►
From YouTube: Websites Weekly Meeting (31st October, 2022)
Description
Layer5 Websites Meeting - 31st October, 2022
Agenda:
Service-mesh-patterns
- Site complete? Ready for announcement?
- Grammatical mistakes in Footer.
- Design pattern in action Page.
layer5.io
- Category count to integrations filter #3423
- Show integration name on hover #3405
- Replaced screenshots on the Docker integration page #3427
meshery.io
- Wrapped up the prolonged PR https://github.com/meshery/meshery.io/pull/818 for twitter feed , waiting for review.
- 3-D Integrations page creation #891
- Dark mode
- Too much Gradients, takes too much attention of the eyes.
- CNCF logo should look like an actual CNCF_white logo.
- Content changes: move away from “service mesh” → “cloud native”
Docs.meshery.io
- [Volunteer needed] Need to reorganize the overall documentation structure
- [Volunteer needed] Need to solve the search anchor overlap issue
Join the community at https://layer5.io/community
Find Layer5 on:
GitHub: https://github.com/layer5io
Twitter: https://twitter.com/layer5
LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/company/layer5
Docker Hub: https://hub.docker.com/u/layer5/
A
A
A
Oh
sure
so
yeah
and
please
make
sure
you
write
your
names
in
the
attendance
list
so
with
that,
let's
begin
with
our
first
agenda
item
for
today,
which
is
on
service
mesh
patterns
site.
So
let's
have
a
look
at
that.
So
I
do
have
this
site
open
currently
and
with
the
on
another
tab.
I
have
the
design,
so
you
can
take
a
quick
look
on
that.
A
A
C
C
The
fact
that
this
particular
book
is
in
is
will
covers
meshery
on
the
second
chapter
of
the
book,
talks
nothing
but
about
meshery,
and
it
says
that
if
you
want
to
learn
the
rest
of
the
service
mesh
patterns
in
the
book
great
you
can
read
about
them
or
you
can
go
to
measure
it
in
there
and
you
can
import
those
patterns,
and
so
these
are
the.
This
is
the
list
of
patterns
you
can
take
the
yaml,
that's
in
the
book
and
import
them
into
to
measure.
I.
C
C
So
if
you
take
a
look
there
yeah
it's
a
little
bit,
you
know.
That's
probably
okay
and
people
are,
you
know
it's
kind
of
like
the
inside
cover
or
the
back
cover
sort
of
says
what
the
book
is
about,
who
it's
for
sure
I,
don't
know
that
who
is
for
has
to
be
in
quotes,
but
you
know
okay,
if
you
keep
scrolling.
So
if
we
just
do
kind
of
a
quick
review
and
try
to
answer
that
question,
are
we
done?
C
E
C
Is
Sean
worth
our
friendship
is
only
growing
as
you
as
you
point
out,
grammatical
mistakes
like
that?
Yes,
that's
right,
that's
right
winner,
the
L
isn't
capitalized
and
yeah.
It
makes
it
makes
a
difference.
You
start
to
question.
Well,
you
know,
gee
should
I
really
trust
these
authors
like
do
they
are
these?
You
know
intelligent
people.
Do
they
know
what
they're
writing
about.
C
So,
like
small
mistakes
like
that
matter,
if
you
train,
if
you
kind
of
let
your
eyes
loss
over
the
next
couple
of
items,
you
hit
the
bottom
service
mesh
interactives
lab
sort
of
suffers.
Similarly
in
terms
of
capitalization,
but
also
in
terms
of
I,
don't
know
what
interactives
is.
That
sounds
like
a
cool
new
video
game
or
something,
but
it
certainly
isn't
how
you
spell
Interactive
anyway,
if
we
go
to
the
next
page.
C
C
Okay,
as
long
as
we
do
that
everywhere
else,
but
I
suspect
that
we
don't,
we
probably
want
to
capitalize
book
I,
don't
know,
there's
you
know,
I'm
a
fan
of
the
green
color
that
we
use
here,
but
there
is
a
poop
load
of
green
on
this
page
and
so,
okay,
fine,
that
you
know
the
expandable
contractible
things
are
green,
okay,
but
then
there's
a
button
after
that.
