►
From YouTube: Adobe Stock Integration public meeting, 3rd March 2020
Description
Adobe Stock Integration public meeting, 3rd March 2020
A
Okay,
guys
anybody
would
like
to
show
them
contributing
their
contributions
like
we
haven't
merged
a
lot
of
pull
requests
since
last
week,
but
if
yeah-
and
so
this
week,
Bailey's
away
technically
I
am
on
vacation.
That's
very
sorry
for
some
delays
and
pull
requests
processing,
but
considering
that
there
are
some
amount
of
open
pull
requests,
you
can
show
that
a
porta
quest
that
is
still
not
merged.
If
you
would
like
to
just
destroy
it
or
discuss
something
in
relation
to
it.
I.
A
B
Okay,
so
I'm
working
on
introducing
the
media
content
API
and
into
the
content
related
modules,
so
currently
just
time
in
there,
maybe
just
in
the
middle
of
the
process
and
will
provide
the
pull
request
older,
because
just
I
had
some
technical
technical
stuff
I
had
to
do
also
and
yeah.
So
this
is
issues
in
progress
and
I
plan
to
finish
it
this
week,
so
we'll
provide
the
base
module,
requested
functionality
and
database
structure.
Also,
just
like
a
small
report.
B
C
Guys
can
you
see
masks?
Can
you
see
the
screen?
Yes,
yeah,
yeah,
okay,
so
I
will
basically
start
with
the
full
repeal
that
I,
merge,
I,
think
I
just
missed
them.
I
am
also
miss
the
previous
meeting,
so
I
haven't
demoed
the
previous
protocol,
so
I'll
start
with
this
possible
to
open
the
several
sign
in
a
talk
ID.
So
basically,
in
this
first
here
the
user
can
open
as
many
as
adopt
adopt
soft
login
window
after
clicking
on
sign
in
order
license
license
image
button.
C
C
If
user
clicks
on
sign
in
window
and
as
you
can
see
it's
another
window,
it's
open,
so
if
user
tries
to
click,
so
it
will
close
the
previous
window
and
just
throw
the
error
of
the
previous
window,
authentication
was
close
and
it
opens
a
new
window.
So
basically,
this
was
the
purpose
which
is
merged
and.
C
I
implemented
interface,
HTTP
action
interface
for
all
the
controllers
in
the
stock
model.
So
basically,
this
PR
will
announce
the
security
for
the
controllers,
because
controller
must
be,
must
accept
sleep
particular
actions
like
get
post
or
like
actions
to
performs
the
witch
perform
in
the
controller.
So,
basically
I
added
the
action
implemented
to
action
interface
for
all
the
modules
just
show
the
code,
so
we
just
implemented
the
HTTP
POST
action
interface
to
another
security,
which
is
called
that
is
using
the
post
post
section.
So
we
just
a
and
producer
implements
the
post
section
interface.
C
If
we
add
or
get
action
interface,
then
we
will
get
the
full
304
error
for
the
controller,
so
it's
people
pretty
enhanced
the
security
same
with
the
other
controllers,
which
is
used
in
our
workshop
module
and
and
fixed
a
horse,
never
issue
which
is
okay,
okay,
so
that
I
guess
from
the
previous
and
currently
in
progress.
I
picked
the
issue
from
the
from
the
grooming
ready
for
the
grooming.
Sorry,
for
that,
but
I
also
find
this
issue,
so
I
was
going
to
make
a
P
R
and.
C
Delta
n
total
out
sorry
for
the
pronunciation
of
the
name.
He
opened
this
issue
and
we
have
fix
this
issue
like
if,
if
there
is
no
image
regarded
images
like
model
from
more
from
series
or
model,
so
there
will
be
a
no
extra
space
for
the
related
images
which
is
as
shown
in
the
issue
here,
so
basically
an
actual
raiser
for
says
there
is
some
extra
spaces
regarding
for
the
related
images,
because
there
is
no
related
image
for
this
particular
image.
So
this
is
the
final
result
if
I
could
find
yeah.
C
C
So
currently
we
are
getting
this
mode
from
Siri
remote
Kimora,
so
we
are
getting
to
the
real
image
section,
but
previously
there
is
a
blind
space,
as
you
can
see
here,
the
red
nerve,
wizard
I
also
find
in
couple
of
the
images,
but
finally
we
fix
it
and
somehow
he
currently
not
showing
the
more
from
series
and
more
from
model
for
the
same
image.
We
found
the
issue.
I
have
a
question.
A
C
C
C
Just
just
like
more
from
this
series
and
moved
from
this
model,
and
just
after
the
request
is
finish,
and
we
don't
get
any
images,
then
just
it,
then
this
section
will
be
hidden
as
we
are
I
did,
condition
is
visible,
I,
guess
yeah,
so
yeah
so
basically
is
visible.
Here
we
have
added
a
condition
physically,
the
cell,
just
to
the
pull
request
code.
So
it's
basically
the
same
thing.
