►
From YouTube: KubeVirt Community Meeting 2023-05-31
Description
Meeting Notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nE09vQWcCTW-9Ohe9oCldWrE0he-T_YFJ5D1xNzMtg4/
A
Welcome
everybody:
this
is
the
31st
of
May
Cuba
community
meeting
last
day
of
May
welcome
wherever
you
are
coming
from
once
again,
if
you
please
write
down
who
you
are
in
the
attendees
list
and
if
we
have
anyone
who
is
new
to
the
meeting
or
hasn't
introduced
themselves
in
a
previous
meeting,
if
you'd
like
to
we'll
take
this
opportunity
for
you
to
speak
up
and
introduce
yourself
and
and
say
whatever
you'd
like
to
say
about
yourself,.
A
B
A
Here
and
I
think
that's
that's
really
the
only
thing
we
need
to
look
at
on
the
early
schedule,
yeah,
let's
progress
if
anyone
does
have
anything
to
add
to
the
agenda
or
the
open
floor
or
any
pull
requests
bugs
or
anything
from
the
mailing
list
that
I'd
like
to
us
to
look
at.
Please
add
it
here.
A
If
there's
not
already
been
added,
it
looks
like
we
have
a
very
small
agenda
today,
so
this
one
is
from
me:
it's
something
I've
been
repeating
for
a
couple
of
weeks
now,
currently
the
kubecon
China
and
North
American
cfps
are
both
open.
This
link
goes
to
our
community
events,
Wiki,
which
I
try
and
keep
up
to
date.
A
Just
let
this
load
both
of
those
csps
cfps,
sorry,
are
due
on
the
18th
of
June,
but
the
cubecon
China
will
be
September
late
September
and
keep
going
North
America
will
be
early
November.
All
the
details
are
in
the
links.
B
A
And,
as
per
usual,
there
is
a
list
of
links
here
in
the
Linux
Foundation,
Cloud,
native
or
devops
days.
So
if
you
ever
find
yourself
with
friend
race
to
spare
and
you're
thinking
about
what
might
be
out
there
in
your
local
community,
there
is
a
usually
an
absolute
ton
of
regional
like
kubernetes
container
days
and
stuff
like
that,
go
through
there
and
if
something
picks
your
interest.
A
Let
me
know
and
I'll
add
it
to
this,
and
if
you
need
any
help
with
putting
together
a
cfp,
if
you've
got
any
questions
about
what
how
Cuba
might
be
represented
or
anything
like
that
feel
free
to
hit
me
up.
A
But
you
will
please
expect
a
slight
delay
until
for
for
a
couple
of
weeks,
it's
going
back
properly
deeper
into
June,
since
it
looks
like
we
don't
have
any
agenda
or
open
floor
issues,
I'm
going
to
jump
ahead
to
the
pull
requests.
But
if
anything
Springs
to
mind,
please
go
ahead,
look
at
them
and
we'll
come
back
to
them.
Just
in
case
someone
adds
anything
at
the
end
of
the
meeting.
C
C
Yes,
I
haven't
look
at
got
any
feedback
on
this
PR.
C
A
Right,
possibly,
is
there
anyone
on
this
call
who
might
be
able
to
help
with
this?
This
is
in
their
wheelhouse
and
is
interested
in
reviewing
it.
A
It's
another
one
that
hasn't
had
much
like
this
is
from.
A
A
bit
over
a
week
ago,
sort
of
hot
blood,
disc.
E
A
F
Yeah,
so
this
one
is
mine:
it
is
a
inspired
one
by
one
of
lobo's
beers
and
we've
talked
about
this
morning
about
the
extracting
a
controller
logic
into
their
own
packages.
So
maybe
this
beer
will
be
change
a
bit
or
obsolete
by
logos.
Beer
we'll
have
to
see.
Thank
you
for
erasing.
It.
A
Wonderful,
thank
you
for
raising
it
all
right.
Well,
we'll
put
that
on
the
back
burner
then,
and
if
it
does
go
ahead,
we'll
probably
ping
Lego
and
have
him
review
it,
then
wonderful.
A
So
I
had
a
quick
look
at
the
mailing
list.
