►
From YouTube: Layer5 Websites Meeting (Mar 1st, 2021)
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
Yeah
yeah,
I
wonder
I
wonder
if
having
been
in
isolation
and
then
coming
out
to-
or
you
know,
having
been
at
home
and
then
coming
to
be
around
a
bunch
of
other
people,
makes
everyone
a
bit
more
susceptible
to
just
regular
colds
and
things
just
because
they've
been
been
exposed.
A
A
A
I
if
I
recall
nikhil
and
the
rest
of
you
have
been
holding
down
the
fort
so
so
nice.
So
you
know
I
congrats
to
all
of
you
for
layer,
5
and
g.
It's
amazing!
It
really
really.
It's
certainly
stands
out
compared
to
the
competition.
A
You
remember
yeah.
I
was
close.
I
was
okay
yeah!
You
look
closely
close.
I
get
some
points.
I
get
some
points
for
and
chin
may
last
yeah
fairly
short
correct.
I
thought
it
was
meta
like
this.
A
Good,
okay,
well
so
some
items,
I
think
each
of
you
probably
have
a
few
different
items.
Well,
each
of
you,
I
know,
have
a
few
different
items
that
you've
been
working
through.
Some
of
you,
we've
caught
up
a
little
bit
have
talked
about
part
of
your
shifting
focus
and
and
some
starting
on
some
fresh
projects
or
whether
they're
totally
fresh
or
fresh
to
you.
A
So
that's
that's
good.
Some
of
the
those
discussions
will
trickle
in
here
we'll
end
up
focusing
on
some
of
those
one
of
the
ones
that
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense.
To
focus
on
here
is
the
the
fact
that
well,
one
of
them
is
the
fact
that
there's
a
number
of
items
to
tie
off
on
layer,
5
and
g,
and
so
there's
a
lot
of
things
that
we
postponed.
So
we
could
go
live.
A
A
C
Oh,
I
think
the
last
one
like
the
first
one
from
the
previous
meeting,
the
review
of
the
new
site
by
augustine.
B
I
think
yes,
we
asked
us
to
create
the
issues,
I'm
not
sure
if
it
created
them.
A
Right
yeah,
he
I
think
so
yeah
near
as
I
could
see
you
think,
josh
created
it
was
either
one
or
two
issues.
One
of
them
had
any
number
of
issues
like
a
few
issues,
bundled
up
inside
okay,
good,
okay.
So
so.
A
So
we
can
re
yeah
so
starting
off
by
reviewing
kind
of
the
audit
that
augustine
had
done.
I
think
you
you
guys
went
over
that
spreadsheet
in
the
past
josh.
Were
you
saying?
Were
you
bringing
that
up
to
say
that
there
were
a
few
items
that
he
had
pointed
out
that
maybe
we
weren't
sure
if
we
should
go
execute
on
or
not.
C
Yeah,
like
I
mean
in
the
last
meeting,
we
discussed
that
augustine
would
have
a
review
like
find
out
things
that
need
to
be
changed
or
something,
and
now
he
mentioned
them
in
the
spreadsheet
and
that
needed
to
be
picked
up.
So
it's
more
or
less
the
same
as
the
post.
Golov
live
issues
that
are
already
created
as
well
and
a
few
other
things.
C
And
I
just
don't
think,
apart
from
that,
the
sheet
that
you
shared
with
me
from
that
for
finding
the
four
four
zero
fours.
What
I
can
say
is
the.
C
Pages
for
the
websites
so
like
for
layer,
five
did
the
most
of
the
those,
but
for
so
should
I
go
on
with
the
mastery
website
as
well
like.
There
are
a
lot
of
measuring
website
pages
that
are
unreachable
and
are
causing
those
issues.
A
Yeah,
so
so
the
one
yep
very
good.
Let
me
put
that
down
as
a
topic
as
well
404,
and
we
got
this.
We
have
the
other
topic
around
preview
builds
and
any
other
topics
so
jinme.
I
think
you
have
this
there's
a
topic
probably
around
rotational
banners,
hero.
A
Banners
and
actually
jimmy,
do
you
mind
pinging
austin,
augustine
asking
him
if
he'll
join.
A
Okay,
well.
A
C
So
like
after
after
nikhil
spear,
is
it
this
so
like
the
thing
is,
if
I
say,
if
I
look
at
the,
what
I
can
say
is
in
the
inspect,
if
I
inspect
it
and
find
it
on
the
code,
then
it's
showing
that
there
is
a
twitter
og
image,
but
it
doesn't
show
up
so
like.
Can
you
just
check
once
like,
I
guess,
nikhil
spear
added
a
few?
If
I'm
not
wrong,.
B
I
tried
checking,
but
it
was
not
showing
for
me.
D
A
But
I
I
don't
think
that
it's
only
twitter
that
will
have
the
issue
with
the
svgs
I've
seen
linkedin
having
an
issue
as
well.
