►
From YouTube: Layer5 Websites Meeting (Sept 14th, 2020)
Description
A bit of Gatsby today.
A
A
C
C
C
B
B
A
B
C
B
B
C
C
C
Yeah
yeah,
but
we
don't
have
that
itemized
if
it
might
be
interesting
to
well
on
the
current
layer,
5
site,
there's
a
light
blue
that
gets
used
for
the
hyperlinks.
There's
a
there's,
a
shade
of
blue
that's
used
on
the
smp
site,
and
it's
that
shade
is
documented
in
the
layer.
Five
io
slash
brand
page.
C
B
C
B
E
C
A
C
D
C
Yeah
yeah,
it's
not
the
best
inside
there's,
and
that
was
in
part
based
on
how
the
cards
work
on
the
other
side
on
the
current
site.
Here,
there's
maybe
two
things
that
we
could
do.
One
is
where
the
this,
the
line
that
says
book
colon
and
it
has
the
title
of
the
book-
that's
just
text
inside
of
the
post
or
inside
of
the
page.
C
C
Cool
cool,
so
in
that
case
we're
probably
okay
modifying
this.
If
we
can,
we
can
probably
remove
the
byline
yeah
yeah,
because
this
is
not
as
much
of
this
isn't
a
post
as
much
as
it's
just
a
page
that
says:
hey,
there's
and
there's
a
book
here,
and
this
is
what
the
book
is
about
and
then
in
the
description
of
the
book,
maybe
toward
the
bottom.
C
C
E
C
E
C
C
To
news:
does
that
make
sense?
There
were,
like,
I
think,
two
things
being
pointed
out.
The
one
is
that
the
structure
we
were
sort
of
structuring
the
text
here
at
the
bottom,
on
multiple
lines
and
from
for
my
part,
it
might
be
nice
if
these
are
these
three
or
four
pieces
of
information
are,
you
know,
entered
on
multiple
lines
for
easier
reading
and
then
the
second
second,
which
is,
which
is
how
it's
structured
here,
which
is
good.
B
B
C
C
C
An
item
to
tack
on
to
nikhil's
feedback
would
might
be
that
there's
a
publish
date
for
the
post
that
was
written
to
put
the
you
know
to
list
the
book.
I'm
not.
I
don't
know
if
that's
relevant
here
or
not
like.
I
don't
know
that
that,
because
we're
not
really
trying
to
treat
these,
this
collection
has
a
collection
of
posts
that
are
categorized
for
books,
rather
we're
just
trying
to
create
treat
this
as
a
collection
of
of
books
of
pages
about
books,
and
so
when
that
page
was
published
is
maybe.
C
Well,
we
should
get
a
better
system
down
of
how
we're
taking
power
down
that
feedback
who's
sharing
the
screen
right
now,
all
right,
okay,
great
sweetie,
if,
if
you
would
while
we're,
if
you
can
jot
those
meeting
minutes
down
while
we're
on,
maybe
you
already
are
but
sure
cool.
Thank
you.
Thank
you
cool.
What?
What
what
do
we
have
next.
A
B
F
C
So
suraj
this
is
like
this
is
potentially
a
great
way
of
getting
getting
your
feet
wet
with
gatsby,
because
yes
siraj,
I'm
no
doubt
in
that
you're
comfortable
with
a
couple.
You
know
a
few
other
javascript
frameworks,
like
the
yeah.
No
doubt
you'd
be
successful
here,
a
couple
of
quick
things
to
give
you
a
feel
for
to
give
to
orient
you
to
this
suraj.
That
is
there's
on
tunisia's
screen
he's
on
the
layer,
5
repository
and
the
the
layer
5
io.
That's
the
name
of
the
github
org
layer.
C
C
That
will
contain
many,
many
many
more
pages,
much
more
content
and
so
to
get
us
off
on
the
right
foot.
They've
identified
that
what
we'll
run
the
new
set
would
be
based
on
react,
but
but
specifically
the
gatsby
has
a
framework
and
there's
a
lot
more
power
in
there.
The
the
thing
is,
it's
so
there's
a
second
site,
the
layer,
5
ng
for
next
generation,
like
the
second
version
of
the
site,
it
is
stored
inside
of
the
branch
called
layer
5ng
and
it's
a
totally
different.
