►
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
A
A
The
Alta
Northeast
Community
Committee
covers
all
Woodley,
Harewood
and
Weatherby
Wards
and
is
a
committee
where
award
counselors
have
an
opportunity
to
discuss
and
make
decisions
about
services
and
priorities
for
the
local
area
and
also
consider
funding
applications
for
local
community
projects
and
youth
activities.
Is
there
echo
on
this,
or
is
it
just
me?
No
okay
could
I
now
invite
members
and
officials
to
introduce
themselves
and
I'll
start
from
this
side
down
so
I'll
go
all
the
way
along
there
to
councilor
Stables.
A
C
G
I'm
going
with
good
evening
from
wetherby
water.
J
Thank
you,
chair
under
agenda
item
number
one.
There
are
no
appeals
against
the
refusal
of
inspection
of
documents.
Underwriter
number
two:
there
are
no
items
which
would
require
the
exclusion
of
the
press
and
the
public
under
item
number
three.
There
are
no
formal
late
items,
but
supplementary
information
was
circulated.
Members
and
that's
in
relation
to
item
10.
The
financial
report
agenda
item
number:
four:
apologies
for
absence
have
been
received
from
councilor,
Dan,
Cohen
and
under
agenda
item
number.
Five
can
I
ask
members
to
declare
any
interesting.
They
have
no.
Thank
you.
Chet.
A
Usually,
at
the
discretion
of
the
chair,
there
is
a
period
of
up
to
10
minutes
to
be
allocated
at
each
ordinary
meeting
for
members
of
the
public
to
make
representations
or
to
ask
questions
on
matters
within
the
terms
of
reference
to
the
Community
Committee.
No
member
of
the
public
would
speak
for
more
than
three
minutes
in
the
open
Forum
with
that
without
the
express
permission
of
the
chair.
There
are
no
members
of
public
here
this
evening
and
we
don't
have.
We
haven't,
received
any
written,
no
okay,
thank
you.
A
A
A
C
C
Firstly,
thank
you
very
much
for
for
having
us
this
evening,
and
you
may
remember
that
we
came
to
talk
to
the
Community
Committee
about
two
years
ago
now,
when
we
were
adopting
the
well
developing
the
best
city
ambition
after
we
moved
on
from
the
best
council
plan,
and
the
purpose
of
coming
to
you
today
really
is
to
reflect
further
on
on
the
last
two
years
with
the
ambition
in
place
as
we
about
to
embark
on
the
first
update
of
that
document,
but
very
specifically,
Keen,
to
talk
to
you
about
some
of
the
things
that
we
talked
about
last
time
that
we've
taken
away
and
developed
and
really
to
come
back
and
test
that
with
you
again.
C
So
just
very
briefly.
What
I'm
going
to
cover
today
is
very
quickly
reminder
of
what
the
rest
of
your
mission
is
a
little
bit
of
focus
on
what
we've
learned
about
out
to
Northeast
from
the
most
recent
census.
Obviously,
understanding
understanding
the
city
is
a
really
key
part
of
being
able
to
generate
these
sorts
of
strategies
and
plans
and
then
revisiting.
C
The
major
thing
on
soccer
is
revisiting
the
biggest
issue
you
raised
with
us
two
years
ago,
which
was
perhaps
the
inability
at
that
point
in
time
to
effectively
measure
the
progress
towards
diversity,
ambition
and
very,
very
much
took
that
away
and
have
done
done
work
since
so
I
want
to
come
back
and
test
with
you,
the
plans
going
forward
and
and
then
a
few
other
questions
at
the
bottom
there,
which
we'll
we'll
come
to
at
the
end,
so
best
city
Ambitions
our
overall
vision
for
the
future
of
leads,
and
you
will
recall
it's
very
much
about
both
what
we
want
to
achieve
for
the
city,
but
crucially
about
how
we
want
to
do
it
and
the
way
that
that
sort
of
manifests
itself
is
through
the
three
pillars
that
you'll
all
be
very
familiar
with
by
this
point,
and
then
that
promoting
that
team
leads
approach
where
everyone
has
a
part
to
play
in
terms
of
driving
towards
the
city's
Ambitions
and
the
third
part
on
the
slide.
C
This
is
the
three
areas
we're
really
focused
on
the
first
of
which
Justin
said
this:
the
sort
of
we're
not
aiming
for
major
change
here,
it's
very
much
Evolution
that
revolution
of
the
current
ambition
and
based
on
that
peer
review
feedback
and
other
General
feedback.
I
think
we're
broadly
confident
that,
with
the
three
pillars
that
the
teams
which
were
on
the
right
track,
it's
about
refining
that
further
where
we
can-
and
there
are
three
things
we're
really
focusing
on
in
this
update.
C
The
first
is
concluding
the
work
done
over
the
last
couple
of
years
and
filling
gaps
in
the
current
and
the
current
version.
The
biggest
of
those
areas
is
monitoring
progress,
but
there's
also
things
around
making
sure
the
partnership
Arrangements
we
have
in
place
to
take
forward
the
best
city
and
City
ambition
has
set
out
clearly.
C
The
second
thing
is
updating
it
to
reflect
where
we
are
now
and
there's
been
separate,
consultations,
I
think,
possibly
with
Community
committees
too,
in
terms
of
new
health
and
well-being,
inclusive
growth
strategy,
so
I
won't
I,
won't
dwell
on
those
things,
but
clearly
we
need
to
date
the
best
city
ambition
in
that
context,
and
then
the
third
thing
is
taking.
This
team
leads
approach
further.
So
what
we
set
out
in
that
currently
are
some
principles
about
what
that
is.
What
we
don't
say
enough
about
is
what
does
that
look
like
on
the
ground?
C
C
So
I
briefly
mentioned
we
sort
of
done
some
reflection
on
the
census
and
the
outer
Northeast,
and
a
lot
of
this
will
not
be
surprising
to
you,
but
that
there
are
the
the
odd
bit
I
thought
was
worth
highlighting
so
population
growth
in
the
area
and
nearly
five
percent
over
the
last
10
years,
which
is
about
3
000
people
quite
considerably
below
the
leads
average,
but
nevertheless
still
still
a
growing
population
and,
as
you
will
know,
much
slower
population
density
in
this
area
than
in
the
city
as
a
whole.
C
So
we've
got
a
bit
of
analogy
here.
If
you
lay
football
pictures
across
the
whole
of
Leeds
in
outer
Northeast
about
four
people
would
live
in
each
pitch
sized
area,
whereas
across
leads
as
an
average
it's
about
20
and
in
some
of
the
inner
city
areas
Europe
pushing
towards
60
and
does
book
some
of
the
trends,
though,
that
we
see
across
the
Leeds
average,
where
we
see
you
know
ongoing
shifts
in
terms
of
housing
tenure.
C
But
we're
talking
very,
very
small
changes,
which
is
quite
interesting
in
terms
of
the
stability
of
the
of
the
market
there
in
this
area,
and
you
won't
be
surprised,
no
travel
to
work
is
changing,
but
again
in
outer
Northeast.
These
Trends
are
particularly
pronounced
compared
to
Leeds
as
a
whole.
