►
From YouTube: Kubernetes WG Apply 20180508
Description
For more information on our meetings check: https://github.com/kubernetes/community/tree/master/wg-apply
A
B
B
A
B
A
B
Generic
a
link
that
that
PR
is
out
for
our
review,
yep.
Okay,
for
this
type
validation
and
there's
actually
so
that
was
actually
the
first
reorganizing
it.
So
we
could
do
error
type
validation
for
this
types
and
there's
like
two
or
three
other
types
of
categories
of
validation
that
we
want
to
do
like
for
this
type
equals
math.
We
want
to
make
sure
it
has
a
key
I
want
to
make
sure
that
list
type,
ru,
block,
10
reviews,
yeah,
there's
one
review:
that's
out.
There
was
a
block
time.
B
B
A
A
B
A
A
A
A
B
C
B
C
D
D
D
A
C
A
D
A
A
D
Okay,
I
eyelid,
then
I
didn't
read
the
pull
in
detail,
but
the
parts
I
saw
didn't
it.
Weren't.
A
D
A
A
D
A
A
D
D
A
D
Well,
presumably,
the
open
it
be,
a
schema
for
the
C
or
D
type
will
be
provided
right
as
part
of
the
CRT,
and
today
anytime,
you
make
a
change
to
a
CRT.
We
rebuild
the
Handler
and
swap
it
in
so
like.
If
you
change
what
verbs
you
supporter,
you
change
to
support
status,
spec.
Whatever
you
make
any
time,
you
change
a
cid,
we
rebuilding
idler
and
swap
it
into
the
endpoint.
All.
D
One
thing
I,
the
dry
run
function
this
your
your
comments
on
the
another
PR
that
was
kind
of
talking
about,
apply
and,
and
some
things
that
a
use
case
that
is
probably
gonna
get
broken
by
the
server
side
apply.
Stuff
I
was
thinking
about
dry
run.
Even
if
we
don't
do
dry
run
in
the
first
revision,
it
would
be
really
handy
to
figure
out
how
you're
going
to
indicate
you
want
a
dry
run.
Know.
B
D
We
can
go
ahead
and
spec
out
the
API
bit
and
then,
if
you
have
request
a
dry
run
and
it's
not
implemented,
the
server
can
say
nope.
But
what
we
don't
want
is
for
a
user
to
say,
I
want
to
dry
run
and
a
previous
version
of
a
services.
I,
don't
know
what
dry
run
is,
but
I'm
going
to
go
ahead
and
submit
your
object.
Yeah.
A
D
A
D
C
D
C
A
B
A
F
D
D
D
E
D
C
A
D
A
A
F
D
F
D
F
B
E
A
A
Yeah
I
think
seems
like
query.
Parameters
are
probably
where
we're
going
to
come
down.
This
is
my
guess:
yeah
after
hearing
this,
but
yeah
in
that
case,
we
absolutely
need
to
have
that
in
like
yeah,
alright,
like
maybe
we
can
just
maybe
we
can
actually
make
a
change
which
adds
these
to
the
to
the
various
options
structs
and
also
adds
a
check
and
their
corresponding
handlers.
That
just
fails
the
request.
If
that
shows
up.
If
we
make
that
small
enough,
maybe
it's
actually
reasonable
to
cherry-pick
back
release
or
to
yeah.