That's
green
and
it
starts
to
get
a
little
I
wonder
if
there
isn't
a
different
button.
Color
that
we
might
want
to
use
maybe
make
that
yellow.
C
D
F
Okay
issue:
I
think
it
would
be
better
if
it's
the
banner
actually
because
the
height
and
the
content
inside
the
duper
type
is
a
banner.
We
use
a
banner
for
that
place
and
then
basically
join
the
conversation
button
there
for
the
design
of
that
particular
button
there.
Since
it
has
so
much
content
in
it,
we
should
convert
it
to
a
banner.
C
C
C
So
here
we
get
another
example
of
a
section
title.
This
one's
meet,
our
authors
so
great.
So
meat
is
capitalized
and
authors
is
capitalized.
That
looks
pretty
good
to
me.
I
think
that
answers
our
other
question
on
the
book
chapters
page
where
we
had
chapters
capitalized
but
book
lowercase.
It's
not.
We
probably
want
to
uppercase
book
so,
okay,
good
good,
all
right.
C
So
we've
got
a
couple
of
nerds
listed
on
the
page,
fine
down
below
there's
an
even
bigger
nerd,
I'm
Matt
he's
here
in
the
Community
doing
a
great
job
of
providing
review,
and
so
too
are
a
handful
of
others
are
giving
technical
review,
and
so
probably
an
action
item
for
for
Lee
to
go,
get
their
info
and
provide
that
to
you
all
here
so
that
they
can
be
listed.
I
would
hate
for
them
to
this
would
be
my
fault,
I.
C
C
C
It
is
bigger
and
Bolder
than
the
the
title
of
like,
like
Nick's
title
Jesus,
I,
couldn't
think
of
another
word,
but
developer
advocate.
So
the
section
title
with
technical
review
by
should
probably
be
a
little
either
a
little
bigger,
maybe
lowercase
Technical
and
review
or
uppercase
all
of
the
rest.
So
something
or
just
put
everything
in
uppercase.
If
it's
a
section,
Title
Here
something
I,
don't
know.
If
other
people
have
better
suggestions,
you
know
please
drop
them
in
on
bought.
C
C
Was
suggesting
hey?
Maybe
we
can
remove
the
width
in
the
with
technical
review
by
yeah
sure,
so
so,
if
we
remove
that
it
would
say
technical
review
by
nice
yeah
that
would
work
as
well.
It
could
be
that
it
okay,
so
the
the
top
says
meet
our
authors.
So
a
lot
of
times
you
try
to
be
symmetric
or
you
try
to
keep
the
same
tone
or
same
phrasing
meet
our
authors.
Technical
review
by
I
was
thinking.
C
C
C
That
is
a
link
that
goes
to
the
about
page
on
there,
if
I'm,
all
right,
yeah,
I,
wonder
okay,
so
in
the
original
design
for
this
site,
I
think
we
had
two
other
Pages,
oh
wow,
you
had
that
on
hand
perfect.
So
here's
the
current
designs
for
the
site,
so
all
of
you
that
are
on
the
call
right
now,
it's
very
nice
to
see
you
all
and
also
this
is
your
site,
or
rather
there's
there's
my
ugly
pictures
on
the
site.
But
that's
not
really
not
the
point.
C
The
point
is
to
tell
people
about
this
particular
piece
of
technology.
The
fact
that
there's
a
book
that
describes
it
and
the
fact
that,
like
actually
one
of
the
bigger
points
for
even
making
this
site
is
to
let
people
know
meshery,
is
a
tool
that
will
help
you
implement
these
things,
these
patterns
and
that's
kind
of
what
we're
missing
the
or
the
big
chunk
of
what
we're
missing.
I.
Think
it's
like
this
third
page,
so
we
have
this
this
overview
page,
the
just
a
quick
overview
of
the
chapters
of
the
book.