C
You
know
it's
a
lot
of
the
same
content,
but
it's
a
totally
different
code
base,
so
there's
a
little
so
if
it's
been
a
while,
since
you've
messed
around
with
a
bunch
of
different
branches
and
pull
requests
and
things
across
different
branches,
this
is
a
good
it's
a
good
way
of
getting
back
to
that
from
a
git
perspective.
But
it's
also
a
great
way
of
what
tunuchi
was
just
showing
about
news.
C
C
C
B
B
Actually
also
done
some,
like
you
know
some
tutorials
for
gatsby
in
couple
of
days
back
so
I
have
like
I've
come
to
know
number
of
things
about
gatsby,
but
there
are
more
in
it
like.
There
are
more
complex
thing
according
to
me
personally,
which
I
am
not
able
to
cope
up
with
on
brand
page,
actually
assign
me
an
issue
regarding
brand
page.
C
Side,
nice
yeah,
that's
great
suraj.
We
should
we
should
note
today's
date
is
like
the
14th
of
september.
I
bet
I
bet
if,
when
we
get
to
like
the
15th
of
october
you'll,
be
talking
much
differently
about
how
comfortable
you
are
with
gatsby
and
things
like
I
I've
little
doubt
that
that
you'll
get
pretty
comfortable
quickly.
C
Yeah,
that's
great!
Thank
you
yeah,
especially
if
you're
hanging
around
to
news
or
josh
here
you'll
get
whipped
into
shape.
I
suspect
yeah
cool,
so
the
la
there's
one
other
caveat
just
to
mention
briefly
and
nikhil
and
tenu
and
neil
and
everybody
something
to
something
that
for
us
to
think
about
a
little
bit.
C
Maybe
this
is
something
for
us
to
rectify
tunisia.
If
you
go
back
to
the
news
page
with
the
collection
of
news
on
the
layer,
5
io
site,
there's
kind
of
two
types
of
listings
on
that
page
and
yeah
to
news.
If
you
were
to
visit,
if
you
were
to
go
to
the
last
tab
that
you
have
open
the
letter,
five
io
slash
news.
C
Oh,
you
are
cool
yeah,
no,
it's
just
it's
delayed
it
it,
but
you
know
what
that
that's
fine
to
speak
to
it
briefly,
there's
kind
of
two
types
of
entries
one
and
you
can
see
it
in
the
small
yellow
button.
One
will
have
an
ellipse
and
one
will
have
an
external
link
icon.
The
two
icons
are
different
and
so
the
one
with
the
external
link
icon
for
the
most
part.
B
C
C
B
C
It
is
that
makes
that
makes
sense.
I
see
how
the
two
are
there.
One
is
to
see
more
and
the
other
one
is
the
external
link.
I
wonder
it
just
as
a
way
of
being
nitpicky
if
we
might
be
able
to
get
those
onto
the
same
line
and
sort
of
have
have
them
on
opposite
sides
of
one
another,
but
on
the
same
yeah,
okay,.
B
D
A
A
D
C
Let
me
just
pile
on
to
that
and
say:
that's
such
a
horrible
suggestion,
no
actually,
when,
when
the
two
get
separated
from
one
another,
it
would
be
a
good
time
to
come
back
to
reflect
to
to
kind
of
ask
that
same
question
like.
Is
it
intuitive
enough
or
does
it
need
a
label,
and
is
there
enough
room
at
that
point
and
so
well
fair
enough?
Moving
on
what
else
do
we
have.
D
C
H
C
D
C
Nice
yeah,
oh
man,
boom.
I
like
the
period
on
the
end
of
this
sentence.
Here,
that's
that's
kind
of
it's.
Just
it's
just
a
statement
of
fact.
It's
just
that's
what
it
is
we
may
as
well
have
v
in,
like
font,
96
or
something
the
serviceman
okay
so
adopt
and
operate
any
service
mesh
with
confidence
using
nice.
We
might
be
able
to
lose
the
period
here
just
as
a
but
my
goodness,
look
at
the
number
of
service
meshes
that
this
thing
supports
some
10
different,
sound.
