►
From YouTube: Kubernetes Release Team Meeting for 20211126
Description
Kubernetes Release Team Meeting for 20211126
A
Hello,
everyone
great
to
have
you
back
to
this
beautiful
burnout
meeting
on
the
november.
The
26th-
I'm
max
will
be
your
host
for
today
and
please
remember,
and
we
need
this
meeting
so
we're
running
under
the
code
of
conduct
of
the
cncf,
which
falls
down
to
be
awesome
to
each
other,
and
let's
run
shortly
through
the
current
status
of
the
release
123..
A
We
do
not
have
any
big
open
topics
at
the
moment
which
we
need
to
discuss
a
short
hint
for
you.
If
you
have
already
some
points
which
you
would
like
to
highlight,
and
the
retrospective
meetings,
which
will
later
come
up,
you
can
already
go
to
the
retro
document
and
add
your
notes
so
that
you
will
not
lose
them
or
lose
your
thoughts,
ideas
and
wishes
of
change.
B
Hello,
so
our
current
status
is
yellow.
We
have
14
passing
jobs
and
four
flaky
ones
in
master
blocking
in
mason
forming.
We
have
eight
passing
and
thirteen
flaking
and
we
are
tracking
them
for
the
fading
one
in
mason
forming.
This
is
one
test
which
is
now
fading
for
quite
a
long
time,
and
it's
also
reported
a
couple
couple
of
the
flaky
ones
are
also
reported,
so
we
are
tracking
them
and
then
1.23
the
massive
blocking
and
mass
informing
stuff.
B
So
we
have
one
failing
which
we
reported
today
opened
up
the
an
issue
and
under
mass
informing,
we
have
two
failing
jobs,
so
we
are
looking
at
them
and
maybe
we
will
also
open
an
issue,
but
that's
it.
Thank
you.
A
Cool
beside
the
the
failing
ones
is
the
release
candidate
quite
stable,
or
does
it
pops
up
here
and
there's
some
additional
flakes?
We
see
here
two
two
flaky
jobs
on
the
master,
but
maybe
you've
observed
some
other
behaviors
or
tests
which
are
not
running
at
all.
B
In
so
the
flaky
ones,
I
did
not
go
get
into
too
much
detail
because
they're
quite
new
about
the
failing
ones,
they're,
a
lot
of
jobs
that
are
failing,
but
they
all
seem
to
be
like,
like.
I
think
the
source
is
the
same
one.
So
a
lot
of
jobs
are
depending
on
one
one
source
of
the
error.
It
seems
like.
I
don't
know
if
fossen
looked
into
that,
but
this
is
something.
C
C
Yes,
hello,
so
our
current
status
is
yellow
due
to
the
fact
that
we
have
critical
issues
and
prs
open.
We
have
two
critical
issues
about
pumping
gcd,
client
version
and
another
one
about
go
modules.
Both
of
them
are
actively
being
worked
on
so
nothing
to
be
concerned.
Of
just
a
note.
C
We
also
have
the
etcd
issue
as
an
important
issue
text
so
due
to
the
fact
that
this
both
labels,
we
see
twice
in
our
reporting
about
the
two
critical
pr's
both
of
them
are
approved,
but
they
are
currently
on
waiting
schedule.
C
So
nothing
needs
to
be
done
here,
yeah,
that's
it.
D
So
our
current
status
is
green,
integration
branch
is
healthy
and
our
team
has
reached
our
authors
for
the
remaining
peers,
which
are
currently
withdrawals.
E
A
All
right
cool,
perfect.
Thank
you
very
much
for
comms
and
release
branch
management.
I
think
we
do
not
have
someone
in
the
call.
As
far
as
I
know,
it
looks
quite
good
on
the
comp
side
and
also
on
the
release
branch
management.
As
you
obviously
see
the
release,
1.23
release
candidate
went
out.
It
was
a
little
bit
bumpy,
but
it
make
it
through
it.
So
everything
is
fine
here.
I
guess
next
milestones.
We
have
already
highlighted
it
on
the
november
30s.
A
Next
tuesday
we
have
actually
the
dog's
deadline,
or
at
least
the
docs
readiness
deadline
which
we
are
looking
up,
and
we
also
should
have
all
the
feature
blocks
already
in
a
review
state
or
in
the
well
situation
that
we
can
review
the
feature
blocks
and
start
scheduling
it
for
the
release,
which
is
actually
in.