►
From YouTube: Meet Your Delegate | Ep.15 ft. Governance House
Description
Chapters:
0:00 Introduction
1:05 Governance House
8:29 Open Questions
⬇ About ⬇
Welcome to the 15th episode of Meet Your Delegate, where MKR holders and the broader community get to know their delegates.
For this episode, we will have Governance House presenting their platform and holding a Q&A session:
@GovernanceHouse - Recognized Delegate
@Patrick_J - Host
⬇ Resources ⬇
Governance House Platform - https://forum.makerdao.com/t/governance-house-delegate-platform/15191
Forum post - https://forum.makerdao.com/t/meet-your-delegate-15-governancehouse/15722
A
B
B
So
governance
house
has
been
created
this
year,
so
it's
a
fairly
new
organization.
However,
the
members
of
the
governance
house
has
been
in
web
3
for
some
time.
It
all
started.
I
would
say
you
know,
within
meta
governance
stuff
in
index
cop,
where
we've
been
discussing,
how
we
can
basically
improve
meta
governance,
not
just
for
index
scope
itself,
but
like
overall
for
the
ecosystem,
because
we
have
seen
a
lot
like
voter
appetite.
B
There
has
been
not
you
know,
much
participation
at
the
forums,
proposals
couldn't
be
executed
and
so
on,
and
there
was
many
things
happening
and
one
of
the
things
was
like.
You
know,
to
create
kind
of
independent
organization
where
contributors
from
various
dows,
which
are
interested
in
governance
and
also
have
knowledge
of
other
aspects
of
d5,
can
join
and
help,
basically,
the
ecosystem
to
grow,
and
that's
how
basically
governance
house
started
and,
as
I
mentioned,
like
the
organization
itself,
it's
a
cooperation
hub.
B
So
the
members
of
the
governance
house
participating
also
in
other
organizations,
dows
protocols
you
can
see
like,
I
would
say
the
major
here-
there
is
probably
a
few
more
and
we
are
expanding
on
that.
We
really
want
to
you,
know,
cover
all
aspects
of
defy
slash
web
3
to
have
the
knowledge
to
be
able
to
actually
like
make
informed
decisions
on
particular
proposals
and
also
to
be
able
to
maybe
create
our
own
proposals
such
as
some
optimizations
and
so
on.
B
B
This
is
our
core
values,
so
basic
on
this
core
values.
We
will
be
basing
our
areas
I
already
mentioned,
one,
which
is
openness.
We
really
want
to
be
collaborative.
We
don't
want
to.
You,
know,
hide
some
information
for
sake
of
having
some
advantages,
or
so
we
really
want
to
be
transparent,
share
knowledge
between
the
entities
and
within
the
ecosystem,
so
we
can
grow
as
an
industry.
B
We
also
believe
that
making
quick
decisions-
it's
not
always
the
best
idea,
especially
if
there
is
you
know
a
lot
of
funds
involved,
and
we
rather,
you
know,
check
like
what
makes
sense
what's
safe
and
how
we
can
proceed
the
best
way
for
the
community
for
the
holders
and
so
on.
Others,
like
trust
integrity.
B
You
know
it's
really
connected
to
the
transparency
itself,
like
informing
community
about
our
decisions,
why
we
are
doing
something
and
also
cooperation
within
governance
house,
where
we
also
accepting
only
contributors
where
we
can
trust
each
other
so
that
there
will
be
no
malicious
actor.
Basically,
so
that's
also
like
within
our
organization
itself.
You
know
being
doing
this.
B
That's
connected
to
the
you
know,
making
our
own
proposals
so
not
just
be
having
opinions
on
something
what
is
happening,
but
also,
if
we
see
gaps
or
if
we
see
like
that
and
specifically
here
for
a
maker,
there
can
be
something
how
we
can
improve,
how
we
can
expand,
maybe
the
market
for
dye
or
something
like
that
or
improve
organization
structure
whatever
it
can
be.
We
want
to
also
put
the
proposals
forward,
so
we
want
to
also
like
contribute
in
the
way
that,
like
we
can
help
out,
we
can
provide
resources.
B
B
That's
fine,
at
least
I
could
have.
You
know,
pause
a
little
bit,
so
you
know
this
is
how
we
want
to
help
make
your
ecosystem
like
we.
If
we
want
to
make
sure
that,
like
the
the
the
dye,
all
the
products
within
maker
is
expanding,
we
are
supporting
the
the
market
and
in
this,
in
the
same
time
we
are
also
defending
the
market
itself.
So
you
know
we
see,
like
both
sides,
kind
of
of
this
equation.
