►
From YouTube: MakerDAO Community Call October 20th, 2020: Governance Portal Redesign with Derek Flossman
Description
Special Guests:
A dive into the upcoming Governance Portal Redesign with Derek Flossman.
On the agenda we have:
- ~45 mins - Portal Redesign Demi + Q&A
- ~15 mins - Further Q&A or Weekly MakerDAO Updates
Maker is a Decentralized Autonomous Organization(DAO) that manages the Maker Protocol on the Ethereum blockchain.
This video is a weekly community call that covers all Technical Milestones, Online Events, Partnerships, New Hires, Highlights from the Community, Real-Life Events, and more. Every now and then we even have a guest.
Maker Relay Ep 16
https://forum.makerdao.com/t/maker-relay-ep-17
If you're curious to learn more about MakerDAO explore some of the resources below:
Awesome-MakerDAO Resource Repository: https://awesome.makerdao.com/
Technical Documentation: https://docs.makerdao.com/
Community Portal: https://community-development.makerdao.com/
Governance Forum: https://forum.makerdao.com/
Website: https://makerdao.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/makerdao
Reddit: https://www.reddit.com/r/MakerDAO/
Chat: https://chat.makerdao.com/home
A
B
Right,
yeah,
hey
everybody!
Welcome
to
what
is
it
october,
20th
maker
dial
community
call?
My
name
is
david
utrobin
and
I'm
here
with
derek
fossman
one
of
the
foundation
team
members,
and
today
we
have
a
really
special
community
call
for
you,
but
before
I
get
into
wide
special,
just
a
really
quick
overview
about
what
the
community
call
even
is.
B
The
community
call
has
been
kind
of
running
every
tuesday
for
years,
and
so
I
do
community
development
at
the
foundation,
and
I
get
the
pleasure
of
hosting
these,
and
typically,
we
do
like
whatever
has
been
happening
over
the
last
week
in
maker.
We
try
to
give
whoever
is
watching
or
listening
an
update
on
just
what's
happening
with
regards
to
governance,
with
regards
to
integrations
with
regards
to
like
interesting
community,
current
events,
etc,
etc.
B
But
every
once
in
a
while,
we
like
to
have
interesting
guests
demos,
people
who
are
building
with
dye
foundation,
team
members
who
are
building
stuff
on
top
of
governance,
and
that's
what's
happening
today
and
and
yeah.
So
today
is
gonna,
be
really
cool.
We
have
derek
and
he
actually
I'll,
let
derek
introduce
himself.
But
we're
going
to
be
talking
about
the
governance
portal
redesign
today
and
so,
as
usual,
feel
free
to
drop
questions
in
the
chat,
I'm
happy
to
raise
them
on
your
behalf.
B
A
Awesome,
thank
you
very
much
so
yeah
in
terms
of
a
short
introduction.
I
I
worked
the
foundation
with
the
design
team
and
the
javascript
team,
predominantly,
and
in
this
case
it's
been
about
the
the
voting
screen,
the
governance
portal,
so
I
will
share
my
screen
and
we
can
dive
into
it
and
absolutely
jump
in
with
questions
along
the
way.
This
is
very
much
an
interactive.
B
B
A
B
A
I
I
don't
really
know,
I
think
what
I'm
gonna
see
is:
let's
just
monitor
the
usage.
If
the
usage
drops
off
straight
away,
then
maybe
we're
looking
at
a
little
bit
less.
It
really
depends
on
people's
comfort
levels.
With
you
know,
using
the
new
site,
there's
also
some
capability
that
we
want
to
use
so
david.
I
can
hear
myself
twice
in
the
background.
A
There's
also
some
additional
features
that
we
we
need
to
integrate
so
you'll
see.
Here
we
have
the
modules
which
takes
you
to
the
emergency
shutdown
module
and
there's
also
the
onboarding
so
voting
contract
stuff
like
that
that
we
haven't
yet
built
into
the
new
site.
So
as
those
capabilities
get
brought
into
the
new
site,
then
we'll
we'll
be
able
to.
You
know,
stop
having
the
v1.vote,
but
for
now
it'll
still
be
live,
so
people
can
definitely
access
it
if
they,
if
they
need
to.
But
for
a
comparison.
A
A
A
Go
for
it,
man
gosh,
am
I
gonna
catch
them
all,
they're,
probably
all
listening
to
this
call.
Okay,
so
we
we
have.
We
have
josh
who's
worked
a
lot
in
the
past
on
the
polling.
He
also
helped
us
build
the
rank
choice.
Voting
initially,
we
have
tyler
who's,
also
worked
on
governance
for
quite
a
long
time.
A
We
have
ashoka
and
also
ethan,
both
of
those
guys
have
done
a
lot
of
work
on
all
front-end
work,
front-end
styling
and
then,
when
it
comes
to
styling,
we
have
mike
from
the
the
design
team
who
has
helped
us
style
this
the
way
it
looks
today.
We
also
have
lawrence
the
lead
of
the
tech
team
that
have
been
working
on
this
and
now
I
really
hope
I've
caught
everyone.