C
C
C
C
C
So
just
as
you
go
to
design
something
just
just
for
context
for
you,
it's
the
third
page
that
we
actually
don't
have
implemented
and
to
me
that
that
was
that
is
or
was
kind
of
the
point
of
the
site
was
to
let
people
know
like
hey.
Here's
go
use
this
tool.
Here's
this
open
source
tool,
go,
learn
and
put
your
hands
on
the
patterns
like
go,
grab,
Mastery
and
then
you
can
and
I
guess
you
might
have
more
history
here
or
to
kill
my
did.
C
We
just
never
get
around
to
designing
what
this
thing
would
be.
I
think
we
described
in
the
blue
lettering
up
above
what
the
you
know.
If
you
zoom
in
on
that,
so
there's
an
overall
descriptor
of
the
page.
We
say
this
page
should
contain
an
overview
of
Mastery
and
the
fact
that
all
patterns
can
be
imported
and
deployed
by
measuring
cool.
C
Okay,
that's
the
purpose
of
the
page
that
the
contents
of
the
page
would
be
potentially
like
a
video
of
mesh
map,
which
is
that
compelling
visual
designer
that
the
page
might
contain
an
overview
of
the
Mastery
catalog.
So
that's
cool
that
meshery.io
catalog
that'll,
where
all
of
the
patterns
are
posted
very
relevant
to
this
book
right.
The
patterns
are
posted
on
the
catalog
that
way,
people
if
they're
reading
the
book
they
don't
have
to
like
retype
the
yaml
from
the
book.
They
just
go
to
the
catalog,
Mastery
catalog
and
import
patterns
into
measuring
from
there.
C
C
So
botany
or
anybody
else
that
might
want
to
take
a
crack
at
a
design.
For
that
page
like
just
to
me,
that's
the
that's
the
money
maker.
That's
like
how
do
you
say?
That's
the
that's!
That's
what
the
whole
site
is
about.
Like
that's
the
page
like
that's
the
one,
so
we
so
yeah
anybody
wanna,
try
their
hand
at
designing
the
page.
C
C
C
Rather,
if
you
would
take
the
there's
that
frame
called
action
or
it's
just
titled
action,
I
guess,
because
the
pages
patterns
and
action
it's
in
the
upper
left
hand
corner
it's
a
really
small
label
called
action.
I.
Think
if
you
copy
that,
if
someone
as
you
go
to
do
your
draft
designs,
you
were
to
copy
the
frame
and
just
kind
of
put
it
down
below,
and
then
you
can
work
on
it
and
change
it.
However,
you
want
to
and
and
anyone
else
that
wants
to
try,
they
would
just
make
it
a
similar
copy.
That
way.
C
People
can
go
nuts
and
make
as
many
changes
as
they
want
and
then
eventually,
we'll
start
to.
You
all
will
do
reviews
and
sort
of
congeal
on
what
the
design
actually
is
and
then
you
can
just
move
those
elements,
those
components
back
into
the
approved
or
the
design
at
the
top,
but
that
way
nobody
gets
there.
C
Nobody
like
puts
a
lot
of
like
the
reason
I'm
suggesting
that
or
the
reason
that
I'm
kind
of
highlighting
that
is
just
because
if
you
don't
make
a
copy
of
the
design-
and
you
start
doing
a
design
right
on
on
this
particular
frame,
other
people
might
feel
like.
Oh
I,
guess,
there's
no
more
room
left
for
me
to
do
anything
because
I
don't
want
to
bump
into
what
they're
doing
or
other
people
will
say.
C
Oh
okay,
this
is
where
you
do
draft
designs,
so
I'll
go
in
and
do
a
draft
design
and
I'll
overwrite
what
you've
done,
and
then
someone
comes
back
the
next
day
and
they're
like
wait,
where's
where's,
all
my
hard
work
go
and
so
I
guess
I'm
just
saying
copy
first
design
later,
as
opposed
to
like
shoot.
First
ask
questions
later:
it's
more
like
copy.
First.