C
So
some
things
that
are
kind
of,
I
think
you
know
just
as
a
consumer
if
you
will-
or
as
someone
deciding
whether
or
not
to
use
this
thing,
it's
like
numbers
pop
out
like
okay,
hey,
I'm
getting
value,
there's
some
inherent
implicit
value
to
like
this
many
things,
I'm
getting.
Okay,
that's
good!
We
might.
I
know
it
would
be
a
tall.
D
Yeah
yeah
yeah,
so
I
like,
I
just
totally
get
the
point.
I
was
I
thought
of
the
same
like
for
each
and
like
it
would
be
like
all
the
service
messages
are
currently
present
so
like
for
all
of
them.
We
could
have
a
single
line
and
a
check
mark
along
with
that,
but
the
yeah
yeah.
The
issue
was
like
it
was
taking
very
long
like
it
would
be
something
so
like
I
can
try
it
yeah,
but.
C
Nice,
well,
it
might
also
be.
We
might
be
able
to
open
this
up
a
little
bit
if
we
were
to
take
and
re-categorize
this
validate
bit.
If
we
move
that
to
well,
we
could
either
move
it
to
under
the
configuration
column,
or
I
realize
if
we
have
four
columns
here,
it
might
start
to
get
a
bit
tight,
but
the
the
validate
is
arguably
kind
of
its
own
category
of
of
capability.
C
It
might,
I
wonder,
yeah
you
might
have
to
play
with
this
a
little
bit
like
what
does
it
look
like
if
there's
four
columns
is
that
too
squished?
Okay,
if,
if
that's
too
squished,
maybe
what
does
it
look
like?
If
there's
a
configuration
block
and
then
beneath
the
since
configuration
is
the
shortest?
And
since
configuration
and
validation
are
fairly
well
related?
C
What
if
there
was
a
style
of
a
column
that
has
it's
the
same
column,
but
it
has
two
sections
and
by
sections
I
don't
necessarily
mean
like
two
two
totally
independent
blocks,
but
rather
it's
the
same.
It's
the
same
column,
but
you
just
have
like
a
a
horizontal
row
or
just
a
small
like
a
dashed
line
or
something
that
that
segregates
them.
C
D
Yeah
yeah
so
like
I'll
just
try
that
thing
also
there
was
a
thing
like
as
we
planned
in
the
previous
meeting
like
it
could
be
the
feature
speed
page
won't
be
just
for
the
measuring
and
we
could
include
it
for
other
projects
as
well.
So
I
thought
that
the
performance
column
might
not
be
a
part
of
the
measuring
features
for
very
long,
so
like
in
case
that
thing
happens,
we
can
like
scrap
it
out
from
performance
part
or
something
like
that.
C
Yeah
good
good
thinking
in
this
case
performance
performance
will
be
a
fairly
big
set
of
features
for
measures.
It'll
probably
be
there
for
a
long.
You
know
for
a
long
time,
but
but
but
yeah,
but
that's
good
thinking,
you're
right
about
like
there's
there's
an
alternative
perspective
like
there
might
be
a
couple
of
ways
in
which-
or
there
are
a
couple
of
ways
in
which
we
we
want
to
show
off
mesher's
capabilities.
C
This
is
a
good
one.
Another
one
is
well
like
in
some
respects:
it's
it's
kind
of
showing
off
its
capabilities
and
it's
documentation
at
the
same
time
and
it's
the
plight
of
every
piece
of
management
software
and
what
it
is
is
a
compatibility
matrix
and
it's
sometimes
it
can
be
used
impressively
if
it's
visualized
well,
it's
kind
of
impressive
and
that's
to
say.
C
Well,
there's
eight
different
service
meshes
that
meshri
supports.
So
that's
that's
kind
of
nice
like
there's
just
a
set
of
check
boxes,
but
actually
each
individual
service
mesh
there's
they
are
pieces
of
software
themselves.
So
istio
is
on
release
1.7
now,
but
it
was
1.6
1.5
like
in
which
one
of
those
do
we
support.
Like
and
so
you
start
to
get
this
matrix
going
on
of
you
know
just
showing
like
the
like:
hey,
does
measuring
run
on
kubernetes
and
on
docker
on
our
windows
and
on
linux.
