►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
C
Whatever
I
it's
my
own
bad
anyway
is:
do
we
talk
about
anything
else?
Other
than
like
hey
smalls,
go
fix
your
pr.
A
That's
about
it
and
the
only
thing
from
last
week,
just
the
action
item
I
had
was
just
to
make
the
private
slack
channel,
which,
as
you
can
see,
is
up
and
going
so.
Thank
you
ray.
D
D
I
yeah,
I
am
I'm
I'm
certainly
not
a
core
psc
person
but
like
from
my
affiliation
with
the
psc,
like.
I
do
not
expect
that
they
would
be
opposed
to
this
and
it
does
match
what
was
done
before
and
it
wouldn't
make
any
sense
to
do
it
any
other
way.
So
yeah.
C
We
worked.
We
worked
closely
with
psc
last
time
and
came
up
with
like
we're
not
operating
in
the
dark
patrick.
Do
you
still
work
with
ps
members?
Can
you
go
smack
him
make
him
respond,
but
what
dude
is
there
any
psu
members
on
your
team?
C
D
C
Okay,
great
all
right,
I
will
as
soon
as
I
close
this
meeting
reboot
under
my
operating
system,
that
has
the
branch
on
it
and
then
I
will
I'll
make
the
change
and
I
will
rebase
and
I
will
push
and
we're
good
to
go
and.
C
Yes,
I
will
do
that
sweet
cj's
on
the
psc,
according
to
the
documentation,
so
I
I
do
work
with
one
person.
Well,
poke
him.
Tell
him
he's.
Tell
him
tell
him
he's
slowly
approaching
my
listen
this!
This
is
for
the
needing
approval
on
the
pr.
That's
in
that
thread
I
mean
just
because
I
like
the
idea
of
me
being
able
to
like
creep
up
on
him
through
a
weird
side
channel.
C
It
doesn't
matter,
it's
not
important.
I
mean
it
was
nice
last
last
cycle
we
did
this.
We
had
a
psc
member
in
the
working
group.
I
am
like
straight
at
capacity
for
open
source
contributions,
because
it's
no
longer
part
of
my
day
job
and
I'm
also
on
the
istio
psc.
C
So
like
I'm
not
looking
to
play
that
role,
but
if
anyone
wants
to
go,
try
and
be
an
at
least
an
associate
member,
that
would
be
useful.
But
again
it's
not
like
the
process
is
fine.
It
doesn't
matter
a
ton.
D
C
C
D
I
mean,
I
think
it's
good
most
of
the
most
of
the
time
other
than
other
than
your
group
and
savita's
group.
Most
of
the
time
is
psp
replacement
related
lately,
because
everybody
is,
everybody
is
very
excited
about
that.
D
D
D
A
C
D
Meaning
like
that
is
so
big
that
somebody
who's
focused
on
it
will
do
a
better
job
than
than
somebody
who
does
it
as
a
small
part
of
a
big
thing,
but
also
we
should
provide
something
for
folks
where,
for
whatever
reason,
they
can't
or
don't
want
to
use
something.
That's
bigger
and
more
successful.
Hey.
C
D
I
actually,
I
actually
run
gatekeeper
in
production
at
work,
which
is
part
of
why
I
am
both
for
and
against
it
as
the
solution
to
this
like,
like
that's,
why
I
want
people
to
use
it
when
they
need
to
use
it,
but
also
want
to
give
them
something
smaller
if
they
need
something
smaller
opa.
D
Mean
like
I
have
three
or
four
library
pr's
that
exist
only
in
my
head
and
who
knows
when
I
will
actually
succeed
in
getting
around
to
to
upstreaming
those
things.
But,
like
you
know,
I
would.
I
would
love
to
see
the
the
psp-ish
library
things
deal
with
higher
order
objects
beyond
pod,
but,
like
I
haven't
written
that
yet
so.
Therefore
I
cannot
pr
it
to
you
yet.
E
Okay,
I
mean,
if
you
need
any
help,
definitely
ping
me
on
slack
or
just
open
an
a
work
in
progress,
pr
happy
to
jump
in.
E
And
just
for
the
community,
I
guess
like
we're
working
on
mutation,
even
though
it's
an
alpha
feature.
We
recognize
that
was
like
a
feature
parity
to
psp,
so
the
the
goal
is
to
have
some
mutation
resources
deployed
so
that
you
can
basically
do
similar
functionality.
As
the
native
pscs
dude.
That's.
D
E
You
can
I
mean
these
are
all
distinct
policies,
so
you
can
deploy
it
if
you
want
it
or
not.
So
that's
the
beauty
of
it
yeah
also,
I
I
didn't
mean
to
like
die
urge
to
call.
C
Yeah,
but
to
that
point
I'm
gonna
go
reboot.
If
anyone
needs
me
I'll
be
on
slack,
though
I'm
fasting
today,
so
I'm
gonna
get
stupider
and
stupider
as
the
day
goes
on,
so
I'm
gonna
try
and
get
this
out
right
now.
E
Hey
I
added
myself
to
the
agenda
just
to
check
in
on
the
security
audit.
I'm
not
sure
if
anyone
can
help
provide
status
or
people
already
dropped.
Okay,.
E
C
E
Yeah,
I
I
just
came
to
check
in
on
the
I
believe
I
reached
out
to
some
folks.
Anna
nish
joined
the
last
meeting
specifically
to
see
what
is
the
process
for
getting
security
audit
reviewed
for
the
secret
store,
csi
project.
E
C
Yeah,
so
let's
pretend
for
a
moment
that
this
one
goes
very
much
like
the
last
one,
because
that's
the
only
experience
I
have
running
on
for
an
open
source
community.
C
The
dates
that
will
that
are
currently
published
in
the
rfc
are
going
to
their
fp
are
going
to
change
shortly.
I'm
going
to
push
them
all
out
by
it
looks
like
two
weeks.
Is
that
right,
yeah
two
weeks
and
then
but
those
are
rough
with
the
dates
that'll.
The
audit
will
take
place
over
in
the
once
the
auditors
show
up
and
until
they
leave.
It
would
be
really
good
for
this
group
to
have
a
representative
from
the
from
that
those
maintainers
to
help
guide
the
auditors
at
the
icky
stuff,
like.
C
E
So
I
guess
we'll
just
wait
for
the
audit
to
happen
and
it
sounds
like
it's
going
to
be
soonish.
I
guess.
C
C
So
this
meeting
is
a
good
place.
This
is
where
we'll
talk
about
it.
There's
a
google
group
that
we
created
and
there's
the
private
slack
channel.
That's
where
we'll
be
vendor
selection
is
a
is
privileged
information,
so
we'd
be
asking
you
to
keep
it
all
secret
until
the
end
of
the
audit,
at
which
point
we
will
publish
our
vendor
selection
criteria
in
the
process
that
we
went
through.
C
E
Yeah
yeah,
I
I
was
just
wondering
like
what
the
next
steps
are.
So
thank
you
for
explaining
all
that.