C
Cool
well
well,
so
this
is
pretty
great
because,
like
if
you
consider
where
the
site
is
today,
it's
like
all
the
ancillary
work
has
been
done
and
it
looks
pretty
good
and
now
it's
time
for
like
this
The
Sweet
Spot,
like
the
page,
the
page
of
the
site,
some
of
it's
kind
of
nice,
because
it'll
be
a
little
like
cheating.
It's
like
well,
there's
a
video
that
will
go
here.
C
A
A
H
H
A
C
H
C
Okay,
good
nice,
hey
great
work,
I'm
surprised
that
this.
This
is
a
compliment
when
I
say
I'm
surprised
that
you
did
this
and
did
it
so
fast,
so
cool
okay,
so
one
thing
I
mean
I,
don't
know
that
people
will
pay
attention
to
this
or
not,
but,
like
you
know,
we're
we're
just
kind
of
rounding
up
in
the
overall
built-in
Integrations,
which
is
like
80
plus
Integrations.
C
We
sort
of
just
round
up
from
76
we're
we're
generous
with
four
extra,
because
in
the
all
it
says
that
we
only
have
76
and
that's
fine,
we're
adding
many.
Many
more
there'll
be
more
and
more
coming,
but
there
is
a
discrepancy
and
so
I
don't
know.
If
that
will
you
know
that's
just
one,
you
know
I,
don't
know
if
people
will
notice
the
chaos
engineering
is
like
well
geez.
It's
a
category
of
one
API
Gateway
category
of
one,
oh
geez.
C
Again
as
a
matter
of
fact,
is
that
really
all
add
up
to
76
I'll
bet
you,
my
bottom
dollar
that
it
does
or
about
you
10
bucks.
It
doesn't
add
up
to
76.
So
it's
not
that
your
code
is
not
counting
correctly.
It's
probably
that
we
have
a
number
that
are
hidden,
so
it
might
be
that
you
would
add
a
qualifier
to
the
76
to
say.
C
I
F
F
C
Nice
yeah,
unless,
like
and
I'd
like
to
hear
from
nikhil,
if
we
could
like
I'm,
not
convinced,
sometimes
we
suggest
to
do
things
between
all
of
us
and
it
sounds
good
when
you
say
it
and
then
when
you
do
it
well,
I
don't
know.
Maybe
maybe
maybe
it's
a
good
idea
to
have
the
count
there
or
or
maybe
not
it's
one
of
those
things
that
what
what
do
you
guys
all
think.
A
C
K
Can
shoot
so
the
pr
was
about
like
showing
the
topic
of
the
integration,
so
I
guess
in
the
last
website
meeting
a
discussion
in
that
we
have
to
remove
this
loan
move
button
right
and
have
the
anchor
anchor
tag
on
the
this
hex
hexagon.
Only
so
I'll
make
the
make
the
changes
regarding
that
and
everything
else
looks
fine
right.
C
K
Yeah,
like
we
have
I'll,
be
removing
this
a
little
more
button
and
just
place
the
anchor
tag
on
this
hexagon
only
like
it
was
before
so
whenever
we
collect
this
hex
again
so
it
we
would
be
like
redirected
to
the
dedicated
page
for
the
integration
so
like
this
learn.
More
button,
won't
be
there
just
the
topic.
K
K
E
A
E
A
A
C
Oh
yeah
yeah,
that's
it
man,
it's
like
it
was
as
easy
as
that
it's
just
like,
but
but
now
that
you
ask
now
that
you
ask
allow
me
to
so
it
we
would
actually
want
to
change
what
the
text
says
as
well.
So
no
longer
no
longer
are
we
talking
about
the
performance
yardstick,
but
we're
talking
about
the
slickness
of
the
meshery
extension
for
Docker
desktop,
if
you
don't
mind
to
just
grab
some
verbiage
from
the
dedicated
Docker
extension
page,
and
you
can
paste
that
over
here
and
we'll.
A
E
A
I
I
A
C
C
B
C
Go
back,
go
back,
move
it
back
on,
go
back
a
little
bit.