C
C
C
So
we
do
want
to
start
to
bring
some
other
stuff
like
shredi
was
brainstorming
on
well
on
video
and
sorry,
I
was
brainstorming
on
video
and
how
to
make
sure
we've
got
the
right
voice
on
the
video
and-
and
my
my
point
is-
is
like
yeah
that
this
page,
the
mystery
project
page,
would
probably
have
it
should
have
some
tutorials
some
overview
videos.
I
had
a
principal
engineer
at
cisco
asking
the
other
week
before
they
had
come
over
and
taken
a
look
at
meshary.
C
They
looked
at
measuring
and
one
of
the
questions
they
asked
was:
oh
great,
you
know,
are
there
any?
Are
there
any?
I
don't
know
if
they
said
tutorials
or
like
they
might
have
said
tutorials
like
tutorials
on
measuring.
I
was
like,
and
at
first
I
thought
that
it
was
an
ill-placed
question
because
they're
a
principal
engineer
and
they
should
know
how
to
just
like
use
a
piece
of
software,
but
it's
not
in
so
much
as
actually
like
siraj.
If
you're
still
on
the
call,
which
I
can't
tell.
C
He's
not,
but
for
anyone
that
joins
just
the
community
here,
a
lot
of
times
we
point
out
that
there's
workshops
and
and
basically
the
workshop
and
the
labs
that
people
walk
through
those
are
basically
tutorials
and
so
actually
walking
something
someone
through
some
features
of
measuring
in
a
video
and
putting
it
here,
a
very
good
idea,
something
we'll
try
to
get
get
figured
out,
but
so
sorry
josh.
I
think
I
kind
of
meandered
all
over
it.
Going
back
to
the
features
like
this
is.
This
is
exciting.
It
looks
good.
D
C
Sure
yeah,
you
know
what
I
appreciate
both
that
that
you
guys
think
in
that
regard,
to
open
up
space
for
others
to
come.
You
know
to
come
and
play
get
to
get
their
feet
wet.
It
also
is
good
because,
to
the
extent
that
you're
able
to
shed
some
of
that,
hopefully
it
works
out
that
you're
able
to
sh
part
of
doing
that
is
shedding
some
load
so
that
you
can
go
on
to
the
next.
C
You
know:
custom
module
on
occasion,
I'll
drop
in
just
to
try
to
add
ads
help
out
a
little
bit
because
because
it
doesn't,
it
doesn't
take
much
to
put
something
here.
I
was
yeah
last
time
that
we
were
talking.
I
think
I
was
sort
of
saying
I'm
remiss
on
it's
frustrating
to
me
that,
like
it
wasn't
more
obvious
to
me
how
to
make
something
like
this
little
visual
globally
styled
as
versus
like
independently
some
of
the
visuals.
C
That
were,
I
mean
a
lot
of
the
visuals
that
we're
using
that
they're
leftovers
from
the
theme.
I
don't.
I
don't
know
if,
like
these
little
sweet,
you
know
these
little
squiggly
lines
and
like
these
grids
and
if
that's
like,
really
what
we
want
to
be
using
at
for
lack
of
anyone
else,
creating
something
they
probably
are.
E
C
Too
yeah
there
were
a
couple
of
others
that
were,
I
thought
like,
like
the
the
issue
with
the
squigglies
is
well,
it's
kind
of
that
they're,
they're,
squiggly
or
rather
they're
not
hard,
and
it's
not
that
we
want
the
sight
to
convey
hardness
and
rigidity
and
like
super
sleek
structure,
but
a
little.
But
this
is
a
little,
maybe
a
little
too
slightly
more
playful
than
I
would
have.
C
C
Straight
lines:
yeah
here
something
even
these
have
a
little
bit
of
maybe
my
eyes
are
playing
tricks,
but
it
looks
like
they
have
a
little
bit
of
wiggle
and
then
that's
fine,
but
it's
much
much
reduced,
and
so
this
sort
of
a
style
is
maybe
slightly
better
aligned.
The
circles
are
probably
fine.
There
is
like
some
so
so
you
know
how
we
you
josh
you
put
these
in,
and
the
idea
was
hey.
