Kubernetes SIG Windows, 7 Jan 2020

Previous Meeting Next Meeting

⏯

youtube image

►

From YouTube: Kubernetes SIG Windows 20200107

Description

Kubernetes SIG Windows 20200107

A

All right, I'm welcome, Happy, New Year and thanks everyone for joining yeah. This is the first sig windows meeting of 2020 and it's January 7th. So this is recorded and please make sure you follow the kubernetes community guidelines taking a quick look at who's here.

A

Okay, so looking at that at the meeting agenda here looks like there's one item that Michael added but I think it was on behalf of been a newb Emir talking about some of the stuff. They were looking at as part of a different approach for qadian implementation.

A

But unfortunately I don't see either of them here yet so we can come back to that if they've got a few, but they come back if they join a little bit late.

A

So one thing I wanted to note real quick is that I'm Adaline has stirred a couple PRS to add Windows Server 1909 to the test pass. That was something that Peter was asking about a couple weeks ago and so I'll get those PRS copied in here. But we did some cleanup on the subscription we're using for running the tests on Azure and now we've got enough quota available to run both 1903 and 1909, at least for the master branch.

A

Is anybody else running tests on 1903 or 1909.

A

We tried anything deep nope.

A

And Jeremy, are you running on 1903 or 1809.

B

I've got stuff running on 1903 1903.

A

Okay, yep, okay, good so from a functional standpoint. I, don't think we've done anything different in the kubernetes codebase that requires 1903. Yet have you noticed any differences in your setup? No.

B

I haven't seen any issues related to the 1903 version: okay,.

A

And same with 1909 I think the only things we might be able to bring in might be possibly some networking improvements.

A

This is there anything that they that you were aware of Dinesh or David that we need to be done to support 1903 or 1909.

C

A

The dynamic port allocation.

A

Is TS are implemented in in cube proxy.

C

A

Is that 1903 1909 or what was the minimum version.

C

What I needed to I was ready, I, don't know what you standing on.

D

There it's a little bit the front in 1909 I, don't I, don't think all the changes are in 1909 Oh, based on the new yeah.

A

Yeah because 1909 was released just as a like an optional update. It's not a yeah.

D

C

But the dynamic port allocation- yes.

D

And I think it's being back. Ported are all the way to ours: five yeah, okay,.

A

But has it already been released for 1909 and 1903.

D

David, let me double check that I can tell you in a few minutes: okay,.

A

A

So other than that I'm not aware of any other made major changes there.

A

Did anybody have have other items for today.

A

The only other item I saw in the slack the last week was about some of the scheduling. Latency tests were added for GCE.

A

Did you have any interesting findings as setting those up yang, or is it just running as expected.

E

I did some testing there so just get 410 pass and takes around 2 minutes. So I, don't know it says good enough or not. Maybe I don't know if you guys have any testing before or any data related.

E

So it's 10 pounds on a single node single nose with a course yeah.

A

I think that's pretty much in line with with what I've observed.

A

D

Each pod has one container each.

E

Yeah each one has a one container pass pass container with past image.

E

So currently I'm doing neither some other testing to find out how much pass we can support because I last time when we run a tea pass, it looks like timeout. Let's take a Tula so currently I'm doing two like 40 or 50, pass to see this working farm.

E

It's on my operations like a linear, linear relationship. If you go up with coming the legacy and the past number yeah and.

E

All the test is based on the desert project repository. It's a perfect test for pottery I replicate on tests from the Linux to two windows and they're, still figuring out in the other test case. I need to replicate like I've noticed. There's a container D note solute test, but I still still freaking out was it when it does and do we need to replicate as well.

E

E

Yes, yeah this pretty much from my Fanning's yeah, okay,.

A

Excellent thanks, sir thanks for sharing that on on the channel, and let us know here.

A

Then I've got the note from the National recurring the DSR.

A

Soft compare builds, but so did I show further to direct server return. Stuff that build you mentioned is something that would be a I think a 20 h1 build because the 1909 build number is lower than that.

A

It's uh still 18 363 is version 1909.

D

Yeah yeah, it's not fully implemented in the 1909 release, it's just a built that they picked out. Okay and it's it's not on there, but it does. These are, does work on bill. You know when a server 1903 and above or.

A

D

Communication paths are like container to container energy servers and container to external support and then in 1909 we're adding or sorry in the build 2003 where we would be adding force to service host. The pod was to note port.

D

A

D

It's like half the paths work on 1903, but.

A

D

Work in 2003, but there's no like progressions or like blockers, but I think would block support for 1903 or 1909. It's just additional capabilities right, yeah.

C

D

Think there's some like a mic is the one ruining that I'll follow up: okay, okay,.

A

All right anybody else have have topics for today.

A

All right, well, I, guess I guess we can end it early then. So if takes time for joining I'm happy new year and I, think we'll probably have have a bit more going on next week as the rest of people get back into town. So.

B

A

Have a good one.