►
From YouTube: Websites Weekly Meeting (April 11th, 2022)
Description
Layer5 Websites Meeting - April 11th, 2022
Agenda:
Uniform card size #312
Play with outline/ drop shadow
Ellipsis to description
Place date and byline to end of card
SMP Dashboard
[Sidebar overlapping with footer #313
Mobile Responsiveness issues
Missing navbar in mobile view [issue]
Service Mesh Catalog
Mobile View #664
Multiple Filter
Expand the Catalog #677
Add another animation for ebpf and opa
Join the community at https://layer5.io/community
Find Layer5 on:
GitHub: https://github.com/layer5io
Twitter: https://twitter.com/layer5
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/layer5
Docker Hub: https://hub.docker.com/u/layer5/
A
A
Okay,
I
think
we
can
start
now,
so
welcome
to
the
websites
call
everyone.
We
always
begin
this
call
by
the
introduction
of
our
newest
members.
So
is
there
any
one
of
the
columns
attending
the
websites
called
for
the
first
time,
even
if
you've
been
to
any
other
calls
before
you
can
feel
free
to
introduce
yourself
over
here
we
have
all
the
people
working
on
the
websites
present
here
today.
A
A
A
C
A
A
E
A
B
B
It's
one
of
the
beautiful
things
about
a
vector-based
graphic,
because
you'll
you'll
hit
the
same
issue
with
images
or
text
where,
if
you're,
trying
to
present
the
collection,
unless
the
same
person
has
made
all
of
the
images
they're,
probably
not
going
to
be
the
same
same
size,
same
ratio
same
and
even
if
they
had
it's
kind
of
a
pain
in
the
rump.
The
same
thing
goes
with
the
text.
B
It's
like
is
all
the
same
person
writing
the
blog
post
and
even
if
they
do
can
they
guarantee
that
that
one
blog
post
would
have
a
shorter
title
or
the
same
length
as
the
rest,
like
you
know,
no
way,
especially
if,
as
you
go
to
provide
an
intro
like
a
little
bit
of
a
preview
to
what's
going
on
or
to
the
post
is
like,
and
so
if
the
goal
is
in,
and
so
it's
one
of
those
things.
It's
a
classical
kind
of
trade-off
situation
in
which
you
identify
what
the
highest
priority
is
like.
B
Is
it
mandatory
to
get
them
all
the
same
size
all
right,
then?
You
need
to
acknowledge
that,
like
something
else
has
got
to
give
at
some
point,
or
is
it
mandatory
to
make
sure
that
all
the
text
is
shown
and
then
you're
like
well
at
some
point?
Not
all
cards
might
be
the
same
size.
You
know
like
you
can
sure
you
can
try
to
refactor
your
images.
B
You
can
try
to
re
wordsmith
your
intro
for
any
large
collection,
though
it's
like
at
some
point
you
just
shrug
and
then,
if
you've
ever
used
wordpress
it's
there.
That
blog
platform
is
a
good
example
of
you
write
the
post
and
then
they.
You
also
can
write
this.
They
have
meta
tags
or
they
have
a
section
in
there
for
like.
B
I
forget
what
they
call
it,
but
it's
kind
of
like
a
pre,
a
preview
section
where
you
would
intentionally
type
in
or
you
would
intentionally
tag
the
first
line
or
two
as
a
summary
of
what
your
post
is
about.
We
don't
have
that
here.
We
could
create
that
type
of
the
system
as
if
for
those
of
you
that
use
jekyll,
you
know
you
can
go
quickly,
create
any
kind
of
metadata
like
that.
B
The
thing
is
is
like,
even
if
you
have
that
it's
not
guaranteed
that
the
blog
author
is
going
to
stick
to
one
sentence
or
that
one
sentence
is
the
same
length
as
another
sentence
so
again
like
if
you're
go
if
you're
going
for
a
card
uniformity
at
some
point,
you
get
a
it's
so
with
the
images
like.
Oh
hey
are
all
the
images
perfectly
squared
up
and
it's
like.
No,
the
last
one
mesh
mark
explained
it
looks
like
part
of
it's
getting
cut
off
well
yeah
because
we
wanted
to
have
a
uniform
rectangular
shape.