C
No,
I
don't
think
it's
the
svg
for
the
home
page.
It's
a
png
for
home
page.
B
F
I
checked
it,
but
then
again
so
yeah,
so
the
thing
is
the
issue
is
somewhat
I'm
not
able
to
understand
the
feature
images
it's
coming
up
like
before
submitting
the
pi
tried
for
tried
in
linkedin
for
one
of
the
blog
post
and
it
was
coming
up,
but
it
wasn't
coming
up
for
other
blog
posts,
but
one
thing
was
like
previously
on
the
for
the
og
image
content
for
other
blog
posts.
It
was
layer,
5
image,
but
after
the
update,
it's
showing
the
correct
feature
image
as
per
the
dev
tools
from
co.
F
I
haven't
tried
it
on
twitter,
specifically
yeah
like
if
you
go
to
the
blog,
the
first
blog
that
we
have
yeah.
This
one
is
coming
up
currently
in
linkedin
as
template
on
linkedin.
It
comes
correctly
on
linkedin
like
the,
but
for
the
blog
post
of
michael
it
doesn't
cost.
A
So,
okay,
that's
interesting!
So
for
this
this
latest
blog
post
it
the
feature
in
it.
Well,
should
I
say
the
og:
the
open
graph
image
is
a
png
the
first.
Well
I
let
me
take
that
back
and
say.
Actually
I
guess
I
didn't
confirm,
but
this
particular
image
right
here
this
thumbnail
first
one
on
the
page,
is
a
png
and
is
that
the
same
one,
that's
used
as
the
og.
C
So
for
the
michael's
blog
as
well,
the
image
is
png,
but
it
doesn't
show
up
on
linkedin.
A
And
so
the
update
that
you
guys
are
referring
to
that's
with
respect
to
the
react.
What
is
that
update.
F
Yeah
so
after
my
update,
like
previously,
it
was
showing
the
layer
5
logo
that
the
layer
5
logo
with
the
dark
battery.
But
after
the
update,
we
are
getting
the
actual
thumbnail
of
future
image
on
this,
at
least
the
meta
stack,
but
in
on
sharing
on
social
media
sharing,
we
are
still
not
getting
this
icon.
C
C
It
was
showing
correctly
on
the
on
the
legea,
the
code,
but
it
it
wasn't
showing
on
linkedin
at
that
point
like
it
at
that
point,
the
recent
blog
post
wasn't
showing,
so
I
replaced
them
with
the
default
image,
that
is,
the
layer,
5
logo
and
then
nikhil
updated,
like
nickel,
made
a
pr
again
to
revert
and
make
the
blog
images
for
all
the
blogs
and
but
so,
by
what
I
can
say
by
luck
at
that
point,
the
recent
blog
post
image
was
coming
up,
so
it
was
thought
that
all
of
the
blog
post
images
would
be
coming
up,
but
it
isn't
coming
up.
C
A
Actually,
okay,
it
makes
sense.
One
of
the
differences
between
the
two
blog
posts
is
the
fact
that
the
second
blog
post
has
white
space
in
its
file
name.
A
Now,
let's
look
so
here's
michael's
we'll
go
look
at
this
now,
so
the
title
of
the
I
don't
know
if
you
guys
can
see
it,
but
the
title
is
michael
space,
goodfeller
space
hyphen,
so
there's
so
that's
one
difference
that
could
possibly
be
throwing
off
the.
A
D
F
Okay,
so
I
think
we
are
not
defining
the
process
for
the
component
for
each
of
the
props
individually,
but
okay,
so
one
thing
is
like
the
thing
which
we
said
just
now
about
the
path
name,
I
think
for
few
of
the
blogs
it's
coming
up,
firstly
like
if
you
check
the
measurements
yeah,
our
measurements
love,
that's
also
png,
but
the
past
team
doesn't
have
the
file.
F
A
B
Yeah,
because
here
I
am
seeing
of
the
that
they
are
using
the
site
url
also
so
that
and
not
a
relative
url.
So
maybe
that
is
the
problem.
C
Yeah
so
like
it
was
initially
the
site
url,
and
I
changed
it
to
how
the
yeah
I'll
just
check.
If
it's
so.
C
I,
but
I
don't
think
that
is
causing
this
issue,
because
initially
when
it
was
the
site
url,
it
wasn't
showing
up
the
default
images
as
well,
but
when
I
changed
it
to
the
relative
url,
it
started
showing
up
whatever
we
are
getting
till
now.
A
Okay,
there's
another
thing
that
will
cause
us
some
pain
here
and
that
is
redirects.
So
one
thing
that
you'll
notice
on
this
blog
post
that
that's
working.
So
this
is
a
png.
It
doesn't
have
any
white
space
in
the
file
name
and
it
is
a
relative
url.