So
if
you
look
back
to
10
years
ago
about
70
drove
their
own
van
alcata
work
and
only
eight
percent
of
people
in
the
area
work
from
home,
that's
changed
enormously.
C
It's
useful
to
be
aware
about
the
impact
that
that
has
locally
and
just
a
couple
of
other
final
bits
here,
I
suppose
really
reflecting
on
three
aspects
of
what
you
might
say:
lead
people
towards
having
sort
of
thriving,
thriving
lives
and
and
living
well
and
on
education.
I
mean
a
lot
of
us.
Probably
won't
be
surprising
on
education,
we
do
see
considerably
higher
levels
of
of
people.
Who've
got
at
least
a
level
four
qualification
and
considerably
lower
than
a
number
of
people
with
no
form
of
qualifications
than
the
leads
average.
C
That
picture
is
mirrored
in
terms
of
health
and
not
quite
to
the
same
extent,
but
but
slightly
better
health
than
the
average
and
slightly
fewer
people
with
poor
health.
What
was
quite
interesting
and
different
for
out
to
Northeast
compared
to
the
rest
of
the
city
is
is
on
religion,
so
for
those
the
similarity
here
being
that
out
on
office,
that's
what
the
rest
of
these
and
indeed
the
rest
of
the
country.
C
The
largest
group
is
now
the
number
of
people
who
say
they
have
no
religion
and
which
is
nearly
30
of
people
in
the
Community
Committee
area
and
but
the
fall
in
the
people
of
the
proportion
of
people
who
describe
themselves
as
Christian,
while
falling
is
falling
back
into
considerably
less
than
in
in
the
rest
of
Leeds,
and
indeed
the
country.
So
the
fall
here
is
about
15,
whereas
you're
looking
20
to
25
across
the
rest
of
Leeds.
C
So
again,
we
can
speculate
why
that
may
be
there's
something
to
do
with
the
the
sort
of
demographic
profile.
The
age
profile
of
the
of
the
the
area
may
be
part
of
that,
but
I'm
speculating.
We
need
to
look
into
that
further
and
similarly,
we've
seen
a
about
a
thousand
people
which
is
about
33
fall
in
the
Jewish
population
and
a
corresponding
increase
in
the
Muslim
population
over
the
last
10
years,
so
again,
sort
of
interesting
demographic
there.
What
what's
different
again,
though,
across
a
lot
of
leads.
C
Now
you
see
the
Muslim
population
being
clearly
the
second
most
prominent
or
third,
most
prominent
demographic
Group
after
Christianity
and
no
religion,
whereas
in
outer
Northeast,
you
don't
see
that
you
actually
see
a
relatively
flat
Trend
after
you
get
past
those
first
two
with
the
Muslim
population,
the
Jewish
population
and
a
number
of
others
are
on
relatively
the
same
number
of
people.
So
again,
some
differences
there
to
the
rest
of
leads.
C
As
I
mentioned,
when
we
came
last
time,
we
talked
a
lot
about,
we
were
moving
away
from
the
best
council
plan
and
your
very,
very
fair
point
she
made
as
a
committee,
where
what
can
you
tell
us
what's
changed
over
the
last
10
years
and
the
answer
was
not
really,
which
obviously
was
not
satisfactory,
and
what
we
committed
to
do
was
to
go
away
and
make
sure
that,
with
the
best
city,
ambition
that
would
not
would
not
be
the
case
we'll
be
able
to
tell
you
really
clearly
how
we've
made
progress
or
not,
and
so
what's
on
screen.
C
Here
is
really
how
we're
proposing
to
do
that,
and
there
are
three
three
ways
really.
The
first
is
the
most
straightforward:
we've
got
a
range
of
performance
indicators
and
key
strategies
that
will
continue
to
be
the
case.
They'll
be
updated
and
we
will.
We
will
monitor
performance
against
those
things.
C
The
other
two
are
much
more
relevant
to
what
you
challenged
us
with
last
time,
and
the
first
is
that
we've
developed
the
tool
called
the
social
lead
social
Progress
Index,
which
I'm
going
to
show
you
a
little
bit
of
in
a
minute,
and
this
really
enables
us
to
look.
We
can't
do
it
to
Community
Committee
geography
currently,
but
we
can
do
it
at
award
level
and
we
can
across
about
50
indicators.
C
C
We've
got
Ambitions
to
take
that
below
Ward
level
in
the
near
future
as
well,
and
then
the
final
thing
will
be
a
much
deeper
periodic
analysis
every
three
years
where
we
will
look
at
analysis
across
a
range
of
factors
from
Health,
the
environment,
Community
safety
and
education,
and
we
can
cut
that
both
by
demographic
group
and
spatially
by
different
sort
of
areas
of
the
city
and
we're
about
to
start
that
work
again
imminently
aiming
to
report
the
2024
report
in
July
next
year.
C
C
So,
with
the
lead
social
Progress
Index,
there
are
a
number
of
things
that
we
can
do
and
I'm
going
to
show
you
two
particular
use
cases.
At
the
moment.
Sorry
I've
got
loads
of
clutter
on
my
screen.
There
we
go
so
the
first
one
is
is
the
scorecard
and
what
this
does
when
it
eventually
loads
is
for
every
ward
in
this
in
the
city.
C
You
can
have
a
look
at
this
range
of
indicators
and
it
basically
provides
a
picture
of
both
how
positive
or
negative
things
are
in
that
war,
but
also
relative
to
the
rest
of
the
city.
So
if
we
pick
because
it's
the
easiest
one
to
get
to
in
this
Community
Committee
area,
if
I
pick
Weatherby.
C
And
you
can
see
here
how,
whether
he
Compares
now,
the
reason
this
is
is
particularly
useful.
Is
each
of
these
domains
breaks
down
into
quite
some
detail,
so
I'm
just
going
to
dwell
on
on
personal
safety
in
the
bottom
left
here,
and
you
can
see
that
across
the
city,
whether
it
be
ranks
fourth
in
terms
of
personal
safety
and
has
really
really
strong
rating
there.
So
you
would
think
well
brilliant
everything's
fantastic
there,
but
what
the
SPI
enables
us
to
do
is
you
can
see?
C
Yes,
you've
got
really
good
outcomes
on
anesthesia,
Behavior
crime
rates,
domestic
abuse,
but
actually
there's
a
there's,
a
significant
issue
in
the
world,
with
the
number
of
people
being
killed
or
seriously
injured
on
the
roads,
we're
out
of
the
33
Wards,
whether
it
be
ranks
20th
out
of
33..
Now
that's
masked
by
sort
of
the
headline
figures,
but
when
we
start
to
drill
down
a
little
bit
more-
and
this
is
version
one-
we
want
to
take
this
a
lot
further.
C
You
can
really
start
to
understand
some
of
the
issues
underneath
that
when
we
can
take
this
down
below
Ward
level
as
well
and
you'll,
be
able
to
see
what
we
call
output
areas
which
I
won't
bore
you
with,
but
it's
basically
groups
of
streaks
what
you
might
call
it
like.
A
neighborhood
you'll
be
able
to
look
at
this
on
that
level
as
well.
So
suddenly
we
can
make
much
more
intelligent
judgments
about
what's
going
on
and
how
things
are
moving
and
on
how
things
are
moving
the
other
bit.
