►
From YouTube: KubeVirt Community Meeting 2022-04-13
Description
Meeting Notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kyhpWlEPzZtQJSjJlAqhPcn3t0Mt_o0amhpuNPGs1Ls/
A
All
right,
well,
it
looks
like
people
are
joining
in
welcome
to
this
week's
weekly
uber
community
meeting.
If
you
want
to
go
ahead
and
log
your
attendance
and
add
any
items
to
agenda
open
floor
or
pull
requests,
mailing
list,
conversations
that
might
need
a
little
extra
attention
feel
free
to
go
ahead
and.
B
B
I
noticed
daniel
hill's
online
and
I
know
he
talks
a
lot
about
test
failing
and
stuff.
I've
got
this
one
which
has
a
failed
test.
It's
a
single
line,
change
to
do
with
a
link
and
it
failed
a
test,
and
it
seems
odd
that
it
would
fail
any
test.
Like
I
know,
there's
been
a
lot
of
been
a
bit
of
a
chatter
about
test
failing
stuff.
Is
it
normal
for
me
just
like
to
run
a
retest,
and
is
there
a
a
good
or
bad
time
to
run
those
retests
to
ensure
better
success?.
C
If
you
have
something
that
is
still
failing
and
you,
this
looks
like
some
kind
of
flakiness,
which
you,
for
example,
could
which
you
could
look
at
first
would
be
the
flag
finder
reports,
for
example,
that
you,
if
you
would
see
there,
that
this
test
was
flaky.
Actually,
then
you
probably
could
do
a
re-test.
C
First
of
all,
I
wouldn't
generally
assume
that
the
test
is
just
flaky
and
just
hit
retest
without
investigating
anything
but
yeah.
If
you
have
the
impression
that
it's
not
flaky
and
it's,
for
example,
it's
working
locally,
then
maybe
it's
a
safe
thing
to
do.
So
I
don't
think
if
that
or
I'm
not
exactly
sure.
If
that
answers
your
question,
does
it
or.
B
C
So
what
I
would
generally
not
advise
is
just
to
just
to
run
the
retest
just
without
checking
anything
so
yeah
but
yeah.
But
I
am.
I
am
aware
that
we
still
have
some
flaky
tests
that
somehow
hold
off
lanes
from
getting
green,
but
I
think
these
are
a
couple,
but
I
also
must
admit
that
we
have
not
the
best
situation
of
ci
recently,
because
we
had
lots
of
things
going
wrong.
D
D
B
I
believe
cats
put
it
into
the
minutes
here.
Progress
were
that
need
attention,
seven,
five,
five,
six
and
if
I
look
at
it
here
it
failed
the
pull,
cube,
e2e
windows,
2016
test,
but,
like
I
said
it's
a,
I
was
replacing
a
it's
a
link.
I
changed
it
from
mini
cubed
to
okd
and
I
I
don't
understand
why
that
would
fail
any
test.
C
A
B
Yeah
kind
of
me
too,
so
the
cube
calendar
meeting
was
set
to
gmt,
which
doesn't
respect
alex
savings
time,
and
I
think
there
was
one
other
one
that
I
haven't
deleted,
which
was
it
was
owned
by
fabian,
which
was
the
correct
time.
I
ended
up
just
changing
the
the
time
of
the
keyboard
to
match
what
is
in
the
the
meeting
minutes.
I
guess
this
is
an
opportunity,
perhaps
to
be
able
to
say.
A
B
B
B
It
basically
gives
us
an
opportunity
to
present
kind
of
like
who
we
are,
what
we're
doing
and
have
like
a
correspondence
with,
I
guess,
key
vert
users
or
potentially
cube
new
keyboard
users.
I've
got
one
presenter
already
confirmed,
but
it'd
be
nice
to
have,
I
think,
a
couple
of
people
to
to
be
there.
Maybe
we
could
run
a
demo
or
it's
kind
of
a
little
bit
open-ended
as
to
what
we
end
up
doing
in
that
minute
slot.
B
G
G
B
D
Yeah,
sorry,
it's!
I
was
a
bit
late,
editing,
those
it's
not
directly
it's
so
it's
like
50
related
to
to
convert
here.
There
was
a
request
to
have
some
checks,
run
validations
or
tests.
However,
you
want
to
call
them
to
run
on
an
active,
even
production
cluster,
and
there
is
a
proposal
raised
to
to
have
something
like
that
in
jail.