►
Description
For the 9th CULPS we have full-time GovAlpha contributor Payton Prose (@prose11), who’ll be talking about his candidacy for Governance Facilitator, which in turn implies that he will be talking about pretty much everything.
Facilitator Onboarding subproposal: https://forum.makerdao.com/t/mip41c4-sp12-govalpha-facilitator-onboarding/7994
Agenda:
https://forum.makerdao.com/t/core-unit-launch-pod-sessions-session-9-govalpha-core-unit/8124
Governance Forum:
https://forum.makerdao.com/
Disclaimer: These calls and the summaries are produced and hosted by MakerDAO community members. Content produced by the community are not the statements or views of the Maker Foundation.
A
B
B
B
So
for
those
who
don't
know
me,
like
I
said
my
name
is
peyton,
I
do
have
some
relevant
experience
in
the
governance
domain.
I
figured
might
be
good
to
tell
people
about
for
those
who
haven't
chatted
with
me
too
much
kind
of
at
the
top
of
the
list
I
suppose
was.
I
was
a
chief
of
staff
and
a
legislative
aide
out
in
colorado
from
colorado's
52nd
house
district
working
in
the
capitol
there
and
getting
kind
of
involved
in
governance.
B
I
was
a
political
science
major
in
in
college,
so
very
interested
in
in
the
realm
of
govern
governance,
and
I
do
have
some
managerial
experience
as
well.
So
I'm
used
to
kind
of
assigning
people
tasks
following
up
meeting
objectives.
That
sort
of
thing
all
all
good
stuff
when
it
comes
to
being
a
facilitator
maker
wise,
you
might
have
seen
a
few
of
the
mips
I've
written,
got
three
in
a
row
there,
47
48
and
49.
Those
are
the
multi-set
governance.
B
B
B
If
you're
looking
for
me
on
github
or
rocket
chat
or
the
maker
forums,
I'm
I'm
pros
11.
So
pretty
pretty
good
bet.
That's
me.
If
you're
here
in
a
maker
area
and
see
that
username
pop-up,
I
joined
the
maker
community
kind
of
later
on
in
in
2020
in
november
of
last
year,
and
I've
been
drinking
from
the
fire
hose
and
trying
to
get
as
involved
as
possible.
The
the
entire
time
really
found
my
way
to
several
little
echelons
of
of
maker
governance.
B
There
help
out
in
in
governance
communications,
in
addition
to
what
I
do
for
for
guf
coms
or
in
addition
to
what
I
do
for
gov.
Alpha
sorry
help
take
notes
snippets
for
the
gnr
meetings
a
lot
of
those
I
I
hope
right.
So
if
you
got
a
problem
with
that,
take
it
up
with
me,
I
guess,
but
in
general,
like
really
I'm
a
writer
by
trade,
so
kind
of
just
hopped
in
and
tried
to
help
writing
as
much
as
I
could
yeah.
B
B
So
what
I
would
really
like
to
kind
of
follow
in
a
lot
of
regards
to
that
with
long
for
wisdom's
footsteps,
as
I
think
he's
done,
a
a
really
fabulous
job
in
terms
of
establishing
dorms
and
and
and
enforcing
them,
on
on
the
forums
and
and
as
a
moderator
in
in
chat,
and
that
is
really
my
philosophy
is
trying
to
be
as
transparent
as
possible
about
what
what
is
acceptable,
what
expectations
are
and
holding
people
to
account.
For
that
definitely
recommend.
B
You
read
my
facilitator
commitment
if
you
haven't
spent
a
decent
amount
of
time.
Writing
that
together.
But
I
also
understand
no
one
wants
wants
to
read
essays.
So
if
you
haven't
read
it
in
full,
I
I
forgive
you
but
the
key
aspects.
I
wanted
to
pull
out
of
of
my
commitment
to
maker
governance.
Were
these
commitments
for
lack
of
a
better
word
to
accessibility,
neutrality
and
transparent
transparency?
B
B
However,
I
did
throw
that
second,
because
to
me,
I
I
really
see
us
as
the
front
lines
of
of
maintaining
accessibility
within
the
dow
kind
of
a
lot
of
different
directions.
I
can
go
with
that,
but
I
guess
the
the
simplest
is
to
say
like
we,
you
can't
be
a
decentralized
autonomous
organization
if,
if
you
don't
allow
people
to
join
with
ease
and
to
participate,
no
matter
where
they're
from
what
their
background
is
and
kind
of
what
what
their
opinions
are
like.
B
B
B
If
you
are
not
neutral,
you
really
are
are,
are
hindering
people's
ability
to
participate
right,
because,
if
you
are
putting
for
certain
views
that
you
personally
believe
in
and
therefore
as
a
representative
of
governance,
it
very
much
gives
the
impression
that
that
those
views
are
are
the
way
to
go.