C
I
just
want
to
dwell
on,
and
this
is
crucial
in
terms
of
that
progress
point
is
this.
Let
me
see
if
I
can
full
screen
this
now.
This
is
the
really
for
me,
the
probably
the
most
powerful
part
of
the
SPI,
which
really
lets
us
track
progress
over
time.
So
I'm
just
for
consistency,
I'll
select
personal
safety
again,
and
you
will
see
this
update
and
what
we
can
do
here
is
at
the
moment.
C
We've
got
three
years
of
data
in
this
in
this
tool,
but
we're
going
to
put
the
two
more
years
of
data
will
be
going
in
before
before
Christmas
and
then
we'll
be
able
to
keep
this
up
to
date
at
least
once
a
year,
and
what
you
can
do
is,
as
you
can
hopefully
see,
you've
got
three
colors
sort
of
greeny,
proper,
green
and
blue
for
2018,
2019
and
2020,
and
it's
very,
very
simple.
The
further
writer
is
the
better
the
outcome
on
this
on
this
grid.
C
So
you
can
see
over
time
how
things
are
moving
so
again
here.
If
we
look
in
in
Old
Lake,
you
are
seeing
in
20
if
you've
seen
essentially
on
personal
safety,
things
go
in
the
wrong
direction.
Unfortunately,
so
in
2018
we
refer
this
right.
We've
moved
slightly
left
in
2019
and
further
left
still
in
2020..
Remember
this
is
about
killed
and
seriously
injured,
crime
rates,
domestic
abuse
and
the
fourth
thing
that
I've
forgotten.
C
But
if
you
compare
that
to
to
hair
wood
you're,
seeing
the
absolute
opposite
Trend
by
the
three
dots
are
moving
consecutively
in
the
opposite
direction.
C
So
again,
this
doesn't
necessarily
tell
us-
and
it
doesn't
tell
us
why,
but
what
it
can
do
is
direct
those
lines
and
inquiry
and
allow
you
to
see
how
the
world
is
comparing
just
for
completion,
whether
it
be
pretty
consistently
and
sort
of
very,
very
little
change
over
the
same
period,
so
I'll
I'll
stop
there,
but
hopefully
that
gives
a
sort
of
flavor
of
of
what
we
can
do
with
the
SPI
and
certainly
how
it
can
help
us
to
measure
progress
over
time.
C
So
just
finally,
my
questions
to
you,
I
suppose
I'm
happy
to
take.
Obviously
any
questions
you've
got
but
based
on
that
very,
very
quick
run
through.
Are
you
sort
of
confident
content
that
what
proposing
addresses
what
you,
the
challenge
you
set
us
last
time
and
I
suppose,
crucially,
is
there
anything
we're
missing
that
you
think
we
should
be
really
taking
forward
as
a
priority
for
further
development
and
then
slightly
more
broadly,
to
help
us
with
the
general
update
of
the
best
city,
ambition
and
mentioned
we
want
to
take.
C
The
idea
of
team
leads
further
in
terms
of
how
how
do
you
achieve
it?
What
does
it
look
like
when
you've
achieved
it
on
the
ground,
so
just
reflecting
on
the
work
that
you
do
in
in
outer
Northeast?
Really?
How
do
you
see
that
working
in
the
community
when
you
think
of
partnership
working
what
works?
Well,
maybe
where
are
the
barriers?
If
I
sit
here
talking
about
partnership
working
somewhere,
you
sort
of
want
to
roll
the
eyes
at
that,
potentially
what
other
things
were?
C
I
I
think
that
there's
been
some
wider
discussions
that
we've
all
had
when
it
came
to
straction
resources
board
earlier
in
the
year
about
the
social,
Progress,
Index
and
I'm
delighted
to
hear
that
you're
going
to
take
it
down
to
more
granular
level
because
of
the
wider
discussion
that
we've
always
had.
I
The
fact
that,
for
example,
in
particularly
our
ward
of
hair,
would
Ward
being
it's
such
a
large
Ward
and
also
probably
the
biggest
contributor
to
why
the
actually
there's
so
many
people
on
that
football
pitch,
because
I
suspect
it's
even
less
for
the
Harewood
Ward.
As
mentioned
in
the
presentation,
can
you
just
give
us
some
more
detail
about
how
lower
level
you're
going
to
be
going
to?
Is
it
when
you
say
the
operational
areas?
I
C
Certainly
I
probably
I
can't
what
I
can't
give
you
as
a
is
a
definitive,
but
what
we're
aiming
to
do
is
to
take
it
down
to
what
we
call
lower
super
output
area,
which
is
is
basically
groups
of
about
a
thousand
people
or
a
small
collection
of
streets
is
what
we're
aiming
for.
The
challenges
you'll
appreciate
is
not
all
of
the
data
is
available
at
that
level.
C
So
there's
a
bit
a
bit
of
a
balance
here
between
having
as
much
in
the
SPI
as
we
want
in
there,
while
also
accepting
some
of
that
isn't
available
at
that
level.
But
we've
got
a
sort
of
development
list
of
people
of
indicators
that
we're
aiming
to
put
together
and
over
the
next
few
years
we
hope
we
will
get
there.
I
I
just
wanted
to
come
back.
Thank
you
for
that
mate.
I.
Think.
The
big
thing
for
us
is
the
fact
that,
for
example,
in
a
ward
like
hair,
would
that
has
a
reputation,
a
name
like
that
that
some
of
our
colleagues
castigate
because
they
just
relate
with
the
stately
home.
We
do
have
pockets
of
deprivation
and
we
also
have
Council
States
in
many
of
our
Villages
and
ultimately,
a
lot
of
our
residents.
I
Ask
you
know:
are
we
able
to
get
the
same
investment
as
we
would
do
if
we
were
elsewhere
in
the
city
and
I
just
wanted
to
ask
really
do
you
have
any
further
detail?
How
the
council,
because
when
we
talk
about
best
city
plan,
we
talk
about
best
council
plan
and
how
it
informs
our
decisions
and
how
we
invest
in
the
future
and
our
future
potential
of
our
residents?
I
C
Yeah
I
mean
you're
absolutely
right,
as
you
say,
that
I
mean
every
ward
has
pockets
of
poverty
and
inequality
in
it.
No
matter
what
sort
of
the
general
the
general
at
wealth
of
the
ward
is,
and
you
yeah
for
sure,
and
we
see
that
in
all
of
the
analysis
that
we
do
the
best
city.
Ambition
as
a
whole
is
absolutely
as
a
sort
of
kicked
off
at
the
start
targeted
on
trying
to
tackle
property
and
inequality.
That's
wherever
poverty
and
inequality
exists.
C
It
is
to
focus
on
tackling
poverty
and
inequality
and
what
we
will
aim
to
do
through
the
work
that
my
team
is
doing
in
terms
of
presenting
the
data
and
the
evidence
and
we'll
do
this
again
when
we
pick
up
the
joint
strategic
assessment
over
the
next
six
months
is
to
really
bring
out
all
of
that.
The
the
evidence
for
where
that
that
inequality
exists,
including
in
Howard
what.
C
Some
of
it
will
some
of
it
will
be
yes
now.