B
I
guess
is
what
we
decided
and
so
there's
a
couple
of
things
I
think
can
help
with
legibility
and
with
making
this
feel
a
little
bit
better.
One
is
there's,
there's
actually
a
number
of
things.
One
is
that
see
the
mesh
mark
card,
it's
hard
for
the
user,
the
viewer
to
tell
that
it's
a
card.
Why?
Because
there's
a
white
background
to
the
image
so
where's
the
edge
of
the
rectangular
card?
Well,
you
can't
tell
until
you
hover
over
that
it's
being
treated
as
a
rectangle,
okay.
Well,
what
can
you
do?
Add
an
outline
drop?
B
B
An
example
of
that
is
the
date
and
the
author,
the
january
26th,
by
the
newsroom.
If
that
is
consistently
placed
and
located
in
the
same
position
of
every
card,
or
it
becomes
pretty
easy
for
your
brain
to
scan
over
that
and
see
where's
the
one
written
by
josh,
that's
the
one
that
I
really
wanted
to
read
and
you
can
find
it
so
a
second.
B
So
there's
there's
one
request,
which
is
to
make
these
a
bit
more
of
a
card
play
with
an
outline
play
with
a
drop
shadow
or
something
to
place
the
the
byline,
which
is
the
author
and
the
date
in
a
consistent
location.
So
in
this
case,
you'd
probably
pin
that
a
certain
amount
of
padding
from
equidistant
from
the
left
side
and
the
bottom
well
or
the
left
whatever.
B
B
Okay,
that's
the
second
thing.
Then
you
come
to
the
intro
to
like
the
preview
or-
and
the
same
applies
to
the
title
is
like.
Is
it
okay
for
our
title
to
span
three
lines?
Four
lines
because
we're
going
from
one
to
two
to
three?
We
have
up
between
one
and
three
lines.
So
is
it
okay?
If
it
goes
to
the
fourth
line,
I
don't
know,
we
should
probably
make
that
decision
and
is
what's
more
important,
the
title
getting
more
room
or
the
preview,
probably
the
title
right.
B
So
as
we
go
to
so
you
there's
another
decision
to
be
made.
It's
like
okay,
well
of
the
things
that
have
to
give
meaning
of
the
the
image
that
gets
cut
off
or
of
the
text
that
gets
cut
off,
where
I
think
we're
deciding,
hopefully
that
it's
the
text
that
should
get
cut
off.
It's
the
image
that
we're
trying
to
get
we're
trying
to
have
a
similar
card
size,
similar
image,
that
of
the
text
that
gets
cut
off.
Do
we
cut
the
date
off
and
the
the
who
wrote
it
the
pie
line?
B
B
What
we
should
probably
do
is
add
the
text
overflow
ellipsis
to
the
preview
text
and
just
cut
it
off
cold
after
you
don't
have
to
specify
after
you
just
say
that
it
has
to
fit
within
the
div
and
the
div
in
the
card.
The
div
is
a
certain
size
and
it'll
just
get
auto
cut
off
and
an
auto
ellipsis
added,
which
is
great
because
it
doesn't
look
like
a
cold
hard
cut
off.
It
looks
like
a
nice
soft,
intentional
cut
off.
B
F
G
E
B
B
B
B
B
I
totally
agree
with
you,
like
the
the
thing
that
you
said
absolutely
what
it's
annoying
that
you
you
like
go
to
click
on
this
and
you
actually
can't
figure.
It's
like
what
it's
frustrating.
Actually
I've.
I've
experienced
it
two
days
ago
here,
so
I
totally
agree
with
your
suggestion.
I
would
just
like
I.
I
have
so
vehemently
agree
with
your
suggestion
that
I
was.
B
That
also
could
have
an
effect
and
so
josh
like
there's.
Here's
there's
there's
merit
to
the
thing
that
you're
saying
about
the
title,
there's
and
the
way
that
you
can
try
to
objectively
weigh
the
suggest.
The
two
suggestions
you
know
to
make
the
whole
thing
clickable
or
just
add
the
title
as
also
being
clickable
one
way
to
objectively
weigh,
that
is
to
say
great.