If
you
would
just
dismiss
you,
let's
just
imagine
smidge,
oh
okay!
Well,
that
looks
left
aligned
to
me.
It
looks
first
of
all
there's
some
lack
of
margins
that
are
consistent.
You
know
between
like
community
and
socials,
and
then
it
looks
like
socials
is
kind
of
on
the
left,
not
necessarily
in
the
center,
but
maybe
those
two
things
are
centered.
It's
just
I,
don't
know.
I
might
suggest
that
Center
isn't
necessarily
what
you'd
be
looking
for.
C
I
gotta
say
I
gotta
say
like
it
doesn't.
Look.
If
you
wait,
go
back
what's
up
all
right,
all
right
there
yeah
or
a
little
bit
further
to
the
right
about
about
an
inch
as
you
kind
of
just
start,
yeah
keep
going
yeah
do
other
people
have
feedback,
it
looks
left
aligned,
not
Center
aligned
now,
which
actually
looks
a
little
better
I,
don't
know
the
other
columns
aren't
necessarily
equidistant
as
well.
It's
just
it
just
kind
of
looks
like
a
smattering
of
columns
and
things
we
do
Center
align.
C
J
So
basically,
this
view
looks
fine
for
smaller
screens,
probably
that
is
happening
around
990
pixels,
so
that
would
be
fine
along
with
center
line,
but
in
case
of
mobile
view
of
a
single
column
with
t
to
the
like
the
Twitter.
What
is
it
called
whatever?
It
is?
The
tweet's
been
shown
at
the
end
of
all
these
items
only
for
diagnosis,
and
it
should
be
Central
item.
J
A
A
A
C
I'll
toss
in
some,
but
hopefully
others
have
other
things
to
say
other
than
awesome:
excellent,
fantastic
amazing,
cool
I'm,
just
I'm
just
reading
off
the
list
on
the
in
the
chat.
That's
all
a
couple
things
the
watch
out
before
the
font
change.
Unless
it
was
intentional
on
the
page,
the
other
thing
is
yeah
that
it's
a
shame
that
not
all
projects
have
such
a
great
looking
white
mode
or
white
logo,
but
our
investment
into
those
is
worthwhile
because
we'll
use
those
on
mastery.io
we'll
use
those
on
layer5.io.
C
C
It's
something
to
prototype.
I,
think
it's
readily
I
think
that
I
think
it's
quite
possible
to
readily
at
hand.
We
don't
have
neces.
We
don't
necessarily
have
links
for
specific
links
for
where
we
want
to
take
people
for
each
and
every
single
integration.
Just
yet,
in
the
long
term,
we
will
I'm
a
next
good.
Next
step
is
to
see
what
this
looks
like
on
integrated
into
the
main
page
or
if
it
becomes
really
difficult
to
kind
of
navigate
the
main
page.
C
If
this
is
a
full
width
section,
as
someone
is
scrolling
through
the
overall
site
and
they
hit
this
section,
all
of
a
sudden,
the
scroll
wheel
doesn't
move
the
page
up
and
down
it
zooms
in
and
out
of
this,
and
so
something
for
us
to
consider.
I
think
it's
great
that
there's
a
dedicated
Integrations
page
and
that
this
is
there
depending
upon
that
user
interaction
when
someone's
trying
to
scroll
over
this
as
a
section,
maybe
this
does
or
doesn't
work
on
the
main
page,
I
guess
I
guess
we'll
see.
I
All
right
so
just
confirming
it
I
had
also
asked
it
earlier
that,
like
we
have
like
the
number
of
Integrations,
we
have
approx
about
500
something,
but
the
periodic
table
is
limited.
So
what
I
was
suggesting
was
that
on
the
spreadsheet
that
that
was
shared,
we
have
some
gold
and
platinum
members.
So
should
we
represent
first
on
the
periodic
table?
I
C
What
does
matter
is
Page
performance.
