►
From YouTube: KubeVirt Community Meeting 2022-03-30
Description
Meeting Notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kyhpWlEPzZtQJSjJlAqhPcn3t0Mt_o0amhpuNPGs1Ls/
A
Daniel
hi
everyone-
this
is
thecube
community
meeting
at
the
30th
of
march.
2022
first
point
is
in
general
introduction,
so
anyone
who
wants
to
introduce
themselves
to
the
keyboard
community
does
now
help
the
opportunity
to
do
this.
So
do
we
have
anyone
who
is
new
and
would
like
to
introduce
himself.
A
Okay,
so
I
think
that
means
no.
So
then
next
point
would
be
the
agenda
nodes
which
are
quite
empty.
So
I
think
I
guess
that
are
there
any
things
that
someone
would
like
to
add
on
short
notice
now
or
should
we
just
go
to
the
open
floor.
A
Okay,
I
think
then
the
lecture
is
the
case.
Open
floor
is
also
empty,
so
yeah
I'd
like
to
ask
for
someone
maybe
to
bring
something
up.
If
you
want.
B
Hi
hi
guys
so
yeah
I
wanted
to
you-
know,
discuss
a
bit
about
this
because
I
opened
this.
I
think
last
week,
or
maybe
before
I
don't
remember,
but
basically
this
came
out
from
some
attempts
with
snow
in
openshift,
not
that
it
it's
important,
but
basically
I
noticed
that
the
workload
updater
doesn't
actually
check
for
the
live
migration
feature
gate
before
migrating
any
vms.
B
Yeah
exactly
so
lubo
argued
that
we
should
fire
an
alert
when
a
misconfiguration
comes
up,
and
here
the
misconfiguration
would
be
that
you
have
live
migration
as
a
workload
update
method,
but
you
don't
have
the
feature
gate
enabled
which
can
easily
happen,
because
we
don't
have
a
validating
web
book
that
checks
the
cuber
cr
at
creation.
B
So
yeah
I
mean
the
discussion.
There
was
like
a
small
discussion
whether
we
should
fire
this
alert
when
it
should
be
fired
and
if
it
should
be,
like
you
know,
rate
limited
in
some
way
right
now
like.
What's
in
the
pr,
whenever
an
update
to
the
cubercr
would
happen,
an
alert
would
probably
fire
would
probably
be
fired
if
there
is
a
misconfiguration
that
won't
happen.
B
C
Like
I
don't
know
a
point
to
make
about
this
like,
as
far
as
I
understand
like
the
events,
are
automatically
cleaned
up
after
an
hour.
C
So
if
this
is
just
like
at
editing,
time
like
it'll,
probably
disappear
from
the
event
list
and
the
relevant
information
will
be
gone
unless
you
have
some
sort
of,
let's
say
a
third-party
service
like
where
you're
sending
the
events
to
which,
probably,
I
guess
it's
what
people
use,
but
nevertheless
my
point
is:
wouldn't
it
make
more
sense
to
have
like
on
the
migration?
C
B
I
think
that
happens
already.
I
think
I'm
not
100
sure
about
it,
but
this
is
like
this
is
a
little
bit
different
because
the
workload
updater
tries
to
migrate
like
outdated
launcher
when
you
upgrade
kuber.
So
I
mean
it's
a
not
so
rare.
B
It's
also
kind
of
a
rare
event
and
it's
a
little
bit
like
detached
from
the
vm
or
vmi
itself,
because
it's
a
rather
like
a
cluster
configuration
rather
than
you
know.
The
vm,
because
I
mean
vm
can
be
live
migratable,
but
you
and
you
can
have
the
feature.
Gate
turned
off
and
that's
still
valid
right,
because
maybe
you
don't
want
them
to
be
migrated.
C
I
see
but
yeah.
My
point
is
only
that,
like
the
events
will
be
automatically
cleaned
up,
so
I'm
not
sure
if,
unless
people
are
using,
something
else
to
put
the
events
on
this
information
will
disappear.
So
I'm
not
quite
sure
how
useful
it
is
like.
My
point
is
basically
that
the
events
do
not
live
forever.
B
Okay,
well,
actually,
I
didn't
know
that,
to
be
honest,
because
that's
usually
I
mean
looking
at
the
code,
that's
usually
what
we
do
firing
an
event
when
we
detect
some
kind
of
like
warning.
In
this
case,
it's
not
like
a
straight
up
error,
but
I
guess
your
suggestion
is
maybe
maybe
putting
like
a
condition
on
the
qrcr
that
would
probably
go
more
in
the
way
of
what
you're
suggesting.
C
I
am
not
sure,
like
I'm,
actually
not
suggesting
anything,
I'm
just
saying
that
like
if
this
is
something
that
happens
like
very
seldom
well
yeah,
the
event
will
very
shortly
so
probably
when
you
will
and
check
what
happened.