B
A
We
we
started
off
the
quarter
before
that
on
building
up
what
information
people
wanted
as
part
of
this
landing
page,
and
then
we
moved
on
to
the
polling
and
executive
work
which
which
happened,
as
I
said
in
the
previous
quarter
of
this
year,
and
at
the
time
we
started
this,
there
wasn't
any
work
or
that
there
wasn't
any
progress
in
the
community
with
regards
to
off-chain
voting
like
you've,
seen
with
yams
or
yearn
with
the
snapshot
capability.
So
that's
something
we're
still
interested
in
and
it'll
move
us
more
towards
that.
A
You
know
complete
off
chain,
no
cost
voting
we're
much
better
today
with
the
the
batch
polling
which
I'll
get
into
in
a
minute.
But
you
know
there's
an
evolution
over
time
that
you
know
crypto
moves
so
quickly,
so
it's
actually
quite
cool
to
see
that
you
know
we're
we're
catching
up
we're
getting
there
so
anyway,.
B
Yeah
definitely
and
just
to
jump
in
right.
I
I
believe
that
that
move
to
like
full
snapshot,
is
that,
in
line
with
the
new
governance,
like
the
new
dss
chief
redesign,
is
that
something
that
is
part
of
that
actual
smart
contract
redesign?
Or
can
you
like
expand
a
little
bit
on
on
how
the
portal
redesign
connects
with
the
chief
redesign?
That's
coming
in
the
medium
term,
future.
A
Okay,
so
the
the
chief
design
is
different
from
what
we're
walking
through
today.
The
chief
design
will
let
you
have
multiple
concurrent
executive
votes
at
any
point
in
time,
so,
instead
of
having
to
bundle
executive
votes
like
we
do
today,
where
we
say
adding
a
collateral
type,
changing
a
debt
ceiling
making
other
changes,
that's
not
possible
in
the
current
system,
but
it
will
be
in
the
new
chief
contract
and,
as
a
result,
we
will
have
to
redesign
the
executive
page
to
handle
multiple
concurrent
executives.
A
Yeah
cool
so
yeah,
like
I
said.
Actually,
let's
start
here,
there's
a
good
point.
We
we
have
call
to
actions
on
the
front
page
which
the
goal
of
this
was
that
people
struggled
to
initially
look
at
the
page
and
realize
okay,
what
what's
what's
happening
in
governance?
What
what
do
I
need
to
do
as
a
maker
holder
as
a
stakeholder
interested
in
the
community?
A
A
A
I
believe
the
development
team
pulled
it
directly
from
the
the
contract.
They
were
looking
at
using
multicall
to
pull
it
but
I'll.
Let
them
jump
on
and
comment
if
they
want
to
in
more
detail
guys
if
you
are
on
feel
free
to
read
a
comment
anywhere
but
yeah
the
to
your
your
point
there
david
that
the
numbers
should
be
the
same.
A
And
then
we
list
the
the
most
recent
executive
vote
showing
that
it's
the
governing
proposal
and
the
amount
of
mkr
on
it.
And
then
you
can
click
through
and
view
that
if
you
want
same
with
the
polling
boats,
there
are,
as
we
saw
before,
16
of
them
at
the
moment.
We're
only
showing
the
top
four
or
five
here
top
four.
A
B
It
sounds
like
so
let
me
know
if
I'm
on
point
here,
so
it
sounds
like
the
front
page
is
meant
to
be
for
the
mkr
voter
who's
like
all
right.
I
gotta
just
see
what's
happening
like
right
now
at
this
very
moment,
so
like
they
go
to
the
front
page,
they
see.
You
know
the
call
to
action,
which
is
like
the
most
urgent
thing.
B
They
see
kind
of
all
the
links
to
the
resources,
but
then
right
under
they
see
like
the
executive
votes
and
the
polling
votes
that
are
either
most
recent
for
the
executive
vote
or
are
currently
active
for
the
polling
right.
I
have
a
question:
is
there
a
way
that
that
the
polling
votes
are
actually
chosen
to
be
displayed
on
the
front
page
versus
like
because
I
know,
there's
16
that
are
active
right
now,
and
I
see
that
there's
about
four
that
are
on
the
front
page.
A
Right,
so
how
recent
the
latest
polls
will
be
the
ones
that
show
in
the
order
that
they're
submitted,
so
we
could
have
a
parameter
that
would
be,
you
know,
potentially
a
star
favorite,
that
long
for
wisdom
when
he
submits
or
another
governance,
facilitator,
submits
a
poll
that
would
warrant
it
to
show
up.
That
would
be
yeah
another
requirement,
but
that's
fine.
A
So,
like
I
like
I
mentioned
on
the
previous
screen,
I
had
already
voted
for
one,
so
I
can
see
a
little
star
here
that
cool
I
voted.
So
I
am
connected.
I've
already
read
through
the
governance,
the
monthly
mips,
so
I'm
pretty
confident,
let's
walk
through
an
example
and
let's
add
that
into
the
ballot
so
you'll
see
here.
I
have
a
little
indicator
of
how
many
poles
are
available
or
active.
Poles
are
available.
A
I've
added
one
to
my
list.
So
let's
keep
going
down,
approve
the
maker
representatives.