If
it
did
take
a
little
while
to
load,
then
it
would
start
to
become
more
of
an
annoyance
than
anything
else.
Part
of
what
we're
trying
to
it's.
The
wow
factor
is
what
we're
trying
to
have
happen
with
something
like
this,
where
it's
like
holy
whoa.
How
many
this
thing
manages
what
I
didn't
know
that
Mastery
did
I
thought
it
was
just
for
service
meshes
like
no.
C
No,
it's
not
to
manage
a
lot
of
things
and
yeah
I
think
it
is
feasible,
or
rather
we
can
make
it
such
that
people
can
interact
with
each
individual
card
and
click
to
go.
Look
at
the
details
of
that
integration.
It's
certainly
cool
to
look
at
and
play
with.
It's
also
more
difficult
to
navigate
than
sort
of
your.
You
know
some
standard
set
of
filters
like
we
were
just
looking
at
on
the
layer,
5
IO
site,
so
so
leaning
into
the
wow
factor
like
yeah.
Maybe
maybe
we
wouldn't
even
let
them
look
at.
C
A
A
A
C
Okay,
and
then
there
were
a
couple
of
other
sections
of
the
site.
Where
is
you
know,
I?
Think
most
people
would
agree
kind
of
visually
appealing
like,
and
that
example
is
like.
Oh,
it's
kind
of
visually
appealing
that
you
get
this
interaction
on
the
menu,
but
it
probably
crosses
the
line
of
being
like
distracting
of
like,
especially
if
you
scroll
down
to
one
of
the
sections
that
gradient
and
the
use
of
it.
C
Click
and
I
think
in
some
places
we
have,
there
are
buttons
that
have
that
gradient,
color
and
they're
clickable
and
in
other
places
the
gradient
color
is
used
as
a
background
to
highlight
words
and
they're,
not
clickable.
It's
like
whoa
we're
misleading
our
users.
We
were
misleading
the
site
visitors
in
some
areas.
We're
teaching
them
click.
Me
click
me
when
we
have
the
gradient
and
in
other
areas
we're
just
like
no
look
at
me.
Look
at
me
either
way.
C
They're,
just
slumming
around
the
site
grabbing
attention
wherever
they
can
taking
attention
wherever
they
can
and
so
I
think
the
biggest
piece
of
feedback
that
I
had
had,
and
maybe
others
see
this
differently
or
can
help
qualify
it
a
little
better.
Is
that
there's
a
a
little
there's?
An
abuse
of
the
gradients
I
thought
that
those
cards
as
their
those
four
cards
as
they're
inverted,
are
quite
beautiful,
they're
beautiful
in
their
light
mode
and
they're
equally,
as
beautiful
in
there
dark
mode
in
the
light
mode.
C
So
if
you
go
yeah,
if
you
go
back
to
light,
so
this
is
what
it
is
today.
This
is
what
they
do
today.
I
believe
when
you
swap
to
dark
mode,
I'll
point
out
that
you
know
part
of
what
makes
them
beautiful
is
that
there's
this
lighter
radiant
lighter
radial
gradient
emanating
from
the
lower
left
hand
corner
of
the
box.
I
I,
think
that
that
makes
it
that
that
adds
to
its
beauty.
C
They're
not
exactly
inverse
they're,
not
symmetric,
and
to
me
that
there's
a
particular
part
of
my
brain
that
starts
to
send
off
signals
and
signals
of
dislike
when
things
aren't
symmetric,
and
so
that
was
just
another
point
of
feedback.
It's
super
small
but
I'm,
highlighting
for
everyone
else
here.
Just
as
you
go
to
review
the
site
and
reflect
on
some
things,
there
was
something
Krishna
had
done
this
in
about
six
hours
or
you've
done.
It
kind
of
you
know
hastily
trying
to
figure
out.
C
If
this
was
a
desired
thing
or
not,
and
so
see
the
cloud
native
Foundation
logo
and
he
didn't
go.
