►
From YouTube: Layer5 Websites Meeting (November 8th, 2021)
Description
November 8th, 2021
Attendees:
Debopriya Bhattacharjee, Yash Kamboj, , Pranav Singh, Piyush Singariya
MeshMate Aditya Chatterjee, Lee Calcote, Deepak Gupta, Tothagata Bhattacharjee
Topics:
meshery.io
[Anshu] LFX box dissimilarity. #610
[Lee] Consider tweaking the LFX icon
layer5.io
[Debopriya] Updates on “Topics” collections in Layer5io
Switch “Topics” to “Resources”
Take a poll on who all would like to start tracking layer5.io’s domain authority and site relevance for specific keywords.
[Yash] Call to Action for handbook. #2298
[Yash] intra-page TOC for handbook. #2322
[Pranav] Discuss CTA in Learning paths. #2313
[Deepak] Updates to Contributing.md. #2328
getnighthawk.dev
[Tothagata] Rename “GetNighthawk” to “Nighthawk on layer5io/getnighthawk site. #200
[Deepak] There is a broken image link on layer5 readme for the Nighthawk logo.
smp-spec.io
[Tothagata]added schema to smp-spec for better SEO. #268
docs.meshery.io
[Aditya] Versioning. #4560
Meshery UI
Incorporating redux and upgrading to Material UI v5
Branch - meshery-ui-restructuring
Proposal - State Management with Redux
Progress tracker - State Management Implementation Tracker
Contribution flow - README.md
A
Hi,
everyone
welcome
to
the
website's
call
so
usually
mesh
mate
aditya
hosts
this
call,
but
I
think
he
has
an
unstable
internet
connection
today,
so
I'll
be
doing
it,
it's
sort
of
my
first
time
hosting
this
call.
So
forgive
me
if
I
go
wrong,
so
we
usually
begin
on
meetings
with
introducing
all
our
newest
members.
So
do
we
have
anyone
is
pronouncing.
Is
this
your
first
time
attending
this
call.
C
B
B
Could
you
scroll
down
a
little
bit
yeah,
so
he
was
suggesting
we
do
something
like
this,
because
right
now,
what
is
happening
is
is
like
it
because
of
the
logo,
and
since
we
write
lfx
next
to
it,
it's
it
has
lfx
written
twice
and
the
logo
is
like,
like
what
I
had
asked
him
to
do
was
to
center
the
logo
with
the
tech
with
the
text.
But
he
couldn't
do
that.
B
A
D
C
So
one
is
that
it
says
g
sod
2020.,
which
it's
like
well
probably
listing
the
year,
is
not
quite
what
we
want
to
do,
because
we,
you
know,
and
then
yeah.
I
suppose
that
if
he's
suggesting
that
we
write
the
words
or
the
letters
lfx
and
not
the
word
mentorship
that
that
that
that
that
falls
in
line
with
the
red,
you
know
it
becomes
symmetric
with
the
rest.
So
that's
that's
probably
a
good
suggestion
and
that
double
previous
point
that
the
blue
and
the
green
don't
really
mix
yeah.
No,
they
don't
we
could.
C
It
is
an
svg
that
at
that
icon
that
lfx,
so
we
we
could
go
whiten
it.
That's
at
that
small
risk
to
offending
lfx
folks,
they're,
not
paying
attention
to
this
site.
Even
though,
even
though
mesri
is
the
number
one
lfx
project,
I
don't
think
they're
coming
over
and
looking
at
it
so
yeah,
you
know
if
anyone
were
inclined
to
change
it
from
blue
to
white.
That
would
probably
be
okay.
B
C
Totally
most
most
of
them
don't
like
it's
just
generally
a
no-no
they're,
they
don't
have
a
brand
kit
like
the
lfx
like
they
don't
have.
They
don't
offer
up
a
range
of
icons
that
work
or
logos
that
work
while
we're
on
the
call
I'll
go
look
to
see
real,
quick
because
yeah,
you
generally
don't
want
to
you
know
you
generally
want
to
adhere
to
what
they're
asking
you
to
do
I'll.