The
number
of
data
points
that
will
be
in
the
jsar
are
vast
vastly
more
than
we're
talking
about
here,
but
wherever
possible.
Certainly,
we
will
aim
to
make
that
available
and
already
we
can
provide
deprivation
data
at
that
level
already
and
I
can
get
that
to
you
now,
if
you
like.
A
Thanks
Nick,
so
we
have
Council
Lam,
then
councilman,
Neil,
Buckley,
then
councilor,
Stevenson
and
then
councilor
Robinson,
okay,.
G
Yeah,
thank
you,
chair.
Thanks
for
coming
and
record,
we've
met
at
the
Arium
last
time.
Didn't
we
yes,
I
think
we
should
the
area
I'm.
Sorry
I
think
we
should
do
that
again.
Chair
because
I
also
recall
we
got
cake
when
we
were
there
so
which
is
so
we
should.
We
should
definitely
have
more
meetings
there.
A
couple
of
practical
things.
First,
on
the
education
slide,
it
looked
like
it
referred
to
Inner
East,
rather
than
outer
Northeast
and
the
data
didn't
look
like
it
was
out
of
Northeast
data.
G
C
It's
a
very
good,
it's
a
very
good
question,
so
I'm
not
an
expert
in
terms
of
what
the
workings
behind
it.
We
we
may
well
be
able
to
do
that
manually.
What
I
meant
was
in
terms
of
the
tool
itself.
It's
not
set
up
to
easily
filter
by
Community
Committee
level.
C
That
is
something
we'll
look
to
building
in
the
future.
I'd
have
to
go
back
and
check
with
the
people
who
know
how,
because
it's
all
indexed,
it's
not
as
simple
as
sort
of
adding
up
and
dividing,
because
there's
various
weightings
applied,
so
I'd
need
to
go
back
and
understand
if
that
would
if
that
would
work.
If
that
makes
sense,.
G
To
be
fair,
I
think
the
World
level
data
is
of
most
use
to
us
anyway
and
being
able
to
break
that
down,
particularly
in
our
outer
areas
to
specific
communities
would
help
us.
G
My
principal
question
really
is
around
what
does
success
look
like,
and
it
follows
on
a
little
bit
from
Council
of
first
point,
because
if
the
goal
is
to
reduce
inequality
and
poverty,
which
absolutely
everyone's
going
to
sign
up
to
that
when
you
look
at
it
strategically,
it
draws
you
to
certain
parts
of
the
city
where
we
know
in
our
area
that
there
are
people
living
in
in
poverty,
it's
masked
by
the
headline.
G
I
think
what
we
would
all
want
to
see
is
that
we're
the
focus
on
tackling
poverty,
inequality
everywhere,
not
just
where
it's
most
concentrated.
Yes,
you
understand,
that's
where
the
resources
should
be,
but
I've
been
around
this
table
for
17
years
of
making
the
same
point,
that's
a
lot
harder
to
be
poor
in
places
like
Weatherby
and
Harewood,
because
you
don't
have
the
same
access
to
concentration
of
service
and
things
like
that.
So
really
it's
I
suppose
what
does
success?
G
Look
like
for
the
city
and
how
would
if
you
were
to
come
back
to
us
in
five
years
and
say
right
yeah.
These
are
the
metrics
that
tell
us
that
we've
achieved
what
we
wanted
to
and
what
would
it
look
like
locally
to
us
because
some
people
would
say
Well
they're
doing
all
right
out
there
and
whether
it
be
so,
we
don't
need
to
worry
just
let
them
get
on
with
it.
Where
actually
we
shouldn't
be,
we
want
everyone
to
do
better.
G
We
want
the
the
areas
that
are
lagging
behind
to
do
better
faster,
but
it's
just
it's
just
getting
that
understanding
of
really
soon,
because
that
was
the
challenge
really.
Last
time
it
was
a
10
years
after
the
first
plan.
Could
you
demonstrated
it
had
an
impact
and
the
honest
answer
was
no.
We
couldn't
and
I'd
hate
to
be
sat
here
in
another
10
years,
and
so
we've
had.
G
We
have
20
years
of
this
and
we
still
can't
demonstrate
any
impact
or
all
the
indicators
are
stubbornly
where
they
were
when
we
started
and
then
you
know
the
approach
didn't
work,
did
it
so
so
a
long-winded
way
of
saying
how
do
we
know
if
this
has
worked
or
not.
C
So
for
sure,
so,
in
terms
of
the
the
this
should
apply
everywhere
absolutely
and
certainly
what
we're
trying
to
do
with
the
provision
of
this
kind
of
data
and
information
I
think
makes
that
argument
easier.
It
really
brings
to
the
fore
what
we
should
be
focusing
on
no
matter
where,
where
that
is
in
the
city,
in
terms
of
what
success
looks
like
I
mean
that
I
mean
that's
the
big
question:
isn't
it
and
I
suspect
across
different
different
areas,
different
parts
of
the
data
different
areas
of
what
we
do?
C
It
probably
looks
different,
so
I
mean
this
is
something
I'm
sure
will
be
endlessly
debated
amongst
yourselves
as
partitions
as
we
go
forward,
but
I
suppose
in
some
areas
that
the
the
aim
is
to
reduce
poverty
and
reduce
inequality.
What
we
found
over
recent
years
is
that
sometimes
standing
still
is
also
progress,
and
what
we'll
be
aiming
to
do
as
we
go
forward,
is
as
much
as
we
can
to
Benchmark
leads
against
similar
places.
C
So
we
can
see
the
relative
change
to
other
places
that
are
basically
some
of
the
same
challenges
that
we
are
and
again
that's
not
in
what
I've
demonstrated
today,
but
will
be
in
that
joint
strategic
assessment.
So
that's
why
we've
got
the
collection
of
tools
available
to
us.
So
if
we
see
Lee's
performing
relatively
well
versus
other
major
cities
in
the
UK,
we
may
see
that
as
progress
but
I
suppose
everyone
will
form
their
own
judgment
about
whether
that's
enough
and
it's
a
really
difficult
question
to
answer.
That's
probably
the
best
I've
got.
D
I've
got
three
or
four
questions
sure,
and
just
following
on
from
Council
alum's
point
about
the
best
city,
ambition,
It
just
strikes
me:
what
does
it?
What
does
it
mean
because
best
in
what,
if
he
says
the
best
in
England,
the
best
in
the
United,
Kingdom
and
It?
Just
strikes
me
that
in
some
of
these
statistics,
you've
gathered
a
whole
wealth
of
statistics
and
presented
them
to
us.
Some
are
good
and
some
are
not
so
good,
like
the
road
accidents,
for
example.
But
what
does
it
mean?
D
For
instance,
if
there
was
a
car
accident
today
on
the
council
estate
in
all
Woodley
near
where
we
live
and
five
people
were
killed,
that
will
probably
skew
the
figures
for
the
whole
year,
wouldn't
it
and
that
that
just
strikes
me
as
as
woolly.
Now
what
are
stakeholders
who
are
stakeholders?
That's
mentioned
in
the
in
the
presentation-
and
you
mentioned
that
there's
been
a
dramatic
change
in
how
people
work
from
70
percent
of
people
driving
into
Leeds
to
43
percent
working
from
home.
