►
From YouTube: KubeVirt Community Meeting 2022-06-22
Description
Meeting Notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1kyhpWlEPzZtQJSjJlAqhPcn3t0Mt_o0amhpuNPGs1Ls/
A
All
right
and
then,
of
course,
while
you're
in
there,
if
you
have
anything
to
add
to
agenda
open
floor,
any
specific
pull,
requests
or
mailing
lists
and
bug
scrub
items
that
you
want
special
attention
on,
go
ahead
and
add
those
now,
while
we're
getting
all
that
filled
out.
If
there
is
anyone
new
on
the
call
today,
who
would
like
to
say
hello,
introduce
themselves,
maybe
give
us
a
quick
tidbit
on
what
brought
you
to
cooper,
we'd
love
to
hear
from
you.
A
B
Hello,
my
name
is
cory,
I'm
from
the
university
of
wisconsin
looking
for
a
solution
for
essentially
services
that
we
provide
that
still
require
a
gui
interface.
A
Yep
you're
a
little
quiet,
but
I
can't
hear
you
how
about
now.
That
is
better.
C
Okay,
so
sorry
I
had
some
audio
issues.
No,
so
I
also
also
was.
A
C
These
vrs
should
be
converted
in
order
to
not
run
all
the
tests
automatically
and
save
civ
resources.
All
we
are
doing
is
adding
a
that
will
hold
the
pr
from
merging,
but
it
should
be
converted
to
draft.
So
first
question
is:
does
anybody
know
how
to
automate
this,
and
the
second
question
is:
do
anyone
agree
that.
A
So
there
was
some
cutout
in
and
out
there
I'm
going
to
summarize.
Basically
what
I
my
takeaway
was
that,
in
order
to
reduce
load
on
ci
and
not
run
automated
ci
tests
on
draft
prs,
we
should
be
vetting
rpr's
to
draft
until
they're,
ready
to
start
running
tests
and
simultaneously
we're
looking
for
tribal
knowledge,
possibly
on
how
to
implement.
That
best.
Is
that
accurate.
C
Yes,
thank
you.
My
other
issues
are
horrible
yeah.
So
if
anybody
knows
how
to
automate
this
with
pro
and
everything,
it
would
be
great,
but
if
not,
then
at
least
we
should
ask
the
people
to
convert
it
to
draft
if
they're
doing
a
work
in
progress.
Pr.
A
A
A
Okay,
moving
on
andrew
burgle's,
regular
reminders
this
month,
of
course,
that
we
are
deprecating
several
of
the
duplicate
calendar
invites
that
are
out
and
about
so.
If
you
do
not
have
the
cncf
organizer.
A
D
D
So
this
means
all
proposal
is
what
can
works,
but
I
still
have
some
issues
because
I
I
tried
the
bootstrap
image
in
the
kuby
world
project
infra
image,
but
the
kind
cluster
failed
to
start.
So
I
tried
the
current
image
which
comes
from
kubernetes
project
and
it
works.
D
I
haven't
investigate
why
quite
deep
on
why
kind
kind
cluster
cannot
start
on
the
bootstrap
image.
It
seems
related
to
my
statements
on
root
face,
and
this
also
happened
on
x,
active
86,
not
only
on
64..
D
So
did
anyone
try
to
start
a
kind
cluster
in
the
photoshop
image
of
x84
g4.
D
D
We
need
to
find
a
way
to
parallel
testing,
to
do
parallel,
testing
on
64
server
without
technician
virtualization,
so
we
choose
to
use
the
kind.
You
know
the
kind
can
start
a
docker
in
docker
environment,
so
we
don't
need
to
use
nested
virtualization.
We
can
also
have
multiple
kubernetes
cluster
on
one
server
by
using
the
docker
in
docker
environment
yeah.
D
D
If
you
can
add
a
dev,
edward
hearth,
I'm
not
sure
if
my
presentation,
my
pronunciation
right,
also
in
the
comments
in
this
issue,
can
you
let
me
either
go
up
yeah
go
up.
I
think
when
the
kubernetes
could
be
words,
community
have
done
some
works
on
trying
to
do
the
equity
tests
in
the
kind
cluster
yeah
yeah,
just
the
one
before
this
one
one.
A
As
far
as
just
does
cooper
run
at
all
in
kind,
yes,
it
does
another's
ci
testing
in
unkind
in
different
locations
on
x86.
I
do
not
know
about
name
arnold
64.
F
That
we
run
in
kind
is,
is
not
parallel,
because
because
of
limited
resources
like
srav,
it's
quite
limited
and
then
we
also
run
vgpu.
D
F
Also
limited
resource,
so
yeah,
none
of
this
is
is
parallel.
D
Okay,
well,
I
don't
need
paranormal,
but
when
I
try
to
start
only
one
kind
cluster
within
the
bootstrap
image.
Okay,
understand
what
I
see
yes,
so
yes
and
I
got
got
some
programs.
F
I
can
take
a
look
at
this,
but
maybe
you
should
look
at
the
vgpu,
the
vgpu
test
lane
with
the
the
kind
that
it
uses
it,
because
it's
a
very
simplified
comparing
to
what
srv
does
so.
Maybe
that
would
also
give
you
some
hints.
I
don't
know:
okay,
cool.
A
A
Pr's
right
in
the
center
anything
last
minute
for
agenda
or
open
floor
going
once
going
twice:
okay,
all
right.
G
Yeah,
this
is
just
a
kind
reminder,
so
basically
the
car
is
ready
for
review.
The
pipeline
is
green.
It
already
has
two
lgtm
labels
and
yeah
would
be
nice
if
someone
from
the
approvers
could
take
a
look,
so
this
can
be
moved
forward
and
also
this
will
unblock
another
pr
with
the
word
cattle
enhancement,
to
enable
the
attestation
in
interactive
way.
C
Hey
vasily:
this
is
a
great
work
and
yeah
sure
I
will
talk
to
some
of
the
brokers
about
it.
We
should
push
us
forward.
E
Hello
yeah.
This
just
needs
a
second
review
because
apparently
daily
neil
belanky
is
no
longer
active
in
the
community,
so
we
need
to
I'll
create
a
pr
to
edit
that
on
as
far
but
at
the
moment,
I'm
just
looking
for
a
second
reviewer
to
tag
and
hopefully
approve
that.
So
we
can
have
better
release
notes.
A
A
A
A
D
A
E
E
Might
be
actually
rather
than
me,
banging
my
head
against
the
wall.
This
might
be
good
for
him
to
arrange
this
yeah.
I
rented
an
error
doing
the
test
work
part
of
the
kit,
the
get
the
cube,
github
io
thing
to
test
blog
updates
and
stuff,
like
that,
I
was
just
wondering
if
anyone
else
has
run
into
this
or
whether
it's
an
issue
with
my
laptop
specifically
the
make
build,
underscore
image
part
rounds
into
a
some
kind
of
a
ruby
bundle,
error.