He
used
the
CSS
filter
to
change
its
to
White
from
color
to
white,
and
in
doing
so
it
doesn't
look
like
the
official
he
needs
to
grab
use
the
official
White
Version,
which
looks
slightly
different,
which
has
yeah
yeah
anyway
yeah.
You
can
see
here
that
the
button
it
uses
that
gradient,
which
is
you
know
pretty,
but
it's
confusing
to
users.
This
is
you
can
interact
with
this
one,
but
not
the
other
ones.
C
Oh
wow
I
didn't
realize
it
that
yeah
anyway.
I
think
that
you
know
from
my
this
is
just
my
own
personal
perspective
is
that
at
these
gradients
might
be
coming
into
style.
Maybe
I
think
I've
seen
them
in
a
couple
of
places.
Maybe
this
is
but
that
doesn't,
but
there's
a
little
bit
of
an
overuse
of
them
here
and
I.
Don't
know
that
it
conveys.
C
Yeah
I
don't
know
that
it
gives
the
site
if
you
go
reflect
on
other
cncf
open
source
project
sites.
Some
of
them
are
pretty
crappy,
and
most
of
them
are
only
about
moderately
good
yeah
yeah.
That
doesn't
mean
that
we
should
hold
back
and
not
have
an
awesome
site.
What
I
mean
is
yeah.
This
also
isn't
a
portfolio
site,
or
this
isn't
a
blog
site,
or
this
isn't
a
like
shopping
sales
site.
So.
C
There's
other
pages
to
look
at
I
think
what
was
more
important
for
me
is
that
more
than
dark
mode,
it's
more
the
content
that
needs
to
be
restructured,
less
service,
mesh,
more
Cloud
native,
this
section,
I
think
right
here,
the
created
by
layer,
5
and
used
by
it
can
be
vertically
cut
in
half
it
should
be.
We
should
just
make
it
much
tighter.
This
is.
C
I
Okay,
so
my
feedback
regarding
the
dark
background
is
that
to
me,
the
doctor
with
the
gradient
doesn't
go
well
with
the
site.
Cause
simple
reasons
like
this
is
not
a
web
3
site
like
the
gradient
look
much
better
like
on
web3
sites,
but
I
mean
like
they
are.
The
gradient
is
taking
more
attention,
is
what
I
would
say.
A
A
So,
let's
quickly
move
to
other
items
for
docs.message.io.
So
it's
a
call
for
volunteer
for
need
to
recognize
the
overall
documentation
structure
and
solve
the
research
and
solve
the
search
anchor
overlap
issue
so
yeah
you
all
can
take
a
look
and
just
on
this
particular
issue,
so
we
will
assign,
if
you
comment
on
this
particular
issue.
So
next
step
we
have
is
Docker
extension
UI
for
Divine.
Would
you
like
to
quickly
cover,
or
we
should
cover
it
on
the
next
call.
F
A
B
L
C
Yeah,
so
in
icons
in
general,
are
a
couple
of
characteristics
like
one
simple,
less
is
more
in
terms
of
icons
generally
or
logos,
I'm
kind
of
conflating
the
two
sort
of
logo,
design,
icon
design,
which
I
think
that
they
share
some
characteristics
but
differ
a
little
bit.
One
of
their
shared
characters.
C
Characteristics
is
well
that
they
are
generally
Square
ish
in
in
that,
or
at
least
in
that
they
fit
into
a
square
presentation
pretty
well,
because
if
you
could
it's
a
lot,
a
lot
like
avatars
or
when
logos
are
put
next
to
each
other
they're,
usually,
given
you
know
a
square
place
to
sit
same
thing
for
icons,
they
get
put
into
buttons
and
other
things
or
badge
in
this
case
yeah.
Maybe
I'll
stop
at
those
two
and
say
to
you
know
so
to
me
something
like
number
four.
If,
particularly
if
the.
C
C
Even
then,
service
mesh
isn't
all
that
we
do
and
it
I
don't
think
it
was
meant
to
be
a
topological
thing.
It
wasn't
meant
to
be
a
network
thing
anyway,
and
it
makes
it
a
little.