That's
in
2021
at
the
height
of
the
pandemic.
D
This
is
almost
2024.,
it's
a
meaningless
statistic!
Isn't
it
and
also
it
what
also
skills
these
things,
which
is
a
slightly
different
point,
is
that
if
43
percent
of
people
are
driving
into
working
from
home
and
not
driving
into
the
city,
now
we're
going
to
have
even
fewer
buses
than
we
had
before,
because
the
unjustifiable
and
how
does
that
work
with
the
best
city
ambition
I'll,
leave
it
there
for
the
Overture.
C
So
to
take
them
slightly
in
reverse
order,
it's
the
one
that
sort
of
data
point
initially,
certainly
obviously,
with
any
with
any
date.
Here
we
need
to
be
aware
of
the
context
in
which
it
was
taken,
and
that
applies
to
everything
that
I've
talked
about
here
today
as
well.
So
certainly
you
know,
we
need
to
bear
that
in
mind
when
we
look
at
making
any
any
decisions
based
upon
that
the
purpose
of
sharing
some
of
that
census.
C
But
but
you
would
need
to
be
wary
of
that
context
for
sure
in
terms
of
the
stakeholders
that
refer
to
in
the
presentation,
I
think
it's
on
the
side
where
we're
reflecting
on
the
findings
of
the
peer
review
and
so
what
they
were.
They
were
referring
to
in
that
sense
was
really
everyone
who
had
a
a
part
in
developing
delivering
the
best
city
ambition.
So
that's
the
council,
partner
organizations
and
staff.
C
They
met
with
I,
think
citizen
groups
and
Community
groups
as
well,
so
I
think
they
met
with
citizen
groups
and
Community
groups
as
well
and
when
they
were
here
so
that's
what
they
were
reflecting
on
when
they
talked
about
the
stakeholders
who
were
who
were
part
of
that
so
absolutely
included
in
the
public.
D
A
Can
I
just
butt
in
there
and
possibly
help
a
little
bit
the
big
lease
chat,
Neil
which
went
across
the
whole
city
and
was
taken
out
of
because
at
first
of
all,
they
did
it
in
cricket
market
and
they
did
it
in
central
Leeds,
and
we
said
at
the
time
we
need
to
take
it
out
around
the
community.
So
they
did
do
that.
A
They've
done
that
two
years
on
the
truck
and
they
based
themselves
in
Village
halls
and
community
centers
and
said
we
are
going
to
be
here,
come
and
talk
to
us
we'll
be
here
for
the
whole
day
and
they
went
out
giving
out
leaflets
on
the
street
as
well
so
I
guess
that
would
be
the
general
public
being
consulted
on
that.
Maybe
but
I
accept
your
point
about
the
community
group.
Certainly.
C
Thanks
yeah
thanks,
councilor,
absolutely
and
the
big
leash
chat
will
be
will
be
repeated
again
in
future
years
as
another
route
to
gain
that
Insight
I
suppose
just
generally
for
sure,
some
of
this
data
result
is
all
is
already
aging,
but
it
will
be
repeated
and
the
social
Progress
Index
I
outlined
we're
aiming
to
base
that
on
as
up-to-date
data
as
possible
and
again
that
will
be
regularly
updated.
So
it
uses
the
latest
possible
data.
C
F
Thank
you.
My
experience
of
of
consultations
isn't
isn't
great,
really
I.
Think
when
we
look
at
all
the
various
streams
we've
had
transport,
this
kind
of
thing.
It's
always
a
few
people
who
respond
and
I
think
the
the
big
leads
chat
is
probably
a
bit
of
an
oxymoron.
Really
it's
it's
more
of
a
tetar
tet
I,
think
between
the
council
and
a
selected
handful
of
people.
F
So
it
would
be
useful
to
know
how
many
people,
out
of
the
entirety
of
the
city
of
Leeds
as
a
percentage,
engage
in
the
big
chat.
That
would
be
quite
useful
for
us
to
know.
I
suspect
it's
a
very
small
number,
but
you
might
want
to
reflect
on
that.
I'll
give
an
answer,
but
my
main
question,
which
is
going
to
be
about
the
figures
you
gave
was
and
and
what
use
they
are
and
how
what
level
of
analysis
goes
on.
F
So
you
you
picked
out
on
on
Weatherby
Ward
on
the
issue
of
of
Law
and
Order
that
Weatherby
Ward
was
I,
think
the
the
second
best
place
in
the
city
not
to
be
domestically
abused.
F
Now,
how
do
you
look
at
the
other
data
to
see
why
that
might
be,
and
are
you
doing
any
analysis
about?
What
are
the
other
elements
that
feed
in
that
result
in
in
that
and
whether
that
data
is
of
use
at
all
whether
there
isn't
a
correlation
and
the
reason
I
raise?
That
is
because
I
have
a
fear
that
whenever
we
talk
about
poverty
strategies,
for
example,
on
children's
scrutiny
board,
we
discuss
this
quite
quite
a
lot.
F
We're
always
told
that
when
you've
only
got
so
much
cash,
you
have
to
prioritize
so
you're,
picking
out
the
areas
where
you
might
get
more
bang
for
your
book.
As
such.
That's
of
no
comfort
to
the
people
who
are
victims
of
domestic
abuse
wherever
they
live
in
the
city.
So
my
fear
in
terms
of
data
and
I
love
data,
but
it
can
tell
you
what
you
want
it
to
tell
you
a
few
manipulate
it
in
the
right
way,
and
my
fear
would
be
that.
C
Thanks
counselor,
so
on
the
big
leads
chat.
I
haven't
got
the
figures
to
handle
I'm.
Sorry,
I
suspect
you'll
be
right
in
terms
of
the
the
headline
number
as
a
proportion
of
the
entire
800,
not
thousand
people.
It
will
be
a
considerably
smaller
number
than
that.
I
will
have
to
come
back
to
you
on
the
actual
turn
out
of
that
in
the
two
years
that
it's
been
run
on
on
sort
of
I
mean
the
specific
issue
of
domestic
violence
and
abuse,
although
this
would
apply
across
the
piece.
C
We'd
have
to
go
away
and
talk
to
colleagues
as
working
on
that
area
to
understand
the
rate,
the
full
range
of
data
that
they
take
into
account
when
designing
interventions
or
agreeing
investment
priorities
that
are
put
forward
for
a
decision.
I
mean
happy
to
have
very
sort
of
happy
to
go
away
from
away
and
do
that.
I,
wouldn't
I,
wouldn't
feel
confident
giving
you
a
a
sort
of
detailed
answer
on
that
here,
because
it's
not
something
I'm,
I'm
sort
of
involved
in.
E
Thanks
Chad,
yeah
I
think
we're
perhaps
following
on
the
slight
theme
here,
but
yeah
I
love,
medium
super
help,
but
anyways
lower
super
output
areas
as
well
after
work
with
indexes
for
work,
and
things
like
that.
Two
points
that
I'm
really
Keen
to
get
your
thoughts
on
like
for
how
we
can
take
this
forward.
The
first
is
the
data
that
you've
shared
about
that
change
in
terms
of
people
working
from
home.