A
A
So
if
we,
if
we
open
up
this
link,
that
has
no
slash
in
my
browser,
it
doesn't
show
us
having
a
slash,
but
that
doesn't
mean
that
other
user
agents
aren't
being
redirected.
If
I
put
a
slash
after
it,
I
get,
you
know
the
slash
removed,
so
the
redirect
may
be
happening
very
quickly
anyway.
Point
is
like
redirection
can
be
an
issue
as
well
or
cause
of
an
issue.
B
Yeah,
I
think,
if
I
remember
correctly,
when
we
got
the
theme
there
was
this
something
like
this
defined
in
the
gateway
node.
I
don't
remember
it
exactly,
but
yeah.
A
Yeah
yeah,
it's
it's
a
curious
thing
like
jekyll
as
a
jekyll
had
changed
its
behavior
between
its
3.8
3.8.5
to
4.0.
They
changed
the
behavior,
where
I
can't
remember
if
they
started
adding
all
slashes
to
all
or
if
they
started
removing
them.
But
it
was
a.
It
was
a
pain
in
the
rump
because
we
needed
to
go
to
4.0
because
we
wanted
to
use
a
new
plug-in
to
help
with
I
forget
with
what.
But
but
then
we
had
to
go
through
a
lot
of
the
pages
and
it's
been
like
a
year.
C
C
A
So
maybe
if
it
makes
sense
to
everyone
here,
maybe
we'll
leave
some
of
this
investigation
for
or
these
are
probably
to
do
items
to
go
off,
and
sometimes
it's
sometimes
the
the
challenge
is
well.
It's
not
the
fact
that
it
was
the
relative
url
versus
the
absolute
up
until
we
something
else
was
changed
and
then
yes,
then
then
it's
a
like.
It
can
be
a
combination
of
the
problems,
so
yeah,
okay,
good.
A
So
what
I
don't
think
we'll
figure
it
out
here
other
than
these
are
positive
steps
forward
things
to
try
to
rule
out
as
well.
A
So
some
of
this
is
trial
and
error,
but
also
some
of
this
is
we
should
be
able
to
look
this
stuff
up
like
you
know,
there
are
millions
of
other
sites
that
you
know
that
run
into
similar
issues,
so
there
should
be
a
definitive
response
like
like
this
is
searching
for
white
space
in
the
file
name
in
the
open
graph
image.
You
know
headers
for
linkedin
shares
like
what
what
is
that
return
for
a
google
search
and
so
okay,
anything
else
we
want
to
cover
here.
A
It's
a
frustration.
The
challenge
is
frustrating
one
of
the
frustrating
things
about.
It
is
that,
as
we've
switched
over
sites,
some
of
our
older
social
posts
will
go.
They'll
now
show
an
empty
where
it
wears
it
was
showing
a
preview
of
the
site
before
with
a
specific
image.
For
that
specific
piece
of
news.
A
Now
it's
blank
yeah,
it's
not
not
the
end
of
the
world,
but
it's
just
annoying.
A
One
of
the
ways
in
which
I
see
that
myself
is
when
looking
at
like
something
like
this.
Like
hey
a
while
ago,
I
shared
the
fact
that
we
were,
you
know,
announcing
a
partnership
with
hashicorp,
and
so
this
particular
there's
a
couple
of
issues
here.
A
Retrieved,
so
that
this
was
something
that
we
had
shared
on
the
layer
five
feed
nine
months
ago.
So
it's.
A
Okay,
next
up
is
this
lightbox
component
to
change.
A
Got
you?
Is
there
a
okay
have?
Is
there
a
plan
of
action
in
terms
of
which,
whether
or
not
to
go,
seek
an
existing
plug-in
or
put
some
javascript
sort
of
universally.
B
A
So
when
we,
when
we
think
about
that,
the
reason
that
this
is
being
raised
up
is
that,
if
you
do,
you
know
if
you
create
a
a
blog
entry
or
something
else
like
here,
here's
an
example
of
an
image.
The
image
this
is
an
svg
would
doesn't
really
matter
you
as
a
user.
If
you
want
to
zoom
in
well,
one
is
not
linked
to,
but
if,
even
if
it
was
linked
to
you
would
open
up
a
new
window.
A
At
and
then
nikhil
is
this
you
on,
or
is
this
on
the
news
section.
D
A
A
Yeah,
I'm
not
sure
so.
The
white
space
will
work
in
this
case
because
there's
a
shadow
around
the
entire
card,
so
people
could
see
even
if
it's
white
on
white
it'll
be
white
with
a
shadow
and
then
white.
So
just
like
the
the
new
stack
one
there
in
the
middle
that
that
seems
to
work
even
that
one's
aspect
ratio
is
off
as
well.
A
If
we
did
what
the
other
path,
which
is,
you
know,
cropping
the
overflow
that
you
know
that
that
would
probably
work
fine
as
well.
It's
I
think
we
should
go.
