►
From YouTube: Kubernetes SIG Windows 20190430
Description
Kubernetes SIG Windows 20190430
A
Cope
bookkeeping
things
really
quickly.
Our
face-to-face
meeting
for
the
special
interest
group
of
Windows
is
scheduled
for
Kubek
unnimaya
on
May
20th
between
11:30
a.m.
to
1:00
p.m.
so.
Please
put
that
in
your
calendar
and
I
believe
you
might
have
to
go
through
the
contributor
summit
and
register
yourselves
for
that.
As
soon
as
I
have
more
details
about
location
and
everything,
I'll
share
them
with
the
folks
that
are
joining
us.
So
single
is
an
opportunity
for
us
to
sit
down
and
chat.
There's
no
recordings.
A
B
A
B
C
C
Yeah,
so
so
for
that
one
that
I
was
paying
I
filed
that
kept
last
week,
I
was
paying
people
on
github
at
pinged
people
again
on
slack
and
so
far,
I
don't
have
any
requested
changes
from
from
from
from
Tim,
while
Claire
or
or
Derek,
but
I
or
you
jus,
but
I
still
haven't
gotten
one
of
them
to
say
that
they
will
approve.
On
behalf
of
sig
note,
so
I've
got
it
on
the
agenda
with
them
at
ten
o'clock
and
I'm
gonna
ask
them
to
either.
C
You
know
pick
an
approver
to
review
this,
or
you
know.
Derek's
belief
was
that
since
we
don't
need
to
make
substantial
changes
to
the
cubelet,
we
might
not
even
need
approval
from
sig
note
on
this,
and
so,
if
they
act
on
that-
and
we
can
just
carry
this
within
the
sig
windows
tree
and
then
you
know
review
it
between
them.
Okay,.
D
C
C
And
so
you
know
within
that
scope,
I
mean
it.
Basically,
it's
it's
not
it's
not!
Broadly
speaking,
it's
not
it's
not
broad
enough
that
they
think
it's
going
to
be
a
major
issue
and
I
think
the
hyper-v
stuff
I
can
work
around
through
with
the
annotations,
but
I
think
that
there'll
probably
be
a
separate
discussion
that
comes
out
of
this
around
how
we
consolidate
those
annotations
with
what
kata
and
the
other
frameworks
are
using.
D
E
E
A
You
can
you
send
a
quick
invite
to
me
and
Patrick
for
the
office
hours
at
the
time
that
you're
gonna
attend,
so
that
me
and
Patrick
can
try
to
join
there.
Don't
worry
about
the
deadline
it
love.
Most
of
the
building
blocks
in
the
cap
does
Lumiere
agree
with
the
principles
of
the
cabin
and
how
we
plan
to
implement
it
or
he's
also
part
of
the
resistance.
No.
E
E
A
So
so
their
main
issues
around
the
fact
of
running
the
miss
services
versus
privilege,
containers
and
you
don't
have
a
option
to
run
the
Miss
privilege
container.
So
that's
that's
it
that
doesn't
all
start
there.
But
okay
I'll
read
through
the
cap
today
but
said
so
then
he
went
to
me
and
my
Patrick
when
you're
going
to
joined
office
hours
and
come
echad
there.
If
you
need
to
pull
this
in
after
the
deadline
with
Claire,
we
can
talk
to
her
about
it
and
I
can
give
her
a
heads
up.
A
E
C
A
C
C
A
C
A
C
E
A
We
can
yeah
I'll
have
to
read
through
their
comments
and
see
if
I
can
ping
Tim
Sinclair
privately,
but
I
will
attend
the
office
hours.
Hopefully
it's
not
on
a
time
that
I
can
reschedule
something
else,
but,
and
you
can
talk
to
them
there
and
see
what
their
concerns
are,
but
I
I
agreed
you
clear
their.
The
journal
thing
is
of
the
another
green
with
something
they
should
offer
an
alternative,
because
in
our
case
like
in
this
situation,
we'll
probably
don't
have
many
options.
A
E
For
them
they
don't
want
to
create
different
like
they
don't
want
to
have
it
diverge
too
much
from
the
way
Linux
us
things,
so
they
don't
want
to
create
something.
That's
gonna
go
away.
Basically,
they're
saying
those
privilege
containers
are
going
to
come
soon.
Then,
why
put
the
effort
into
doing
this
right
now?
The.
A
A
None
of
us
knows
but
Windows
services,
how
things
have
done
in
the
windows
world,
and
these
linux
guys
need
to
understand
that
there's
a
difference
here
and
who
can
who
can
be
stuck
into
it
a
singular
way
of
thinking.
Just
because
that's
why
I
was
running
Linux
I'll
help
address
some
of
that
and
shatter
them.