B
If
you
don't
think
that
that's
right,
another
reason
they
might
be
doing
it
is
they
might
want
to
copy
and
paste
the
text
and
go
put
it
somewhere
else.
So
they
you
know,
but
actually
before
that
it
would
be,
they
might
want
to
copy
a
link
to
that
post
because
they're
interested
in
it,
and
they
want
to
send
it
to
somebody
else
and
that's
something
that
we
would
want
to
facilitate.
We
would
want
them
to
do
so.
B
That's
probably
number
two
number
three
is
like:
oh,
they
just
wanted
to
copy
the
text,
not
necessarily
the
link,
so
maybe
number
three
number
four
is
probably
just
because
they're
kind
of
reading
the
page
and
they
just
kind
of
like
to
read
with
their
mouse.
You
know
how
you're
kind
of
reading
you
know
you're
kind
of
looking
at
something
you
sort
of
put
your
finger
on
it,
but
you're.
Not
you
don't
want
to
do
anything
you
just
kind
of
want
to
like
track
your
mouse
and
then
you
know
sometimes
you're
browsing
a
site.
B
You
don't
really
want
to
click
on
anything
or
you're,
just
kind
of
reading
it,
but
it
is
kind
of
nice.
You,
you
hover
your
mouse
on
something
and
it
animates
you're
like
okay
and
you
kind
of
keep
going,
and
it
just
gives
it
a
little
more.
So
that's
like
you
know,
there's
like
a
real
it's
an
actual
thing
to
think
about.
Like
does
it
feel
good,
so
four
items
we
walk
back
to
the
most
important
one
of
like
they
want
to
click
like
okay.
Well,
how
do
we
best
facilitate
the
click?
B
That's
that's
kind
of
the
thing
we
revolve
around
and
then
what
we
do
is
analyze
of
the
answer
to
how
we
best
facilitate
to
click.
Does
that
negate
or
prevent
them
from
sharing
the
article
copying
the
text
or
getting
an
interactive
new
experience,
and
so
so
so
I'm
trying
to
be
fair,
because
because,
like
like
for
abba
j,
I
was
like
look
dude,
I'm
not
going
to
explain
it.
No,
we
don't
need
to
read
me.
B
No
I'm
just
I'm
just
messing
with
abigail.
You
know
anyway,
anyway,
maybe
I'll
pau
I'll
kind
of
stop
there,
because
I
think,
because
you
guys
you
can
kind
of
walk
through
the
rest
of
it
to
sort
of
say:
okay,
hey!
How
do
we?
You
know
if
we
make
the
whole
card
clickable
wait!
A
second
does
that
prevent
them
from
right
clicking
and
getting
the
link,
I'm
not
sure
it
depends
on
how
we
do
it.
I'm
not
sure
you
know
like
so.
Those
are
you
know.
Those
are
things
to
bear
in
mind.
So.
A
A
So
the
next
topic
is
the
service
mesh
dashboard.
So
aditya
subway
was
working
on
this
and
I
recently
just
there
was
an
overlap
to
shoot
the
footer.
So
I
fixed
that.
So
there
are
a
lot
of
issues
with
the
mobile
responsiveness
and
I
think
this
will
have
a
lot
of
ui
changes
as
well.
So
anyone
on
the
call
who
wants
to
volunteer
to
fix
the
mobile
responsive
issues
right
now,
you
can
do
so.
I
think
he'll,
probably.
E
A
E
B
They're,
both
about
as
dynamic
as
the
other
gatsby
has,
I
mean,
there's
no
question
that
gatsby
or
a
react
app
or
or
like
docusaurus,
which
is,
I
think,
react
based.
I
think
I
thought
is.
Maybe
it's
hugo
based
or
something
like
is,
is
just
a
more
capable
framework
than
jekyll
like
because
you
can
just
line
up
the
feature
set,
and
it's
like
okay
yeah,
this
one,
this
one's
just
more
capable
they're.
B
Helps
make
part
of
that
easier
sifting
through
all
that
data
and
carving
it
up
in
different
ways,
a
little
bit
easier,
yeah,
that's
the
the
one
of
the
things
that
double
create
just
mentioned
is
one.