We've
got
some
things
floating
around
anyway,
so
why
don't
we
make
them
relevant
like?
Why?
C
Don't
we
have
our
projects
floating
or
why
don't
we
have
like
the
icon?
The
logos
of
different
service
meshes
floating
and
I
think,
as
it
turns
out,
I
think,
we've
all
concluded.
I
think
that
they're
too-
and
I
know
you
know
this-
I'm
not,
but
I'm
just
trying
to
think
aloud
like
like
the
while,
while
it's
the
case
that
these
are
too
distracting
because
maybe
they're
too
real
like
this
is
really
a
thing.
C
That's
really
measury
and
that's
really
image
hub
and
really
that
the
things
that
were
floating
around
before
were
easy
to
ignore
because
they
were
just
like
squigglies
or
whatever.
Like
they
didn't
mean
anything,
maybe
there's
somewhere
in
between,
like
like,
we
might
just
need
little
floating
particles
that
are
easily
ignored,
but
are
slightly
more
relevant
to
service
mesh
things.
C
C
I
don't
know
that
these
are
all
consistent
with
one
another
or
I
would
say
that
they're
not
consistent
with
one
another
in
terms
of
but
but
this
is
a
lot
of
this
is
some
good
starter
stuff
like
this
one
is
a
good
example
of
a
lot
of
times.
This
will
mean
you
have
nodes
and
edges,
and
that
means
a
network
related
thing.
C
C
This
works
out
well
because
this
sort
of
fits
in
with
the
workshops
icon
that
we
have
by
the
way
just
one
other
thing
that
you've
probably
seen
some
conversation
about.
Some
chatter
about
is-
and
neil
is
probably
putting
the
most
effort
in
here
and
that's
anime
animating,
the
svgs
or
or
finding
some
animation.
C
G
C
Nice,
if
that's
the
case
like
if
anyone,
if
anyone's
going
to
work
on
like
earnestly
work
on
creating
animations
for
the
site
and
we're
identifying
something
like
adobe
edge,
adobe
animate
as
the
thing
I'll
layer,
five
will
fund
a
the
subscription
necessary
for
people
to
have
access
to
that
software.
If
that's,
if
that's.
D
D
So
yeah,
I
had
a
point
when
you
were
discussing
about
the
feature
space.
So
when
we
asked
the
project
page
ready
for
each
of
the
projects,
are
we
going
to
list
means
we
are
going
to
list
three
features
and
other
aspects
of
each
other?
So
we
can
try
out
some
animations
like
this
back
here
that
we
can
see
on
this
track.
C
D
C
C
You
know
it's
not
the
best
experience,
but
but
but
I
think
that
we'll
get
there
and
to
your
point
that
that
sounds
about
right
like
immediately,
we
would
probably
just
drop
them
onto
the
project
page
and
into
the
getting
started
section
or
if
there
is
a
section
that
goes
further
to
detail,
like
you
had
said,
to
kind
of
detail,
configuration
management
with
a
short
video
or
something
we
would
probably
take
them.
There.
D
And
as
far
as
the
migration
of
data
is
concerned
means,
I
just
have
a
point
means
we
can,
when
sheepy
have
the
you
organize
that
newcomers
committee
you
can
just
do
a
checkup
means
if
anyone
is
working
or
not.
Otherwise
we
can
start
working
on
that.
Otherwise,
it's
on
hold
for
a
long
time
like
some
of
the
data,
can
be
migrated
easily
or
it's
been
on
the.
D
C
C
B
B
B
A
D
C
Yeah,
I
think,
yeah,
that's
yeah.
I
agree
nico
you're
right
that
on
the
projects
like
we
could
you
can
move
over
the
text
and
some
of
the
pictures
and
things,
but
inevitably
and
that's
good
and
that's
helpful,
inevitably
to
nikhil's
point
we'll
come
back
to
each
each
of
the
projects
and
probably
give
them
quite
a
bit
of
customization
to
you
know,
really
highlight
all
the
project
capabilities.
B
B
C
Know
totally
yeah,
like
can
I
kind
of
pair
programming
on
the
for
on
the
first
one
or
two
migrations,
or
the
first
one
or
two
things
that
you're
doing
inside
the
ng
site?