The
event
will
already
be
gone
and
like
what
you're
attempting
to
do
will
well
not
happen,
or
it
will
happen
for
a
very
short
for
a
very
brief
period
of
time.
So
I'm
just
pointing
that
out.
C
B
C
Right
yeah,
I
think
so,
but
I
honestly
and
but
this
is
for
the
vms-
it's
not
for
like,
for
let's
say
pieces
of
the
cluster
like
you're
upgrading
the
launchers,
or
something
like
that.
These
are
for
users,
vms,
isn't
it.
B
Yeah
yeah
the
workflow
updater.
Basically,
what
it
does
it's
yeah
migrating
the
the
vm.
In
order
to
update
the
you
know,
the
underlying
launcher.
C
So
I
guess
so
I
think
eddie
abstracted
really
well
what's
happening
and
I
think,
like
a
status
condition.
For
this
I
mean
honestly,
it
seems
like
the
correct
place
to
have
it
okay,
but
as
you.
C
A
Okay,
then,
if
that's
so
concluded,
then
I
don't
see
any
else.
Any
other
pull
requests
does
that
need
to
tension
here.
So
let's
have
a
quick
look
at
the
mailing
list
review
whether
we
probably
skip
some
stuff
that
might
not
be
handled
somehow
we
have
here
the
design
proposal
for
the
memory
dump,
but
I
think
this
is
already
eight
days
ago,
so
I
think
the
only
thing
that
yeah,
I
think
there
is
nothing
to
do
here.
So,
let's
move
on
to
the
next
one.
A
A
F
Yeah
I
can.
I
can
confirm
that
that
is
the
experience
funny
thing
to
you
as
well.
A
Okay,
so
yeah.
I
think
that
we
can
just
accept
this
and
then
find
someone
who
wants
to
work
on
it.
So,
let's
see,
maybe
I'm
not
sure
if
we
can
just
tag
him.
Probably.
A
By
the
way,
catherine,
would
you
probably
be
interested
in
also
working
on
that
or
because
I
think,
if
it
hurt
you
also,
then
you
might
also
be
interested
to
improve
the
experience
for
other
people.
I'm
not
sure.
A
Yeah
yeah,
if
you
I'm
just
going
to
to
put
the
issue
link
into
the
chat,
if
anyone
is
interested
to
looking
into
that.
So
sorry
that
was
the
wrong
one.
This
one
then,
when
you
can
might
be
able
to
take
a
look
on
that.
A
A
F
G
Hi
everyone
I
mean
this
is
more
of
the
issue
of
the
host
operating
system.
I
think
what
we
are
missing
is
the
mention
or
in
our
dock,
that
some
packages
are
needed
in
order
to
properly
work
with
some
settings.
F
A
I
think,
can
I
just
just
tag
you
on
that
lugo
or
should?
Should
I
add
something
on
that?
I
can
just
also
do
that.
So
so
you're
saying
this
is
this
is
just
correct
so
because
we
are
not
exactly
saying
that
we
are
not
directly
supporting
rocky
linux,
for
example,
because
there
are
packages
missing
right,
and
maybe
I
think
this
the
open
thing
there
would
be
to
open
up
a
section
in
the
user
guide,
probably
where
we
would
advise
what
packages
are
exactly
missing
or
wouldn't
that
help
somehow.
F
If
we're
trying
to
address
a
wider
variety
of
possible
common
implementation
challenges,
we
might
do
a
documentation
section
specific
to
like
common
caveats
or
something
I
need
to
find
documentation
that
says
that
more
eloquently
but
and
and
emulate
that,
but
that
would
make
sense.
H
I
guess
we
can
also
suggest
installing
this,
this
policy
that
we
have
already
compiled
just
manually,
and
then
this
will
happen.
A
Bloody,
do
we
have
it?
Do
we
have
a
link
for
me
what
I
can
just
put
in
there
so
where
we
describe
how
that
is
installed
manually,
somehow,
to
be
honest,.
A
A
Okay
dude,
would
you
be
wanting
to
tackle
that
somehow
or
I
guess.
A
A
D
A
I'm
having
a
little
bit
I'm
a
bit
confused.
This
looks
like
chinese
no.
A
Okay,
so
he's
saying,
ipv4
addresses
this
one,
and
this
is
an
ip6
ipv6
address
right,
oh
no!
This
is
no.
F
C
C
Off
my
my
connection
is
really
bad
at
the
moment,
but
the
mac
addresses
match.
But
apparently
I
am
honestly
the
big
thing
is.
I
have
no
clue
what
the
the
screenshot
actually
represents.
Where
did
this
come
from
and
what
are
we
saying
this
ipv4
cider
actually
is
I
don't
know
what
it
says,
so
I
guess
that
he
expects
this
to
match
with
the
info
below,
but
I
cannot
say
that
it
should
match,
because
I
don't
know
what
the
above
one
actually
is.