Is
the
major
drawback
to
using
a
different
piece
of
tech
for
the
dashboard,
as
ver
versus
for
the
main
site
is
like?
B
It
typically
becomes
really
obvious
to
the
user
that
this
is
a
different
site,
there's
a
different
thing,
and
that
could
be
okay.
You
can
like
go
to
a
different
subdomain
to
a
totally
different
it
just
and
in
a
lot
of
respect
a
lot
of
times.
It
usually
is
looking
kind
of
cheap
and
glued
together,
because
it
is
that
still
doesn't
that.
Okay,
fine,
is
that
that
doesn't
mean
that
that's
necessarily
the
hard
requirement
that
it
has
to
look
exactly
the
same.
It
has
to
be
this.
You
know
totally
and
fully
integrated.
B
B
It's
just
a
whole
hog
move
this
site
off
of
jekyll
onto
the
other,
the
new
tech,
because,
like
the
rest
of
the
site's
like
it's
like
two
layouts,
it's
the
page,
the
main
page
and
a
blog
post
layout-
and
it's
like
you
know,
that's
not
it's
not
very
difficult
it'll.
Actually,
it's
funny
because
it'll
actually
take
you
ever.
You
guys
us
a
really
long
time
actually,
because
it
just
takes
a
long
time
in
open
source
land
like
this,
where
people
are
kind
of
giving.
You
know
30
minutes
once
a
week
to
do
stuff
takes
forever.
B
The
yeah,
the
notion,
the
the
dynamicism
that
aspect
of
it
is
there's
one
of
the
components
to
to
this
site
is
that
it
will
be
sourcing
metrics,
as
so
data
for
the
charts
from
a
a
remote
rest
api,
and
so
the
fact
that
that
rest,
api
will
be
running
behind
a
server
or
a
server
will
be
serving.
It
can
help
with
the
dynamic
aspect
of
those
queries
and
like
the
ability
for
a
user
to
select
certain
things,
they
want
to
view
and
get
just
the
right
of
data
back
and
so.
B
If,
because
this
is
only
so,
this
is
just
kind
of
a
quick
prototype
like
this
doesn't
consider
for
a
lot
of
things
of
someone
wants
to
look
at
the
graph
in
a
modal.
They
wanted
to
download
the
screenshot
of
the
graph.
They
wanted
to
download
the
data
behind
the
graph.
They
wanted
to
slice
it
up
a
few
ways.
B
They
won't
have
three
columns
that
they
want
to
compare
the
graphs
they
wanted
to
like
and
if
there's
a
different
theme
or
different
framework
or
something
that
has
the
bulk
of
that
more
difficult
stuff,
then
it
maybe
it
makes
sense
to
just
move
the
whole
site
to
that
other
thing,
because
the
easiest,
because
it's
the
easy
stuff,
the
main
page
and
the
blog
post-
that,
like
those,
are
super
easy
and
if
the
hard
stuff
is
done
somewhere
else.
Maybe
we
should
lean
into
that,
so
I
mean
there's
merit
to
it.
B
One
of
the
another
consideration
in
this
discussion
is
like:
do
we
have
expertise
or
familiarity
with
in
the
community
with
that
other
framework,
whatever
that
is,
and
for
gatsby
it's
like
yeah.
We
do
you
know
we
didn't
before,
but
yet
now
we
do,
and
you
guys
actually
represent
that
you
guys
have
familiarity
with
both
and
are
we
okay
with
sustaining
you
know
with
like?
Do
we
have
enough
learnings
there?
It's
like
yeah
yeah.
We
do
actually
have
enough,
so
you
know
like
I
will
encourage.
B
B
Yeah,
it's
a
good
question.
Yeah,
that's
a
great
it's
the
right
time
to
ask
that
kind
of
a
question.
It's
a
good,
but
then,
as
you
go
to
evaluate
it
and
kind
of
facilitate
that
discussion
through
the
community,
as
you
start
to,
if,
as
you
start
to
list
down
some
of
the
points
of
how
many
charts
are
we
going
to
show
how
much
history
is
there
going
to
be
how
many
ways
people
need
to
slice
it
up?
Does
anyone
need
to
save
their
view?