C
Look
while
we're
on
the
call
and
see
if
we
can
find
one
that
that
they
do
approve
of
or
that
they
do
have
as
an
alternative,
because
the
other
alternative
is
to
just
you
see
the
first
box
before
the
l,
like
the
other
alternative,
is
to
just
use
that
that's
more
like
the
linux
foundation,
photo
the
linux
foundation
logo
and
we
could
switch
to
that
because
the
other
ones
are
just
logos
as
well.
So.
E
A
A
No,
I
think
we
have
quite
a
few
articles
right
now.
I
just
have
to
find
the
images
for
the
thumbnails,
because
right
now
it's
all
the
same
and
it's
all
service
mesh
related.
So
I
could
not
think
of
separate
images
for
everyone
and
just
a
little
bit
of
more
tweaking
so
that
it's
completely
different
from
the
book
but
yeah
similar.
C
Yeah
yeah,
this
is
good
the
yeah.
I
wonder
you
know
the
longer
that
we
look
at
this.
The
topics
area
yeah
like
I
really.
I
really
like
how
the
url
is
layer.
Five
io,
slash
topics,
slash
like
like
the
url
structure
is
nice
for
that,
but
when
we
consider
the
range
of
topics
that
we
might
have
and
if
we
consider
that,
maybe
we
would
like-
I
guess
I-
I
wonder
if
it
isn't
more
aptly
called
resources,
not
topics.
C
Yep
yeah
now
why?
Why
didn't
I
like
that?
Like
here's
right,
I
think
I
think
we
should.
I
think
we
should
probably
do
that.
We
should
probably
change
the
name
from
topics
to
resources.
First
of
all,
it's
just
easier
for
us
to
speak
to
and
easier
like,
as
you
go
to
explain
it
to
other
people.
It's
I
think.
I
think
it
it's
a
bit
easier
to
comprehend
what
you're
talking
about
when
you
say,
hey,
we've
got
a
bunch
of
resources.
C
We
want
to
put
out
there,
they
can
be
on
different
topics,
and
you
know,
and
and
yeah
they
can
be
long,
written
articles
that
withstand
you
know
the
test
of
time
and
and
so
they're,
not
necessarily
dated
or
don't
necessarily
have
a
specific
author
assigned
and
those
can
be
of
different
types
like
it.
You
know
it
could
be
a
tutorial
or
kind
of
a
walkthrough,
a
how-to.
It
could
be
just
an
explanation.
It
could
be
a
bunch
of
different
things
like.
I
think
I
think
that
makes
sense
when
you
say
topics,
not
resources.
C
I'm
sorry
when
you
say
resources,
not
topics.
It's
it's
I'm
only
like
I'm.
Only
like
a
quarter
of
the
way
into
my
cup
of
coffee,
so
it's
pretty
it's
pretty
tough.
We
did
the
whole
like
fall
back
an
hour.
You
know
it's
anyway.
Here's
why
I've
withheld
up
until
this
conversation,
and
so
while
in
general,
we
do
desire
for
and
by
the
way,
pranav
I'll
just
say
like
it
was
wonderful
that
you
had
your
webcam
on.
It
was
really
nice
to
see.
C
Represent
the
each
project
as
well
as
they
can
there's,
you
know,
300
something
people
who
poured
who've
done,
commits
and
prs
to
measuring,
like
mastery.I
o.
It
should
look
300
people's
effort
worth
like
you
know
it
should
look
as
good
as
it
can
and
so
great
then
you've
got
the
nighthawk
one
and
you've
got
the
s
p.
One
and
you've
got
the
doc
site
and
you've
got
and
so
layer.
Five
that
I
o
it's
it's
a
representation
of
all
of
those,
so
so
gosh
it
should
look
really
good
or
like
it
should
be.
C
You
know
it's
and-
and
I
think
that
it
does
like
we
overhauled
it.
You
know
it
was
something
else
before
we
overhauled
it.
It's
running
gatsby!