That
that
makes
a
lot
of
sense
like
it'll,
save
you
a
lot
of
time
and
it
might
save
some
of
the
others
on
the
call
that
would
be
reviewing
the
work.
It
might
save
them
a
lot
of
time
as
they
would
have.
There
won't
be
as
much
to
review
or
as
much
feedback
to
give,
because
it
would
have
been
done
yeah.
C
C
C
B
B
Going
to
be
used
in
a
single
page,
we
are
storing,
I
was
storing
it
in
the
custom
module
itself
and
the
things
which
were
going
to
be
used
again
and
again,
like
the
smp
logo,
etc
that
were
stored
in
the
assets.
Folder,
okay,
or
have
you
already
developed?
Like
a
card?
You
know
the
cards
which
I
want
to
use
in
the
brand
page
actually
like
they.
They
are
already
developed
by
you
or
I
should
have
like.
B
C
Yeah
yeah.
No,
that's
a
great
question.
It's
a
great
distinction,
so
shridi,
if
you
were
to
visit
like
the
projects
page
or
the
books,
page
or
posts,
or
really
anything
that
the
term
cards
is
being
used
like
this
is
a
collection
of
individual
pages,
and
so
it's
a
list
and
the
way
it's
presented
is
like
as
a
card
and
so
and
usually
like.
I
think,
a
lot
of
times
in
my
mind.
C
H
C
G
G
G
C
C
G
D
G
D
No,
actually,
the
thing
was
if
we
have
an
arrow
like
that
is
the
purpose
which
it
actually
fulfills.
It
should
go
down
to
some
part
of
the
section,
but
we
don't
want
that
if
we
wanted
the
user
to
scroll
down
eventually
by
visiting
all
the
sections
from
the
top,
otherwise,
which
section
will
you
be
pointing
to
it.
D
D
G
I
mean
that,
but
I
didn't
opt
for
that
because
I
guess,
like
the
user,
will
scroll
down
from
like
it's
pretty
normal
to
scroll
down
right.
So
I
didn't
edit
that
over
here
I
just
had
it
because
when
the
page
lands
it,
it
opens
with
the
full
background
view
right
so
like
with
the
hero
peak.
On
that
the
background,
so
that's
why
I
added
that
arrow.
G
Okay,
so
I
was
saying
that
I
didn't
apply
what
you
just
said
like
upon
clicking
on
that
downward
arrow.
It
will
move
to
the
next
section.
Next,
like
I
thought,
someone
who
is
going
to
the
site
will
scroll
down
by
himself
or
herself
so
yeah.
That's
it
like
the
page
lands
with
the
full
background
view
of
the
hero
image
and
the
background
so
yeah,
that's
for
it.
E
G
A
G
G
C
Yeah
I
mean
overall,
like
the
net
overall,
the
maximization
of
the
hero
to
fit
the
size
of
the
user
screen,
that's
fantastic!
It
gives
it's
a
it's
a
much
better
feeling
much
better
taken
care
of
thing.
It's
not
something
that
you
find
on
on
a
lot
of
pages
actually
and
then
having
a
small
indicator
to
go
down
is
like,
I
don't
think
it
hurts.
C
C
I
think
that
most
people
would
discover
that
they
could
scroll
down,
even
if
the
arrow
wasn't
there.
Just
because
that's
what
you
do
on
most
pages,
but
I
think
it
it's
pleasant
enough
that
it
it
sort
of
fits
in
with
the
background
image
enough.
That
I
mean
it's
not
annoying
and
it's
soft.
It's
not
like
flashing
at
you.
You
know
quickly.
It's
like
it's.
Okay,.
D
G
C
G
C
Wow,
okay,
I'm
behind
then
yeah
I'll
go.
Take
a
look.
It's
you're!
Probably
you've
probably
got
the
right
suggestion
it.
What
we
don't
want
to
do
is
create
a
1995
like
marquee
of
like
a
scroll
link.
You
know
like
but
yeah.
If
it's
done
tastefully
like
having
some
having
the
logos,
you
know
having
an
autoplay
logo.
That's
that's!