I
could
vote
straight
away
through
here
or
I
could
actually
have
a
look
just
to
make
sure
I'm
good
with
what
the
governance
facilitator
has
put
in.
I
see
many
familiar
names,
that's
awesome!
So
again,
let's
go
with
the
yes
add
that
to
my
ballot
now
the
capability
here
is:
I
can
either
I
can
either
go
to
a
next
poll
and
read
through
and
vote
again.
A
I
can
go
back
to
a
previous
poll,
but
I
quite
like,
where
you'll
see
that
it's
registered,
that
I
have
added
yes
for
this
poll
to
my
my
ballot,
but
I
quite
like
the
overview
page,
so
I
will
jump
back
which
lets
me
confirm
that,
yes,
these
are
here
they're
added
to
my
ballot.
I
haven't
voted
on
these
other
ones,
so
we've
tried
to
make
it
pretty
clear
so
that
users
can
understand
where
they
are.
A
When
there's
such
a
long
list
of
polls
and
what
remaining
items
they
can
vote
on
and
then
let's
say
I
were
just
going
to
look
at
these
two,
not
the
full
list,
then
I
can
go
to
the
review
page
and
that
will
show
me
the
additional
two
that
I
want
to
vote
on.
I
guess
we've
got
time,
so
let's
actually
go
back
into
the
polling
and
vote
on
a
few
more.
We
know
we
want
medianizer.
A
Add
that
to
my
ballot
you'll
see
it
adds
on
there
again.
Oracle
worked,
that's
all
good
stuff,
the
green
light
poll.
So
yes,
why
not?
Absolutely?
This
is
all
good.
I
forgot
to
add
it
to
my
ballot.
There
we
go
okay,
one
crit,
crucial
step.
You
got
to
make
sure
that
it's
on
there.
The
good
thing
is,
though,
that
oh
yeah
more
collateral
types,
that's
great.
Okay,.
A
A
I'm
sure
there's
some
upper
number
limit,
but
essentially
so
yeah.
What
we're
managing
you
know
within
the
say
up
to
20
to
30.
I
don't
think
I've
ever
seen
any
more
than
that
for
a
week
wouldn't
be
a
problem.
I
won't
go
through
and
vote
at
the
moment,
but
let's
see
what
the
gas
comes
in
at
so
here,
looking
at
about
eight
eight
to
three
dollars,
I
think
gas
has
gone
up
today.
This
morning
it
was
around
one
dollar,
so.
A
Actually,
one
thing
I
didn't
click
into
for
you
guys
was
also
we've
retained.
The
vote
breakdown.
I
I
forgot
to
mention
that,
because,
in
the
current
version,
you'll
remember
that
we
actually
show
it
in
the
right
hand,
column,
and
there
was
feedback
from
the
community
that
people
are
swayed
by
automatically
seeing
that
and
going.
I
I'm
I'm
not
going
to
vote
or
I
will
vote
in
that
direction
and
there
was
sort
of
a
consensus
feel
that
it
was
driving
people's
votes
one
way
or
another.
A
So
we
wanted
to
keep
it
there,
because
people
are
still
interested
in
knowing
where's
the
majority.
Where
is
the
yeah?
The
where
the
key
drive
is
on
which
side
of
the
pole?
So
it's
still
there,
but
it's
just
not
as
prominent
so
we
haven't
lost
any
functionality,
we've
just
hidden
it
a
little
for
those
that
don't
want
to
see
it
straight
up.
Hopefully
that
makes
sense.
B
If
you
want,
I
could
really
quickly
read
out
the
thing
that
frank
wrote
in
the
chat.
He
said
that
one
thing
that
remains
the
same,
if
I'm
pulling
for
say
the
community
greenlight
poll
for
uniswap,
and
I
want
to
read
up
on
such
via
the
forum
thread,
it
takes
me
out
of
thevote.makerdao.com
website
and
I
then
have
to
reload
the
webpage
once
I'm
done
reading
it
on
the
forum.
Anyway,
you
can
hyperlink.
B
A
B
A
A
B
And
then
sam
also
added
a
piece
of
feedback,
he
wrote
selecting
the
option
of
a
vote
and
then
pressing
add
to
ballot.
Sometimes
I
miss
pressing
that
button,
perhaps
selecting
the
drop
down
option
could
be
sufficient
enough
to
add
to
the
ballot
automatically
so
like,
I
guess,
removing
that
need
for
a
button.
Click.
A
A
A
Cool
okay.
So,
let's
move
on
to
executives.
Actually
I
remember
one
thing:
I've
forgotten.
We
are
still
working
on
categorizing
polls
so
back
to
polling.
Sorry
for
the
jumping
around
we've
introduced
two
filters
as
well,
so
it
we
will
have
categories
for
polls
such
as
risk
values,
collateral,
onboarding,
oracles,
governance,
changes
like
process
changes
or
technical
changes
that
require
contract
changes,
so
those
will
be
categories
that
will
be
or
poll
types.
B
A
Yes,
so
you
will
be
able
to
find
all
the
polls
relative
to
a
time
a
specific
time
through
this
capability
yeah
and
the
alternative
way.
