►
From YouTube: Kubernetes SIG Service Catalog 20170913
Description
- Should we disable the link checker temporarily?
- Demo of CRD storage for service-catalog resources
- Spec for serviceclass and serviceplan
- Orphan mitigation
A
B
A
B
B
B
C
B
Like
I
said
to
the
check
to
the
slack,
I
won't
go
to
get
to
it
until
after
dinner
tonight.
So
if
you
guys
really
need
us
in,
like
like
within
X
whole
hours,
go
ahead
and
merge
the
PR
to
disable
it
and
I'll.
Take
the
AI
to
re-enable,
then
try
to
put
over
checks.
We
need
around
or
retries
around
it.
I
can.
C
B
C
A
D
Okay,
what
I
was
gonna
say
is
that
we
need
to
probably
add
some
logic
that
we
can
just
filter
certain
links
and
disable
them
selectively
because,
like
go
report
card,
comm
has
been
the
offending
URL
that
we've
seen
and
that's
not
critical
to
anything
that
we're
building.
So
that
would
be
a
good
candidate
for
flagging
as
being
not
required
for
the
curl
to
succeed.
B
Yeah
I
mean
I,
guess
we're
at
one
point:
we
could
look
into
adding
whitelist
or
something
like
that
to
say
you
know
these
domains
are
okay,
that
because
we
know
they're
flaky
or
something
like
that,
but
let's
try
the
reach
5
logic
first
and
and
see
how
that
goes,
and
if
it's
a
little
problem,
we'll
we'll
look
at
adding
more
hacks
that
way:
okay,
okay,
okay,
thanks
all
right!
Next
up,
no
demo
of
CRD
yep,
you
want
to
share
your
screen
ice
cream.
E
E
E
E
The
first
step
in
keeps
a
in
created
cluster
I
need
to
do
is
to
give
permissions
to
service
catalog.
Without
this
permission,
I
think
CRE
creation
doesn't
work
or
something
I
can't
remember
exactly
what,
but
adding
making
service
law.
Cluster
admin
worked,
I'm,
not
sure
if
there
is
a
more
granular
permission
to
fix
the
issue,
but
for
now
I'll
just
do
that.
E
A
E
So,
as
you
can
see,
it's
it's
there
and
actually
I
can
show
there
that
there
are
two
like
service.
Brokers
is
alias
with
clashing
for
both
Service,
Catalog
and
and
series
and
I
had
to
make
a
fix
to
make
it
work
because
for
TP
ours,
the
API
version,
the
coding
group
and
version
was
the
same
for
TP,
ours
and
Service
Catalog,
and
it
currently
doesn't
work
for
API
aggregator,
because
the
namespaces
are
crashing
with
each
other,
and
here
I
can
show
you
that
this
is
default.
Is
a
Service
Catalog.
E
One
I
can
also
like
prefix
with
Service
Catalog
whatever,
and
there
is
another
one
for
series.
As
you
can
see,
the
the
prefix.
The
API
version
is
different
here.
It's
perfect
with
CLE,
so
I
have
to
register
a
new
scheme
and
with
a
new
group
version
with
the
same
types
and
so
on
just
to
make
it
work.
Okay,
so.
E
E
E
E
A
So,
regarding
system
admin,
you
can
use
the
audit
to
our
back
tool
that
Jordan
Liggett
put
into
the
chat
to
narrow
down
what
the
permission
issue
is:
yeah
cool,
so
I
had
another
question
and
I
forgot
what
it
was.
It'll
probably
come
back
to
me.
So
overall,
though
it
seems
like
this
is
a
demo
of
an
in-progress
PR
and
you
feel
as
though
you
still
have
work
to
do
on
it
right.
Well,
it's.
E
Let
me
check
nice
a
lot,
so
it's
ready
to
review
is
just
it
like.
The
watch
seems
to
be
broken,
but
there
are
many
more
changes
to
review
so
anything
but
which
can
be
reviewed.
So
if
it
all
works
also
like
even
if
watches
broke
and
I
guess,
we
can
just
merge
them,
I
always
say
bye,
but
fix
separately,
yeah.
A
A
You
might
want
to
ask
Kent
rank
or
at
Microsoft
if
you
would
have
a
chance
to
review.
I
know
that
Aaron
is,
is
sick
and
then
he's
gonna
be
out
for,
like
he's
out
for
the
rest
of
the
week
in
next
week.