It's
doing
you
know
you
got
you
all
of
you
are
at
we're
looking
at
something
well
we're
looking
at
the
entire
thing
that
devil
priya
has
done,
but
but
like
the
that
call
to
action
for
the
discussion
forum,
that's
from
her
and
and
there's
a
lot
of
things
for
in
here
from
various
people.
I
guess
my
okay,
okay,
so
good.
C
C
Part
of
it,
too,
is
just
when
someone
searches
for
how
to
write
webassembly
filters
in
rust
or
whatever
that
you
know
that
google
points
them
to
here
to
these
resources
so
that
search
engine
optimization
has
been
why
it
is
that
I
liked
the
url
structure
topics,
because
it
felt
a
little
more
a
little
less
generic
a
little
more
specific,
but
it
isn't
technically,
like
the
word
topic,
the
word
resource
both
pretty
generic,
like
both
it.
It
felt
like
if
you
navigate
to
any
any
number
of
other
websites
a
lot
a
lot
of
times.
C
They'll
have
a
slash
resources
that
they'll
have
and-
and
it's
not
doesn't
look
too
dissimilar
from
what
we
have
like
there's
a
way
of
browsing
the
categories,
kind
of
browsing,
the
different
resources,
but
it
always
felt
like
it
was
just
a
marketing
fluff
like
there
wasn't
a
lot
of
real,
either
engineering,
deep
content,
and
so
that
was
it
was
mostly.
My
logic
was
like
hey:
do
we
get
discounted
in
terms
of
search
engine
optimization
for
using
something
like
slash
resources
or
like
eventually?
C
Would
that
have
been
better
under
a
slash
topics
like
what
are
the
topics?
Well,
the
topic
is
service
mesh.
So
it's
like
layer,
five
io,
slash
topics,
service,
mesh,
console,
troubleshooting
and
maybe
there's
a
number
of
troubleshooting
articles
under
there
like
it
seemed
to
flow
pretty
well
as
opposed
to
like
layer,
five
io
generic
resources
or
like
resources,
which,
in
my
mind,
is
like
generic
generic
crap
slash
surface
and
like
I
did.
I
don't
think
it
makes
a
difference
necessarily
like
it.
C
It
is
you
guys
ever
hear
the
phrase
when
you're
trying
to
you're
trying
to
take
a
round
peg
and
put
it
into
a
square
hole.
It's
like
the
topics.
It's
like
trying
to
shove
a
round
peg
into
a
square
hole.
It's
like
it
kind
of
fits
but
not
like,
whereas
resources
is
like
it
fits,
and
so
having
said
all
that,
I
feel
a
lot
better
now
that
I
said
that,
so
we
can
go
to
resources
and
and
now.
A
Like
what
I
was
thinking
is
first
redirect
to
a
resources
page,
and
then
we
probably
give
a
list
of
all
the
topics,
probably
service
messages
or
console
or
linkedin,
and
then,
when
a
person
navigates
through
each
topic.
We
have
these
set
of
articles
for
that
topic.
So
the
url
could
be
resources,
slash
topics,
slash
whatever
the
general
topic
they
go
to
and
the
structure
would
be
in
a
similar
manner.
You
come
to
a
resources
home
page
which
has
everything
which,
like
the
generic
information
and
then
a
separate
place
for
topics.
C
Yeah
yeah,
let
me
think
about
that
like
for
sure
much
of
the
majority
of
what
you
just
said
is
like
is
yeah
like
that's
true.
We
should
do
that
like
you'll
you'll,
have
this
higher
level
area
to
go
to
like
there's
resources
and
then
there's
categories
of
things,
and
then
there
might
be
subcategories
of
things
like
like
yeah
for
sure
and
then
and
you're
trying
to
salvage
the
word
topics
to
help
make
me
feel
better,
which
is
good
and
yeah.
I
guess
part
of
that
question
is.
A
C
A
C
Okay,
so
that's
not
quite
as
sophisticated
as
what
you
were
suggesting
if
you
go
back
and
go
to
a
different
one,
it's
like
like,
if
you
go
to
meetups,
and
so
this
is
conceptually
like
it's
a
different
thing
right,
it's
not
a
now.