And
anyone
who
doesn't
hold
those
views
isn't
welcome
to
participate.
B
So
obviously,
that
feeds
into
the
first
point
of
accessibility
pretty
well,
but
in
general,
I
see
neutrality
as
as
kind
of
being
supportive
of
the
governance
process
of
teaching
people,
how
they
can
do
things,
how
they
can
put
forth
their
ideas
and
not
taking
a
stance
on
on
those
ideas
within
themselves
other
than
you
know.
This
is
how
you
you
do
that
also
again,
with
would
long
have
a
lot
of
good
things
to
look
up
to
and
to
learn
from
there
in
terms
of
modeling.
B
The
way
they
are
because
if
people
don't
know
what's
behind
a
decision,
you
really
can't
expect
them
to
to
request
improvements
to
that.
You
really
can't
expect
them
to
monitor
how
how
that
process
is
going
if
they
really
don't
know
the
inputs
coming
into
it.
So
I
leaned
on
a
bit
of
a
cliche
regretting
it
perhaps
a
bit
now,
but
I
said
sunlight
remains
the
the
best
disinfectant.
B
You
know
leslie
knope
a
great
person
to
embody.
When
I
hear
what
I
hear,
what
I'm
being
yelled
at
is
people
caring
loudly
at
me,
so
bring
it
on.
If
you
got
it,
I
shared
a
link
to
the
presentation
in
in
the
chat
here.
It's
got
links
just
to
the
gov
alpha
mandate,
long
for
wisdoms
facilitator
application
in
case
you
wanted
to
compare
those
and
then,
of
course
mine,
but
other
than
that.
I'd
love
to
open
up
the
floor.
A
That's
actually
a
good
segue
for
my
one
of
the
few
questions
that
I
have
for
us,
which
is
you
mentioned
it
and
I
think
tim
did
it
as
well
in
the
in
the
forum
like
you're,
presenting
yourself
as
an
additional
facilitator
and
as
much
as
I
like
long.
I
think
that
facilitators
should
be
standing
on
their
own
right
without
being
additional
to
anyone
right.
So
that's
a
deal
with
my.
B
I
don't
have
the
that
necessarily
in
front
of
me,
but
I
guess
what
I
would
say
about
that
is.
Our
mandate
is
clear
that
we
would
like
to
have
three
governance
facilitators.
There's
there's
a
lot
of
really
good
reasons
for
this,
particularly
in
terms
of
redundancy
having
good
across
globe
coverage,
both
in
terms
of
time
and
and
representation
for
for
contributors
and
just
in
general,
as
kind
of
a
backstop
and
and
making
sure
people
are,
are
empowered
to
more
people
are
empowered
to
do
something.
B
Should
they
see
something
wrong
when
they're,
the
only
ones
around
so
perhaps
additional
was
was
maybe
not
the
best
way
to
put
it.
But
I
think
it
is
important
that,
like
I,
I
don't
see
myself
as,
as
you
know,
trying
to
be
a
a
second
long
as
much
as
really
adding
my
own
personality
and
and
my
own
commitment
into
that.
That
mandate
that
was
already
been
put
forward
and
approved
by
the
community.
C
A
D
B
Cryptocurrency,
in
particular
enables
is
this
ideal
to
shield
identity
without
without
losing
trust,
and
I
personally
see
that
as
something
that's
important
to
maintain
within
within
the
organization,
and
I
think
I
think
we're
used
to
like
identity
based
stress
systems.
So
it's
much
easier
for
us
to
trust
faces.
Perhaps,
but
I
I
would
challenge
that
I
think
like
it's.
B
You
run
into
the
same
things.
You
know
like
maybe
there's
more
work
involved
if
you
want
to
took
out
a
community
or
create
a
fake
identity
to
to
try
to
dupe
someone.
But
fundamentally
it
comes
down
to
like
what
you
can
contribute
toward
narrativization
and
and
like
how
you
let
your
actions
speak
for
yourself,
and
I
don't
see
much
of
a
difference
whether
you
put
a
face
to
to
yourself
or
not
in
that
regard.
A
A
D
I
I
have
I
I
didn't
make
it
and
I
hope
my
mic
is
okay,
because
I'm
using
my
headphones,
but
I
didn't
make
it
for
the
very
first
part
of
the
call.
But
I
was
curious
what
like,
assuming
that
you
do,
get
voted
in
as
a
facilitator.
What
would
be
like
the
division
of
labor
or
responsibility
between
yourself
and
long
for
wisdom
at
gov
alpha.
B
A
B
B
In
general,
though
I
have
been
pretty
much
since
I
came
into
the
dow,
I
was
asked
to
look
at
source
cred
and
have
been
participating
pretty
heavily
with
with
that
integration
and
figuring
out
how
to
improve
it
and
how
to
monitor
it
and
and
all
those
things.
