►
From YouTube: KubeVirt Community Meeting 2019-09-18
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Stew,
thank
you
very
much,
and
here
we
go.
I'm
Fabien,
hello,
so
being
out
for
a
little
bit.
I
just
wanted
to
catch
up
with
our
submission
to
CN
CF.
So
it
was
so
great
to
see
that
we
got
to
sponsors
tour
for
cube
roots
who
entered
the
CSU,
sent
bog,
CN,
CF
sandbox,
and
it
we
just
at
the
pr2
65.
It
was
exactly
which
is
here.
Oh
that's,
the
wrong
one
and
we
got
accepted
the
process
to
have
cubed
in
the
sandbox
is
in
full
process.
B
It's
mainly
a
couple
of
things,
so
I'm
Daniel
will
speak
about
some
of
that
later
on,
that
is
enabling
DCO
and
investigating
all
the
licenses
we're
using
for
for
Qbert
and
Daniel.
Give
us
an
update
there.
Other
parts
are
transferring
the
cubed
IO
domain
over
to
the
CN
CF.
That
process
has
been
started
and
it
will
probably
lead
to
interruptions.
Our
domain
will
get
lost,
so
we
have
to
choose
a
new
name
in
the
worst
case,
but
ideally
the
scene
CF
will
just
get
that
new
name.
B
A
new
domain
I
mean
as
part
yeah
and
that's
it.
So
congratulations
to
all
of
us.
Actually,
if
also
for
adding
your
use
cases
to
the
2d
to
the
pole,
request
for
the
scene,
CF
I
think
we
did
much
more
and
was
actually
needed
to
enter
the
sandbox,
and
it
was
a
little
bit
interesting
to
see
how
long
it
took
to
get
that
second
sponsor.
Considering
that
there
is
no
written
rule
that
they
need
to
be.
You
know
knowledge
on
the
sponsor
side
to
to
sponsor
a
project.
B
B
B
A
B
B
The
other
thing
we
got
is
actually
we
can
speak
about
q''-word
at
the
I,
think
it's
it's
C
and
CF
pods,
which
is
like
a
goof
area,
but
the
smaller
pods
and
I'm
still
following
up
with
the
C
and
C
F.
If
we
can
have
some
presence
there,
I
still
need
to
get
some
details.
But
if
you
plan
to
attend,
then
maybe
you
want
to
spend
an
hour
or
two
to
speak
about
Cuba
at
those
pods
I
expect
that
we
get
some
time
there.
Although
I
don't
know
the
details
yet
all
right.
C
Actually,
regarding
the
CF
for
us
entering
Frost,
the
sandbox,
we
got
asked
by
CN
CF
numbers
that
we
need
to
enable
D
Co
for
every
commit
we
do
so.
This
is
a
plugin
that
checks
whether
the
commits
are
signed,
actually
not
that
hard,
but
we
are
still
in
the
process
of
enabling
this
for
all
repos.
As
this
is
the
ask.
I
talked
to
a
woman
more
about
that,
and
he
told
me
there's
also
a
plugin
for
prowl,
which
we
are
going
to
an
evil.
C
C
D
D
C
E
A
E
F
So
just
a
question
for
my
own
clarification
in
my
own
edification.
If
you
will
this,
this
DCO
plugin
sounds
like
a
great
idea:
I
always
think
about
security,
making
sure
that
the
right
people
are
checking
in
and
when
we
pull
it
down
it's
safe.
Is
this
a
CNCs
requirement
and
is
it
gonna
like
like
like
now,
because
we
now
are
part
of
the
sandbox.
F
B
You're
having
the
DCO
is
a
requirement
and
actually
what
I?
What
I
wonder
about
this
discussion
is
really
is.
If
we
should
should
require
GPG
signed
commits
as
well
as
well
as
two-factor
authentication,
at
least
for
the
core
contributors
with
merge
rights.
I
mean
we
know
how
much
that
stuff
went
on
and
where
it's
going
on.
So.