That's noted, we don't uh currently have an agenda, so if there's anything you want to mention feel free, otherwise, I'll, probably just uh call it good in a little bit.

What's the scope of the test grade UI work yeah. um Basically, we are uh rewriting the UI, because our UI is uh a couple like rounds of best practices out of date. uh So we have.

um We have some work on going in the test grid repo uh currently for, like um I, think what we have in basically an MVP status right now, um and that should be going forward to be like the uh replacing the UI later this year. I don't have a good timeline because, like again, uh we have several people working in it, but none of us are running experience. So um it's being an interesting learning experience but yeah.

Eventually it should replace the UI entirely, um and hopefully we get a easier development is the main one, but also uh we should have some stuff like better performance and just like a better separation of like the data in View and stuff, like that, going forward too godspeed thanks.

Yeah I think we were debating doing like a rewrite versus not, but it's uh there's some technical factors that I think mean the rewrite's gonna be far easier, and hopefully it should be available for folks to try out uh against the real data before the end of the year. Definitely.

Well,.

All right so at six after uh is there anything that folks want to discuss real quick or should we call it.

All right uh sounds like there's nothing, so it's really good to see. Y'all thanks, uh apologies to a short meeting, um as always, there's always the uh Sig testing Channel. If folks have anything to discuss um and I believe there was also a design document on the suggesting mailing list recently. So I will probably take a look at that after this um that if anybody else is feel free to yep, that's for arm testing. So thank you. Everyone, yeah, I, think sucks, see you later.