E
It
is
really
significant,
particularly
when
you
align
it
with
the
Broadband
statistics
that
are
there
showing
actually
the
speeds
are
lower
in
our
area.
Actually,
it's
not
just
speed,
so
we
should
be
looking
at
booktake
as
well,
something
that
I've
long
campaigned
on.
We've
long
campaigned
on
us
in
the
Howard
world
to
actually
book
the
coverage
in
our
area
make
sure
that
more
people
can
exercise
at
the
speed
Broadband.
When
you
put
that
against
43
of
people
working
from
home,
it's
now
not
just
preferential
it's
essential,
and
particularly
in
a
city
like
ours.
E
The
second
part
to
that,
then
is
then
we
look
at
things
like
early
years
and
declare
an
interest
share
on
the
early
years.
Provision
as
well
I'm
sure
councilor
Stevenson
will
too,
but
when
we
look
at
that
that
we're
32nd
in
the
Harewood
Ward
across
Leeds
in
terms
of
what
we
can
do
it
for
early
years
provision,
that's
a
significant
problem
when
we're
considering
that
we
want
people
to
move
into
the
area
who
are
to
start
families
and
what
that
might
mean
for
the
future
of
the
area
both
of
those
issues.
E
The
main
part
of
funding
is
completely
out
of
the
control
of
lead,
City
Council.
It
is
private
sector
business
rollout,
that's
there
or
private
sector
provision,
that's
in
the
area,
so
I
guess
the
question:
firstly,
is:
what
can
the
city
council
do
if
anything,
on
that?
It's
great
that
we
have
the
stats,
but
you've
told
me
something
that
I
might
not
be
able
to
do
anything
about.
E
So
what
can
we
do
in
terms
of
that
space?
The
other
is
then
on
water
and
sanitation.
There's
a
keen
debate
going
on
about
water
and
sanitation
at
the
moment,
however,
this
and
it
suggests
that
12th
in
Harewood,
ninth
in
Weatherby
19th
and
all
Woodley.
Sorry
on
that,
however,
that
that
stat,
those
stats
don't
as
best
as
I,
could
see
from
having
a
quick
look,
relate
to
the
health
and
quality
of
the
rivers
and
streams
and
estuaries
around
our
area.
C
Thanks
Council
Robinson
on
this
on
the
final
Point
yeah
you're
right.
It
doesn't
include
that,
and
perhaps
that's
something
we
could
take
away
and
feedback
is
something
that
maybe
we
should
look
to
include
in
in
future,
not
least
given,
as
you
say,
the
amount
of
attention
that's
getting
as
an
issue
at
the
moment
and
the
increase
it's
had
in
the
public
Consciousness,
and
so
that's
probably
an
area
for
further
development.
C
That
again,
will
just
over
time
continue
to
enrich
the
picture
that
this
tool
can
can
give
us
and
the
other
two
points
on
on
early
years.
In
Broadband,
yeah
I
mean
a
compelling
argument
very,
very
well
made
I
suppose
what
I
would
say
enables
us
to
do
as
a
city
council
is
to
have.
You
know
stronger
Tools
in
our
arsenal
when
we're
and
when
we're
entering
any
conversation
with
any
other
partner
outside
of
this
organization
to
lobby.
For
that
investment.
To
argue
for
what
communities
in
Leeds
need.
E
Just
as
a
brief
follow-up
there-
and
it's
maybe
Marvel
Point
than
a
question,
and
maybe
for
you
chair
so
on
the
water
and
sanitation
point,
I'd
absolutely
suggest
that
we
include
that
and-
and
hopefully
that
could
be
a
recommendation
coming
from
this
committee
that
should
be
included
in
the
future,
particularly
given
the
profile
of
it
in
the
media,
but
the
relevant
for
many
relevancy
for
many
residents.
The
second
is
on
those
Broadband
speeds.
On
the
back
of
this.
H
So
a
couple
of
points-
one
of
them
was
just
picking
up
on
what
council
lamb
said
actually
earlier,
and
it
was
just
expanding
it
out
a
bit
in
that
when
we
look
at
what's
actually
achieved
and
how
that's
measured,
just
really
to
reiterate
that
you
know,
because
you
talked
about
comparing
the
overall,
how
we're
achieving
with
other
cities.
H
But
surely
what
would
be
a
better
measure
is
to
look
at
by
what
the
percentage
increase
is
by
every
Ward
and
then
look
at
the
overall
position,
because
unless
we
know
by
you
know
it
may
be
that
we
focused
on
in
cities
which
I'm
sure
we
do
rightly.
But
it
may
be
that
you
know
50.
We've
got
a
big
increase
in,
but
the
others.
Actually
we've
got
a
decrease
in
and
that's
so
important
to
those
areas.
So
we
do
need
to
have
that
detailed
information
going
forward.
H
So
that
was
on
that
one
in
terms
of
the
percentages
we're
talking
about
those
working
from
home,
which
I
did
equally
I
found
really
interesting.
So
the
one
of
the
questions
is:
when
will
we
get
an
update
in
numbers?
So
when
will
we
know
actually
postcovid
what
the
position
is
and
the
second
question
follow-up
from
that
was:
we
actually
need
a
better
breakdown.
C
Thanks
counselor
yeah,
really
good
points
really
for
our
points.
It's
Tricky
on
that
one,
so
that
the
source
of
that
data
was
the
2021
census
which,
if
we
get
another
one,
we
won't
get
one
for
10
years,
so
that
so
that
is
not
a
reliable
source
of
updated
information
over
the
coming
years.
I
suppose
the
issue
of
work
from
home
specifically
and
you
can
see
from
the
Census
Data,
where
broadly
across
no
matter
what
part
of
leads
you
look
at.
C
It's
gone
from
roughly
like
two
or
three
percent
to
somewhere
between
20
and
40
across
the
majority
of
the
city,
and
that
will
be
the
case
nationally.
I
think
this
is
probably
likely
to
become
something
that
is
studied
more
than
we've
had
in
the
past.
So
there
are
rain.
There
are
a
range
of
regular
surveys
that
take
place
most
of
them
from
ons
annual
population
surveys,
labor
market
surveys
that
I
don't
know
I'm
speculating,
but
I
suspect.
This
may
well
be
something
that
comes
into
that
going
forward.
C
So
we'll
give
us
a
more
regular
source
to
monitor
that
unless
your
first
point
in
terms
of
that
progress,
monitoring
with
the
city
outside
and
including
within
City
app
yeah,
absolutely
you
articulated
far
better
than
I
did
so.
Take
definitely
take
that
point,
and
that
is
absolutely
what
we're
looking
to
do.
K
K
My
colleague
made
Neil
councilor
Buckley
working
from
home
in
2021
is
so
fundamentally
different
in
terms
of
the
numbers
now,
because
the
choice
options
were
completely
different
and
I'm
worried
about
a
notion
of
building
apart
from
broadband
speed,
which
is
a
I
think,
is
just
a
necessity
of
life
now,
quite
frankly,
but
to
try
to
look
at
building
a
suite
of
services
in
the
direction
of
travel
and
a
city
plan
that
has
within
it
the
notion
that
a
significant
proportion
of
people
are
working
from
home.
