►
From YouTube: Kubernetes SIG Windows 20200428
Description
Kubernetes SIG Windows 20200428
A
Hello,
everybody
and
welcome
to
another
sick
windows
meeting
it's
the
28th
of
April
and
as
always,
this
is
a
recorded
meeting.
So
please
adhere
to
the
CN
CF
code
of
conduct
be
aware
that
our
meetings
and
just
like
everybody
else's,
are
not
getting
posted
on
YouTube,
not
for
the
last
month.
We're
trying
to
fix
it.
It's
not
up
to
me.
The
six
contributor
experiences
tries
to
fix
that.
So
you
know
I'm
just
waiting
for
them,
I,
basically
just
upload
them
on
YouTube
right
now,
so
you
can
keep
them
there.
A
A
A
A
A
B
A
A
A
C
Okay,
so
basically,
the
idea
is
that
we
need
to
run
different
OS
versions
on
in
the
round
robin
fashion
on
the
same
job.
So
basically,
let's
say
one
day:
one
Windows
version
the
other
day,
another
and
so
on.
Now,
because
of
the
way
a
guys
engine
runs,
so
they
basically
because
we
feed
it
the
template
and
it.
C
C
Sown
in
the
kubernetes
building,
whatever
all
that
stuff
now,
the
problem
is
that
it's
highly
firm,
I,
not
only
try
from
the
punch,
would
provide
a
specific
logic
and
those
decorators,
but
I
don't
even
know
if
there
is
necessarily
a
way
to
do
it
from
what
I
saw.
So,
basically,
it
wouldn't
work
that
way
just
having
the
same
job
and
it's
switching
between
between
the
images
and
I
would
also
add
that
it
would
not
be
clear
from
a
test
grid
standpoint.
At
any
point.
What
we're
running
the
alternative
to
that
is
I
mean.
A
A
B
A
C
We
can
add
another
layer,
we
can
say
in
cube
this,
for
example,
so
I
look
into
this.
So,
for
example,
at
this
moment
in
cube
tests,
we
do
have
a
randomizer
for
say
the
location
of
a
particular
cluster
that
we
create.
So
we
don't
crowd
up
anyone
location,
so
it
just
it
just
selects
locations
at
random.
If
you
don't
specify
one,
we
can
potentially
do
that
with
the
images
in
the
sense
that
we
can
add
a
flag
to
instruct
this
round-robin
thing
in
queue
test.
C
Now
the
downside
there
is
that
you
would
have
to
I,
don't
know
how,
if
we
can
specify
the
images
between
it
needs
to
choose
from.
Let's
say
another
I
mean
another
flag,
another
parameter
or
something
like
that.
I,
don't
necessarily
am
clear
on
the
mechanics
on
how
we
would
do
that,
but
it
is
possible
I,
don't
think
it's
the
most
extraordinary
best
approach
in
the
sense
that
the
way
it's
just
a
feature
and
it
just
belong
in
there
is
it's
a
use
case.
It
doesn't
belong
in
the
intention
in
the
queue
test.
C
C
A
The
idea
there
was
that
we
I
mean
if
we
have
resources
and
you
can
actually
test
every
single
OS
and
do
a
full
test
matrix.
That's
great,
like
I,
believe
when
we
first
brought
it
up.
The
idea
was
that
we
don't
this
unlimited
cache
of
resources.
So
that's
why
we
had
recommender
or
Smith
I
recommended
it
to
run
one
every
day,
a
different
OS
right,
but
if
I
have
the
option
to
test
all
of
them
using.
C
A
C
Great,
what
I'm
saying
is
that
if
we
reduce
the
frequency,
so
we
have
three
jobs.
If
you
reduce
the
frequency
of
the
jobs
to
let's
say
three
days,
so
we
know
that
each
of
them
will
trigger
every
third
day
right.
So
it's
the
same
amount
of
resources
for
three
different
jobs
because
keep
in
mind
a
job,
creates
and
destroys
a
cluster.
So
there's
no
resources
that
keep
hanging
wrong.
