►
From YouTube: KubeVirt Community Meeting 2023-02-01
Description
Meeting Notes: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1nE09vQWcCTW-9Ohe9oCldWrE0he-T_YFJ5D1xNzMtg4/
B
A
As
always,
if
everyone
in
attendance
would
please
pull
up
the
agenda
and
add
themselves
to
the
attendees
list,
that
would
be
greatly
appreciated.
A
And
while
we
wait
for
any
last
attendees
to
draculain,
if
we
have
any
new
people
on
the
call
who
would
like
to
say
hello
or
introduce
themselves,
and
what
brings
them
in
today,
we
would
love
to
hear
from
you.
A
A
Agenda
is
looking
pretty
light
today
so
far,
so
if
there
is
anything
on
anyone's
mind
and
they're,
not
sure
whether
or
not
it
belongs
in
the
agenda
or
brought
up
during
today's
meeting
definitely
feel
encouraged
to
speak
up.
If
anyone
needs
help,
adding
anything
to
the
agenda
feel
free
to
mention
it
in
chat
or
speak
up,
and
let
me
know-
and
we
will
make
sure
to
add
it
for
you.
A
Anyone
with
anyone
who
has
joined
the
Google
Groups
community
should
be
able
to
edit
the
document
and
add
things
for
themselves
as
well.
A
A
We
will
go
ahead
and
remind
everyone
that
the
kubert
summit
cfp-
it
has
been
open
for
a
little
bit,
but
if
you
haven't
got
your
proposals
in
yet
definitely
be
sure
to
get
those
in
by
tomorrow.
Cfp
is
closing,
and
we
look
forward
to
seeing
everything
that
the
Brilliant
Minds
in
the
Kubrick
Community
come
up
with
to
share.
A
If
anyone
does
have
any
last
minute
interest
in
getting
an
extra
pair
of
eyes
to
review
their
cfp
before
submission,
please
feel
free
to
speak
up,
bring
it
to
me
or
Andrew
in.
A
Kubernetes
slack,
we
will
be
happy
to
to
help.
However,
we
can.
A
And
Stage
things
that
should
be
added
if
anyone
has
a
bug
or
a
PR
or
any
conversation
that
is
in
the
mailing
list
that
they
want
to
have
more
discussion
on.
Please
drop
links
to
the
things
that
are
important
to
you
on
the
PR's
mailing
list
or
bug
scrub
list,
and
we
will
jump
into
those
with
the
two
that
we
have.
We
may
as
well
go
ahead
and
jump
in
now.
A
E
E
Sorry,
so
this
is
a
Community
member
from
our
slack
and
found
out
that
we
basically
get
in
the
reverse
metrics
from
what
we
expect.
So,
if
we
expect
to
see
it
from
the
VMI
perspective,
we
don't
we
get
it
from
the
host
perspective.
So
if
you
wanna,
if
you,
for
example,
download
chunky
image
and
you
expect
a
received
metric
to
go
up,
you'll
see
the
opposite.
E
You'll
see
the
transmit
one
going
up
interesting
yeah
and
it
goes
like
pretty
deep
into
how
livert
reports
them
and
I
am
not
sure
how
we
could
fetch
the
correct
ones
as
in
the
ones
that
get
taken
from
the
VMI
from
the
domain
perspective.
Maybe
someone
with
some
libert
knowledge
can
advise
what's
missing
here.
A
Is
there
anyone
on
the
call
who
knows
who
we
should
at
least
CC
on
the
bug
or
is
there
any
requests
for
additional
information.
A
B
A
Cage
right
now,
I
know
I'm
gonna
go
ahead
and
put
it
on
next
week's
agenda.
Make
sure
we
don't
let
it
slip
through
the
cracks.
A
Thank
you
for
joining
and
bringing
it
up.
B
A
C
The
multi-q
just
enable
the
queues,
so
the
resize
and
transmission
would
be
missing
and
that's
what
the
user
is
asking
for,
but
I'm
not
sure.
If
that
makes
sense
for
us
to
do.
C
C
B
A
It
looks
like
Roman
responded
to
this
one,
but
it's
not
a
sign.
Do
we
expect
this
to.
F
I've
opened
this
issue
and
I
just
wanted
to
emphasize
that
this
issue
affects
both
the
API
server
and
the
play
and
grow
package
for
people
who
are
using
it
and
what
the
woman
had
suggested.
There
is
to
use
a
something
that
is
close
to
the
gold
standard
standard
library,
but
I've
done
a
little
digging
and
it
seems
like
this
library
is
also
not
very
recommended.
A
A
The
websockets
library
inside
it
would
be
great
to
hear.