Here's
the
problem
is
the
url
structure
is
still
just
the
same.
It's
just
community
events
that
doesn't
mean
that.
B
C
Is
how
it
would
be
yeah
yeah
and
then,
if
you
go
into
one
of
the
chapters
like
this,
has
got
a
pretty
long
structure
to
it.
So,
oh
look
at
that.
So
we're
on
slash
like
you
clicked
on
getting
started,
but
it
inserted
istio
and
if
you
click
to
switch
to
yeah
cool
okay,
so
so
for
one.
I
think
that
I
should
stop
being
a
baby
and
we
should
get
off
of
topics
and
just
call
it
resources
and
if
it
ever
comes
to
an
issue
in
the
future
like
hey,
we
can
we
can.
C
C
We
can
do
that.
So
so,
if
we,
if
we
switch
from
topics
just
the
word
topics
to
the
word
resources
and
then
continue
from
there,
I
think
I
think
we'll
be
in
excuse
me.
I
think
we'll
be
in
a
pretty
decent
spot.
If
you
go
back
to
the
webassembly
article
and
we
take
a
look
at
the
url
structure,
so
on
the
that
initial
article,
just
how
to
write
a
webassembly
filter,
it
has
a
topic,
I'm
sorry
it
has
a
category
assigned
and
it
has
a
tag
or
two
assigned.
C
Okay,
if
you
yeah,
if
you
click
either
the
tags,
it
will
do
a
search
for
any
articles
that
have
those
same
tags
and
if
you
click
on
one
of
those
articles,
it
won't
have
it
in
the
it
won't
be
in
the
url
structure
and
so
so
yeah
as
as
we
good,
I'm
I'm
definitely
overthinking
this
like.
We
should
just
switch
to
resources
when
we
get
there
like.
C
If
we
had
like
25
topics,
25
entries
or,
like
you
know,
articles
or
videos
or
whatever
it
is
on
istia
and
console
like,
and
we
have
10
10
of
these
things,
we're
tracking.
So
we
have,
you
know
25
here
25
to
25,
so
we
have
250
our.
You
know,
pieces
of
content
now
and
then
we
start
writing
about
web
assembly
so
like
25,
so
we
have
like
you
know
over
time.
C
So
so
I'm
not
I'm
not
an
expert
on
on
anything
that
we
do
here,
amazingly
enough,
and
so
if
you
couldn't
tell
already-
but
I
pretend
to
know
a
couple
of
things
and
at
least
we'll
we
can
all
learn
together
that
for
so
for
search
engine,
optimization
google's
like
our
the
engine
we
want
to.
You
know
the
engine
that
we
want
yeah.
We
want
to
work
well
with
so
okay.
So
what
do
they
care?
What
the
url
structure
is?
Okay?
Well,
I
like
does
it
care?
It's
like
okay.
C
C
They
talk
a
lot
about
it
and
and
actually
the
way
that
the
algorithms
work
they
change
over
time
in
part,
because
the
web
has
changed
over
time
in
part,
because
people
tried
to
game
the
system,
so
they
put
in
additional
considerations
so
that
people
can't
just
have
a
page
full
of
9
000
copies
of
the
word
webassembly
and
then
have
it
rank
higher
like
they.
They
they'll
they'll
count
that
as
a
negative
at
some
point
and
so
yeah,
and
so
in
terms
of
like
search
engine
optim.
C
This
word
seo
and
like
search
engine
optimization,
is
sort
of
a
generic
term
now
for
the
stuff
that
we're
talking
about
so
so
in
terms
of
how
a
page
ranks
in
terms
is
there's
a
few
things.
How
fast
is
the
site
like?
How
fast
does
the
page
load?
That's
the
consideration.
It's
like
why.
Why
was
that?
That's
a
consideration
like
it's
part
of
the
user
experience
they
want
to
bring
you
the
best
con.
You
know
resources
the
most
quickly.
Okay,
fine,
fine,
fine,
so
we
have
to
optimize
speed.