We
should
go
with
the
the
former
we
should
go
with.
We
should
test
out
and
see
if
just
maintaining
an
aspect
ratio
and
having
it
fit.
The
card
as
much
as
we
can
is
the
way
to
go,
is
to
try
it
do
a
hundred
percent
on
either
width
or
height,
and
then
let
the
other
one
be
auto
and.
G
A
Okay,
nice
yash
filed
a
couple
of
issues,
so
we
josh,
I
don't
think
is-
is
on
the
call
I'm
chin
may
can
I,
but
can
I
use
you
again
to
poke
josh
pandy
and
see
if
he's
available
of
the
couple
of
items
that
he
had
filed?
I
don't
know
that
I
think
actually,
chinmay
are
you
working
on
some
of
those
okay.
I
think
he
filed
a
couple
in
the
same
one,
so
one
two
three
four
five,
which
is
fine.
I
don't
know
that
no,
the
other
josh
is
looking
at
him.
A
I
don't
know
that
they
require
much
discussion
so
on
the
404s,
so
there's
a
spreadsheet
that
we've
been
using
to
track
some
of
tying
off
some
of
the
items.
Okay,
there's
a
there's,
a
different
spreadsheet
josh.
Now
I
don't
recall.
A
Different
spreadsheet
that
we
were
using
that
came
from
google
analytics.
That
was
saying
there
were
any
number
of
missing.
You
know
links
a
lot
of
those
started
with
meshri.layer5.io
yeah.
Those
are
things
that
I
don't
know
that
you're
gonna,
I'm
not
sure
if
you'll
need
to
deal
with
them
so
previously.
D
D
A
A
A
A
A
C
C
Because
I
just
like,
I
looked
at
the
analytics
and
it
was
the
seventh
most
visited
page,
the
four
zero
four.
A
A
Son
of
a
gun,
all
right
all
right,
rotational,
hero,
banners,
so
josh
isn't
with
us
nor
is
veneed-
has
have
people
seen
this
work.
C
Yes,
I
I
just
saw
it
afternoon
the
both
of
the
pr's.
A
One
of
them,
I
so
I
think,
josh
fixed
one
of
the
issues.
Yas
josh
recently
fixed
an
issue
on
on
his
new
banner,
the
alt.
This
alternate
banner
he's
going
to
refactor
his
to
fit
into
this
new
rotation
system.
This
new
linear
rotation
system,
linear
in
so
much
as
when
someone
goes
to
the
site
that
it
wouldn't
just
be
random,
randomly
calculated,
which
banner
to
show,
but
rather
I
haven't
looked
but
beneath
will
have
used
local
storage
of
the
visitors
browser
to
store.
A
C
So
I
think
this
might
lead
to
this
might
lead
for
a
single
session.
I
I
just
have
to
check
it
on.
A
C
A
C
A
Okay,
okay,
that
that
that
sounds
good.
So
then
I
guess
the
question
is
just
oh.
The
question
is
just
yeah:
it's
a
session
based
versus
local
local
storage,.
F
F
F
I
don't
think
so
much
further.
It
should
work
not
in
this
condition.
A
C
So
I
think
we'll
have
to
go
with
the
local
storage,
because
the
session
storage
will
be
like
no
longer
valid
if
they
kill
the
browser
once
so
like
it's
for
you
visit
the
website
single
once
and
you
constantly
keep
on
reloading
the
page.
You
can
get
it
different
all
the
time,
but
once
so
is
there
a
need
to
use
local
storage
or
we
can
go
ahead
with
this
install
because
anyways?
If
you
are
visiting
website
today
and
again,
you
come
and
visit
it
tomorrow.
It
isn't.
A
The
same
play
is
it's
not
the
end
of
the
world
if
they
end
up,
if
the
majority
of
the
time
people
end
up
seeing
the
same
initial
banner
even
and
the
same
user
comes
back
and
they
end
up
seeing
the
same
banner
because
they
were
either
in
private
browsing
mode
or
they
were
using
a
different
device
or
they
were
using
a
different
browser
on
the
same
device
or
they
had
just
cleared
their
cache,
not
not
the
end
of
the
world.
A
A
So,
okay
other
comments:
are
we
ready
for
discuss
layer,
five
that
I.
A
A
Okay,
so
we've
got
about
15
minutes
left.
This
is
probably
it's
okay,
that
we
don't
discuss,
get
nighthawk,
necessarily
unless
vinayak
or
chinmay,
or
does
any
anyone
on
the
call
have
open
eyes
on
the
call?
A
Well
fine,
then
tonight,
let's
get
let's
hit
this
first
before
we
spend
the
rest
of
the
time.
On
these
other
two
items,
then
I,
how
far
off
are
we
on
get
nighthawk?
This
thursday
is
the
cncf
sig
network
call,
so
we'll
want
to
do
an
update
there.