C
D
Like
around
three
or
four
weeks
ago,
when
the
smp
site
was
just
launched,
it
was
something
in
law
like
it
was
thought
of.
The
the
logos
of
the
companies
that
were
involved
were
thought
to
be
made
of
something
similar
to
that
like
a
horizontal
autoplay
or
something,
as
the
five
logos
couldn't
be
fitted
in
a
single
horizontal
row,
so
yeah
it's
for
that
part
of
it.
Yes,.
C
C
The
there's
two
issues,
primarily,
I
think
with
the
footer
one,
is
that
it.
These
are
really
good
links
and
actually
the
only
place
that
most
of
them
are
is
down
here,
stuffed
down
in
the
footer,
and
so
we
need
to
bring
them
up
like
into
this
contributing
area
like
this
is
like
only
loosely
related
to
smp.
It's
fine
to
have
this,
but
the
point
is
like
hey:
where
do
I
go
to
the
github
to
like
see
this
code
and
what's
going
on?
C
G
C
C
The
other
thing
is
that
it
just
so
happens
that
we're
using
the
same
it
kind
of
looks
redundant
like
we're
using
the
same
color
and
then
the
same
color.
It's
not.
It's
just
so
happens
that
these
two
are
next
to
each
other.
It's
not
horrible,
but
I
think
what
does
end
up
getting
a
little
bit
in
the
way
is,
is
here
on
a
blog
page
that
there
does
need
to
be.
We
need
to
like
invert,
our
colors
here
like.
If
this
is
a
white
background,
we
need
some
separator.
C
C
Okay,
yeah
yeah,
yep
yep
right.
That
makes
sense
because
it's
just
sort
of
header,
footer
kind
of
the
same
you
know
and
then
yeah
you
could.
You
know
you
would
probably
do
a
little
bit
of
coloring
on
the
things.
It
might
be
the
case
that
it
doesn't
always
need
to
be
two
layers
tall
like
if
it's
going
to
be
statically,
two
layers
tall.
Maybe
we
would
have
one
two
three
four.
Maybe
we
would
move
the
third
one
down.
C
C
It's
not
bad
that
the
footer
is
tall.
Oh,
oh,
I
see
what
you
I
know
what
you're
asking
now
neil,
I
think.
Now
what
you're
asking
is
hey.
You
know
when
you
look
at
meshri.io
or
layer5.io
like
these
things.
These
sites
have
significant
footers,
like
they
have
resources
and
links,
and
you
know
tweets
and
things
and
like
we
have
a
twitter
for
smp
like
yeah.
That
makes
total
sense
to
me
yeah
sure
we
could
do.
C
We
can
totally
do
something
like
this
or
like
the
layer,
five
one
yeah
yeah,
that's
entirely
appropriate
and
neil
actually
for
for
the
most
part
I
like,
maybe
maybe
some
of
the
rest
of
you
guys
on
the
call
wouldn't
like
to
hear
me
say
this,
but
like
man
I
just
want,
I
want
you
to
just
take
the
s
p
site
by
the
horns
and
just
just
just
don't
ask
what
don't
ask
for
permission.
Just
I
mean
you
I
haven't
seen
you
suggest
something.
C
That's
I
mean
if
you
get
it
wrong,
we'll
we'll
you'll
get
feedback
and
we'll
correct
it,
but
like
it's
kind
of
hard
to
get,
you
know
like
it's
kind
of
hard
to
get
wrong.
I
think
of
the
20
something
suggestions
that
you
had
to
change
decide
to
enhance
the
site.
The
only
one
that
I
that
I
really
had
feedback
on
was
like
the
diminishing
of
the
yeah.
C
C
Some
of
these
are
fairly
well
constrained,
smaller
things
that
others
might
come
to,
I'm
not
I'm
not.
I
come
to
bear
on
largely
it's
great
neil
that
you're
doing
it
directly
beautiful.
If
there's
a
couple
in
there
that
you
think,
oh
you
know,
maybe
somebody
else-
maybe
I
wouldn't
get
to
this
for
a
few
days.
Somebody
else
might
try
it.
You
know
some.
C
I
am
desperate
neil
part
of
the
reason
that
I'm
telling
you
just
go
forth
and
prosper
on
the
site.