You
know
like
it's,
maybe
more
than
needs
to
be
conveyed,
or
it
makes
a
little
it's
not
as
simple
as
it
could
be,
but
those
are
things
that
come
to
mind
on
the
UI,
like
the
other
one.
C
Because
do
you
hear
that
tail
on
the
that
hat
on
the
top
of
the?
U
I
don't
that
it
doesn't
look
like
a
u
and
it's
confusing,
and
so,
but
if
it
was
just
you
and
I,
that
would
be
simple
enough
and
straightforward
enough.
One
thing
that
I
think
we
need
to
clarify
is
like
wait.
A
second
is
this:
a
ux
badge,
a
ux
badge
or
a
UI
badge,
or
is
it
both
and
depending
upon
where
people
leaned
in?
C
You
know,
which
is
if
I
was
divine,
I,
might
say:
okay,
fine.
He
talked
a
lot
about
number
four.
What
if
I
take
off
that
line?
If
I
take
the
pencil
the
pen
head
and
I
increase
the
size
of
that
Circle
the
while
increasing
the
size
of
the
that
small
vertical
line
such
that
now
I
can
have
I
can
equally,
maybe
not
equally,
but
I
can
represent
the
dark,
green
and
the
light
green
there's.
C
C
Alternatively,
we
could
put
these
things
out
for
vote
I
to
be
critical,
like
I.
Think
the
general
to
be
critical,
like
most
of
them
are
rubbish
like
number
five
rubbish,
absolute
garbage,
seven
like
six
terrible
terrible.
The
overuse
of
hexagon
here
in
this
space
is
unbelievable.
If
you
go
to
l.cncf.io,
the
use
of
hexagons
across
the
landscape
is
all
unimaginable.
C
You
know,
I,
don't
know
some
Egyptian
I,
don't
know
what
it
is,
but
anyway
I
don't
mean
to
say
the
rubbish
and
all
that
crap,
but
if
five
actually
is,
is
really
super
terrible,
it's
like
it
just
it
just
doesn't
apply
to
any
of
the
design
factors
or
principles
it
doesn't
fall
on
which
is
like
with
this
low
contrast.
It's
confusing
it
looks
like
a
snowflake.
It
look,
it's
an
abuse
of
the
Mastery
logo,
one
everybody,
whoever
makes
a
logo,
they
will
tell
you,
don't
do
that.
C
Don't
take
my
logo
and
mess
with
it.
They
will
all
tell
you
that
they're
like
right,
big
and
bold,
like
do
not
because
they'll
have
dues.
Do
this.
Put
our
logos
like
they
were
designed,
do
not
take
our
logos
and
abuse
them.
You
anyway,
anyway.
Don't
do
that
the
logo
so
like
in
this
case,
hey
there
our
logos,
so
we
want
to
do
it.
We
can
so
like
the
U
and
the
I
on
top
of
the
measure.
You're
like
okay-
maybe
maybe
you
know
there
are
logos.
If
we
want
to
do
that.
C
D
D
C
C
Yeah,
there's
a
bunch
of
other
things
to
design,
though
there's
a
there's,
a
ton
of
either
logos
or
artwork
to
design
like
there's
a
there's,
a
ton
so
yeah,
there's
a
ton
of
like
little
stick
figures
that
we
need
to
promote
people
in
the
community
Divine
not
too
long
ago
had
a
new
member
profile
on
the
layer
5.
I
o
website.
That's
an
awesome
thing.
That's
that's
because
others
in
the
community
recognize
his
contributions
and
wanted
to
invite
him
to
have
one
great.
C
So
we
that's
like
one
of
those
things
that
we
would
go
celebrate.
So
if
we
go
tweet
about
it,
There's
an
opportunity
for
a
visual
graphic.
The
a
little
stick
figure
is
what
we've
used
a
lot
of
times
to
promote
people
in
the
you
know
or
or
just
find
divine's
photo
and
his
member
card
and
tweeting
that
out,
but
somebody's
got
a
put
that
together.