It
doesn't
look
like
there's
anything
that
hasn't
had
responses
or
been
looked
at,
please
sort
of
something
up
there
if
I
am
mistaken
and
we'll
move
on
to
the
bug
scrub.
A
So
some
of
these
I
half
watched
the
recording
from
last
week
and
it
didn't
look
like
we
did.
A
big
bug
strap.
So
these
all
from
the
last
two
weeks,
rather
than
just
the
last
week.
A
Oh
yeah,
so
this
did
have
a
response
from
I
think
it
was
a
leache,
but
the
comment
I
thought
answered
that
question
and
no
one's
been
having
to
jump
on
it
is
anyone
on
the
call
able
to
or
interested
in
getting
a
bit
deeper
into
this
I
never
met
the
root
FS
on
an
Ubuntu
virtual
machine.
A
All
right,
I
might
bring
that
over
to
Alicia.
Then
this
one
is
is
everywhere
from
a
metrics
Team
on
the
call,
because
I
suspect
this
one
is
about
there's
a
particular
metric
that
they
can't
they
can
get
from
Linux
VMS,
but
not
the
windows.
Vms.
E
A
B
I
I
wanted
to
have
a
look
at
this,
but
I
need
to
do
some
other
stuff.
First.
A
Looks
like
it's
there's
anyone
from
the
compute
Sig
present
that
might
be
able
to
take
this
one
on.
A
There's
a
lot
of
information
here
to
go
through.
This
looks
like
another
Well
detailed
bug
is
anyone
of
a
call
from
the
compute
say
able
to
well
just
keeps
going
have
to
jump
out
of
this
or
how
is
this
something
that
you
work
with.
B
C
C
But
I'm
not
sure
if
this
issue
can
be
fixed
by
the
spr,
but
it's
too
relate
it
to
the
memory
usage
yeah.
E
A
C
Yeah,
this
is
my
issue
about
to
release,
arm
64
image
and
binary
and
I
haven't
get
many
feedback
from
maintenance,
so
I'm
not
sure.
If
my
walking
direction
is
right
or
maybe
I
need
to
do
anything
else.
C
C
No
I
I
haven't
sent
this
in
the
email,
I
just
ping.
Some
maintenance.
A
Wow
is
anyone
the
call
able
to
offer
any
input
onto
the
what's
required
for
the
I'm
64
release.
C
A
C
A
One
thing
I
can
do
is
I
could
poke
the
maintainers,
who
have
already
been
added
here
and
ask
them
to
provide
their
their
input
thanks.
A
C
I
have
writes
down
on
a
draft
proposal
for
kubikan
China
and
it's
currently
in
the
internal
review
in
my
company,
so
after
that
I
will,
because
this
is
a
presentation,
is
in
Chinese.
I
will
translate
it
into
English
and
send
you,
and
can
you
help
me
to
take
a
look.
A
Absolutely
absolutely
okay,
just
let
you
know
yeah
I'm,
on
I'm
on
vacation
most
of
next
week
as
well,
I'll
be
back
Wednesday,
otherwise,
I'll
be
able
to
help
you
from
the
12th
of
June
onwards.
A
You
are
welcome,
I,
look
forward
to
it
and
unless
anyone
else
says
anything
that
I
would
like
to
add
and
I
like
to.
E
Jump
at
the
last
minute:
okay,
so
I
have
two
questions.
One
is
for
networking
part
of
Cuba,
so
I'm
working
on
a
design
proposal
in
the
pr
218,
so
it
is
supporting
reverse
user
interface,
but
the
keyboard
VMS.
So
since
I
I
see
Edward
is
also
present
here.
So
I
would
like
to
check
what
are
the
plans
for
keyword
for
having
database
Edition?
E
So
in
the
pr
comments,
I
got
I
mean
I
got
few
comments,
saying
that
we
need
to
have
I
mean
qubit
is
planning
to
decouple
the
interface,
adding
religion
method
from
a
keyword
code.
So
I
just
want
to
check
the
plan
for
that,
so
that
I
can
make
a
plan
for
my
proposal.
D
Hi
yeah,
so
I
think
I
answered
in
the
email
that
my
at
least
my
plan
is
to
have
a
something
written
like
a
small
kickoff
about
what
are
our
options
or
how?