C
Okay,
fine
relevance
like
devops
was
just
saying
like
they
searched
for
webassembly.
Does
this
thing
even
say
web
assembly
more
than
that?
It's
like
okay,
fine,
that
page
does,
but
the
domain
itself
does
it
have
it
has
historically.
Does
it
have
relevance
to
webassembly?
It's
like
part
of
the
consideration,
so
also
maybe
it
does
maybe
has
like
20
000
pages
that
say
webassembly
on
every
page.
Great,
except
does
it
have
any
authority
like?
Does
anyone
has
anyone
linked
to
it
and
said?
C
C
It
said
web
assembly
like
40
times,
but
it
actually
set
it
in
small
font
down
in
the
footer
down
there
at
the
bottom,
where
you
couldn't
really
read
it
because
it
wasn't
important
like
what
was
important
was
at
the
top
of
the
page
is
like
why
a
baby
will
throw
up.
It's
like
a
right.
Is
it
in
the
title
of
the
page
like
that?
C
C
Aspect
of
this
is
like
well,
the
url
structure.
Did
it
have
web
assembly
in
the
euro?
Well
shoot
it
must
that's
again
like
it
must
have
something
to
the
web
assembly
if
it's,
if
it's
that
important,
if
it's
way
up
in
there,
okay,
okay,
and
so,
if
you
look
at
if
to
dabble
priya's
point
as
she
was
exploring.
If
what
we,
if
we
have
this
this
structure,
resources,
slash
service,
meshes
slash,
istio
troubleshooting,
and
then
we
have
the
title
of
this
article
says.
C
There's
I'll
tell
you
guys
or
you
all
this
is
that
well,
there's
there's
import
like
a
reason
why
you
all
are
implicitly
familiar
with
click
bait,
which
is
you
know?
I
don't
know
you
know
I
won't
give
specific
examples
of
clickbait,
but
but
sometimes
you'll
see
them
as
like.
You'll
see
like
oh,
you
know
five
ways
to
lose
weight
today.
You're,
like
oh,
my
god,
you
know
it's
like
ten
ways
to
lose
weight
today.
Actually,
do
you
know
what
the
five
ways
is?
C
More
often
clicked
than
the
ten
ways
like
was
it
six
ways:
seven,
eight
nine
ten,
like
there's
studies
done
on
this,
and
if,
unless
my
memory
isn't
serving
me
well,
it's
like
it's
like
anywhere
anywhere
between
five
and
ten
you're
doing
good
and
actually
that
type
of
a
title
x,
ways
to
something
or
x
things.
You
didn't
know
that
those
rank
hi
like
those
get
clicked
on
the
other
ones
get
clicked
on.
Quite
a
bit
is
the
how
to
something
something:
how-to's
how-to's
and
those
listicles.
C
That's
what
they're
called
the
x-ways
to
do
such-and-such
it's
called
a
listicle
and
while
you
might
feel
slimy
writing
it
in
the
title
like
you're
trying
to
get
it's
just
debate
for
people
to
click
on,
like
it
kind
of
you
know,
kind
of
works
as
well.
So
there's
a
catch-22
like
you
have
to
set
aside
your
moral
values
as
you
do
it,
and
then
you
publish
it
so
I've
totally
digressed
into
like
seo.
But
part
of
the
reason
that
I
went
into
this
is
like
look.
This
discussion
about
seo.
C
Some
of
you
are
just
improving
your
english
skills,
just
as
a
generic
thing,
some
of
you
are
hopefully
hopefully
taking
away
some
things
about
seo
today,
things
that
I
know
to
be
true
like
I'll.
I
will
tell
you
when
I
don't
know
what
I'm
talking
about
in
this
case,
like
that,
those
things
are
all
those
things
are
all
true
like
those
aren't
debatable
things.
C
C
D
C
Goes
by
or
two
years,
and
maybe
the
content
is
still
just
as
relevant
now
as
it
was
then,
which
would
be
great.
It's
a
well-written
blog
timeless.