B
Are
we
going
to
compare
the
like,
as
you
sort
of
go
through
and
itemize
the
feature
set
of
which
some
of
the
things
I
just
said
is
like?
Well,
I
don't
know,
I
don't
know
we
should
figure
that
out
like
dude.
Does
anyone
need
to
save
a
view
or
actually
like,
while
we
probably
won't
have
accounts
and
the
ability
for
people
to
like
save
a
view?
One
another
important
consideration
is
I
go
on?
I
see
a
chart,
I'm
like!
Oh,
my
goodness,
that's
terrible
that
he's!
You
know
I
need.
B
B
B
B
Maybe
we
should,
I
think,
if
we
didn't
have
gatsby
already
or
something
it
would
be,
that's
kind
of
a
big
kind
of
a
big
hurdle.
It's
like
wait.
What
are
we
trying
to
do
here?
Are
we
trying
to
when
we
finally
moved
off
jekyll
on
the
layer,
five
io
site
to
gatsby?
It
was
like
look
we're
like
pressing
this
thing
up
against
its
edges.
The
theme
is
kind
of
you
know
junk.
We
need
this
thing
to
really
sell
the
rest
of
the
projects
and
represent
all
of
what's
been.
B
You
know
everyone's
given
and
so
like
nikhil
was
there
for
a
long
time
like
we
digesting
this
new
piece
of
tech,
doing
all
new
designs,
doing
reviews
doing
that,
you
know
forever
and
it's
pretty
fantastic.
It
gets
compliments.
You
know
it's
and
so
the
question
the
reason
I
bring
it
up
is
like
okay.
We
have
that
some
of
that
expertise
now.
The
question
for
this
is
how
just
how
amazing
do
we
want
for
this
to
be
when.
B
B
This
is
why
I
didn't
answer
you
and
slackins,
because
it
would
have
sounded
like
I
was
being
kind
of
rude
and
it
because
it
would
have
just
been
too
too
short.
It
would
have.
My
response
is
like
that
sounds
great
abj
go
ahead
and
do
it
like
like,
and
so
what
I
mean
by
that
and
that's
not
not
meant
to
be
rude.
It's
just
meant
it's
just
like.
B
Oh
hey.
We
have
to
take
a
deep
breath
and,
like
that's
a
bit
more
work,
okay,
are
we?
Are
there
people
committing
to
that?
If
so,
you
know,
let's
go,
do
it,
and
so
that's
like
a
good
thing
to
chat
with
subeti
about
as
well.
It's
like
hey,
I'm
committing
to
you,
know
you're,
committing
to
what
he
is
or
or
multiple
people.
B
You
you
can
also
like
one
powerful
thing
by
the
way,
just
in
general,
one
really
powerful
thing
in
discussions
like
this
is:
let's
say,
you've
found
what
you
thought
to
be
a
pretty
well
suited
well-suited
theme.
If
you
go,
do
a
prototype
just
in
a
different
repo
or
or
on
a
branch
or
something
of
using
a
different
framework.
B
E
Potentially
I
thought,
like
the
data
will
be
different
for
every
user
like
we
are
considering
and
sign
up
functionalities
like
if
I
log
in
and
data
will
be
different
for
me
or
if
you
just
login
data
will
be
there
are
some
check
boxes.
If
I
click
on
this
check
boxes,
then
charts
will
update.
So
in
those
cases
I
I
thought
like
jekyll
will
reload
itself.
So
I
I
I
don't
know
much
about
right
now.
That's
my
mistake.
I
will
like
do
some
research
on
that,
so
yeah.
B
No,
no
and
yeah
totally
and,
moreover,
actually
I
think,
like
it's,
it's
yeah,
it's
kind
of
a
hard
conference.
It's
kind
of
hard
to
make
statements,
because
it's
like
well
jekyll
is
almost
and
gatsby
in
this
case.
Is
there
almost
neither
here
nor
there
when
you
were
to
ask
yourself
if
you
checked
the
box,
would
it
refresh
like
you
can't
really
answer
it?
If
all
the
data
that
you're
given
is
like
it's
a
jekyll
site,
if
you
click
the
box,
will
it
refresh
it's
like?