We
are
checking
if
the
mode
from
series
and
more
from
model
is
checked.
C
If
it's
a
if
we
have
in
the
array
or
otherwise
we'll
just
hide
it.
I
just
use
the
same
code
to
CDs
step,
which
is
already.
We
have
created
this
function
and
just
Timm
Timm
code
so
for
show
CDs
tab
and
show
model
def,
which
is
the
same
as
when
we,
when
we
don't
have
any
images
related
to
model
or
with
related
to
series,
so
we
just
hide
a
basically
high-tech
part,
so
I
check
both
the
conditions.
If
we
have
both
oh,
if
we
get
both
the
empty,
then
we
just
hide
the
section.
A
C
C
A
C
C
Demo
that
makes
me
first
okay,
so
basically,
in
this
PR
there
we
will
get
the
license
quota
box
or
dialog
box,
in
which
message
a
message
will
be
appeared
that
you
will
use
a
one
license
image,
even
if
the
license
is
imaged,
if
like,
if
the
image
is
license
outside
the
auto
outside
he
adopts
of
integration
or
before
the
log
thing.
So
I
will
show
the
quick
demo
of
this
issue,
but
I
will
too
can
display
the
only
the
issue.
C
Okay,
so
basically
it
stick.
It
will
take
sometimes
I
think
before,
because
I
need
to
find
any
image
with
the
license
lever.
I
think
I
will
give
a
proper
demo
in
the
next
PR
I,
guess
yeah
and
another
pull
request
is
the
virtual
type
that
we
are
because
I
think
in
the
couple
of
meeting
before
yeah
virtual
dive
is
introduced
for
the
option
provided
so.
C
A
D
C
D
A
A
Yeah
yeah
thanks,
so
my
I
I
took
a
look
and
and
the
virtual
type,
and
actually
we
do
have
the
generic
implementation
for
filters
already
in
the
Adobe
stock
client
right.
There
is
a
simple
filters
class.
There
is
not
a
virtual
type,
but
it's
it's
basically
providing
the
generic
approach
or
adding
filters
do
understand
what
I'm
talking
about
right
now.
C
C
A
C
C
A
C
A
It
virtual
type
right
we
can
just
use
this
configuration
is
a
real
type,
so
we
shall
type
in
this
case
is
just
additional
layer
that
probably
can
be
emitted.
So
actually,
what?
What?
If
you
have
done
in
the
polar
quest,
is
a
great
thing
to
simplify
the
the
options,
the
providers
of
the
options
and
make
it
easier
to
configure
and
extend
them,
but
I
guess
that
the
same
the
same
thing
can
be
used
just
with
real
type.
What
you
need
to
do
is
just
remove
the
virtual
type
from.
C
A
One
more
one
more
thing
to
discuss
and
a
couple
of
pull
requests.
I
would
like
to
show
you
that
were
created
recently.
So,
first
of
all,
there
is
still
one
poor
request
that
we
are
working
on
to
merge
to
magenta
to
repository
from
Sankar
open
26
days
ago
ago,
serration
car
for
delays
with
julia
swiss
processing.
A
C
Sort
by
component
as
I,
checked
and
found
that
we
don't
need
any
sort
by
component
CSS,
but
but
I
just
found
that
we
need
to
as
in
adopts
of
integration.
We
have
added
that
also
sort
by
a
component
in
inside
the
field.
I
think
listing
filter
listing
filter
part.
So
we
need
to
add
the
CSS
regarding
the
listing
filter.
So
I.
Don't
think
that
we
need
to
introduce
that
listing,
filter
CSS
in
sort
by
component
part.
C
So
that's
why
I
said
that
it
needs
to
be
a
part
of
a
table,
saw
integration
instead
of
merging
Tory
book
repository,
because,
as
we
have
discussed
that
we
need
to
find
the
exact
definition
regarding
the
code
by
component,
which
I
talked
about
like
four
or
five
meetings
ago,
that
I
have
created
sort
back.
Whole
UI
component,
like
you,
verify
the
definitions,
and
so
that's
why?
I
just
added
this
short
by
component,
simple
and
all
the
CSS
are
regarding
to
the
listing
Fitness.
C
A
A
So
if
you
can
create
a
custom
grid
that
is
based
on
mass
masonry
grid
and
include
the
sort
in
component
in
this
custom
grid,
the
expectation
is
that
any
components
that
are
that
we
are
delivering
to
magenta
to
will
work
out
of
the
box
and
we'll
look
so
we'll
have
that
all
the
styles
will
have
the
proper
look
out
of
the
box
in
magenta
to
so
in
case.
We
need
to.
C
A
C
Yeah,
it
will
look
exactly
the
like
be
seeing
in
the
in
our
head
of
stock
integration.
Just
like
the
positioning
of
the
court
by
component
is
beside
like
I,
think
the
pair
number
of
record
form
I,
guess
we
are
adding
this
order
component
beside
the
number
of
effort
form
so
in
the
CSS
is
regarding
the
sort
by
component,
if
to
add,
is
basically
the
position
of
the
salt
back
of
eight.
