►
From YouTube: Community Contribution Triage 07/15/2020
Description
No description was provided for this meeting.
If this is YOUR meeting, an easy way to fix this is to add a description to your video, wherever mtngs.io found it (probably YouTube).
B
Let's
review
and
trash
couple
of
issue:
it's
actually
bug
reports,
not
ready
solution,
and
we
need
to
let
the
priority
severity
base
it
on
bug,
description,
okay,
let's
start
first,
one
about
fpt
tax
for
a
configurable
product
fpt,
it's
fixed
product
tax,
additional
tax
that
can
be
applied
to
the
product
and
this
bug
about.
B
Okay,
let's
see
step
by
step
steps
reproduce.
Firstly,
we
created
fbt,
attribute
and
enable
its
tax.
Add
this
new
attribute
to
the
product
attribute
set
and
try
to
apply
it
to
the
configurable
product.
Now,
let's
see
like
pictures
first
picture,
it's
our
parent
configurable
products.
As
you
can
see,
we
have
applied
fpt
tax
with
some
dot
0.5
amount.
Then
we
have
a
couple
of
child
of
this
configurable
products.
B
Let
me
resize.
It
has
actually
three
child
products
like
product,
one
with
0.1
tax
product
2
with
0.2
and
the
product
3
with
0.3
tax,
and
it's
just
a
quick
summary.
Our
main
parent
product
has
this
value
for
tax
and
child
has
a
different.
B
B
The
base
price
of
parent
products
multiplied
by
a
quantity
of
products
in
the
cart,
so
it's
like,
as
you
can
see,
but
expected
result
that
it
should
be
calculated
based
on
each
item
that
in
card
in
this
case
it
means
like,
should
be
base
product
and
then
each
product
thumb
of
our
current
card,
also
additional
information
if
our
main,
like
parent
product,
doesn't
have
at
all
fpt,
but
a
child
has
fpt.
This
tax
will
not
be
shown
end
card
at
all.
C
Okay-
and
this
is
this-
is
just
an
issue
that
was
reported.
There's
there's
not
a
fix,
for
it
is.
B
B
B
C
Well,
it
seems
like
so
if
I
read
those
details,
it
sounds
like
they
go
to.
Okay,
so
yeah
they
click
on
new
synonym,
synonym
group.
They
click
on
the
drop
down,
they
just
select
a
different
drop
down,
and
then
they
write
something.
So
why
would
they
expect
the
scope
to
change
like
I
it?
I
just
it
sounds
like
they're,
just
selecting
a
different
result
in
the
drop-down,
but
they're
not
actually
making
a
I
to
me.
It
sounds
like
it's
working
as
expected
unless
you
guys
are.
B
Let's
imagine
I
go
to
this
form
and
in
the
scope
I
click
drop
down
and
select
different,
not
default
by
different
story,
and
then
I
feel
synonymous
for,
for
example,
then
I
click
reset
and
this
synonymous
field
are
cleared,
but
the
scope
still
the
same
as
I
selected,
it's
not
resetted
to
default.
Oh
yeah.
C
Modifying
so
like
I
don't
see
any
harm
being
done
by
the
user
like
to
me.
Reset
would
mean
that
it
clears
out
the
synonyms.
It
doesn't
necessarily
mean
it
reverts
the
drop
down
back
to
what
it
was
selected.
Before
I
mean
it's
very
easy
for
the
user
to
see
that
it's
not
changed,
and
if
they
want
to
go
back
to
default,
they
can
just
select
it.
So
let's
do
this
as
a
exp
works
as
expected,
won't
fix
or
whatever
you
guys
want
to
call
it.
A
It's
really
depends
to
the
forum
in,
in
this
case
it's
pretty
simple,
because
we
see
just
two
two
fields
like
the
drop
down
and
input
area,
but
in
case,
if
we
will
have
the
large
form
with
2050
fields,
it
will
be
harder
to
check
that
we
miss
to
change
the
scope.
Is
I
mean
that
scope
is
not
alternative
default?
One
or
another
field
is
not
returning
to
default
one.
A
B
B
B
Okay,
what
our
decision
we
just
still
want
to
reject
it.
Yes,
sorry.
B
B
First
of
all,
we
have
a
bundle
products.
Let
me
probably
open.
We
have
some
bundle
products.
These
bundle
products
have
two
section
of
the
child:
do
they
options?
First,
one
option
is
drop
down.
Second,
one
check
box,
not
sure
it
really
matter
anyway.
First
section
contains
product
number,
six
and
product
number.
Eight
second
option
set
contains
like
product
one
and
product
two.
B
But
the
result
is,
as
you
can
see,
we
add
product
to
the
card.
It
has
like
one
discountable,
I
would
say
product
and
not
discountable
product.
C
B
D
B
In
this
case,
it
should
be
according
to
our
rules,
applied
for
like
product
number,
six
or
product
number
eight,
and
in
this
case
we
add
product
number,
six
and
product
number
one.
So
we
expect,
based
on
our
rule,
that
it
will
be
applied
only
for
product
number.