If
you
want
to,
if
you
are
really
trying
to
look
at
all
the
polls,
you
could
look
in
github
where
we
have
all
of
the
the
polls
mentioned,
but
this
should
be
easier,
cool.
B
A
A
So
excuse
me,
you
can
also
expand
that
and
then
view
all
the
older
proposals,
as
well
as
the
amount
of
mkr
that
is
still
supporting
them.
So
it's
quite
easy
and
helpful
to
see
the
distribution
so
we're
looking
really
good
on
the
latest
executive,
92
000
mkr.
That's
great!
It's
a
lot
of
security
on
the
hat
which
is
awesome,
and
then
you
know
the
older
ones,
20,
000,
40,
000,
etc.
So
it's
good
to
get
a
view
of
what
amount
of
mcar
is
supporting
where
or
where
it's
been
forgotten
and
not
moved
up.
B
That's
actually
so
cool
because,
usually
you
see
like
something
sub
100
kmkr
is
usually
like.
Maybe
80
90
75
000
mkr
is
the
typical
barrier
to
get
something
passed,
just
heuristically,
I'm
kind
of
observing,
but
looking
through
these
old
executives,
you
could
see
that,
like
a
third
of
all
mkr,
like
almost
300
000
mkr
is
just
sitting
in
governance,
which
is
actually
incredibly
impressive.
A
Yeah
and
it's
really
really
important
with
the
sort
of
the
way
the
ecosystem
has
changed
a
little
bit
this
year
with
all
the
the
yield
farming
and
what
liquidity
pools
exist,
where,
whether
or
not
those
pose
a
threat
or
not.
But
it's
important
to
see
the
amount
that
we
have
on
the
proposals
from
a
security
perspective
as
well.
So
yeah
really
happy
to
have
that
view
that
we
had
in
a
previous
and
a
another
older
site,
but
not
the
the
governance
side
that
we
had
before
so.
B
A
A
A
A
We've
had
some
feedback
about
this
that
maybe
we
can
make
it
a
little
easier
to
read.
For
example,
some
of
these
numbers
are
quite
long
and
potentially
confusing
what
is
exactly
spot
rate
or
dust
limits,
and
things
like
that
that
we
can
probably
add
a
little
bit
more
color
to
for
the
average
user.
So.
B
B
So
this
is
like
automatic
executive
vote,
auditing
and
people
don't
even
have
to
know
how
to
read
the
code.
They
could
just
see
that
that's
so
freaking
cool
wow.
That's
that's!
Actually
a
huge
knocking
down
of
a
serious
barrier
for
accountability
and
governance,
so
kudos
to
the
team
for
this,
because
this
is
this
is
incredible.
A
Yeah
yeah,
it's
super
helpful
and
I
I
think
the
smart
contract
team
referenced
it
as
well,
when
a
new
spell
is
created
just
to
make
sure
as
part
of
their
audit
trail,
that
okay,
we've
checked
and
the
front
end
reflects
it
as
well.
There's
going
to
be
more,
there
will
be
additional
changes
we'll
make
to
this,
not
only
for
the
jug
and
the
vat
contract,
so
this
list
will
gradually
grow
so
that
it
encompasses
other
contracts
as
well,
because
that's
something
that
we're
able
to
build
out.
A
A
A
A
So
other
otherwise,
we
have
resources
that
follow
along
with
the
both
the
executive
page
and
the
polling
page,
some
ui
enhancements
that
the
team
made
particularly
around
the
polling
page.
Is
that
the
right
hand
side
of
the
screen
follows
you,
as
you
work
your
way
through
the
polls.
So
that's
super
helpful
because
you're
always
seeing
and
have
the
ballot
visible.
A
Yeah,
so
I
think
I've
covered
everything
off
in
terms
of
the
executives
with
the
three
sub
tabs
here
proposal
detail
on
chain
effects,
comments
and
those
comments.
Once
you,
you
will
vote
for
the
proposal
you'll.
You
then
get
a
message
that
you
sign
with
your
wallet
and
then
that'll
appear
in
the
list
with
amount
of
mkr.
I
think
the
one
thing
to
mention
with
the
amount
of
mkr
is
the
amount
of
mkr
that
the
user
has
in
their
wallet
at
the
current
point
in
time.
A
So
we're
doing
a
quick
check.
This
is
really
probably
mostly
relevant
at
or
around
the
time
of
voting.
So
we
haven't,
you
know,
created
a
separate
database
to
do
a
point
in
time
amount
of
mkr
say
if
we
were
looking
at
it
from
three
months
in
the
future
or
looking
back
three
months.
That
may
not
be
accurate
at
that
time.
A
So
the
sorry
yeah,
no
you're
right
the
second,
the
second
point
there.
So
if
I
were
to
let's
say
I
voted
on
this
and
then
changed
my
balance,
the
balance
would
then
reflect
my
current
balance,
not
the
balance
at
the
time
of
voting.
So
it's
not
a
snapshot
of
a
point
in
time.
It's
that
balance
signed
this
message
and
that
account
currently
has
this
amount
of
mkr,
which
may
deviate
from
what
was
actually
used
when
voting.
