►
From YouTube: Kubernetes WG Apply 20191210
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
B
C
A
A
A
A
A
D
Your
meditating
with
that
yeah
yeah
sure,
so
it's
we're
we're
it.
The
idea
is
to
avoid
serialize
and
all
the
way
through
JSON
to
get
done
structured
for
structure
types,
so
that's
kind
of
the
intuition
is
that
there's
like
a
seemingly
needless
conversion
to
an
intermediate
form
if
you
want
to
get
rid
of
we've
previously
identified
that
that
was
kind
of
a
long
pole
in
some
of
the
some
of
the
conversion,
steps
that
need
to
happen.
D
You
know,
hard-coded
approach
where
you
get
the
iterator
and
the
accessors
and
everything
that
way
so
that'll
kind
of
give
us
a
good
bounds
to
determine
whether
or
not
the
reflector
approach
is
competitive,
with
a
generative
approach
or
whether
a
generative
approach
might
be
worth
exploring
further
and
so
we'll
give
it
update.
Once
you
have
that
figured
out.
A
Thank
you,
Joe
yeah.
Also
so
Joe
talk
to
varcek,
which
is
doing
sums
gonna,
be
anything
and
it
looks
like
we
have
more
wriggle
room,
wiggle
room
to
have
a
location
spell
service
added
by,
and
so
we
ran
some
tests
and
it
looks
much
better
now
than
it
used
to
without
us
doing
anything.
So
that's
a
very
good
piece
of
news.
I
think
why
we're
starting
to
see
things
improving
quickly,
they'd
use
the
size
of
soya
diced.
The
size
of
this
I
realized
manage
fields.
A
B
B
After
we
change
to
using
map
string,
string,
I
probably
have
to
change
a
lot
or
more
than
before,
so
I'm,
not
sure
how
ready
it
is
like
something
old
when
I
try
to
implement
it,
but
okay
got
messed
up
by
radiation
or
something
I
look
at
it.
We
can.
But
then
you
know
here
we
can
even
like
discuss
the
name
again,
because
now
it's
options
in
the
cap
and
I
also
think
of
changes.
B
A
A
Thank
you,
Karen
looks
like
most
of
the
documentation
items
are
assigned
to
me,
but
a
lot
of
that
so
yeah.
We
need
to
clean
up
some
of
these
because
the
topology
is
diagnosed.
What
Maria
is
doing
the
CRE
elese
type
and
map
keys.
All
of
these
already
gathered
somewhere
energy
funny
issue
that
Maria
is
working
yeah.
E
So
good
that
ones,
if
you
want
to
give
me
the
first,
let
me
have
a
look
first
and
second,
a
sort
of
the
documentation
that
we've
just
started
looking
at
ice
and
I,
which
is
literally
like
starting
with
this
list
type,
if
you
change
it
to
that
other
list
type,
how
does
it
behave?
Yes,
this
is
the
one
that
I'm
going
from,
and
so
the
point
that
says
topology
compatibility
and
has
three
nested
sub
points.
Oh.
E
A
A
A
E
A
D
A
E
A
Oh
let
me
know,
but
my
understanding
is
that
at
this
point
the
X
cube
on
it
is
everything
should
be
clearly
defined,
documented
and
working
in
control
tools
and
in
Cuba
per
API
I'm.
Pretty
sure
it's
not
the
case,
but
we
need
to
find
all
the
places
where
this
is
not
properly
defined
or
not
working
properly.
Okay,
Thank,
You,
Miriam.
A
B
A
A
Just
to
make
it
clear
for
everyone,
somebody
reported
a
bug
that
when
you
do
apply,
you
don't
know
if
something
has
changed
or
not.
Today,
if
you
do
a
client-side
apply
with
kernel,
it's
gonna
say
this:
one
hasn't
changed.
This
one
has
been
modified.
This
one
hasn't
changes.
One
has
been
modified
right
now
we
send
for
the
server.
We
send
everything
to
the
server,
but
we
never
know
it's
something
actually
changed
on
that.
So
some
people
would
like
to
see
what
happened
or
like
something
happen.
A
A
A
A
B
A
B
A
F
F
C
F
A
A
A
B
A
E
A
E
A
B
B
The
removal
process
I
currently
is
because
it
was
pretty
easy
and
it
probably
needs
more
tests
or
more
test
cases,
because
currently
I
only
tested
for
removing
maps,
lists
and
items
and
not
maps
and
lists
in
maps
and
lists
and
stuff
like
that
yeah.
But
in
general
there
is
a
roofing
to
know
that
removes
every
field.
A
B
A
B
A
So
you're
gonna
get
conflicts.
I
really
appreciate
that
you
are
attached
because
we
don't
have
tests
for
the
specific
function,
which
is
payment
because
anytime
I
make
a
change.
This
is
the
thing
that
breaks
because
we
don't
have
tests.
So
thank
you
for
my
writing.
Your
tests
I've
edited
the
issue.
Let's
we
have
four
minutes.
A
Yeah,
okay,
so
can
you
imagine
PR
given
if
you
can
let
you
know
if
it's
complicated
and
then
I
look
at
it?
Okay,
yeah
I.
Don't
think
we
have
any
plans
to
do
that
now,
very
nice.
If
we
fix
this
because
somebody
opened
the
back
for
it
Jenny
do
you
know
that
somebody
complained
about
the
protocol
being
like
way
out
now.