On
the
back
end,
abhishek
has
been
working
on
on
a
few
different
things,
so
he'll
have
an
update
for
the
the
pipeline
in
the
back
end
of
the
project,
but
on
the
front
end.
A
So
one
item
for
me
has
been-
and
austin
has
worked
on
this
as
well-
is
to
get
a
vote
out
on
the
logo.
C
Okay,
so
basically
most
of
the
things
are
complete.
According
to
the
mock-up,
the
one
main
thing
that
is
remaining
is
still
the
navbar,
and
the
other
thing
would
be
the
footer
a
little
bit,
but
I
I
think
I
spoke
to
you
about
the
footer
and
we
decided
to
go
with
this
one.
A
Yeah,
that's
not
too
big,
yep
yep!
This
will
by
the
way,
if,
if
we're
able
to
drop
this
onto
a
row
onto
its
own
or
like
th,
this
is
of
the
least
importance
of
what
we're
showing
or
not
it's
not
the
least
important.
But
just
it
looks
wonderful,
yeah
yeah,
it's
yeah,
it
looks
like
it's
getting
called
out
as
a
prominent
thing,
just
like
the
site
is,
and
so.
C
Sure
I
think
moving
it
down
like
under
these
four
tabs
would
be
great
make
sense.
A
One
thing:
if
we
end
up
if
it
makes
sense
to
have
symmetry
between
the
logo
and
something
else
over
here,
that
something
else
could
be
a
dis.
You
know
a
description
like
sort
of
like
this,
that
on
the
smp
side
it's
got
or
it
could
be.
I
guess
we
don't
have
a
twitter
handle,
so
it
wouldn't
be
a
twitter
handle.
C
Right
one
thing:
I
want
to
ask
that
in
the
get
knight
hawk
current
footer,
we
have
a
lot
of
links.
I
think
like
getting
started,
resources
and
all
these
links,
so
I
don't
think
we
right
now
have
anything
to
link
them
up.
To
so
can
we
like
have
a
smaller
footer
like
the
one
in
the
smp
smp
website.
A
I
think
it
ends
up
having
all
a
lot
of
the
same
links
but
they're,
not
as
prominent
they're
there.
A
lot
of
them
are
down
here
and
yeah
most,
I
think
most
of
those
links
or
all
those
links
go
to
an
external
resource.
So
I
think
the
answer
is
like
yeah
like
hey.
This
is
a.
This
is
a
fine
looking
footer
and.
A
A
A
C
A
A
Just
to
get
my
test,
okay,
this
makes
sense
all
right,
vinayak,
any
okay,
so
good.
Moving
on
bananic
the
deploy
service
smash.
A
What
what
remains
there.
C
A
C
C
E
A
Right
yeah,
this
reminds
me
that
simple
trick
that
you
can
do
with
your
fingers.
You
know
you
like,
take
your
thumb
and
you
pull
it.
You
pull
it
apart.
All
right
anyway,.
D
A
Two
news:
do
you
want
to
do
you
want
to
take
a
quick
look
and
see
if
there's
a
a
pointer
or
two
to
try
out
a
couple
of
different
things,
to
try
out
with
the
css
or
or
vanity?
Do
you
wanna?
Do
you
feel
comfortable.
C
Still
the
other
one
thing
that
is
with
the
deploy
service
mesh
is
that
I've
linked
it
to
a
google
sheet.
I
I
think
I
showed
it
to
you,
but
the
only
issue
is
that
it
is
not
updating
itself
automatically
like
it's
like.
We
have
to
run
the
script,
and
then
it
updates
with
all
the
new
for
form
entries
that
have
been
made.
A
A
A
Conceptually
they
end
up,
then
completing
the
form
at
the
end
of
which
they
submit
it
and
now
they're
the
a
record
is
created
in
firebase
the
database
there
about
who'd
filled
it
in
and
what
their
response
was
or
what
their
answers
were.
A
C
Right
basically
like
the
google
sheet
gets
updated,
but
we
have
to
do
it
manually
and
no
email
is
currently
pushed
from
the
google
sheet,
but
I
think
we
can
easily
do
that.
But
that
would
be
of
no
point
because
we
are
already
like
manually
updating
the
google
sheet
and
then
the
email
gets
pushed
right
in
front
of
us.
C
A
A
C
B
C
A
Auto
code,
I
think
it
it's
actually
the
the
single
automation
that
we've
been
using
there,
I
think
is,
has
been
down
for
a
couple
of
weeks,
even
though
we
haven't
made
any
code
change,
so
we
haven't
been
being
notified
of
new
people
joining,
and
I
haven't
gotten
a
chance
to
look,
but
why
that's
the
case
so
anyway?
I
guess
what
I'm
saying
is:
auto
code.
Maybe
it's
maybe
it's.
This
integra.
A
F
Just
one
thing
I
would
like
to
add
to
that
page
design
is
that
we
could
show
up
numbers
for
these.