B
I
know
that
in
in
one
of
the
chats
somebody
I
believe
roone
was
who
asked
if
you
can
comment
on
governance
polls
and
kind
of.
I
know
that
I'm
kind
of
already
premeditating
the
answer,
because
I
know
you
can't
at
the
moment
is
there
plans
to
implement
that
and,
if
not
kind
of
yeah,
what's
the
status
of
that.
A
Yeah,
so
we
we
can
certainly
do
it
if
the
community
wants
to
have
that
as
a
capability
with
polls,
absolutely
the
it
can
be
extended
to
support
the
the
polls
in
the
same
way
that
we
do
it
for
executive
voting.
We
felt
that
executive
voting
was
more
important
to
have
that
understanding
and
validation
from
community
members
in
a
written
form
more
so
than
polling.
A
So
we
we
said,
let's
just
go
with
executives
for
now,
and
if
it
gains
traction,
if
people
like
it,
if
it
gets
used,
then
we
can
also
look
to
have
that
work
with
polling.
One
thing
I
will
say,
though,
is
that
this
polling
solution
does
have
in
some
way
a
limited
life
span.
If
we
see
the
snapshot
solution
take
off
and
in
talking
with
those
guys,
there
also
feels
like
there's
an
opportunity
for
comments
to
be
used
there
as
well.
So
again
in
an
off-chain
voting
solution.
B
Yeah
very
cool
yeah,
I
think,
and
to
kind
of
color
and
give
more
context
to
the
people
watching
the
call.
I
know
that
whenever
there's
like
a
vote,
even
a
contentious
vote
that
might
be
like
you
know,
50
50
off
yes
versus
no
or
something
like
that.
You
know
when
it
resolves.
No,
everybody
is
kind
of
sitting
there
scratching
their
head
asking.
Why
and
the
ability
to
actually
comment
as
a
voter
and
say
hey.
This
is
why
I
voted
no
is
like
obviously,
an
incredible
piece
of
feedback.
B
B
No,
you
know
so
having
that
information
is
just
another
piece
of
of
the
community's
ability
to
communicate
with
each
other
and
the
ability
for
voters
to
communicate
with
each
other
about
the
fundamental
reasoning
behind
their
votes,
and
we
would
think
that
you
know
voters
would
want
to
do
that
because,
ultimately,
everybody's
on
the
same
team,
everybody
wants
a
better
managed,
better
designed
protocol,
and
so
it's
in
everybody's
interest
to
kind
of
give
that
kind
of
feedback.
When
you
vote.
In
fact,
that
might
be
more
important
than
the
vote
itself
right.
B
Nice,
nice
yeah,
so
I'm
gonna
give
it
like,
maybe
like
another
five
six
minutes
for
people
to
to
ask
questions
and
stuff.
I
am
curious
about
a
few
things
myself,
so
I
know
that
there
was
a
site.
I
think
there
still
is
a
site
called
mkr
gov
dot
science
that
has
like
a
lot
more
analytics
about
like
the
on-chain
stuff
for
votes.
It
has
like
nice,
visualizations
and
graphs.
B
A
I
think
the
next
work
in
terms
of
just
the
levels
that
expectations
that
the
next
set
of
work,
we're
looking
at
at
doing,
is
working
on
the
liquidations,
2.0
yeah,
big,
big
chunk
of
work,
which
is
super
important
there.
There
were
a
number
of
nice
to
haves.
That
we
were
thinking
for
for
this
portal
was,
would
be
to
have
like
a
user
admin
page
where
it's
more
specific
to
you
and
your
engagement
in
governance
over
time.
A
So
you
know
how
have
you
speak
over
and
how
many
of
the
votes
that
you
voted
on
were
actually
went
in
the
way
of
the
way
the
protocol
went
so
how
you've
contributed
to
it,
and
then
nft
is
how
they
could
play
a
role.
So
there's
a
lot
of
opportunity
in
this
sort
of
customization
of
participation,
gathering
gaining
more
involvement
from
people
in
the
overall
process
which
we've
been
looking
at
as
well.
A
So
I'm
sure
the
the
mkr
gov
site
in
terms
of
the
way
analytics
are
used
there
to
represent
voting
participation
over
time
where
they
have
those
graphs,
which
is
quite
cool,
which
I've
I've
referenced.
Quite
a
lot
just
to
get
a
feel
to
sort
of
sentiment
has
been
quite
useful,
so
yeah
like
feedback
like
that,
where
we
can
incorporate
additional
capability,
it's
definitely
welcome.
I
haven't
put
it
on
the
roadmap
yet,
but
the
more
I
hear
about
it.
If
people
want
it,
then
that's
super
helpful.
B
Nice,
which
it
kind
of
leads
me
to
my
other
question,
if,
if
somebody
wanted
to
kind
of
help
your
team
work
on
the
governance
portal,
what's
the
method
for
them
to
reach
out
and
help?
Is
there
like
available
resources
for
something
like
that?
Like
I
know,
amy
and
community
development
do
grants
like?
Is
there
an
opportunity
for
somebody
to
say
hey
like
I
want
to
pick
up
your
work
while
you
guys
are,
are
prioritizing
like
with
liquidations
or
whatever
else
you
guys
might
be
prioritizing.