Six.
C
B
C
C
Oh,
okay,
that's
what
gets
confusing
okay
got
it!
So,
no,
no,
no
you're
fine!
So
it's
a
bundle
product
with
two
simple
products
in
it.
One
of
the
products
gets
is
supposed
to
have
a
10
discount,
but
the
other
shouldn't.
So
I
wonder
if
that
is
that's
interesting
like.
Let
me
think
through
that.
B
A
A
D
C
I
would
prefer
it
to
either
discount
yeah
the
one
product
or
don't
apply
a
discount
at
all,
because
maybe
there's
like
a
rule
or
like
you
know,
I
could
think
of
logic
like
if
the
product
is
not
part
of
a
bundle
or
if
the
product
is
part
of
the
bundle,
then
don't
apply
a
discount
like
like
if
there
was
a
promotion
or
something,
but
at
any
rate
yeah,
it
does
seem
like
you,
shouldn't
apply
the
discounted
both,
oh
especially
since
it
says
ten
percent
bundled
item
test.
C
I
guess
that's
the
name
of
the
one
product
so
that
doesn't
make
sense.
Okay,
let's
do
I
guess
a
p
2
s
2
on
this.
A
B
Next
one
about
sitemap
quite
long
description,
but
let
me
try
to
explain
first
of
all,
we
enable
we
create
a
second
website
and
store.
Then
we
add,
specific,
like
add,
store
code
to
the
url
setting.
It
would
affect
this
bug.
I
think
then
we
enable
generation
setting
for
xml
sitemap
and
like
enable
this
functionality,
I
mean.
Then
we
select
option
like
enable
submission
to
robot
txt
place
it
on
the
site,
map
location,
do
other
stuff
to
apply
our
setting,
and
now
we
create
two
site
map.
B
B
B
Then
we
like
save
config,
flash
all
cache
and
phone
and
go
to
the
storefront
and
as
we
can
see,
the
name
of
the
file
is
not
applied
according
to
our
expectation
for
the
the
right
part
of
the
picture.
With
the
default
default
scope,
it
shown
correct
sitemap.xml,
but
for
our
additional
website
second
website
or
the
website.
It's
still
shown
like
for
default,
sitemap
ml
file.
C
So
this
is
for
okay
yeah,
so
this
is
like
a
sub
domain,
so
yeah
like
in
that
example,
german,
locale,
or
something
like
that,
and
they
want
two
separate.txt
files
for
each
yeah
yeah.
B
Generally,
this
functionality
is
often
in
use
and
talking
about
specifically
about
this
bug,
I
think,
like
the
problem
in
this
precondition,
could
be
some
of
these
settings
lead
to
this
result,
I
mean
some
of
the
precondition
brought
the
experience
that,
for
example,
it
works
fine
as
expected,
if
we
like,
set
this
value
to
no
it's,
it's
not
true.
It's
just
my
suggestion
like,
for
example,
and
I
think
one
of
this
precondition
is
crucial
and
k
for
this
incorrect
uninspected.
C
So
that's
an
interesting
thought
so
like
how
how
how
do
we
figure
that
out
at
what
stage
of
this
ticket
do
we
figure
that
out,
like
let's
say
we
set
the
priority
before
someone
goes
and
fixes
it
would
they,
like?
Maybe
there's
like
to
your
point-
maybe
there's
nothing
to
fix.
Maybe
it's
just
a
like.
Oh,
you
should
do
this
instead
of
that
like,
when
do
we
figure
out?
B
D
C
Okay,
that
makes
sense.
C
D
D
B
Magenta
through
api,
but
it
also
has
a
ui
user
interface
flow,
for
example,
in
admin
when
we
create
a
new
product,
go
to
admin,
try
to
create
a
try
to
create
new
order.
Sorry
and
we
use
create
new
customer
fill
default.
Billing
address
value
and
set
use
the
same
for
shipping
address.
There
are
check
boxes
and
from
user
perspective
it
looks
like
okay,
you
just
reuse
it,
but
in
the
database
will
be
saved
only
the
default
billing
address
and
for
shipping
address.
B
A
B
To
receive
it
like
ask
for
customer
requests
like
market
and
so
on
from
user
perspective,
it's
okay
magento
can
deal
it
on
the
storefront,
but
in
the
admin
panel
we
have
like
empty
empty
value
for
shipping
address.
It's.
If
briefly
explain
this
issue
and
user.
Sorry,
let
rolling
user
provide
his
like
business
scenarios
and
it's
like
sounds.
He
has
their
business
that
have
has
some
unique
address
attribute
specific
and
in
their
cases
it's
important
to
ask
to
have
both
these
addresses.
C
A
But
but
in
general,
if
we
use
api,
not
direct,
call
to
database,
I
mean
our
rest
api
or
graphically,
I
don't
know,
will
be
received
with
the
others.
Information
or
not.
D
A
B
B
C
Yeah,
let
me
so
this
looks
like
it's
been
going.
C
So
I
guess
a
p3
s3,
I
guess
e3
s3.