Otherwise
it's
hard
hard
to
understand
what
the
use
is.
If,
if
we
are
moving
too
strongly,
then
how
much
does
it
strongly
define
90
percent.
C
No,
I
haven't
attempted
to
do
it,
but
I
think
you
can
like
just
copy
the
style
that
we
are
using
in
the
above
tool
tip
to
like
display
it
display
under
it.
The
percentage
of
the
slider.
A
A
A
A
So,
there's
a
little
bit
of
work
on
my
end,
that's
needed
in
order
to
finalize
what
all
the
questions
are,
so
we
know
how
many
we
have
and
if
we
really
need
a
second
section,
because
in
design
it's
like
there's
kind
of
these
two
different
sections
factors
of
your
service,
mesh
functionality
and
here's
the
functionality
section
of
what's
important
to
you
and
then
factors
of
your
environments
and
workloads
and
all
of
those.
But
if
we
don't
have
all
the
questions
written
down,
then.
A
A
Okay,
next
up
is
josh.
C
A
A
No,
I
shouldn't
say
that
that
was
silly.
It's
like,
yes,
we
will
be
hosting
or
actually,
unless
the
pricing
is
ridiculously
cheap,
which
yeah
you
know,
which
I
don't
think
is
necessarily
so
100
a
month
for,
like
five
of
us
to
access.
C
Options
are
so
there
is
an
option
named
community
deployment
where
they
would
deploy
it
on
digitalocean
and
provide
you
with
the
server.
But
you
will
have
to
pay
something
like
five
dollars:
the
digital
ocean
hosting
fee
per
month.
A
C
E
A
F
C
So
as
it's
mentioned,
that
all
the
ui
and
features
would
be
given
only
the
thing
is
like
the
support
or
help
and
all
those
things
won't
be
or
like
the
other
thing
is,
they
won't
be
maintaining
it
will
be,
the
will
be
maintaining
if
we
host
it
on
our
own
or
if
they
host
it
they'll
be
maintaining
they'll,
be
providing
the
the
space
and
all
of
those
things.
So
that's
what
they
charge
for,
but
it
as
it's
open
source
software.
C
A
Yep
yeah,
I
think
so
that's
my
understanding
as
well
is
that
there
isn't
there
is
in
there
of
what
discourse
is
offering
it's
really
about
hosting
and
operating
it,
and
I
don't
think
it's
really
has
much
to
do
with
withheld
functionality
the
after
we
get
it
ho.
So,
okay,
let's
go
look
at
this
open
issue
after
we
get
it
hosted.
A
There
is
a
few
different
things
to
do.
One
of
those
is
that
the
default.
A
The
default
theme
we're
going
to
want
to
customize
the
theme,
so
here's
here's
the
what
I
think
are
the
probably
high
level
steps
is,
is
josh
and
abhishek
go,
have
a
conversation
about
how
we
want
to
deploy
it
and
what
what
methodology
on
what
system
and
and
what
does
that
look
like
and
get
it
deployed,
give
it
a
a
new
domain
name
discuss.layer5.io?
A
A
A
What
does
it
mean
to
moderate,
so
the
bulk
load
of
in
part,
the
thing
that
josh
will
be
doing
is
pushing
us
to
get
through
all
these
things,
and
some
of
that
means
working
with
others
to
determine
what
this
should
be.
How
much
do
we
want
to
spend
to
make
it
super
highly
available,
is
a
question:
how,
in
what
form,
should
we
deploy
it,
but
then
josh
of
the
some
of
the
hands-on
more
of
the
hands-on
work
that
you'll
end
up
getting
into
is
like.
A
Okay,
once
we've
identified,
how
many
topics
and
what
what
are
the
different
features
and
functions
and
which
features
and
functions
should
we
use
and
which
one
shouldn't
we
is
a
perspective
that
you
would
come
up
with,
and
how
do
we
style
it
to
look
as
much
like
the
layer,
five
io
site
as
possible?
A
A
So
when
you
go
down
to
their
community
section
here,
community,
okay,
it
goes
to
another
page,
but
if
you
join
their
their
forum,
it's
community.traffic.io
and
it's
an
instance
of
discourse,
and
you
can
you
can
tell
if
you
go
to
discuss
istio.I,
it's
an
instance
of
discourse.
They
look
different,
though,
because
they're
configured
differently
and
they're
using
them
differently.
C
A
And
josh
is
going
to
need
help
or
rather
nikhil
jump
in
there
as
well
or
like
hey
the
I'm
I'm
meeting
ignoramus
on
this
course
couldn't
tell
you
what
all
the
options
are.
I
wish
we
we
should
use
them
or
not
or
like
hey
here's
what
it's
going
to
take
for
us.
We
have
to
have
some
mail
services
that
we
use
and
so
there'll
be
end
up
being
a
number
of
people
involved
in.