B
We
need
to
support
the
expansion,
but
we
also
need
to
protect
maker
from
any
governance,
attacks
exploits
and
so
on.
So
that's
that's
how
we
want
to
really
support
the
maker
ecosystem
and
you
know-
and
that's
probably
it
from
the
presentation
perspective.
So
I
hope
it
was
the
five
to
ten
minutes
as
promised,
and
now
we
can
get
into
the
questions.
But
before
that
matthew
or
joe,
do
you
want
to
add
something.
C
I'm
just
big
fans
of
dye
and
big
fans
of
d5,
and
all
of
us
here
are
very
passionate
about
the
space.
I
want
to
make
sure
we
can
help
out
any
way
we
can
to
keep
d5
running,
especially
with
this
crazy
market
going
on
right
now
and
this
cascain
liquidations
across
these
centralized
actors.
It's
never
been
more
important
for
crypto
to
have
d5
right
now
and
to
have
it
be
really
strong
and
had
the
whole
community
come
together.
So
really
happy
to
be
here.
Work
with
you
guys.
D
Yeah
very
well
covered
there,
our
print
car
and
joe.
So
I
just
like
to
echo
that
really
looking
forward
to
working
with
mike,
I
think
we've
done
a
bit
of
work
already
maker,
like
around
some
of
the
integrations
with
arbeit.
Now
the
arc
market
so
really
looking
forward
to
getting
d3m
plugged
in
there
in
the
future,
when
the
time's
right
and
just
really
looking
forward
to
working
with
the
community
and
yeah
doing
everything
we
can
to
help
and
drive
some
of
those
connections
and
integrations
across
d5.
So
looking
forward
to
it.
A
Thank
you
for
the
presentation.
I
think
you
were
well
within
the
time
limit.
So
that's
really
good.
I'm
just
going
to
open
the
floor
straight
up
to
questions.
I
can
see
there's
a
couple
of
questions
already
coming
through
in
the
chat
david.
Do
you
want
to
hop
on
the
mic
or
do
you
want
me
to
read
them
out.
F
B
So
I
can
answer
first
and
if
joe
and
or
matthew
want
to
add
something
so
from
like
what
we
know
and
I
already
kind
of
touch
upon
it
like
index
scoop,
it's
like
a
large
mkr
holder.
If
they
delegate
to
us,
we
don't
know
yet
there
is
some
technical
you
know
over,
which
needs
to
be
done
to
enable
the
delegation
itself.
Then
they
might
consider
delegating
to
us,
but
it
will
be
up
for
the
community
for
to
vote.
E
A
Oh
yeah,
so
there
was
a
question
in
the
chat
from
kianga
who's.
A
acre
invest
one
of
our
other
delegates
and
she's
asking.
If
you
could.
Let
us
know
your
backgrounds
in
the
space
and
what
you
would
be
spending
time
on
other
than
governance
house,
or
is
governance
house
kind
of
a
full-time
role
for
all
of
you
across
the
various
protocols.
C
Yeah,
I
spent
a
lot
of
time
consulting
in
a
space
right
now
with
bankless
consulting
it's
tokenomics
consultant,
I'm
also
a
d5
power
user.
I've
been
in
this
space
since
2016..
I
also
work
with
tokenomics
now:
building
tokenomics
models
from
scratch,
and
some
governance
work
with
voltage
finance
as
well
as
bankless.
D
I'll
follow
on
there,
so
I'm
matthew,
graham
I
joined
index
coup.
Basically
in
2020
I
led
the
finance
team
there
built
that
out
to
well
from
scratch
to
a
full
team.
I
also
contribute
at
llama
which
does
more
treasury
management
kind
of
flavor
across
a
number
of
different
partners
there
and
more
recently,
with
the
medic
government's,
become
more
actively
involved
in
the
harvard
ecosystem.
D
So
we
have
governance
houses
proposal
there
on
that
forum,
also
looking
to
set
itself
up
as
delegate
in
that
system
and
we've
been
contributing
in
our
ecosystem
for
for
quite
a
while,
basically
through
index
coupe,
but
now
more
recently,
under
the
governance
house
kind
of
banner,
so
yeah
here's
a
lot
of
d5.
So
it's
been,
it's
been
a
great,
so
always
continuing
learning.
I
love
that
about
d5
and
everything.
B
B
Second,
it's
bankrupt,
consulting
which
is
kind
of
connected,
because
I'm
specializing
on
governance
and
to
economics
on
kind
of
both
sides
and
then
I'm
also
part
of
git
coin.
So
there
I'm
helping
with
operations
and
governance.
So
lately
I
was
redesigning
their
forum
to
kind
of
support
the
discussion.