So
I
believe
Kent
has
some
pretty
deep
experience
on
the
stuff.
I
can
try
to
scrounge
up
a
reviewer,
that's
familiar
with
CRD
stuff.
I
am
NOT
personally
and
I
am
fairly
bandwidth
constrained
at
the
moment,
so
I'm
not
sure
I'm
gonna
had
time
to
learn.
Okay,.
E
Just
forgot
to
mention
that
in
TBR's
they're
all
resources
had
to
be
namespace
scoped
and
because
service
broker
and
service
class
are
global
in
service.
Catalog
Aaron
has
I
think
it
was
him
who
wrote
the
hack
for
passing
the
namespace
like
Service
Catalog,
for
example,
where
to
put
all
the
global
objects
so
for
see
at
ease.
We
don't
have
to
do
this
because
they
support
both
namespace
and
cluster
of
scopes
so
for
service
brokering
service
class
I
have
made
a
change
to
use
cluster
scope,
and
now
we
don't
need
this
hack
with
a
custom
namespace.
A
B
All
right,
any
other
questions
comments
all
right.
It
looks
very
cool
nice
job.
Now,
thanks
all
right.
Next
on
the
agenda,
revisits
of
service
class
and
service
plans
should
have
a
spec.
So
we
talked
about
this
yesterday.
There
seem
to
be
general
consensus
in
that
direction.
Did
anybody
have
any
concerns
or
issues
as
they
were
thinking
about
it
over
the
evening?.
A
So,
on
that
note,
I
have
had
Morgan's
whole
requests.
That
is
a
prereq
for
that
one
checked
out
several
times:
I
built
it
I've
started
doing
the
walkthrough
and
I've
gotten
distracted,
so
I
think
you
are
with
Morgan.
Now
you
should
let
him
know.
I'm
gonna
try
to
finish
that
review
tonight
sounds
good.
Oh
no!.
B
A
F
B
A
C
B
B
B
All
right,
cool,
yeah
I
will
take
some
notes
on
that.
A
lot
of
second
H
all
right
and
that
with
that
we
are
at
the
end
of
the
agenda
or
does
anybody
have
any
topics
that
are
relatively
urgent?
They
want
to
bring
up
that.
We
should
have
a
call
tomorrow,
otherwise
I'm
hearing
a
suggestion
that
maybe
we
should
cancel
tomorrow,
any
objection
to
canceling
tomorrow.
F
A
There
are
some
polls
that
matt
has
in
progress
at
once.
We
get
them
in
we're
going
to
be
unblocked
on
even
more
stuff
that
we
have
consensus.
None
that
isn't
implemented
so
I
think
that
we're
in
pretty
good
shape.
My
concern
every
time.
I
say
that
in
a
meeting
it's
that
everybody
will
be
like
whoo
I
can
relax
and
then
we
won't
be
in
good
shape
anymore.
So
just.
B
F
Well,
if
we
could
do
the
in
the
wind,
where
are
we
roughly
flailing
in
the
wind
as
far
as
beta
dates
are
going
and
to
see,
if
there's
any
big,
huge
icebergs
that
are
not
getting
the
attention
they
need,
if
it's
just
a
matter
of
just
knocking
them
down
one
at
a
time,
and
it's
just
a
matter
of
getting
people
time
to
work
on
them,
then
fine,
let's
cancel
it
I
know,
for
example.
The
name
issue
is
something
it's
a
gift
that
keeps
on
giving
I,
don't
know
any
closer
to
resolving
that
I.
A
B
Just
let
you
know
of
those
18
issues
that
attack
is
beta.
Three
of
them
are
tagged
as
needs
proposal,
but
I
believe
all
three
of
them
either
have
a
proposal
or
on
the
verge
of
getting
one
because
and
the
getting
one
is
the
name
one
so
I
think
we're,
as
Paul
said,
we're
pretty
darn
close
to
being
designed
out.
We
just
need
you
all
to
sign
up
to
do
the
work
yeah.
A
So,
for
example,
concurrent
updates
matt
has
a
poll
that
is
still
in
progress,
I
think,
but
it
it
deals
with
that.
One
sorry
what
oh
he
says:
it's
ready
for
review,
so
even
better
and
yeah
I
basically
agree
with
Doug
I.
Think
we're
we're
just
about
plan
dad
and
some
of
the
stuff
is
already
in
progress.
Okay,.