You
know
content,
but
what
we're
telling
google
is.
This
is
two
years
old.
So
if
you're
finding
something
else
somewhere
else,
that's
newer.
You
might
want
to
give
that
to
users.
C
Oh
okay!
Well,
that's
too
bad,
because
actually
this
that
didn't
matter
so
should
we
just
go
back
into
the
blog
post
and
change
it
down.
Okay,
now
or
like
hey
the
person
that
wrote
this
is
no
longer
here
or
or
you
don't
like
them,
or
they
have
nothing
to
do
like
they.
Their
name
didn't
add
anything
to
what
you
were
digesting
or
it's
just
a
distraction
or
it's
like.
How
can
I
trust
that
anyway?
But
these
factors
kind
of
come
come
into
play
as
well,
and
so
hence
why
we're
creating
resources
yeah?
C
C
So
one
is,
if
you're,
if
you're
violating
the
rules
like,
if,
if
you're
trying
to
game
the
system,
then
if
you
do
it
too
much
they'll
they'll
count
you
they
might
just
cut
you
from
the
whole
list.
They
might
count
you
negative
whatever
another.
One
is
the
meta
tags,
so
in
the
head
of
the
you
know,
so
so
pranav
was
like
yeah
yeah,
of
course,
why?
C
C
They
look
for
the
text
that
you
said
described
as
describes
the
page,
and
then
they
reinforce
that
with
your
h1
and
your
h2
and
less
with
your
h3
and
less
with
your
h4
and
that's
what
you
know
like
because
that's
you
know
lesser,
so
they
also
yeah.
If
it
says
web
assembly
five
times
on
the
page,
that's
better
than
it
just
saying
it
once
like.
A
C
If
it
says
it
90
000
times,
maybe
that's
in
it,
you
know,
but
anyway,
the
meta
tags
is
so
having
considered
all
that,
I
to
google,
it's
not
going
to
matter
if
you
categorize
your
if
your
site
url,
if
your
url
structure
was
such
that
these
are
a
set
of
resources
versus
these
are
a
set
of
topics
like
those
two
terms
are
almost
interchangeable.
Anyway,
we
should
go
off
and
do
the
same
thing
about
structuring
and
categorizing
and
sub
collections
irrespective
and
the
word
resources
just
is
about
easier
fit.
C
Good
yeah,
thanks
for
letting
me
tell
you
all
of
you
that,
like
it's
something
that
if
people
are
interested
and
maybe
even
if
you're,
not
maybe
that
we
would
start
to
measure
specific
keywords
and
like
how
are
we
doing
like,
did
it
even
make
a
dent
in
the
world
that
we
wrote
this
thing,
there's
some
things
that
you
all
can
go
search
for
now
that
doesn't
have
the
word
layer,
five
that
doesn't
have
the
word.
Measuring
that
just
has
some
things
that
we
talk
about.
C
You
might
find
that
layer,
five
or
its
projects,
ranked
like
number
two
or
like
number
three
or
number,
that's
actually
pretty
pretty
cool.
Some
of
you,
who've,
been
here
long
enough.
You've
been
invited
to
have
member
pages
on
this
site.
If
you
go,
google
yourself,
you
might
want
to
wash
your
hands
before
you
do
that.
But
if
you
go
google
yourself,
you
might
find
that
your
page
ranks
or
that
that
that
the
layer,
five
page
ranks,
and
so
that's
awesome.
C
C
But
okay,
good
so
I'll
shut
up
now.
Hopefully
that
helps
give
everybody
like
anyway,
sorry
that
last
piece
about
like
tracking
ourselves
on
certain
keywords,
I
think
that'd
be
to
me
it's
kind
of
nice
to
watch
to
understand
where
we
are
and
how
far
we've
come
and
how
well
we're
doing
again
like
it's,
not
a
small
consideration
that
google
will
say.
C
They'll
say
that
that
this
page,
what's
really
fast,
it's
very
relevant,
but
the
domain
authority
is
like
it's
like
yeah,
it's
just
it
isn't
much.