K
For
the
majority
of
the
time
when
we're
not
certain
that
that
is
the
case
is
troubling
for
me
now
I'm
not
saying
that
there
are
not
still
significant
numbers
of
people
working
from
home.
The
point
is,
we
don't
know
and
to
build
a
suite
of
service
and
a
direction
of
travel
around
something
that
we
just
don't
know,
but
that
may
well
be
quite
likely
on
a
false
positive.
K
Is
troubling
and
I
hear
what
you
say
when
you
say?
Oh,
don't
worry.
Counselor
we've
got
mechanisms
to
take
that
data
flip
into
account,
but
actually
history
shows
us
that
once
we've
recorded
data-
and
we
said
we
start
to
move
in
that
once
it's
written
in
a
report-
well
and
we
start
to
try
and
suddenly
we're
reducing
bus
travel,
because
if
people
are
working
from
home
religiously
two
days
a
week
out
of
five,
then
well,
we
don't
well
straight
away.
K
We
need
40
less
buses
and
we
start
there
starts
to
be
a
knock-on
and
then
areas
of
the
city,
for
example
the
outer
North,
where
we're
out
of
Northeast,
where
we
are
already
served
so
poorly
by
public
transport
so
poorly.
K
Sometimes
the
misses
off
the
actual
map,
where,
where
we
rely
on
proper
Public
Services,
even
though
the
investment
in
our
Public
Services
is
week
at
best,
it
worries
me
when
we're
using
data
that
we
know
is
quite
likely
skewed
and
so,
while
I'm
sort
of
noting
the
point
you're
making
I'm
not
reassured
by
it,
because
history
shows
me
that
once
we've
recorded
data
cancel
that
on
it-
and
this
is
dangerous
data
to
act
on,
because
it
was
skewed
thanks.
Jeff.
C
Thanks
cancer,
Cohen
I,
completely
understand
the
point,
I
suppose
just
to
stress
and
try
to
try
to
reassure
you.
I
probably
should
have
stuck
a
warning
label
on
that
slide.
The
purpose,
the
purpose
of
sharing
that
those
you
know
very,
very,
very
high
level
sort
of
census.
Insights
with
you
today
was
really
just
a
point
of
interest
for
the
outer
Northeast,
some
some
of
the
information
that
was
in
the
census
that
was
different
to
other
parts
of
the
city.
C
To
absolutely
stress
that
that
work
from
home
data
is
not
part
of
the
social
Progress
Index
and
will
not
be
part
of
the
joint
strategic
assessment.
There's
no
proposal
to
to
base
any
decision-making
or
even
to
factor
that
into
any
evidence
base
that
we're
developing.
It
was
solely
the
purpose
of
here
this
evening,
giving
you
a
bit
of
a
flavor
of
what
the
census
was
telling
us
about
outer
Northeast
I
hope
that
sort
of
stresses
the
point
and
and
sets
your
mind
at
rest
as
much
as
I
possibly
can.
A
And
thank
you
for
taking
the
time
to
answer
the
questions
that
we've
put
to
you
tonight.
You're
very
welcome
to
stay.
If
you
wish
to
do
so,
but
you
know
we're
quite
happy
to
release
you
if
you
want
to
go
and
I
understand
that
counselor
Stevens
has
got
to
be,
do
okay!
Thank
you.
So
we're
now
moving
on
to
a
gender
item
number
10,
which
is
the
finance
report,
can
I
invite
Carl
and
Elaine
to
introduce
it.
Please.
B
B
65
pounds
left
the
Airwood
Ward,
the
actual
balance
for
the
world
is
16
558
pounds
and
73
Pence
and
that's
as
a
result
of
the
project
under
spend
an
amount
being
added
back
into
that
well-being,
budget
and
then
finally,
we've
got
Weatherby
currently
got
21
423
pounds
and
93
Pence,
and
then
we've
got
a
couple
of
well-being
projects
for
consideration
by
the
committee
more
than
happy
to
go
through
those
chair,
but
I
know
we
have
had
conversations
with
relevant
counselors
regarding
whether
or
not
they
want
to
support
those
applications.
B
B
And
then
page
21
refers
to
the
yaf
budget
position
so
once
again,
awwardly
apparently
has
got
8
888
pounds,
sorry
887
pounds
and
80
Pence.
The
Airwood
ward
has
got
8028
pounds
and
63
Pence
and
once
again
that's
the
result
of
a
project
to
understand
and
then
finally,
where
the
big
has
got
just
over
400
pounds,
so
427
pounds
and
97
pounds
and
then
once
again
share
we've
just
got
one
project
for
consideration,
but
just
to
indicate
that
this
has
also
been
discussed
with
the
relevant
Ward
members.
B
Yeah
and
then
finally
chair
in
terms
of
the
capital
budget,
there's
been
no
change
since
the
last
committee
meeting
on
the
24th
of
July,
so
all
Woodley
has
currently
got
12,
320
pounds
and
37
pence.
The
Harwood
ward
has
got
10
854
pounds
and
32
Pence
and
then
finally,
we've
got
the
Weatherby
world
with
eight
thousand
eight
hundred
and
twenty
pounds
and
32
Pence,
and
that
concludes
the
finance
departure.
Okay,.
B
So
if
I
can
just
refer
the
committee
back
to
the
additional
supplementary
information
in
relation
to
finance
report,
so
this.
I
B
Okay,
so
this
is
a
well-being
project
for
consideration.
It's
the
Airwood
and
Weatherby
until
anti-burger
project,
the
total
project
cost
is
7
838
pounds
and
16
Pence
because
it
covers
both
of
those
Worlds.
The
proposal
is
that
the
two
words
would
split
equal
at
50
50,
which
would
mean
that
there
would
be
3919
pounds
and
eight
Pence
taken
from
both
of
those
two
Wards,
but
also
once
again
sure
just
to
indicate
that
those
conversations
have
taken
place
with
the
relevant
World
members.
A
Thank
you
for
that
gentlemen
and
ladies,
so
I
I
gender
item
number
11
is
the
update
report
and
again
that's
for
Carl
and
Elaine
to
present
major
items
from
that.
Thank
you.
B
Sorry
in
agreement
with
the
chair
in
the
committee
and
our
counselors
like
to
take
the
reporters
read
so
just
a
couple
of
key
things
from
me.
I
remember.
A
conversation
took
place
that
the
last
committee
meeting
on
the
24th
of
July,
and
that
was
in
relation
to
the
relatively
small
numbers
of
young
people
and
that
had
engaged
with
that
yak
consultation
survey.
So
one
of
the
key
things
we've
done
is
taking
that
feedback
on
board.
B
We've
now
created
that
yaf
consultation
survey
we've
got
it
out
as
quickly
as
possible
so
that
we
can
hopefully
engage
with
as
many
young
people
as
possible
and
one
of
the
key
things
now
we've
got.
A
learning
past
will
be
for
Elaine
to
work
with
those
Community
groups,
youth
organizations
to
increase
those
numbers
of
young
people
and,
as
I
said,
Chad,
that
the
survey
is
live.
So
there's
a
couple
of
means
and
methods
that
young
people
can
actually
consult
with
that
survey.