D
D
Have
to
keep
those
separate,
and
then
we
can
just
vary
the
the
frequency
of
those
jobs.
I,
don't
do
you
know.
Is
there
when
I
was
looking?
I
only
saw
a
way
to
specify
the
frequency
in
like
a
total
number
of
hours.
Is
there
a
way
to
kind
of
stagger
that
so
if
we
have
three
jobs
that
are
all
set
to
run
at
like
72
hours
apart,
you
know
that
they
would
run
what
like
24
hours
apart
rather
than
having
them
all
three
run
every
three
days,
not.
A
B
A
B
A
C
B
D
F
A
G
G
So
what
absurd
hub
is
laying
you
attached
about
him
to
a
node
and
then
it
will,
if
it's
not
format,
right,
petition
format
and
during
the
teardown
we
actually
do
not
do
anything.
Special
just
remove
some
symlink
created
during
the
volumes
at
hub
and
I
noticed
they're
mighty
sure
that
after
volume
is
detached
from
the
disk
from
the
node
that
it
is
in
your
unclean
State,
and
so,
if
you
attach
again
and
use
it
in
my
say,
Linux
node,
so
it
will
fail
to
month
so
I
think
during
the
volunteered
on
this.
G
It
require
some
proper
like
an
amount
or
dismount
operation
and
I
tried
to
use
a
month.
Wow
months
we
were
command
to
place,
/
p.
That
means
remove
the
driver
directory
and
the
closed
file
system
and
it
works.
So
if
you
attach
the
linux
node
with
NTFS
file
system,
it
can
successfully
month
so
I
would
just
want
to
confirm
right.
This
is
a
proper
like
operation.
We
should
do
during
volume,
teardown
phase
and
anyone
have
some
knowledge
about
it.
Right
I
just
want
to
hear
about
a
penis.
A
G
Reasonable
to
me,
yes,
I,
think
I
kind
of
go
some
information
there
saying
if
you
don't
do
this
his
mount
and
detach
busy
like
just.
G
Unplug,
the
disk
from
node,
and
if
you
attach
again
right
in
an
unclean
state
for
Windows,
it
will
do
some
automatic
repair,
but
for
Linux
it
won't
do
it,
so
it
will
fail
and
also
if
anyone
interesting
like
investigate
how
to
share
they
have
between
Venus
and
Windows.
Note,
please
let
me
know,
or
you
want
to
share
some
knowledge
about
it.
Yeah.
F
G
F
G
F
F
G
G
F
G
G
A
H
You
have
an
update
on
endpoint
slices.
Do
you
know
that
started
the
work?
He
actually
has
the
first
implementation
ready.
It's
testing
it
as
a
Friday.
He
was
basically
Friday
evening
was
testing
it
so
I'm
hopeful
that
it
will
be
in
the
next
version
of
communities,
because
he
was
saying
that
it
shouldn't
take
him
too
much
time
to
finish
testing
I'm
having
it
for
review.
So,
depending
on
how
fast
the
video
goes,
it
might
be
the
code
fairly
quickly.
H
E
So
Darren
point
slices
basically
like
we
all
know
with
the
current
endpoints
API
I,
think
it's
in
the
currents
and
the
current
state
or
in
the
current
design
of
endpoints
there's
some
perf
problems
that
can
occur
when
there's
a
lot
of
endpoints
backing
a
service.
Basically,
the
endpoints
object
can
grow
very
large
and
since
the
whole
object
needs
to
be
recomputed,
whenever
any
operation
is
made,
you
know
just
a
single
endpoint.
It
can
lead
to
a
higher
strain
than.
B
E
E
A
E
B
A
You're,
adding
all
these
things-
and
you
know
within
probably
let
them
across
the
program
just
or
or
David.
If
you
can
take
a
look
at
that
and
make
sure
that
you
put
a
small
amendment
there,
then
how
it
will
work
on
Windows
and
and
and
put
it
out
for
review,
I'm
sure
you
should
be
fine,
but
let's,
let's,
let's
partner
up:
okay,
okay,
I'll!
Take
the
action
item.
Thank
you.