I
figured
this
out
so
and
it's.
A
D
E
F
F
A
But
one
thing
to
potentially
try
is
to
have
the
repo
within
the
same
org
that
doesn't
seem
as
probable
of
a
solution
or
as
a
probable
of
an
issue.
As
the
second
thing.
The
second
thing
that
you
had
mentioned,
which
is
hey,
we're
trying
to
push
to
a
fork
and
forks,
have
special
rules,
and
do
we
need
to
have
a
fork?
No,
we
actually
all
we
need
is
just
public.
We
just
need
a
public
facing
file
server
here.
A
We
just
need
a
place
to
go
drop,
a
collection
of
folders
and
files,
static
content
to
be
able
to
point
to.
When
that
static
content
is
configured
and
published
that
it
it
needs
to
be
configured
with
its
own
root
level.
Folder
pointed
in
the
right
way
like
so
that
it
displays
correct.
So
it
has
all
the
right
relative
links
anyway.
So
yeah,
let
me
go
create
a
repo,
a
new
blank
repo
and
get
the
same
permissions
going
on
so
that
you
can.
F
F
We
were
facing
issues
with
that,
but
I
saw
a
plug-in
named
asset
prefix,
something
like
that.
I'm
not
sure
how
much
like
friendly.
That
would
be
to
use
it,
because
the
main
issue
being
that
we
are
hosting
the
site
there
would
be
two
redirects,
basically
like
layer,
five
last
dot,
github
dot,
io,
slash
then
again
slash
pr
name,
then
again,
the
home
page.
F
A
Okay,
so
okay,
this
batik,
while
it
can
be
a
pain
in
the
butt.
This
particular
issue
is
completely
solvable
because
it's
the
question
is
hey:
where
is
where's
the
site
published?
What's
the
base
url
for
the
site
and
how
are
you
internal
to
the
site?
How
are
you
referencing?
A
A
The
url
is
layer,
5,
layer,
5.,
io.github.io,
slash
preview,
deploy
slash
pr
number
whatever,
like
it
doesn't
matter.
What
it
is.
It's
just
one
place
you
go
change
it
and
conceptually
the
rest.
All
the
rest
should
fall
in
line
because
all
the
rest
of
the
references
you
have
you
should
be
using
relative
urls
throughout
the
entire
rest
of
the
site.
A
If
you
define
the
root,
the
so
there's
a
base
url
and
like
a
root
directory,
if
you're
setting
those
two
things
when
you
recompile
the
site
like
that
needs
to
be
changed
in
the
workflow,
it
is
a
consideration
to
be
made
and
then,
when
we,
when
the
rest
of
the
gatsby
build
happens,
it
should
be
built
off
of
that
pr
number
like
that
that
new
folder
number
it's
in
concept
like
we.
We
don't
need
another
plug-in
because
before
you
do
the
gatsby
build
you
just
update
the
config
in
in
the
workflow
itself.
A
You
update
the
katsp
config.js
to
use
the
new
location
that
it's
going
to
be
published.
To
simple,
for
me
to
say
like
no
doubt
there
are,
will
be
hiccups
like
we're,
not
referencing
in
the
right
way
in
some
areas
or
or
a
plug-in
that
we're
using
a
react
plug-in
that
we're
using
it
didn't
use
relative,
urls,
very
well,
and
so
it
it
has
an
issue
and.
A
Okay,
very
good,
so
so,
unfortunately,
lee's
taking
another
action
item.
So
this
this
action
item
is
one
of
the
things
is
to
go:
go
create
a
new
repo
from
scratch,
don't
not
as
a
fork
and
then,
let's
see
if
the
fork
was
causing
our
issues,
do
you
guys
have
a
preference
on
what
the
name
of
that
repo.
A
A
A
F
Oh,
I
don't
think
so,
like
only
creating
a
this
creep
over
another
one
was
for
me
to
try
on
the
different
creative
views.
E
B
There
is
one
repo
I
found,
which
successfully
did
everything
we
wanted.
I
didn't
have
the
time
to
try
it
out
yet,
because
what
they
were
doing
is
that
when
they
built
the
site
for
a
pr,
they
build
it
and
zip
all
the
contents
and
upload
it
as
a
build
artifact
and
when
after
and
they
do
this
in
a
workflow
and
and
then
you
know,
workflow
run
they
download
that
build
artifact
and
push
that
to
nightlife.
A
Nice,
that's
good
that
that's
almost
exactly
what
we're
trying
to
do.
We
just
weren't
zipping
it
and
we're
not
looking
to
push
to
netlify,
because
I'm
I'm
I'm
tired
of
not
the
fine.
I
like
it.
It's
not
doing.
It's
not
help.
It's
not
doing
anything
for
us
like
not
in
this
case
we
just
needed
a
public
file
server
to
serve
files
off
of
and
we
can
go
create
as
many
repos
as
we
want.