So,
even
though
there's
this
other
site
that
does
it
doesn't
have
as
relevant
of
content
a
little
bit
slower.
It
has
so
much
authority
because
there's
other
articles
linking
to
it
like
so
those
arrows
have
weight
those
backlinks
and
so
at
some
point
like
now.
C
C
C
C
We
all
might
should
do
the
meetings
that
we
normally
do
without
lee
haranguing
you
all,
but
also
maybe
do
a
little
bit
of
like
a
group
study
on
google
analytics
as
a
tool
or
on
seo
as
a
thing
or
maybe
we
grab
a
tool,
there's
a
tool
out
there,
there's
a
bunch
of
free
tools
out
there
that
will
look
over
your
site,
assess
it.
Tell
you
what
you
know,
what
keywords
and
etc,
where
you
rank
for
things,
and
we
might
do
well
to
introduce
that
and
begin
to
kind
of
understand
it
together.
C
C
C
A
A
C
C
For
me,
one
of
the
things
is
that
I
guess
you
know
it
can
be
a
great
full-width
call
to
action
on
a
page
that
has
no
other
call
to
action.
That
can
be
nice
in
many
other
areas.
We
do
just
need
fairly
small
call
to
action.
You
know
with
widget
size
call
to
actions,
and
so,
if
there's
two
versions
of
this
or
or
to
look
at
how
that
reduces
down.
So
what
does
this
do
in
terms
of
being
responsive.
C
C
Another
place
that
this
could
be
useful
is
potentially
on
the
resources
area,
the
the
new
resources
area,
not
the
topics
area
or
in
in
a
blog
post
itself.
So
if
you
click
on
she
code,
africa,
if
you
click
on
a
blog,
let's
see
do
we,
so
I
think
we
have
a
fairly
consistent
call
to
action
at
the
bottom
of
many
of
these.
C
D
B
B
A
A
A
C
Oh,
I
see,
and
so
does
that
happen
when
you
okay,
if
you
hover
over
the
map,
the
new
contributor
map,
the
newcomers
map
yeah
and
you
so
some
of
those
resources
directly
linked
to
google
docs.
I
think
the
first
two,
that's
a
google
doc,
that's
yeah,
so
it
might
have
something
to
do
with
that
svg.
I
don't
know
that
that
yeah.
B
B
Yeah,
I'm
not
sure
about
the
alternative.
Here,
it's
a
it's
a
gatsby
issue
like
we
have
to
do
something
specific
for
gatsby
like
over
here.
It's
it's
in
javascript
that
window.location.pathname
there's
some
problem
with
that
with
using
window,
so
it
it
requires
some
research.
I
asked
him
to
present
here
if
somebody
knew
what,
if
anyone
knew
what
the
solution
is,
but
I'm
not
sure.
B
E
B
E
A
B
A
B
B
Are
you
using
with
hundred
percent
for
this
entire
callout,
this
widget
yeah?
That
might
be
the
problem?
That's
why
it's
like
it
might
help
if
you
give
it
a
fixed
width.
So
that's
that's.
Why,
like,
since
the
entire
callout
is
shrinking,
the
logo
is
shrinking
along
with
it
yeah
it's
happening
at
100.
So
if
you
give
it
a
specific
width,
it
might
solve
the
problem.
B
D
B
I
changed
it
and
added
some
navigation
system
to
contributing
dot,
md
file,
which
changed
a
bit
of
like
how
the
project
was
structured,
added
some
sections
fixed,
some
like
links
and
stuff
and
then
gave
a
bit
a
much
better
explanation
of
setting
up
a
local
development,
environment
and
yeah.
This
is
it
so
would
like
everybody
to
see
and
like
suggest
something.
C
C
Well,
it's
really
hard
to
argue
with
this
one
like,
oh
hey,
there
is
a
table
of
contents
on
the
page
too,
so
that's
yeah,
yeah,
yeah
and
there's
only
so
much
you
can
do
in
markdown,
but
great,
like
hey
before
you
get
started
nice
and
the
community
and
the
newcomers
guy
by
the
way
the
newcomers
guide.