So
I
definitely
see
that
going
forward
as
something
I'll
I'll,
probably
keep
taking
the
rings
on
and
because
yeah
I
enjoy
it.
I
find
it
interesting.
B
I've
got
good
community
connections
there
and
I
think
I
can
bring
value
in
that
as
it
relates
to
to
transparency
and
a
couple
of
my
other
goals.
I
I
also
think
like
I'll
be
taking
on
some
projects
got
one
in
the
works
for
for
kind
of
showing
what
we've
been
up
to
and
gov
alpha
with
with
the
forum
thread.
Those
would
be
kind
of
the
two
main
areas.
I
guess
I
could
say
I
look
to
see.
E
And
peyton
today
I
noticed
that
you,
you
have
some
expertise
when
it
comes
to
real
estate,
and
I
was
just
wondering
if
you
had
some
kind
of
background
or
you
know
you
just
seem
to
know
rwas
pretty
well
and
wanted
to
know
if
you
have
worked
in
this
space
before
but
yeah.
I'm
totally
for
you
know
having
you
onboarded.
So
no
criticisms
here
just
want
to
know.
If
you
had
some
kind
of
background
because
it
seems
like
you
pick
it
up,
pretty
quick,
which
is
which
is
cool.
B
Thanks,
I
appreciate
that
frank,
no,
no,
real
real
estate
experience.
Most
most
of
that
comes
from
just
engaging
with
with
seven
the
real
world
assets
committee.
I
attended
all
their
meetings
and
asked
a
lot
of
silly
questions,
but
I'm
I'm
a
pretty
quick
learner.
I
do
have
some
like
finance
experience.
B
I
guess
like
trading
options
and
investing
both
in
traditional
markets
and
crypto,
but
not
not
not
much
in
terms
of
real
estate
or
or
any
of
that
back
stuff,
but
as
a
bali,
size,
student
and
just
a
general
student
of
life,
I'm
very
into
reading
and
learning
as
much
as
I
can,
and
particularly
when
I
find
out
I'm
wrong
on
something
figuring
out.
Why
I'm
wrong
and
what
information
I
was
neglecting.
E
And
yeah
that
makes
sense,
and
when
it
comes
to
advocacy,
I
just
thought
of
something
like
how's
that
going
to
work.
Are
you
going
to
be
advocating
like
50
of
the
things
that
are
the
requirements
of
what's
being
asked
for
by
the
community
and
50
will
be
long?
I
mean
how's
that
going
to
work,
or
maybe
you
did
cover
it.
I
missed
it
because
I
joined
kind
of
late.
E
Yeah
yeah,
so
being
an
advocate
for
governance.
You
know
raising
community
governance
issues
right
with
the
community,
and
so
recently
we
had
the
you
know.
I
was
for
the
marcon's
core
unit
and
paper
was
against
it
like
like
how's,
that
gonna
work
like
how
do
you
guys
divide
it?
Maybe
somebody
did
ask
you
this.
I
feel
like
they
did
and
I
was
spaced
out
sorry.
B
B
Maybe
if
you
want
to
chime
in
long,
but
I
I
don't
know,
I
I
think
we
both
will
have
kind
of
the
freedom
to
speak,
we'll
be
coordinating
with
each
other
on
on
important
issues,
but
in
general
also,
I
think,
like
experience
is
important
like
if
you
want
to
imagine
like
50
50
sure
in
terms
of
like
ability
to
do
things
and
and
to
give
my
weight
of
opinion.
But
I
definitely
think
long
is
seeing
a
lot
more
within
community
governments
and
has
a
lot
more
to
drawn
with
that.
B
So,
particularly
for
for
tough
things
at
the
start,
I
might
be
deferring
to
him
more,
but
I,
I
suspect,
I'll
be
able
to
handle
things
just
just
as
well,
but
I
am
mindful,
I
guess,
I'm
a
pretty
self-reflective
person.
So
I
do
try
to
be
very
mindful
of
when
my
opinion
may
not
be
the
most
most
important
or
the
most
valid
in
the
room.
E
Oh,
and
can
you
kind
of
give
us
some
some
color
on
what
the
daily
activities
are
of
a
governance
facilitator?
I
would
imagine
you
already
have
spent
like
a
bunch
of
hours
per
day
with
long
and
the
rest
of
the
team.
So
can
you
give
us
a
little
color
like
what's
it
like?
Do
you
guys
have
meetings
on
mondays?
B
Yeah,
so
part
of
the
challenges
is
some
things
do
happen
on
on
a
recurring
basis.
Some
things
are
are
very
much
ad
hoc
right,
like
if
there's
a
governance
emergency,
you
can't
plan
for
that
to
be
on
a
monday,
but
we
we
do
have
a
pretty
robust
system
in
in
work
in
terms
of
like
required,
weekly
governance
actions,
for
instance
like
we
meet
as
a
core
unit
once
a
week
on
tuesdays.