What
is
going
there,
because
I
think
bitcoin
is
a
really
good
example-
that
there
is
really
a
lot
of
discussion
on
the
forum.
A
G
Yeah,
I
can
hop
on
the
mic.
You
guys
it's
it's
tim
from
d,
black
loops
or
fbl
delegate.
I
just
wanted
to
sort
of
take
the
time
now
to
unpack
meta
governance
as
a
service.
There's
a
lot
of
people
who
mention
meta
governance-
it's
a
nice
buzzword,
but
I
think
the
actual
deliverables
of
what
it
is
are
kind
of
unclear.
So
maybe
you
guys
can
sort
of
unpack.
Who
is
the
customer?
Do
you
charge
what's
the
impact
it
provides?
I
give
a
little
bit
of
that
track.
B
D
Yeah
sure
thing
might
jump
in
there
all
right,
so
meta
governance
as
a
service
is
it's
a
new
term
that
we've
we've
coined.
So
I
think,
being
a
delegate
and
active
in
communities
like
voting
and
governance
is,
is
not
so
much
new.
I
think,
there's
a
number
of
players
in
the
space
to
do
it,
so
we
obviously
want
to
help
solve,
like
the
the
boat
apathy
problem
being
active
in
communities
bringing
opportunities
to
those
communities
so
where
we
differ,
which
is
where
media
government
service
really
kind
of
comes
into
the
fold.
D
D
So,
if
you
can
some
examples
of
it
is
we've
been
looking
at
supporting
some
of
the
listings
on
the
harvey
markets.
Some
applications
have
gone
through.
Are
they
grants
where
it's
people
there?
Some
communities
are
like
offering
a
pick
up
like
pay
for
some
of
the
resources
to
basically
cover
supporting
that
asset
listing
there.
D
H
Yeah
hi,
I
just
I
have
a
follow-up
on
that.
Thanks
tim
for
the
question,
because
I
I
I'm
still
not
sure
I'd
fully
grasp
the
concept
I
mean.
I
I've
been
thinking
about
and
and
others
in
the
space
have
used
the
term
meta
governance
and
how
how
I'm
thinking
about
it
is,
for
example,
from
maker's
perspective
right.
We
have
tokens,
you
may
hold
tokens
and
other
protocols
and
then
the
meta
governance
like
we
have
our
own
governance,
which
we're
all
here
doing
all
the
time.
H
But
then,
as
a
dao
us
participating
in
the
governance
of
another
protocol
because
we
hold
the
assets,
which
is
a
challenge.
We
don't
really
have
a
mechanism
in
place
right
now
to
monitor
and
form
a
view
and
decide
as
either
maker
holders
or
as
delegates,
perhaps
how
we
would
vote
tokens
on
other
platforms.
D
I
think
it
encompasses
everything.
You've
just
said
and
probably
goes
a
little
bit
further
okay.
So,
for
instance,
I
think
someone's
touched
on
already
it's
like
indus
coupe
has
dpi
there's
a
whole
heap
of
governance
tokens
inside
dpi,
so
index
coupe
is
very
active
in
voting
in
different
communities,
so
they
vote
with
their
index
token
on
a
snapshot
and
then,
if
that
quote,
gets
implemented
on
their
respective
community.
D
So
in
this
instance,
if
maker
was
like
index
food
and
has
like
lots
of
asset
holdings
where
it
could
use
to
vote
in
these
communities,
what
you
have
is
like
a
governance
process.
You
probably
have
to
figure
out
what
that
looks
like
with
your
next
coup.
It
is
using
snapshot
and
then
it
would
be
make
beholders
boating
would
be
the
comparison
there
and
then
because
there's
so
much
happening
in
this
space.
D
How
do
you
keep
on
top
of
what
just
what's
happening
in
maker,
but
all
these
other
communities
you're
going
to
vote
on
so
then
it
comes
to
a
question
of
how
can
you
take
high
context
and
knowledge
around
that
vote
and
then
basically
share
it
with
the
broader
community?
So
they
can
either
form
their
own
opinion
and
then
vote
accordingly,
or
do
you
then
elect
to
say
delegated
art
to
a
group
which
has
the
context
which
will
provide
the
updates
or
even
just
facilitate
that
as
a
process,
because
there's
one
there's
the
process.
D
The
actual
vote
goes
through.
There's
enabling
people
to
actually
vote
with
information,
because
otherwise
people
default
just
end
up
either
not
voting
or
vote
yes
and
then
there's
the
actual
execution
and
implementation
of
it.
So
at
index
code
governance
house
has
presented
a
proposed
letter
to
the
index
council
to
actually
run
the
snapshot,
provide
a
recommendation
and
discord
to
the
contributors
and
then
actually
implement
that
vote.