Is
that
a
link
to
a
google
doc?
C
B
C
Yeah
it's
an
interesting
thing.
Some
of
what's
in
the
handbook
has
been
pulled
from
here,
so
there
might
be
a
little
bit
of
duplication
between
the
two,
not
that
we
need
to
de-duplicate
that
that's
fine,
I
just
but,
but
it
is
kind
of
a
point
of
curiosity
that,
like
oh,
I
think
the
the
way
like
it
I
get
like
if
you
take
something
like
the
badges,
for
example,
what
should
be
articulated
in
the
community
handbook
is
what
are
the
badges?
B
Yeah
otherwise,
like
I
could
do
that,
but
yeah
I
could
do
that,
but
I
thought
like
this
is
just
for
like
the
contribution
like
for
contributors
to
know,
so
they
are
just
like.
They
just
want
to
know
about
the
badges
and
add
them,
but
there
could
be
a
different
file.
Then
we
could
dedicatedly
like
go
on
a
bit
descriptive
mode
about
what
these
badges
are
and
how
one
content.
A
E
C
Not
an
easy
thing
to
rewrite
either
it's
kind
of
funny
because,
like
like,
if
you
look
at
underneath
the
logo
on
this
page,
the
subtitle
says
the
easiest
way
to
get
started
with
nighthawk.
It's
like
wait,
wait
nighthawk
is
the
easiest
way
to
get
started
with
nighthawk,
okay,
what
yeah
yeah
so
so
yeah
there's
a
bit
of
like
it's
yeah.
C
It's
a
good
call
out
on
your
part,
the
if
you
to
help
you
along
and
actually
empower
you
to
write
something
that
makes
more
sense
here
recently,
just
the
last
late
last
week,
I
think,
on
layer,
five
io
slash
project,
slash
nighthawk.
That
page
has
been
mostly
rewritten
in
accordance
with,
like
melding
the
two.
E
E
C
Oh
yeah
they're
not
doing
nearly
as
much
as
layer.
Five
is
like
and
I
don't
know
I
don't
know.
I
don't
know
the
structure
of.
I
wouldn't
bother
with
it
like
we're.
Just
gonna
make
we're
just
gonna
waste
time
trying
to
figure
it
out,
and
I
would
it
would
be
wonderful
if
intel
comes
over
and
says
hey
we're
not
listed
at
if
they
think
it's
important
enough
that
they're
not
listed
as
a
sponsor
there.
Great
then,
let's
add
them,
but
otherwise,
like
I
I
don't
want
to.
C
E
E
C
A
B
Yeah
I
went
through
the
dock
and,
like
I
went
through
the
readme
page
and
like
there's
only
one
thing
like
for
to
replace
image.
We
just
need
to
add
the
get
get
part
in
the
tag
like
it's.
It's
actually
in
my
night
talk
right
now,
but
we
just
need
to
add
get
over
there
and
I
guess,
and
that
would
solve
the
solve
the
issue.
But
but
I'd
like
to
like
go
through
the
readme
page
and
like
structure
it
structure
it
too.
So
I'll
do
that.
B
Hey
so
I
have
done
some
changes
to
this,
like
I
have
like
me
and
lee,
and
I
we
were
talking
about
like
we
got
on
a
call
last
day,
so
I
have
changed
the
structuring
of
it
and
now
I
have
not
put
the
changes.
I
had
the
practicals
going
on
so
yeah,
so
basically
this
will
just
be
restructured
and
the
previous,
the
previous
versions
will
just
have
a
static
html
site,
while
the
new
one,
while
the
latest
version
would
keep
getting
updated
yeah.
B
A
C
Nice
all
right
well
we'll
take
that.
I
I'm
taking
a
couple
of
action
items
away
and
so
we'll
take
that
poll
about.
Does
anybody
like
just
quickly
since
you
all
are
on
the
call
does?
Does
anybody
want
to
do
further
study
about
google
analytics
and
seo,
or
is
that
kind
of
a
distraction
from
working
on
code.