►
From YouTube: KubeVirt Community Meeting 2022-07-27
Description
Meeting Notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kyhpWlEPzZtQJSjJlAqhPcn3t0Mt_o0amhpuNPGs1Ls/
A
A
A
While
everyone
is
doing
that,
we
have
any
new
attendees
today
would
love
to
invite
you
to
speak
up
and
say
hello.
I'd
like
to
welcome
you.
I
feel
like
seeing
what
brought
you
here
today
or.
A
A
A
C
Hi
I
just
wanted
to
check.
If
someone
here
maybe
has
experience
or
knows
we
have
any
rules
about
it,
because
I
think
we
are
not
using
it
at
the
moment.
I'm
not
really
sure
it's
a
it's
just
a
way
to
it
was
raised
what
one
of
the
options
to
use
for
some
fix
that
we
need.
We
need
information
to
be
reflected
from
the
from
the
pod
up.
It's
an
annotation
actually
at
the
moment
on
the
board,
and
we
want
it
to
reach
the
vert
launcher.
C
So
there
are,
there
were
several
options
to
do
it
and
one
option
is
to
use
this
download
api,
which
event
essentially
creates
a
volume
and
and
mounts
the
the
information
on
a
file
from
the
pod,
and
it's
it
can
change
all
from
the
fly.
If
you
change
the
information
it
can
change
as
well,
but
the
question
is:
do
we
maybe
do
we.
D
C
So
the
use
case
at
the
moment
is
we
need
to
pass
information
from
from
an
annotation.
I
I
mean
I
would
prefer
not
to
discuss
on
if
we
need
to
use
it
or
not,
but
in
general
we
want
to
pass
the
information
of
multu's
network
status.
It's
a
report
that
motus
posts
puts
on
an
annotation
on
the
board
and
the
contender
is
we
need
that
contact
in
order
to
correctly.
C
C
D
D
I
don't
think,
there's
any
reason
to
avoid
this.
I
think
that
I
would
prefer,
instead
of
using
a
volume
to
pass
in
the
information
using
a
environment
variable.
C
Yeah,
it's
not.
The
problem
is
that
we
cannot
use
the.
I
think
we
cannot
use
the
environment
verb
because
I
think
that's
not
like
I'm
not
100
sure
that
with
the
environment
variables
we
cannot
change,
and
the
problem
here
is
that
the
information
is
reaching
is
coming
after
the
code
is
created,
so
the
pod
is
created.
C
There
is
an
annotation
that
is
added
by
multus
at
some
point
and
that
information
we
need
to
pass.
So
at
that
point
the
pod
is
already
created.
So
I
don't
think
we
can
change
the
environment
very
well,
but
I'm
not
sure,
like
the
volume,
I'm
sure
we
can
change
the
data
there,
but
I'm
not
sure
if
we
can
update
the
we
can
add
new
environment
variables,
while
the
pod
is
already
running.
B
Can
you
hear
me
yeah
yeah
yeah,
so
I
I
did
pretty
much
exactly
that
invert
handler
already
to
get
multiple
information
for
the
dedicated
migration
network
and
yeah.
Indeed,
it
was
the
only
solution
I
could
think
of
an
environment.
Variable
was
not
an
option.
C
B
C
F
E
The
code
right
now
and
I
can
see
that
when
you're
like
when
we're
templating
the
pod
like
if
you
like,
it,
allows
for
the
plot
template
to
feature
the
downward
api
things.
So
if
you
put
this
on
the
vmi
spec,
it
will
eventually
trickle
down
to
the
pod
from
what
I'm
understanding.
E
So
if
you
put
like
something
with
the
downward
api
on
the
vmi
spec
like
the
volume,
it
will
be
like
the
pods
templating
thing
will
put
that
information
into
the
pod
spec.
C
D
C
C
D
D
Yeah,
there's
no
reason
to
avoid
the
downward
api
that
I'm
aware
of.
I
mean,
of
course,
we'll
have
to
see
the
pr
but
sounds
reasonable.
D
A
The
open
floor
item
today
domain
join
after
clown.
Some
conversation
was
in
cooper
dev.
I
am
not
caught
up
on
the
kubrick
dev
thread.
For
that
are
there
any
specific
questions?
I
know
that
there's
different
ways
of
managing
windows
instances
presuming
this
is
about
windows
instances.
G
Yes
is
about
windows.
We
would
like
to
have
any
help
to
create
the
eml
file
with
the
xml
file
mentioned
from
alex,
but
we
didn't
get
any
loki
until
now
how
to
implement
the
domain
join
of
the
the
windows
to
activate
directory
after
we
clone
it.
We
have
prepared
an
image
which
is
prep
in
a
proper
way,
but
after
run
it
we
need
to
do
the
domain
join.
G
A
Yeah,
if
anyone
has
anything
specific
on
that
and
wants
to
add
to
the
cube
for
dev
discussion,
I
will
link
it
back
up
here.
Is
there
anything
cooper
specific
to
that?
It
sounds
like
a
question.
That's
generally
applicable,
regardless
of
what.
G
User
you're
using
we,
we
we
would
like
to
to
modify
the
emo
file
of
group
word
and
be
able
to
do
the
domain
join
with
that
yaml
file,
and
this
is
all
you
understand-
that's
what
we
was
not
able
to
do
until
now.
A
I'm
going
to
try
and
not
get
ahead
of
myself
with
general
assumptions
on
the
topic
without
at
least
being
caught
up
on
the
kubrick
debt
side.
Does
anyone
else
have
anything
top
of
mind
to
add
to
that?
That
might
be
pointing
in
the
right
direction.