B
The
first
one
is,
they
can
fill
out
the
survey
link,
but
we've
also
got
a
QR
code
that
they
can
use
to
fill
in
the
app
consultation,
and
the
key
thing
is
we're
aimed
to
get
as
many
responses
as
possible
and,
as
always
the
case
chair.
Those
responses
will
inform
the
budget
spend
for
the
next
financial
year.
A
D
Well,
you'll
all
smile
at
this,
but
at
on
page
28
under
climate
change
it
says
climate
change
is
the
single
biggest
threat
to
population
health?
B
D
I
I
just
wanted
to
know
one
thing,
which
is
that,
through
the
initiative
particularly
pursued
by
councilor
Robinson,
tomorrow
will
officially
be
a
year
since
the
anniversary
of
well
since
Queen,
Elizabeth,
II's
funeral
and
one
of
the
big
things
that
we
certainly
do
in
the
Airwood
is
making
sure
that
we
leave
a
legacy
of
her
outstanding,
70
plus
years
of
public
service.
So
I
just
wanted
to
put
that
on
the
record.
Thank
you.
Jack.
E
It
was
just
to
follow
up
on
page
31,
employment's,
employment
and
skills
activities
and
provision,
in
my
request
earlier
for
a
paper
to
come
forward
on
and
officers
to
come
forward
on
broadband
and
internet
and
that
rollout
as
well
within
that
item.
It
talks
about
the
the
number
of
people
who
have
been
received:
training
and
skills
provisioned
in
ICT
and
digital
Communications
I'd.
Welcome
that
been
included
in
that
sort
of
reference
that,
in
that
report,
would
want
to
make
sense
to
tip
both
at
the
same
time,
if
that's
okay,.
I
Thank
you
chair
further
to
our
discussion
last
week
briefly,
and
my
request
I
just
wanted
to
put
then
mention
to
the
meeting
that
I
am
requesting
that
we
bring
forward
a
future
committee
committee
item
on
illegal
traveler
camps,
given
the
space
of
the
amount
that
we've
particularly
had
across
the
outer
Northeast,
and
particularly
in
the
Harewood
Ward
since
the
opening
of
the
East
Leeds
orbital
Road,
and
to
discuss
what
we're
going
to
do
about
it.
Given
our
previous
warnings
and
lack
of
action
since
from
lead
city
council.
Thank
you.
K
Thank
you,
chair
and
I
promise.
Faithfully
Council
Brooklyn
aren't
working
in
kahoots
on
this,
but
but
I
I
have
a
genuine
and
Urgent
concern
around
Public
Health,
which
actually,
interestingly
enough,
is
referred
to
at
page
29
of
the
reports.
K
Colleagues
will
be
aware
that
in
parts
of
the
country
there
have
been
significant
Falls
in
take-up
of
childhood
vaccinations,
particularly
MMR
I,
think
it'd
be
really
helpful
to
get
something
from
public
health
around
vaccination
take-up,
particularly
among
MMR,
particularly
around
childhood
vaccinations,
but
also
actually
what
the
take-up
compared
to
previous
around
flu
and
the
covid
vaccination
programs,
obviously
rolling
out
how
that
is
looking
because
off
the
back
of
obviously
very
significant
pandemic.
K
A
H
A
So,
thank
you
for
that.
Ladies
and
gentlemen.
The
final
agenda
item
is
agenda,
item
number
12,
which
is
the
date
and
time
of
the
next
meeting,
and
it
will
be
on
Monday.
The
11th
of
December
at
5,
30
pm
here
and
I
will
bring
men's
pies
counselor
I
apologize
profusely
for
not
having
brought
biscuits
today.
Okay,
thank
you
very
much.
Oh.
G
H
I
know:
okay,
they
had
this
last
time
before
you
close
can
I
just
say,
can
I
just
say
something
please,
which
was
in
terms
of
the
next
meeting.
It
was
just
a
query
so
because
one
of
the
things
that
I
raised
at
the
end
of
the
last
meeting
was
about
the
where
this
meeting
is
cited,
so
it
was
really
just
to
say
it.
We
were
going
to
consider
this
going
forward
as
to
whether
we
have
to
come
here,
because
again
there
are
no
members
of
public
here
and
I
suspect.
H
It
is
because
we're
here
we're
in
Leeds-
and
you
know,
I
strongly.
Think
and
I
have
asked
other
people.
You
know
where
we
live,
if
they're
more
likely
to
come,
if
it
is
in
with
a
reward,
and
of
course
the
answer
is
yes,
so
I
strongly
think
we
need
to
consider
going
forward
where
this
meeting
is
held.
Can.
A
I
just
say
on
that
point:
cancer
Stables,
that
this
has
been
discussed
at
length
on
several
previous
meetings
and
that
because
of
covid,
and
because
of
the
uptake
that
we
had
in
people
actually
watching
on
this
on
the
light
online
on
the
screening
and
also
after
the
meeting
that
we
were
engaging
with
many
many
more
people
on
that
basis,
that
never
turned
up
at
any
of
the
meetings
when
we
went
to
the
communities.
A
Unfortunately,
the
technical
people
tell
us
that
it's
extremely
difficult
for
security
reasons
to
actually
live
stream
meetings
from
anywhere
in
the
community.
They
just
don't
have
the
facilities
to
do
it,
so
it
has
been
discussed
several
times,
but
I'm
quite
happy
to
put
it
on
the
agenda
for
the
next
meeting.
Please.
H
Do
because
one
of
the
questions
again
at
the
end
of
the
meeting,
we
had
a
little
discussion
about
it.
Last
time
was
we
asked
whether
we
can
have
a
look
at
the
data
to
see
in
terms
of
the
numbers
What
proportion
of
those
people
who
are
watching.
It
are
actually
Council
offices,
because
it
was
suggested
that
sometimes
you
know
the
things.
There
are
topics
that
come
up
that
are
relevant
to
offices
and
they
are
encouraged
to
watch
it.
H
So
what's
important
will
be
really
useful
to
understand
you
know
if,
if
I
don't
know
how
many
it
is,
if
there's
a
couple
hundred
people
watching
it,
but
actually
when
they
look
at
it,
a
hundred
of
them
are
offices
or
off
on
because
it
could
be
multiple
times
they're
watching
it
same
people.
Well,
I'm,
not.
We
need
a
bit
more
information.
A
G
We
should
say,
obviously
this
was
discussed
at
full
Council
last
week
on
the
Community
Committee
annual
reports,
and
we
suggested
as
part
of
the
review
of
community
committees,
that
this
is
something
that's
looked
at.
It
is
it's
a
challenge.
I
think
we're
on
the
same
page
we'd
like
more
people
to
engage,
but
we
also
have
been
here
for
17
years
and
we
have
often
gone
out
into
the
community
and
when
we're
in
Treetops
in
all
Woodley,
which
isn't
available
at
the
minute.
G
G
The
so
that
it's
getting
the
balance
rights
of
making
sure
it's
accessible
but
as
I
say
it
was
say
at
full
Council.
Last
week
it
was
discussed
and
it
is
something
all
of
us
are
agreed
on
trying
to
take
forward,
but
not
having
the
opportunity
and
people
with
disabilities
who
wouldn't
be
able
to
come
wherever
it
was.
They've
got
the
opportunity
to
watch
us.