E
D
Right
so
one
second,
if
you
read
the
the
screenshot
with
the
yemen,
so
that
says
that
the
ip
address
was
detected
on
the
pod
of
the
world
launcher
more
or
less,
and
what
you
see
here
is
I'm
guessing
it's
what
he
sees
in
the
in
the
guest
itself.
This
is
what
so
he
says,
it's
not
the
same.
D
No,
it's
not
not
depend,
it
depends
on
the
it
depends.
What
binding
is
he
using.
D
Okay,
he's
using
bridge
so
if,
if
he.
C
Yes,
it
should
match,
but,
like
I
don't
know
what
the
thing
above
is
like
you,
you're
saying
this
like
you're
assuming
this
is
the
the
guest
info.
D
A
Okay,
so
let's,
let's
have
a
quick
look
at
the
virtual
machine
instance,
probably
so
what
we
can
at
least
deduce
from
that
is
that
the
network,
where
is
it.
B
Yeah,
you
can
see
the
guest
main
interface
from
the
yaml
as
well
from
the
vm
definition,
because
he
says
that
he
wants
an
intel
e
thousand.
And
I
think
I
read
that
in
the
screenshot
as
well.
So.
A
A
And
ask
for
what?
Can
you
elaborate
a
little
bit
on
what
you're
expecting?
Because
this
is
not
completely
clear.
C
C
A
D
A
Okay,
I
hope
hope
that
makes
it
a
little
bit
more
clear.
So
I'm
going
to
add
this.
Okay,
like
I
said
eddie,
did,
was
that
the
would
you
want
to
look
at
that
author
or
should
I
attack
you
on
the
issue,
or
should
we
just
wait
until
he
gives
us
more
information.
C
D
Let
me
yell,
just
one
note:
is
I
don't
I
don't
I
mean
if
he's
using
the
bridge
binding,
then
whatever
ip
was
said
there,
it
should
be
faster.
I
guess.
D
A
C
With
like
with
that,
we
can,
we
can
see
it
because
I
mean
if
the
pod
interface
does
not
have
an
ip.
I
have
no
clue
how
this
could
happen.
Well,
we
wouldn't
try
to
pass
it
along
to
the
guest,
but
I
guess
that
breaks
like
kubernetes.
C
A
A
A
Okay,
so
actually
can
we
just
can
we
just
I
wouldn't
want
to
just
just
tell
him
that
that
we
are
probably
not
supporting
this
old
version,
but
we
could
at
least
suggest
that
he
might
might
be
updating
to
a
new
version
and
see
if
this
still
occurs
somehow
or
what
you
would
you
think
I
I
think
yeah,
but
but
if
112,
I
think
he
doesn't
have
any
other
option
right.
So.
G
Hi,
can
you
please
ask
the
person
to
provide
crd
for
virtual
machine
instance.
A
A
A
Okay,
so
that's
done
okay,
so
then
I
think
we
should
be
good
with
the
bug
scrub
just
going
to
reload
reload,
the
pack
we'll
stop
there.
So
let
me
see
most
of
the
things
have
at
least
a
couple
of
issues
or
some
labels.
Okay.
So
then,
let's
get
back
to
close
this
box
cup
and
yeah
final
call
for
anyone
probably
to
bring
something
up
before
we
close
the
meeting.
A
Oh,
I
saw
that
there
is
another
request.
I
think
we
have
time
for
that.
Probably
so
maybe
we
can
have
a
quick,
quick
discussion
about
that.
If
anyone
wants
to.
G
I
A
Okay,
okay,
we
have
already
a
discussion
going
on
so
so,
okay,
so
you're
just
wanting
to
bring
this
into
to
everyone's
attention.
Or
do
you
have
a
specific
question
on
this?
How
we
should
proceed
or
what
do
you
want
to
ask.
I
I
just
would
like
further
review
and
you
know
push
it
over
the
hump
here.
I
think
it's
kind
of
gone
still
the
past
couple
weeks.
A
Okay,
so
yeah.
I
guess
that
you've
noticed
probably
that
we
had
some
stuff
in
nci
going
on
and
we
had
a
quite
a
hard
time,
so
maybe
oh
yeah.
I
see,
for
example,
that
yeah,
but
the
job
triggers
already
look
good.
So,
okay,
I
think
there's
everything
at
least
regarding
from
ci
side
there.
It
looks
that
looks
good,
so
yeah.
Anyone
else
wants
to
want
to
have
a
look
at
that.
A
A
G
A
A
Yeah
sure
sure
yeah
I
just
saw
that
this
was
already
reviewed
by
you.
So
so
we
should
be
good
there,
okay,
so
okay,
then
I
think
that
we.