B
B
Did
you
take
and
it's
like
did
the
theme
that
you
got
have
get
that
or
or
did
you
build
that
in
and
and
and
so
I
mean,
I
think
that,
like
I
thought
that
your
question
was
is
well-placed
because
if
for
nothing
else,
you
just
step
back
and
you
and
you
look
at
the
the
project-
it's
like.
Oh
oh
you're,
trying
to
make
something
that
feels
pretty
good.
It
could
be
dynamic.
People
are
slicing
up
views
and
etc.
It
sounds
kind
of
complex.
B
A
All
right
so
moving
on
to
the
next
topic,
so
this
was
something
I
think
we
discussed
in
one
of
the
previous
calls
and
supra
deep
is
already
working
on
it.
So,
basically,
on
the
get
nighthawk
site,
the
navbar
right
now
isn't
visible
in
mobileview,
but
the
problem
is
a
lot
of
people
have
tried
to
fix
it.
It
is
visible
in
the
previews
like,
but
it
isn't
visible
anymore
and
so
it's
visible
in
the
build
and
in
the
previews.
A
So
this
started.
When
you
know
people
are
fixing
the
like
the
mobile
responsiveness
of
the
navbar,
but
now
it's
gone
all
together
so
yeah
this
started
when
we
were
trying
to
fix
this.
So
I
think
this
is
a
little
like.
This
is
something
which
we
have
to
look
into
urgently
and
sugradip
is
looking
into
it.
But
if
someone
over
here
finds
out
another
fake
spirit,
you
can
get
in
touch
with
him
or
with
us,
and
let
us
know
so.
This
is
just
something
I
wanted
to
bring
up
consideration.
E
No
not
yet
like.
I
am
chasing
some
errors
in
in
this
get
nighthawk
project,
so
I
like
first
need
to
like
resolve
those
errors.
The
error
is
related
to
like
something
time
zone
info,
so
I
need
to
resolve
this
error.
The
errors
came
from
like
I'm,
using
a
different
version
of
ruby.
That's
why,
like?
I
first
need
to
resolve
that
error
and,
like
first
need
to
resolve
a
apr
to
like
in
that
pr.
I
am
working
on
the
sidebar,
the
sidebar.
G
E
A
F
A
All
right,
so
the
last
discussion
will
be
about
the
service
catalog.
So
if
you
guys
haven't
seen
this
yet,
but
I
think
so
we
were
working
on
the
service
mesh
catalog
and
there
have
been
issues
regarding
the
mobile
responsibilities
open
for
a
long
time.
So
I
think
on
the
issue
right
now,
the
person
who's
assigned
isn't
responding.
A
The
last
time
I
checked
so
I'll,
probably
tell
akshay
to
move
forward
with
this
he'll
probably
be
able
to
fix
it.
So
this
is
what
we
have
currently
one
need,
one
enhancement
which
any
one
of
you
can
work
on
is
the
ability
to
filter
like
to
have
multiple
filters
right
now,
as
you
can
see,
these
are
two
different
categories,
but
we
can
only
visit
one
category
at
a
time
like
even
like
suppose
I
go
to
deployment,
but
I
want
istio.
A
It
doesn't
like
show
me
deployment,
and
this
view
it
basically
visits
different
links
and
shows
me
different
filters.
So
we
want
these
to
combine
together.
We
also
have
web
assembly
filters
and
I
think
there
was
an
open
issue
to
expand
the
catalog
to
ebs
programs.
So
there
is
a
lot
of
work
that
needs
to
be
put
into
this
catalog.
So
if
again,
this
site
is
on
jekyll,
so
anyone
who's
familiar
and
wants
to
work
with
it.
You
can
start
with
working
on
this
multiple
filter.
Everything
is
there.
A
A
B
Yeah
and
after
the
ebpf
programs
there
is
oppa
policies
and-
and
the
thing
is
is
like
you,
don't
have
to
know
either
of
those
two
pieces
of
tech
to
create
a
new
category,
because
because
it's
just
about
as
simple
as
like
adding
new
metadata
or
what
have
you,
I
mean
you.
But
it's
a
good
excuse
to
go.
Learn
some
of
that
tech.
But.