A
C
Other
thing
that
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
is,
you
know:
I've
asked
some
similar
windows
engineers
to
look
into
if
some
like.
So
if
you
ask
them,
is
our
privilege
containers
possible,
they
say
no,
but
then,
if
you
get
a
little
more
finer
grain
and
say,
ok
well,
could
we
make
something
that
has
these
privileged
aspects?
C
Then
the
answer
is
maybe
and
so
I'm
trying
to
see
if
they
could
scope
something
out
that
might
be
feasible
in
2019,
because
if
not
we're
talking
a
year
and
a
half
away
yeah,
because
that
means
they
would
be
doing
it
in
a
version
of
Windows
that
they
haven't
started.
Yet.
So
it's
like
ok,
so
you
know
and
if
that's
the
case
and
we
can
go
back
and
tell
us
a
closer
lifecycle
and
say:
ok,
if
we
do
this,
it's
gonna
stick
for
at
least
four
releases.
C
C
A
C
A
154
around
16,
okay
call
it
another
thing
that
I
also
initiated
for
a
future
release
for
116,
for
example,
is
I,
initiate
a
conversation
about
support
for
Windows
nodes
in
cluster
API,
so
cabbies,
basically
getting
a
lot
more
traction
these
days,
a
lot
more
development
for
either
AWS
GCP
and
as
well
as
VMware
and
I've
basically
been
participating
in
some
of
those
conversations
and
the
goal.
There
is
to
make
sure
that,
when
they're
designing
that
data
model,
Windows
is
part
of
the
data
model
and
then
on
the
implementation
side
with
depending
on
the
provider.
A
If
it's
VMware,
AWS
I
have
to
figure
out
how
to
make
sure
that
Windows
is
provisioned
in
those
cases
too
I
think
the
azure
one
is
probably
gonna,
be
the
easiest
one.
Since
you
know
we're,
gonna
have
Microsoft
folks
running
it,
so
they'll
be
able
to
to
handle
that
the
the
VMware
on
probably
as
well,
because
that's
that's
in
in
my
scope
of
influence
I
will
see
about
the
rest.
C
A
So
so
clean
kid
stone
is
the
development
lead
at
VMware?
That's
basically
has
a
team
that
will
run
the
cubby
for
the
cup
V,
which
is
a
VMware
won
the
Cup
a
doesn't
have
an
owner
just
yet.
Okay,
actually
cup
disease.
There's
your
one,
sorry
Cubs!
These
are
your
copies.
The
AWS
one,
but
I
will
continue
monitoring
that
there
are
still
ways
away
from
a
high
level
perspective.
The
the
cub
work
right
now
is
in
V
1
alpha
1,
so
you
know
they're.
A
They
still
have
to
kind
of
prove
part
of
the
the
data
model
and
then,
as
that's
basically
getting
proved
and
understood.
Well
then,
there's
going
to
be
this
base
implementation.
That's
gonna,
be
very
similar
and
hub
all
of
the
different
cluster
providers
to
do
that,
and
that's
basically
the
copy
itself,
and
once
that's
done,
the
different
cluster
providers
will
come
in
and
start
adding
that
individual
value
on
top
of
it.
So
so
we
have
some
time
before
we
have
to
worry
about
that.
But
first
thing
is
to
make
sure
that
the
data
model
includes
this.
A
A
Just
a
cap,
like
you
know,
some
of
the
things
that
you
know
the
kind
of
pop
out
is
things.
You
know
this.
One
I
decided
the
other
day
cannot
pull
in
for
a
container
image
from
private
repository
on
Windows,
that's
pretty
big
problem
or,
or
you
know,
the
better
login
options
that
we
talked
about
kind
of
figuring,
some
of
that
out
so
or
patek.
You
finished
it
so
I
remove
public
visibility
on
teleport,
oh
yeah,.
C
If
you
need
to
review
on
that,
I
know
that
several
of
these
were
very
close
to
the
code
freeze
deadline
and
we
weren't
able
to
get
all
of
them
reviewed
and
in
last
time,
so
I'll
take
a
look
at
those
probably
starting
tomorrow
and
see
if
I
can
get
some
of
those
test
case
ones
at
least
back
back
through
the
process.
Now
that
now
that
that's
in
line
there
and
another
actually
got
a
quick
question
for
Adelina,
so
we
also
set
up
a
crowd
trigger
that
can
run
the
Windows
jobs.
A
C
Claudio
and
I
put
together
a
list
of
things
to
look
for
when
doing
reviews
as
part
of
the
promotion
criteria
and
I
also
mentioned
it
there.
So
that
way,
if
someone
had
a
question
about
whether
or
not
a
test
case
would
pass
on
Windows
before
after
the
change,
they
could
do
that.
Oh
yeah,
we
can
get
in
a
developer
guide
too.