Is
that
well,
if
it
wasn't
for
nikhil,
largely
actually
people
really
wouldn't
be
getting
that
much
feedback,
at
least
from
like
I
know
tunisian
josh,
you
guys
give
feedback
to
yourself
and
to
others
and
you're
do
you're
doing
you
guys
are
doing
great.
It's
really
nice.
It's
really
awesome
actually
to
see
like
josh.
You
haven't
gone
from.
C
C
What
I'm
trying
to
say
is
I
I
am
clearly
or
I
hope
that
you
guys
feel
empowered
go
and
make
decisions
and
screw
stuff
up.
It's
okay!
I
I,
for
my
part,
the
slap
on
the
risk
that
you
will
receive.
Isn't
it's
it'll
be
a
course
correction,
not
a
slap
on
the
wrist,
it's
more
like
I.
We
want
the
site
done
promptly,
not
so
fast
that
it
that
we
cut
corners
and
it
doesn't
look
good
and
it's
not
the
right
setup
for
the
future.
C
But
but
we
do
but,
but
we
do
want
to
move
quickly,
and
so
I
want
to
make
sure
that
you
guys
feel
empowered
to,
and
I
think
that
you
are
like
I've
seen
you
guys,
create
issues.
Do
the
implementation,
give
yourselves
feedback,
accept
and
merge
the
pr,
the
full
thing-
and
I
like
didn't
even
say
anything.
C
So
I
think
that
that's
really
cool
mccool
one
item
potentially
for
you
and
that
is
that
we've
been
looking
at
using
strappy
as
a
visual
interface
for
editing
content
on
layer,
5ng
and
dhruv
patel
had
stood
up
a
small,
a
test
instance
of
strappy
in
the
past
and
he
needed
to
take
it
down
and
now
we're
we're
without
one.
And
so
I
guess
my
ask
of
you
is,
if
like,
if
you
create
a
free
like
a
free
tier
aws
account
or
if
you
have
some
other
accounts
or
what?
What
have
you?
C
Oh
thanks
yeah
and
it
doesn't
have
to
have
don't
don't
spend
any
money
on
our.
You
know
like
don't
don't
but
but
yeah
we
we
we
don't
have
a
pla.
We
just
need
a
playground
to
learn
more
about
strappy,
try
to
connect
it
to
layer.
5
ng
try
to
do
some
updates
in
there
and
because
at
some
point
the
there'll
be
others
just
pumping
in
content
like
it'll
it'll
be
good.
F
D
D
C
D
C
This
is
actually
cool
like
it
could
be
a
point
of
interest
for
you,
but
for
the
rest
of
you
as
well.
I
have
like
one
minute
before
this
next
call
starts,
so
what
I
ended
up
doing
really
briefly.
Last
night
was
I'm
acknowledging
that,
like
we're,
gonna
have
to
switch
from
google
meat
over
to
zoom
entirely
because
the
plan
of
g
suite
that
we're
on
doesn't
support,
recording
the
meetings,
and
so
we
just
have
to
move
to
zoom,
and
it's
like
okay.
C
Well
now,
we've
got
these
links
in
every
like
a
bunch
of
places.
We
have
to
go
update
the
links
to
how
to
join
the
meeting
and
say.
Oh
my
gosh.
We
tried
to
use
bitly
to
help
abstract,
provide
a
layer
of
indirection
between
the
the
links.
Well,
the
thing
is:
we're
not
paying
for
a
bitly
account,
so
I
don't
think
that
we
can
go
sign
in
and
like
update
the
link
that
those
bitly
links
point
to
so
it's
like
geez,
so
I
just
created
a
very
extraordinarily
small
jekyll
site.
C
If
you
will
it's
not
a
site,
it's
just!
It's
not
intended
yeah
exactly
it's
totally
that
it's
not
intended
to
be
a
site.
It's
just
intended
to
be
redirects,
so
meet
dot
layer.
Five
that
I
o
slash
community,
redirects
to
or
newcomers
redirects
to
so,
but
to
nikhil's
point:
should
anyone
ever
accidentally
just
like
land
on
me,
dot,
layer,
five
dot
io?