D
It
is
a
combination
and
you
can
probably
add
an
extra
flavor
to
that,
which
is
if,
throughout
our
network,
we
find
an
opportunity
to
integrate,
die
or
even
make
a
token.
We
will
bring
that
into
the
maker
community
and
present
that
so
there's
several
different
flavors
to
it,
but
holistically
it
spans.
Everything
you've
touched
on.
E
Oh
yeah,
I
could
repeat
it
and
also
add
a
little
bit
to
it.
So
I'm
curious,
who
is
the
most
knowledgeable
person
on
the
team
for
the
best
to
make
maker
exactly
like
how
knowledgeable
are
they?
How
long
have
you
been
following
and
all
of
that,
and
additionally,
is
there
anybody
any
like
sort
of
specialization
that
you
would
say
your
team
has
that
can
contribute
to
better
decision-making
overall
maker
now.
B
So
we
are
trying
to
have
like
four
every
particular
aspect
of
our
maker,
someone
who
will
understand
that,
so
we
can,
you
know,
vote
like
make
informed
decision
on
it.
If
we
don't
have
that
expert,
if
there
will
be
some
specific
topic
we
don't
know
about,
we
would
probably
abstain
from
voting.
So
just
to
maybe
summarize
it
like
us.
Three
should
like
combine.
Have
the
knowledge
to
vote
on,
unlike
majority
of
the
proposals,
each
of
us
has
different
expertise.
A
E
I
Thanks,
patrick
boy,
I'm
trying
to
figure
out
where
to
go
with
this,
because
I'm
thinking
about
this
governance
as
a
professional
organization
right-
and
you
know
if
I
thought
about
these
professional
organizations
being
spread
across-
I
don't
know,
let's
just
say
the
entire
governance
space
right.
You
have
serious
conflicts
of
interest
going
on
and
then
you
have
potential
lack
of
specialization
like
I
for
one
I
could
be
in
I
own
stuff
in
a
lot
of
different
things
and
I
potentially
can
participate
in
governance.
I
I
If
they're
communicating,
you
know
delegates
communicate
somewhat,
but
not
a
lot,
you
know.
How
am
I
going
to
do
that
when
I
have
to
deal
with
four
five,
eight
ten
people
in
an
organization
versus
having
a
single
point
person
who
may
be
knowledgeable
and
is
the
person
that
can
delineate
and
or
put
pass
out
information
to
the
organization?
And
how
is
that
going
to
work?
I
You
know
I,
I
guess,
I'm
blessing,
I'm
saying
I'm
going
to
have
a
hard
time,
seeing
like
a
us
representative
right,
like
in
the
legislature,
being
a
group
and
then
that
group
being
able
to
sit
in
european
legislature
or
chinese
legislature
or
whatever
and
then
having
to
deal
with
all
the
conflicts
of
interest
and
manage
all
these
different
things
in
ways
that
make
sense.
And
so
I'm
kind
of
curious
how
you
deal
with
that.
B
Yeah,
I
know
great
great
question
and
I
think
there
was
multiple
question
in
in
that,
so
I
will
start
with
the
first
one
with
the
point
person.
So
yes,
personally,
I
don't
believe
that
like
group
can
be
accountable.
So
that's
why
I
took
kind
of
the
spot,
like
of
being
like
a
point
person
and
accountable
for
everything
and
also
like.
If
someone
needs
to
communicate
to
governance
house
for
maker
things,
it
will
be
through
me
and
I
will
make
sure
that
whoever
needs
to
be
involved
will
be
involved.
B
B
So
that's
the
first
conflict
of
interest
and
like
confidentiality,
so
definitely
transparency.
It's
like
number
one.
So
we,
whenever
we
can,
we
don't
want
to
kind
of
you
know
we
want
to
share
knowledge
and
we
want
to
kind
of
make
sure
that
we
can
do
that
within
the
group
or
even
beyond,
like
to
support
the
the
default
ecosystem.
B
However,
I
understand
that
some
information
may
be
confidential
and
we
will
respect
that
so
whenever
maker
says
like
that,
there
will
be
like
there
is
a
confidential
information
which
cannot
go
beyond
maybe
myself
or
like
beyond.
The
internal
group,
like
you
know
who
is
involved
within
maker
and
governance
house
means,
maybe
me
joe
matthew.
B
We
will.
We
will
respect
that
and
we
will
make
sure
that
it
doesn't
go
beyond.
If
that's
what
maker
will
kind
of
instruct
us,
but
we
don't
want
to
hold
information
from
someone
or,
like
you
know,
not
be
transparent.