B
B
So,
okay,
so,
given
that
siberia
and
abenai
are
considering
it
like,
it's
probably
for
one
of
you,
it's
ideal
to
take
on
the
epf
programs
and
the
oppa
policies,
or
just
like
in
terms
of
creating
those
two
categories,
because
it's
kind
of
the
same
thing
you
just
kind
of
do
another,
but
then
someone
else
to
work
on
the
multi-select
instead
of
the
radio
buttons.
Maybe
I
wanted
to
look
at
patterns
that
had
that
were
both
of
type
deployment
and
of
type
traffic
management.
B
B
B
B
Something
that
can
probably
be
done
is
where
it
says
service
mesh
catalog
is
like
maybe
it
shouldn't
say
the
surface
mesh
catalog
there.
Maybe
that
should
be
up
top
or
maybe
it
shouldn't
say
that
at
all
or
but
point
is
like
there's
a
third
item
of
adding
those
two
new
part
of
adding
those
categories
is
like
the
css
that
comes
with
adding
the
right
color.
So
for
the
ebpf
programs,
the
primary
color
that
we
would
probably
choose
is
probably
yellow
the
the
same
yellow.
That
is
on
the
bees,
hiney
and
then.
B
A
A
F
H
D
So
update
on
the
time
hearing-
yes
yeah,
so
update
on
the
search
feature,
so
I
I'm
currently
working
on
it,
though
I
was
able
to
to
adjust
the
query
for
the
graphql,
so
nikki
suggested
that
I
should
maybe
make
the
pagination
to
like
the
resource,
the
one
that
was
used
in
the
resource
page,
where
it's
actually
like
paginating
on
the
current
way,
rather
than
returning
any
queries.
So
I'm
trying
to
do
that
now.
Since,
yes,
I
have
actually
like
adjusted
the
I've
adjusted
the
graphql
query.
D
D
So
if
you
go
to
the
resource
page,
there's
the
that's
where
the
pagination
works,
it's
different
from
the
one,
the
one,
the
one
that
works
in
the
block
space,
it's
different,
so
it
doesn't
really
go
to
a
separate
different
page,
but
in
the
blogs
page
it
goes
to
a
different
page.
So
I'll
see.
If
I
could
do
that,
then,
if
that's
done
then
yes
I'll
make
it
there.
A
A
A
H
All
right,
so
so,
as
we
know,
the
test
results
are
like
in
more
number
like
it's
around
34
000
plus
test
results
right
and
to
show
them
in
a
drop
down.
Menu
is
not
like
not
feasible
right,
because
it's
showing
34
000
results.
They
can
stack
down
method
that
is
not
feasible
at
all,
so
we
are
thinking
of
like
you
know
some
suggestions
like
what.
How
can
we
display
all
these
data?
That's
so
that
it's
not
too
clustered
as
well
as
it
is
like
very
easier
to
navigate
to
different
results.
H
E
H
H
I
I
But
if
you
try
to
fetch
all
the
data,
it
will
take
a
lot
of
money
see
because,
as
of
now,
they
are
already
34
34
000
and
by
the
time
the
dashboard
gets
completed,
it
might
cross
40
000.
So
it
will
again
take
a
lot
of
time
and
even
if
it
gets
completed
40
bit
time,
it
will
only
increase
so
loading
that
that
many
data
doesn't
make
sense.
I
I
E
H
So
there
there
will
be
some
like
a
way
to
differentiate
between
the
tests,
but
still
I
don't
think
that
will
be
enough
to
you
know,
reduce
the
number
but
yeah
that
that
can
be
the
numbers
could
be
reduced,
but
not
to
a
great
extent.
I
think
I'm
not
actually
seeing
the
like
actual
details
like
actual
metrics
or
actual
numbers
of
dash
that
each
service,
mesh
or
performance
profile
has,
but
I
don't
yeah.
That
was
what
I
was
saying.
H
So
maybe
we
can
do
that
like
display
certain
number
of
tests,
if
at
all
that
a
particular
performance
profiles
and
the
service
mesh
combined,
has
that
number
of
tests,
and
you
can
think
of
like
other
ways
to
display.
If
the
user
wants
to
display
like
wants
to
see
more
results,
we
can
think
of
some
other
way
to
provide
them.
That
results.