A
Yeah
yeah
good
question.
I
think
the
the
best
way
here
is
to
reach
out
to
amy
amy-
and
I
have
discussed
this
before
because
I
I
know
when
we've
got
some
big
chunks
of
work
like
the
liquidation
stuff
coming
down
the
track.
There
are
going
to
be
other
things
like
instant
access
modules,
perhaps
when
we
have
mip
17,
which
is
the
manual
implementation
of
debt
ceilings.
But
then
what
happens
after
that?
If
the
community
are
comfortable
with
that
implementation,
then
potentially
there's
an
opportunity
for
an
intern
access
module
which
you
could
access
through
this
site.
A
That
would
give
you
specific
parameter
capability
for
changes
in
the
system,
and
that
would
be
something
that
you
know.
We
could
provide
requirements
for
someone.
So
if
anyone's
interested
in
that
sort
of
level
of
work,
then
absolutely
reach
out
to
amy
on
that
and
amy,
and
I
will
will
gladly
sort
of
look
at
the
resources
and
availability
of
work
and
and
see
what
can
be
done
so.
B
A
Yeah,
I'm
probably
going
to
butcher
all
the
names.
So
I
don't
know
if
anyone
from
the
js
team
is
on
feel
free
to
to
to
shout
out
otherwise,
I'm
happy
to
add
to
the
forum
post
the
languages
that
are
used
and
the
systems
behind
how
we've
built
it.
Yes,
if
no
one
wants
to
jump,
jump
out
and
and
give
a
laundry
list,
I'm
happy
to
collate
that
and
put
it
into
the
forum
post.
B
Yeah.
Also,
generally
speaking,
if
because
I
know
that
you
are
definitely
a
busy
man
derek
also,
generally
speaking,
reach
out
to
derek
or
reach
out
yeah,
it's
amy
and
like
or
anybody
who's
here
on,
the
team
like
joshua,
I
know,
has
been
pretty
active
in
the
chat
for
this
call.
I'm
sure
that
literally
any
one
of
these
people
will
be
totally
totally
helpful
to
plug
you
in.
B
A
B
I'm
just
setting
up
myself
for
doing
a.
I
guess
for
the
last
15-20
minutes
of
the
call
we're
gonna
do
like
a
run-through
of
maker
relay
episode,
17,
which
was
released
by
tim,
anna
and
and
jerry
and
luis
last
night,
so
they
are
on
the
govcoms
working
group,
so
they're,
actually
a
team
of
people
in
the
dow
community
members
who
are
basically
putting
together
this
weekly
relay
newsletter
publication.
Whatever
you
want
to
call
it
there's
a
lot
of
synonyms
it
can
go
by
but
yeah.
B
A
B
B
A
B
B
B
A
B
B
Peace,
all
right
cool,
so
if
you
want
to
follow
along
for
the
next
like
15
minutes
about
maker
relay,
there
is
a
button
right.
Underneath
this,
like
maker
thing,
it's
a
little
green
call
to
action.
It's
like
glowing,
it
says,
make
a
relay.
If
you
click
on
it,
it
will
bring
you
to
the
forum
like
tag
section
for
make
a
relay,
and
it's
listed
by
latest
so
yeah.
B
B
That
might
not
be
english
speaking,
who
also
want
to
keep
updated
and
stay
yeah
just
stay
up
to
date
on
what's
happening
in
maker
dao,
so
cheers
cheers
to
luisa
on
that,
and
I
believe
yeah
chow
is
saying
in
the
chat
that
he's
working
on
portuguese
as
well,
which
is
exciting
all
right
cool.
So
let
me
share
my
screen
and
get
into
the
news
or
the
relay.
Rather,
I
feel
like
news
is
a
very
divisive
descriptor
of
publications.
B
It's
like
oh
news,
screw
that
stuff
all
right,
you
should
be
able
to
see
my
screen
now.
Actually,
I'm
gonna
try
to
make
it
a
little
bit
wider
for
you
guys
and
maybe
like
zoom
in
a
little
bit.
So
the
the
words
are
a
bit
more
legible
for
everybody,
okay,
cool,
so
yeah
props,
I
believe
to
anna.
I
haven't
really
gotten
an
understanding
of
who
makes
these
banners
for
the
episode
each
week,
but
this
one's
really
pretty
it's
red.
B
It's
my
favorite
color,
see
red,
or
does
that
look
like
orange
to
you
guys,
no
idea,
they're,
cousins,
orange
and
red
anyway
enough
of
me,
rambling
about
colors,
so
yeah,
hey
everybody!
Thanks
for
checking
out
the
maker
relay
yeah,
whether
you
hold
maker
or
die
own,
a
vault
want
to
get
more
involved.
This
is
the
one-stop
shop
for
updates.
So
definitely
bookmark.
B
This
maker
relay
link
right
here.
If
you
bookmark
this,
you
will
be
all
set.
I'm
put
that
in
chat,
so
you
can't
miss
it
all
right
and
so
yeah,
let's
go
on
so
the
first
section
of
the
maker
relay
typically
covers
votes,
which
is
really
great.