That's
not
something
what
we
want
to
do,
I'm
not
sure
if
I'm
answering
your
question,
but
I
hope
so.
B
Okay,
if
you
have
any
other
like
concerns
like
please
let
me
know
you
know,
we
want
to
make
sure
that
this
cooperation
would
work
so
so
there
if
there
needs
to
be
adjustments-
and
we
are
you-
know
newly
created
organization
with,
like
very
I
would
say,
ambitious
vision
and
to
grow
the
fico
system
and,
like
you
know,
we
want
to
learn
as
much
as
we
can
like
how
this
can
actually
operate.
So
we
are
rather
supportive
than
like
making
any
blockers
on
the
way.
A
Any
other
questions,
yeah
there's
been
a
few
questions
raised
in
the
chat,
so
I'm
going
to
try
and
summarize
them
into
kind
of
one
one
question.
So
the
question
is
regarding
how
your
decision
making
process
is
as
a
team?
Is
it
one
person
that
will
be
making
decisions?
Do
you
all
have
an
equal
say
and
similarly,
to
that,
what's
kind
of
the
structure
of
the
team
is?
Is
it
an
organization?
Is
it
a
dao?
Are
you
employees
of
governance
house?
Are
you
the
owners
of
governance
house?
How?
B
Yeah
so
currently,
and
this
might
evolve.
Currently,
there
is
a
basically
towards
maker.
I
will
be
the
responsible
person,
so
I
will
be
responsible
for
making
the
final
decisions
and,
like
you
know,
I
will
be
basically
joe.
I
met
you
and
david,
and
maybe
a
few
others
will
be
like
advising
on
that.
This
might
might
change
eventually
that
we
will
form
now
at
the
at
the
moment.
B
A
And
then
kind
of
a
logical
follow-up
question,
then
might
be.
I
know
tim
raised
this
in
the
chat
so
there's
occasions
at
maker,
where
we
need
people
to
vote
quickly.
So
that's
how
maker
works
is
how
any
any
governance
proposed
an
executive
vote.
If
there's
a
big
security
issue,
we
we
will
be
contacting
delegates
saying
we
need
you
to
vote
within
the
next
few
hours.
B
B
A
G
Yeah,
if
I
can
add
a
little
context,
mostly
like
obviously,
if
we're
thinking
long
enough
term,
this
will
sort
of
be
a
proxy
for
like
fiduciary
duties
right.
So,
if
you're
running
as
an
organization
there's
some
level
of
compliance
internally
right,
we
see
that
from
other
teams.
So
I
was
just
curious
if
you
guys
are
starting
with
one
trusted
actor
who's
running
like
a
one
of
n
multisig
or
if
you're
actually
just
doing
one
eoa.
B
Yeah,
so
I
I
think
this
is
something
what
we
need
to
discuss,
because
with
the
fast
like
decision
making,
as
you
just
mentioned
like,
I
will
be
the
one
deciding,
but
we
had
multisick
so
like
now.
I
see
the
paradox
in
it,
so
I
think
that's
something
what
we
need
to
discuss
internally,
how
we
can
execute
on
it
and
if
there
will
be
basically
just
like
you
know,
I
can
do
the
decisions
from
wallet
which
I
own.
A
B
So
the
legal
entity
timeline
as
it
has
not
been
decided,
what
type
of
legal
entity
we
will
be
using
or
if
it
will
be
tao,
and
you
know
for
maybe
in
multiple
jurisdiction.
I
cannot
really
like
give
you
any
concrete
answer
there
is.
There
is
no,
there
is
no
decision
made.
There
is
no
clear
roadmap
on
that
one,
okay,
yeah.
A
Yeah,
that's
great
yeah,
so,
as
we've
hit
our
time
now,
I'm
going
to
wrap
this
up.
So
thank
you,
bunker,
matthew
and
joe
for
coming
to
spend
half
an
hour
with
us
answering
a
lot
of
questions
there.
I
thought
that
was
a
really
interesting
discussion.
I
certainly
enjoyed
it
and
it
seemed
to
stimulate
a
lot
of
compensation
which
was
really
good.
So
what
will
happen?
A
Next
is
we'll
post
this
up
on
youtube,
and
I
will
be
in
touch
with
you
over
the
next
couple
of
days
to
get
you
live
as
a
recognized
delegate
on
the
on
the
voting
portal
and
you'll
then
be
able
to
share
that
address,
and
anyone
who
wishes
to
will
be
able
to
delegate
to
you
so
yeah.
So
welcome
welcome
to
maker
dao
and
I
look
forward
to
working
with
you
going
forwards.