F
A
We
can
try
out
something
else
other
than
the
green
circle
and
we're
kind
of
only
doing
this
in
one
spot.
It
was
just
sort
of
filler
content.
If,
if
there's
a
bunch
of
space,
oh
hey,
we'll
fill
it
in
with
some.
You
know
some
design
element
just
to,
but
but
yeah.
If
we
want
to
try
out
something
else,.
A
And
then
yeah,
I
think,
nikhil
your
voice
is
a
little
bit
hard
to
hear
so.
But
I
think
what
you
were
saying
is
part
of
the
feedback
was
that
these
logos
are
getting
cut
off
like
this
and
and
your
perspective
was
that
that
was
intentional
by
design
and
yes,
it
is
like.
Is
it
crucial
that
people
can
see
all
the
partnerships?
F
Yeah,
I
think
the
second
one
that
we
just
said
is
thing
the
thought
for,
like
I
got
from
two
of
the
person,
I'm
not
sure
how
understand.
A
A
A
F
G
To
me
it
feels
intentional,
but
I
think
we
should
have
a
gradual
motion.
I
mean
very
slow
motion
to
show
all
the
so
that
they,
the
viewers,
can
know
that
it
was
intentional.
A
A
A
But
yeah
so
nikhil,
like
I,
don't
know,
feedback
to
think
on
one
thing
that
is
a
little
bit
of
an
issue
with
that
section.
A
A
A
A
D
A
With
as
popular
as
mac,
os
has
become
for
developers,
particularly
for
our
target
audience
like
it's
actually
the
case
that
there's
a
there's,
a
number
of
there's
like,
or
it's
popular
enough
that
now
a
lot
of
developers
will
switch
to,
even
though
they
have
a
mac.
They'll
switch
to
chrome
just
because,
but
still
the
number
will
be
in
safari.
A
F
What
again
the
maintainer
section.
A
Yeah,
okay,
all
right,
then
yeah,
then
okay,
I
I
see
then
yeah.
I
feel
much
more
comfortable
dismissing
both
of
those
because
it's
like
yes,
that's
the
point
like
and
sites
do
that
and
I
I
shouldn't
off
hand
I'm
not
offhandedly
dismissing
them,
but
when
we
get
it
would
be
nice.
If
we
add
a
few
more
like
the
more
that
we
have
in
there,
the
more
it
will
become
apparent
that
we're
not
trying
to
show
them
all
or
that
if
they
were
slightly
moving,
then
you
could
see
them
all
like.
A
That's
not
the
point.
The
point
isn't
on
the
main
page
to
show
you
all
the
things
that
you
can
possibly
see,
we're
not
giving
you
all
the
documentation
to
measure
it
all
of
its
features,
because
we
can't
fit
it
all
there
and
the
same
thing
for
all
the
projects
we're
into
and
all
the
partnerships
that
we're
into.
We
can't
we're
just
showing
you
some
some
of
the
higher
some
of
the
high
ranking
ones,
and
then
you
can
click
to
go
see
the
rest.
A
A
We
should
probably
do
it,
but
it's
it's
okay,
that
since
we
have
since
we
do
have
individual
places
to
to
point
people,
I
guess,
since
we
already
have
the
tools
in
place,
it's
okay,
if
we
point
people
specifically
to
information
about
each
of
the
items,
what
I
was
trying
to
say
is:
if
we
didn't
have
those
links,
that
would
be
fine
as
well,
because
we're
actually
all
we're
trying
to
tell
them
is
we
do
some
interesting
work
and
we
work
with
interesting
prominent
companies
and
that's
about
like
it.
A
It's
a
nicer
site
when
you
can
link,
can
figure
out.
Oh
what
is
actually
going
on
with
hpe,
but
if
we
didn't
have
it
wouldn't
be
the
end
of
the
world
and
and
that
the
reason
I'm
saying
that
is
to
my
point
about
not
being
able
to
see
them
all.
That's
also
fine,
like
that's
not
the
point,
the
point
is
not
to
show
you
because
is:
are
these
the
only
partnerships
that
we
have?
No,
there
are
more
but
we're
not
showing
them
to
you,
because
we
don't
feel
like
they
bubble
up
to
the.
A
A
A
Anything
else,
hopefully,
that
I'm
not
pushing
pushing
back
on
what
you're
you're
saying
like.
Hopefully
that.
F
A
A
Oh,
I
see,
okay
got
it
nice,
okay,
each
of
the
items
that
have
my
name
on
them.
If
you
guys
don't
hear
from
me
today,
you
should
hear
from
me
today
on
them.
All
of
them
are
things
that
can
we
can
solve
today.
So.
A
Okay,
cool
well,
we're
definitely
over!
So
that's
it
thanks
guys
for
coming
well
catch!
You
catch
a
couple
of
you
tomorrow,
but
most
of
you
on
the
mastery
dev
call
so.