What
needs
to
be
done
or
summarize
everything
that
I
learned
until
now
and
I
hope
to
have
it
in
mid
next
week
and
and
then,
but
until
then,
or
even
after
you
can
propose
yourself
or
I
mean
it's
it's
still.
D
We
don't
have
anything
in
that.
We
can
say
that
we
can
start
working
on
at
this
moment,
so
so
I
hope
that
we'll
have
something
written
in
the
middle
of
next
week,
so
we
can
start
discussing
it
and
showing
all
the
scenarios,
because
your
scenario
is
one
of
of
many
now
so,
and
we
hope
to
to
me
to
manage
to
cover
them
all
in
in
the
planning
and
I
will
hope
that
you
and
others
will
be
able
to
feedback
based
on
the
work
that
you
have
now.
E
Okay,
okay,
thanks
and
I
also
have
a
quick
question
about
cubot
CI
repo.
So
for
this
for
the
same
interface,
if,
if
the
proposal
I
mean
if
the
changes
we
plan
to
make
I
mean
are
checked
in
then
we
need
to
have
the
keyboard
CI
to
support
dbdk
So.
E
If
I
make
a
change
to
Qbert
CI
report
to
have
this
dpdk
support
for
the
concurrent
release,
so
suppose
I
have
my
exchanges
for
1.27
kubernetes,
provided
suppose
in
the
next
quarters,
we'll
be
we'll
be
getting
a
feature:
kubernetes
Pro
questions
and
we'll
be
creating
new
providers.
So
will
the
change
will
be
handled
by
tuber
itself,
or
will
it
be
coming
back
to
me
to
make
the
changes
for
every
provider.
D
I'm
guessing
it
will
it
I,
don't
I,
don't
have
it's
hard
to
to
know
how
it
will
roll
out,
but
usually,
if,
if
we
are
I
mean
the
solution
that
is,
we
are
looking
for,
is
something
that
anyone
can
add
anything
in
if
it's
dpdk
or
if
it's
even
the
existing
Bindings
that
we
support
now
so
let's
say
we
are
using
now
the
bridge
binding.
So
I
would
like
to
see
the
the
solution
covers.
The
bridge,
binding
and
I
would
like
to
see
the
solution
also
cover
the
dpdk
one.
D
D
Like
you,
you
it's
either
you
you
will
have
tested
it
on
your
side
or
it
will
be
tested
as
part
of
convert.
If,
if
the
demand
will
exist
like
if
it
people
will
want
it
as
part
of
the,
and
they
would
want
to
cover
this
test,
but
consider
that,
if
the
if
the
plugin
is
written
in
a
way
that
the
project
itself
does
not
depend
on
you,
you
using
dpdk
or
something
else,
it's
not
a
mandatory
to
test
it.
D
So,
if
we'll
have
decoupling
between
the
in
covert
core
projects
and
providing
networking
binding
or
networking
anything,
then
if
the
separation
is
really
good,
then
then
cover
the
covert
core
project
will
not
need
to
add
it
to
its
CI.
This
is
what
I'm
trying
to
say.
It's.
D
Part
of
some
other
project
that,
like
the
project
that
creates
the
the
support
for
dpdk
right,
let's
Let,
It,
Be,
cni
device,
plugins
or
any
other
part,
any
other
code
that
is
external
to
that
is
external.
That
project
can
can
run
the
CI
for
the
this,
but
you
could
use
the
convert
CI
for
it.
It
just
means
that
you
need
to
take
to
have
a
lane
there
to
create
your
own
main
that
that
can
test
it.
E
D
Okay,
I
I
hope
it's
like
it's
clear,
I'm,
trying
to
say
exactly
the
ownership
of
of,
for
example,
the
dtpdk
solution
will
be
on
the
on
the
team
that
works
on
that
dpd
casing,
so
it
will
be.
Hopefully
it
will
be
a
different
repo
and
that
referripple
can
use
covert
Ci
or
it
can
use
whatever
it
fights
better.
D
B
E
Okay,
yeah
thanks
thanks
Edward.
A
One
well
I
should
ask
because
twice
now
someone's
had
something
to
add.
Does
anyone
else
have
anything
they'd
like
to
add
or
ask
or
comment
on.