We
have
a
voter
onboarding
guide,
so
if
you're,
an
mkr
holder
and
you're
interested
in
voting
and
you're
kind
of
intimidated
and
you're
curious
on
how
to
do
that,
you
could
check
out
the
voter
onboarding
guide.
B
B
People
are
help
happy
to
to
help
help
you
get
set
up
so
yeah
monthly
governance
cycle.
There
is
so
we
are
actually
currently
in
week
three
of
the
october
governance
cycle,
and
so
we
had
a
yeah.
We
had
a
governance
poll,
monthly
governance
poll
that
bundles
all
the
mips.
This
is
here
so
in
last
week's
relay.
B
We
were
going
through
inclusion
polls
so
on
week.
Two
typically,
what
happens
is
each
individual
mip
that
is
formally
submitted
to
the
governance
cycle?
Each
individual
one
is
voted,
should
it
be
included
in
this
governance
poll
or
not,
and-
and
so
this
is,
that
bundled
governance
poll,
and
it
includes
all
of
these
mips.
I
actually
you
know
what
I
might
as
well
going
to
16
and
oh
no
sorry
we
are
in
16
or
no
we're
in
17.
So
let
me
actually
show
you
guys
what
these
are.
B
B
Mip
20
is
the
target
price
adjustment
module,
which
is
a
it's
an
iteration.
It's
an
improvement
on
the
old
trfm
idea,
which
is
the
target
rate
feedback
mechanism
idea,
but
basically
this
helps
governance
have
the
ability
to
do
negative
rates
on
die,
and
obviously
this
is
just
being
voted
in
as
some
functionality
to
the
protocol.
B
It's
not
actually
being
used,
yet
a
separate
vote
will
have
to
happen
for
for
this
tool
to
be
used,
but
nevertheless
it
gives
you
know
traders,
market
makers,
who
are
primarily
and
dye
markets,
the
security
that
the
peg
will
be
enforced,
and
I
think
that,
even
just
as
a
psychological
signal
having
this
tool
is
an
important
important
thing
to
the
ecosystem
and
so
mkr
voters
have
agreed.
I
believe
that
the
inclusion
poll
ran
through
yes
with
like
flying
colors
on
this,
so
it
was
really
cool.
B
They
always
go
to
the
forum
thread
that
has
all
the
details
on
all
of
them,
so
yeah
check
those
out
and
also,
I
believe,
the
this
week's
discussion
link
points
to
charles's
weekly
mips
update,
which
is
great
also.
I
just
realized
the
maker
relay
episode
and
the
up
mips
updates
are
actually
in
sync
17
and
17..
So
that's
that's
pretty
cool
anyway
yeah.
So
there's
a
number
of
proposals
in
the
request
for
comment
yeah.
So
sorry,
I'm
like
skipping
around,
so
I'm
not
going
to
go
through
all
the
other
ones.
B
If
you're
interested
just
check
them
out
yeah,
we
only
have
10
minutes,
so
I
kind
of
want
to
run
through
things
a
little
bit
quicker.
This
week
we
have
a
number
of
proposals
in
the
request
for
common
phase.
These
are
proposals
that
are
in
the
forums
they
haven't
been
formally
submitted
to
the
monthly
governance
cycle
or
even
weekly
governance
cycle,
but
they
are
still
in
discussion,
and
this
is
a
really
important
phase
for
any
mip
or
sub
proposal.
It
gives
the
community
mkr
voters
integrators
anybody
who's
a
stakeholder.
B
One
of
the
biggest
pieces
is
feedback,
so
if
you're
in
the
community-
and
you
know
you
don't
have
to
comment
on
all
of
these-
but
if
any
of
them
catch
your
eye,
definitely
go.
You
know,
spend
a
lunch
break
read
through.
One
of
these
proposals
add
some
thoughts.
They
are
extremely
extremely
valuable,
so
yeah,
and
also,
if
you're
on
the
maker
forum-
and
you
are
giving
feedback
you're
actually
earning
money,
because
we
have
a
source
credit
integration
on
the
forum
that
you
can
opt
into
and
actually
I
will.
B
Let
me
just
tag
the
whole
source
cred
tag
here,
yeah
so
check
that
out
yeah,
so
you
can
opt
in
and
actually
earn
die
for
contributions
on
the
forum
for
for
good
feedback
for
comments
that
earn
a
lot
of
likes
for
threads
that
lead
to
governance
actions.
There's
a
lot
of
really
interesting
stuff
there.
B
B
Debt
ceiling,
instant
access,
module,
operational
support,
domain
definition-
oh
yeah,
so
this
is
an
interesting
one.
I
wanted
to
highlight
this
because
amy
has
been
working
on
it
and
also
it's
the
emergence
of
a
new
type
of
domain
team
that
I
don't
think
many
people
have
talked
about
or
understood
in
the
past,
but
operational
support
is
going
to
be
a
really
huge
thing
for
after
the
foundation.
Finally,
dissolves
and
this
whole
thing
is
run
purely
by
elected
domain
teams,
so
operational
support.
B
It
helps
seed,
the
most
interested
and
most
passionate
and
the
most
talented
people
in
in
our
space
to
do
cool
around
maker,
so
definitely
check
check
out
this
mip
and
add
any
feedback.