A
All
right
again,
if
anyone
does
come
across
info,
that
might
be
helpful,
adding
to
the
uber
dev
conversation
on
that
would
be
welcome.
A
A
B
Sorry,
I
added
this
to
the
thing
I
went
through
the
pull,
requests
and
pulled
out
the
stuff
that
doesn't
have
any
comments
on
them.
So
that's
why.
B
Hi
cat,
you
should
be
able
to
add
okay
to
test,
just
as
a
comment
should
be
cute
for
testing
them.
A
C
I
just
have
one
administrative
comment
here:
is
try
not
to
use
the
okay
to
test
too
much?
It's
usually
for
non-members
pr's
in
general.
Usually
someone
needs
to
explicitly
run
a
specific
test.
C
And
use
the
okay
to
test
only
only
when
you
it's
like
only
when
you
feel
it's
it's
appropriate
to
give
like
from
now
on,
approved
to
test
it
on
all
the
future
pushes
because
this
is
what
it
does
actually.
A
Do
we
have
something
documented
in
developer,
documentation
or
something
like
that
on
what
types
of
tests
we
can
request
or.
C
I
think
that
there
is
this
list.
No,
so
this
is
the
the
point
is
like.
There
is
a
change
and
the
change
probably
affects
a
specific
test
and
then
then
the
specific
test
you
need
to
do
slash
test
and
then
the
name
of
the
it's
from
the
list
below.
I
think,
but
this
is
like
a
not
a
hard
rule.
It's
just
sometimes
it's.
I
think
it's
okay.
To
do
it's
more.
Let's
say
it
will
help
the
ci
to
be
less
loaded
and
it
will.
B
A
H
Hi,
I'm
ali,
that's
that's
my
pr.
I
I
just
wanted
to
know.
How
can
I
move
it
forward,
like
I,
I
think
I'm
missing
an
approved
label
on
this.
I
just
wanted
to
bring
it
to
attention.
A
F
Also
add
some
context
to
this.
This
was
some
in
the
pr
that
we've
been
working
on.
It's
part
of
the
sig
scale,
it's
one
of
our
performance
jobs.
Well,
I
think
that
the
400
vm
density
test
doesn't
clean
up
after
itself
correctly,
so
this
pr
is
focused
on
addressing
that,
so
that
job
will
start
working.
A
It
it
looks
like
it's
being
actively
worked.
Is
there
anything
specifically
that
needs
extra
discussion
or
action
right
now.
H
Yeah
so
I
have
tested
this
vr
locally,
it
works
and
I
think
there
is
just
one
label
which
is
missing
in
order
to
you
know
merge
that
I
was
wondering
if
someone
someone
can
bless
it
with.
You
know,
take
a
look
and
bless
it
with
an
approved
level.
H
If
yeah,
if,
if
there
is
anything
on
my
side,
I
can
do
to
help
with
this
review,
please
let
me
know
I
can
share
more
details
as
needed.
A
A
So
this
has
been
a
little
bit
of
chatter
virtual
machine
instance,
preset
in
favor
of
renamed
instance.
Virtual
machine
instance
type
looks
like
this.
Conversation
doesn't
have.
A
A
If
you
have
any
to
share
now,
please
feel
free
to
speak
up
and
contribute
your
thoughts,
otherwise
feel
free
to
find
the
conversation
in
the
coopert
dev
mailing
list.
H
That
I
want
one
yeah,
so
I
I
think
there's
a
conversation
going
on,
but
I
just
wanted
to
get
get
this
for
opinion
in
the
community.
So
there
was
an
issue
reported
that
I
have
reported
that
does
not
the
the
keyboard
admitter
web
hook
does
not
validate
spec
dot
affinity
and
in
order
to
add
that
validation,
it
would
be
great
if
we
can
import
a
package
from
kubernetes.
So
basically
the
same
validation
that
the
board
runs.
We
should
be
able
to
validate
those
in
vmi
spec
as
well.
H
However,
the
validation
package
is
not
exported
as
a
standalone
package
like
like
the
type
score
v1
which
can
get
you
the
pod.
H
So
I
was
wondering
if,
if
folks
feel
that
this
would
be
useful-
and
we
like
should
report
this
in
upstream
kubernetes-
to
add
that
as
a
standalone
package
that
can
be
imported.
H
Yeah
thanks
for
giving
me
an
opportunity
to
raise
this,
I
appreciate
it
I'll
follow
the
thread.
H
A
All
right,
if
anyone
has
any
ideas,
solutions
or
next
steps
to
add,
please
feel
free
to
contribute.
F
B
B
A
I
did
some
direct
kernel
duding
with
coopert
a
few
weeks
back.
A
B
F
Yes,
if
I
understood
the
understated
correctly,
it's
like
you
have
a
vm,
and
probably
it's
also
kvnvm
and
on
top
of
it
or
the
user,
creates
another
one
with
skewbird.
C
Well,
does
it
mention
it's
nested.
A
Yeah,
if
we
can
capture
any
of
the
additional
context
or
have
them
add
it
to
the
bug,
that
would
be
helpful.
A
All
right,
but
if
I
direct
them
towards
bugzilla,
would
that
be
out
of
sync
with
what
was
already
discussed,
I'm
not
up
to
speed
on
that
conversation.
B
It
looks
like
rona
muir
has
suggested
that
yeah
in
the
slap
channel-
okay,
I've
got
a
thumbs
up
from
this
stuff,
but
yeah
there's
no
bug
link
in
that
slack
chat.
So.
C
C
B
A
Going
once
going
twice,
thank
you
all
for
joining
and
for
contributing
today.
Today's
call
look
forward
to
seeing
you
same
time
same
place.
Next
week
have
a
good
week.
This
cat.