see
if
I
can
get
it
in
and
there's
another
which
actually
needs
a
technical
review.
I
need
to
follow
up
on
that
guys.
Well,
stop
date.
A
D
A
F
F
Course
no
problem.
Thank
you
green.
Obviously,
it's
been
a
quiet
week
with
cube
gun,
and
but
we
are
prioritizing
the
topics
that
we've
received
from
out
the
sex
and
we'll
be
starting.
The
blog
post
coordination
today,
slash
Monday
and
we
got
some
contact
from
the
CN
CF,
so
I
have
a
call
scheduled
with
Ken
as
well.
So
things
are
looking
good.
Okay,.
A
A
H
A
H
A
Don't
see
clear
so,
let's
so,
let's
move
on
release
Lee
a
witness,
not
here
so
I
am
obviously
taking
her
place
and
I.
Guess
the
really
the
big
things
that
I
did
now.
I
can
say
that
we
have
a
couple
deadlines.
Today
we
dogs
they
are
seeing
released
today
and
cold
tub,
as
you
was
just
mentioned
by
Carlos.
A
Right
now,
I
mean
obviously
I
cannot
make
a
decision
without
consulting
without
consulting
with
the
rest
of
the
team.
But
since
everything
seems
to
be
okay,
we
we
might
need
a
little
bit
of
extra
time
for
four
dogs
to
a
full
box
to
get
in.
But
things
look
okay.
So,
let's
see
what
else
is
there
to
discuss
six
scalability
issues?
There
is
nothing
listed
in
there
and
I
guess,
just
for
the
record.
I
was
checking
test
grid
everything
earlier
a
master
conforming
in
Veronica.
A
Please
correct
me
if
I'm
saying
something
wrong,
but
must
inform,
in
their
scale
correctness,
to
run
that
just
fail
put
the
test
that
actually
fail.
This
conformance
test
and
the
same
conformance
test
is
running
okay,
you're,
not
the
other
conformance
test.
So
possibly
it
was
just
a
flake
so
other
than
that.
Yeah.