Amy
amy
and
and
everybody
in
the
community
would
greatly
appreciate
it
sub
proposals.
So,
oh
yeah,
look
at
that.
There's
a
sub
proposal
for
source
credit
funding,
so
I
believe
they're
actually
about
to
be
seeking
funding
directly
from
the
protocol,
which
is
really
really
cool.
B
So
at
the
moment,
source
cred
was
funded
by
the
foundation
grants
through
the
foundation.
But
if
I
am
right
and
I'm
totally
assuming,
but
I
assume
that
this
yeah
it
would
come
from
the
maker
protocol-
that's
really
really
cool.
Actually
so
moving
on
yeah
facilitator
onboarding,
I
believe
that's
amy
calendar
exceptions.
Oh
this
is
an
important
one
to
note.
B
So
and
it's
it's
more
or
less
like
universal
I'd,
say,
but
that's
a
strong
word.
So
don't
take
my
word
for
it.
If
you
want
to
learn
more
about
mips
by
the
way,
if
you
go
through
the
relay
it'll
they'll
point
you
places,
so
you
could
definitely
go
check
out
all
the
different
mips
at
the
forum
and
yeah
yeah,
so
weekly
governance
cycle.
We
got
three
minutes.
So
I'm
gonna
run
through
this
a
little
bit
quicker
weekly
governance
cycle.
B
We
have
a
number
of
polls,
as
we
saw
in
in
derrick's
demo
today,
there's
a
proof
maker
representatives.
There's
a
poll
to
increase
the
surplus
buffer.
It's
actually
not
the
surplus
auction
buffer,
it's
just
the
surplus
buffer,
but
I
believe
that
the
forum
title
is
like
surplus
auction
buffer.
Oh
no,
they
changed
it
cool
yeah,
but
either
way
it's
gonna
be
if
this
goes
through.
It's
gonna
be
changed
from
two
million
to
four
million.
B
There's
a
lot
of
discussion
around
why
I
will
leave
it
to
you
guys
to
figure
figure
it
out.
Just
click
on
this
discussion
link
yeah.
These
are
just
oracle
stuff,
so
I'm
going
to
skip
over
it
number
of
community
green
light
polls.
These
are
all
based
on
the
applications
that
were
submitted
over
the
last
month,
so
go
check
those
out
and
vote.
B
These
are
so
the
maker
relay
actually
also
added
a
section
recently
about
the
votes
that
happened
last
week
that
actually
passed
or
failed.
Even
but
oh
no,
I
guess
this
is
oh
yeah
yeah!
No,
these
are
all
passed.
So
we
added
an
ethb
vault
type.
If
you
didn't
notice,
this
one
has
a
lower
collateralization
ratio
and
a
higher
stability
fee
and
we're
testing
out
this
idea
of
alternative
facilities
for
the
same
collateral
just
with
different
param
risk
parameters.
B
B
All
the
domain
teams
did
their
assessments,
including
risk
assessments,
smart
contract
assessments
and
oracle
assessments.
So
there's
a
ton
of
info
there
that
is
valuable
yeah.
So
these
are
the
smart
contract.
Oh
sorry,
this
is
these.
Are
the
domain
team
updates
there's
just
a
couple
that
were
worth
highlighting
this
week?
I'll
leave
it
to
you
guys
to
read,
but
this
was
covered
both
in
the
governance
call
on
thursday
and
also
yeah.
Just
these
are
the
quick
points
here.
So
I'll
leave
it
to
you
all
to
check
that
out.
B
Looking
for
somebody
to
work
for,
I
believe
I
think
that
the
grant
is
three
thousand
die
per
month
for
six
months.
It's
a
18
000
fellowship
grant.
If
you're
interested
in
such
a
research
grant
go
apply
because
it
is
available
yeah.
All
the
relevant
links
are
over
here,
so
check
those
out
yeah.
This
is
also
just
kind
of
current
events
so
make
representative
stuff.
B
This
has
to
do
with
the
real
world
asset
initiative
that
matthew
rabinowitz
has
been
pushing
along
with
success
capital,
if
I'm
not
mistaken,
there's
also
an
update
on
state
of
the
peg.
So
if
you're
curious
how
the
peg's
been
doing,
it's
been
pretty
much
flat
at
1.01
as
it's
been
for
like
the
last
month
or
so
right.
900
million
die
about
100
million
away
from
the
big
b,
which
is
exciting
the
big
1
billion.
But,
of
course
it's
been,
it's
been
pretty
flat
for
the
last
week.
B
B
So
you
can
check
this
link
out
I'll,
actually
post
it
in
the
chat,
because
I
think
it's
along
for
wisdom
would
greatly
appreciate
it.
If
you
are
interested
in
being
more
active,
if
you
have
like
outstanding
questions,
join
this,
it's
kind
of
like
office
hours
with
the
governance,
facilitator
and
and
long
for
wisdom
is,
without
a
doubt,
hands
down
one
of
the
most
helpful
people
and
one
of
the
smartest
and
most
proactive
community
members
at
maker
dao
so
go
check
it
out.