You
fear
we
need
to
add
so
here
the
CSS
are
regarding
those
regarding
those
comfort.
A
Yeah
I
understand
that.
Thank
you.
Just
don't
tell
that
just
to
be
sure
and
to
just
in
general
to
let
you
guys
know.
Maybe
sir
pie
will
be
not
the
only
component
that
we
will
decide
to
arch
too
much
into
two
and
just
for
everybody
to
be
on
the
same
page.
Thanks
for
that
Sankar
also
I've
seen
we
have
some
issues
with
the
static
test.
There
I
don't
know.
I
reported
yeah.
C
A
Have
some
lack
of
information
on
just
tests
displays
just
array
instead
of
a
specific
error
message?
I
will
help
with
this
one,
but
basically,
what
can
you
do
if
you
don't
see
the
proper
results
for
the
static
test
on
version
2
temporarily,
while
we
are
working
on
the
fix
for
this
problem
is
just
to
run
to
run
the
test,
for
this
particular
like
run.
This
particular
test
on
your
local
and
you'll,
see
on
the
proper
error
message
with
all
the
details.
I.
C
A
C
999
yeah,
yeah,
yeah
tested
that
and
I
didn't
get
any
error
because
I
had
tested
using
the
node
module
installed
the
node
modules,
all
the
load
modules
and
run
those
tests.
Both
a
test
and
I
didn't
get
any
a
javascript
error.
I
thought
that
it
might
be
a
different
configuration
file
for
both
b2b
and
the
commerce
edition,
or
so
have
you
every
instance
of
different
configuration
balance.
C
D
A
Right
now
it's
not
possible.
He
may
be
possible
in
future.
Iced
I,
don't
I,
don't
have
any
updates
on
this
one's,
not
right
now
yeah,
but
right
now
you
can
see
on
the
three
results.
If
you
have
some
issues,
some
problems
and
you
need
to
see
the
looks,
I
can
see
the
locks,
so
you
can
still
contact
me
and
I
can
go
and
fetch
locks
for
you,
but
there
is
no
like
automated
thing
to
publish
books
with
the
test
results
right
now.
Okay,.
A
Okay,
thank
you
then.
Yes,
so
we
went
through
the
the
pull
requests
for
some
of
them.
The
results,
Apple
requests
for
extracting
the
media,
gather
integration
and
meet
from
the
media
gallery
I
models
so
that
we'll
have
when
this
pull
request
will
be
merged,
will
have
new
module,
but
the
media
gallery,
UI
or
media
gallery
module
will
not
will
not
be.
A
A
A
A
When
the
module
is
our
it
yeah,
we
need
to
update
the
mod
Mon
file
and
to
add
this
module
to
the
Mon
Mon
file.
Otherwise,
when
you
run
mod
man
own
mod
man
update
for
the
domestic
integration
based
on
our
installation
guide,
this
model
will
not
be
so.
The
module
will
not
be
copied
to
I
mean
the
sim
link
will
not
be
created
in
this
particular
destination.
A
This
file
is
staying
mudman,
that
the
same
link
from
the
module
directory
to
the
I
mean
the
sim
link
in
up
code,
magenta
media
gallery
integration
to
the
module
directory
will
be
created,
and
there
is
another
called
man
file
that
has
to
be
updated.
When
we
are
adding
modules,
there
is
the
route
mod
man
file
that
is
basically
import
in
all
the
modules.
So
we
have
touched
the
line
for
a
new
model
here
as
well.
A
Okay
and
yeah
Gabrielle
recently
joined
our
project
and
a
couple
of
his
peers
was
merged,
and
now
he
also
created
now
finally
created
the
functionality
to
add
the
images
from
new
media
gallery
to
the
content.
The
PR
is
still
in
the
review,
but
I
guess
so
it
can
be
merged.
So
we'll
be
able
to
add,
will
have
that
selected
button
and
we'll
be
able
to
add
images
from
new
media
gallery
to
the
target
elements
and
one
more
interesting
pull
request
that
we
recently
created
it's
not
in
the.
A
It's
not
in
that
of
istic
integration
repository,
but
in
the
SDK
repository,
as
you
remember,
when
we
were
developing
that
bistec
integration
during
the
second
milestone,
we
needed
to
get
the
information
on
files
on
the
image
by
ID
and
we
figured
out
that
files
API
is
not
currently
implemented
in
Adobe
stock
SDK,
the
stock
API
PHP
package.
A
A
A
A
Just
fix
in
a
couple
of
em
after
afters
that
you
can
see
are
for
failing
right
now.
It
will
be
much
easier
on
the
internal
builds
and
then
it
is
on
Travis,
because
you
can
see
much
more
detailed
information
on
the
test
execution
and
the
results,
including
the
link
screenshot
and
all
the
tests
in
a
nice
valuer
results
for
you.
So
yeah
I
will
be
really
happy
if
somebody
will
help
a
bit
with
the
MFT
after
stabilization.