B
Obviously,
every
week
we
have
polls
and
executives
going
online
going
online
or
on
chain.
I
guess
I
should
be
saying
so.
We
do
have
a
pretty
robust
coordination
effort
on
that
in
terms
of
what
needs
to
be
done,
wednesday,
thursday,
friday
and
monday
for
for
polls
as
well.
Obviously,
the
the
gnr
call
on
thursdays
is
a
pretty
key
commitment
to
it.
B
E
B
C
A
D
Hi
guys
yeah,
okay,
so
I
I
can
I
can
let
you
hear
my
accent
yeah
I
was
just
I
want
to.
I
wanted
to
ask
about
this
idea,
basically
of
scaling
the
core
units
with
more
facilitators,
as
opposed
to,
for
example,
creating
a
separate
core
unit
right
so
yeah.
I
wanted
to
ask
more
about
this
because
in
a
sense
these
are
two
different
type
of
scaling,
and
I
don't
know
if
one
is
better
than
the
other
or
if
you
consider
this,
what
in
some
details.
B
But
when
you
have
a
group
of
people
who
have
all
been
trusted
and
who
have
been
informed
about
their
goals
and
in
public
with
the
community,
when
you
give
them
the
the
chance
to
kind
of
collaborate
and
say
hey,
you
know,
is
this
all
right
like
what
needs
to
be
done
here?
I
think
you
you
reach
much
better
decisions
than
having
siloed
or
independent,
consistent
consensus,
consensus
mechanisms.
Sorry
words.
C
C
You
really
want,
like
the
situation
you
really
want
to
avoid,
is
having
like
multiple
government
facilitators
in
different
court
units,
saying
different
things
about
how
there
should
be
progress
right
so
having
them
in
the
same
unit
kind
of
well
personally,
I
think,
helps
mitigate
like
the
risk.
This
risk
right,
because
not
only
do
they
are
they
sort
of
gonna,
be
you
would
imagine,
they'd
be
working
closer
or
more
closely
together.
C
So,
given
that
managing
the
same
unit,
but
also
kind
of
critically,
they
share
like
a
budget
right,
and
this
kind
of
means
that
there
is
there
is
a
very
strict
cost
to
like
to
kind
of
this
facilitators.
Disagreeing
like
to
the
point
of,
like
you
know
to
the
point
of
like,
cannot,
can
also
reconcile
these
these
issues
in
that
like,
if
there's
a
202,
multisig
and
the
facilitators.
So
like
can't
agree,
then
nothing
can
happen
at
all
right.
C
So
there's
kind
of
like
a
backstop
there
in
that
like
in
order
for
any
progress
to
be
made,
the
facilitators
need
to
agree
and
that's
kind
of
not
true
if
you
have
like
separate
coins
with
their
own
budgets
like
there's,
essentially
no
there's
no
kind
of
like.
What's
the
word,
there's
kind
of
no
there's
no
like
mechanism
to
kind
of
like
force
the
facilitators
to
work
together,
essentially,
which
you
really
kind
of
want
it's
kind
of
incentive.
But
it's
not
it's
more
than
sort
of
an
incentive
right.
C
You
know
you
cannot
like
you,
you
can
get
to
a
point
where
you
there's
just
like
no
way
of
moving
forwards
and
because
there
is
that
risk,
you
have
to
kind
of
compromise
more
than
you
would.
If
you
had
your
like,
if
each
facility
had
their
own
resources
now,
I
think,
in
terms
of
cool
units,
generally,
it's
kind
of
a
little
bit
more
complicated,
because
you
know
some
cool
units
can
scale
kind
of
much
more
in
a
much
more
parallel
way.
Like
you
know,
you
can
have
like
a
risk
team
that
works
on.
C
You
know
one
set
of
things,
the
rest
in
the
works,
another
set
of
things,
there's
steam
that
works
on
the
third
awful
set
of
things
right,
and
they
don't
necessarily
have
to
interact
or
work
together.
For
that
to
be
for
that
to
be
scalable
and
good,
but
that's
kind
of
not
the
same
for
governance,
you
kind
of
really
want
there
to
be
kind
of
one.
I
guess
voice
right
coming
from
the
kind
of
officials
or
the
governor's
facilitators.
C
B
Yeah,
I
fully
stamped
that
just
especially
like
in
terms
of
like
again
back
to
I
love
swimming
to
this
philosophy
of
a
dao,
but
the
the
idea
that
the
community
is
really
in
charge
and
governance
helps
the
community
indicate
and
go
forth
with
their
decisions.
So
if
you
have
different
people
who
are
saying
different
things
to
to
the
community,
it
gets
very
confusing
like
who
do
you
listen
to
and
by
having
one
group
that
has
to
reach
consensus?
You
you
do
to
kind
of
solve
that
problem.