►
From YouTube: Meet Your Delegate | Ep. 4 Ft. MakerMan
Description
Welcome the fourth episode of Meet Your Delegate, where MKR holders and the broader community get to know their delegates!
For this episode we will have delegate candidate @MakerMan presenting their platform and holding an AMA session.
Delegate Platform: https://forum.makerdao.com/t/makerman-delegate-platform/9891
MakerMan:
Forum - MakerMan
Chat - MakerMan
Email - DaiMakerMan@gmail.com
A
Make
her
down
all
right,
hello,
everyone
and
welcome
this.
Is
the
fourth
meet
your
delegate
meeting.
My
is
peyton.
I'm
pros
11,
one
of
the
two
governance
facilitators
here
at
maker
tao
long
for
wisdom
was
the
one
doing
the
other
delegate
meetings
so
we'll
try
to
keep
the
quality
just
as
good
on
this
one.
I'm
joined
today
by
makerman
who's
here
to
basically
give
his
platform
as
a
a
recognized
delegate
and
a
bunch
of
other
awesome
maker
people
who
might
have
questions
on
what
that
platform
consists
of.
A
B
But
for
me
the
basic
issue
was
kind
of
looking
at
the
system
from
all
the
stakeholders
point
of
view,
and
then
I'm
I'm
big
on
sustainable
and
scalable
systems.
So
I'm
really
big
on
sustainability.
So
if
you
do
something
you
want
it
to
last
into
the
future
and
not
just
be
a
flash
in
the
pan,
you
know
and
of
course,
with
maker
and
everything-
that's
online-
you
want
it
to
be
secure
right
and
then
my
other
big
thing
is
using
data
to
drive
goals.
B
B
That
kind
of
you
know
me
looking
at
stakeholders
and
stuff
I
mean
I
was
around
during
black
thursday
and
was
sitting
and
watching
going.
When
are
we
going
to
emergency
shut
down
the
system
as
we
were,
you
know,
throwing
out
zero
bid.
F,
you
know
and,
and
everybody
just
kind
of
you
know,
sat
and
then
after
even
as
the
event
was
going
on,
you
know
I'm
sitting
here
and
I'm
like
all
these
vault
holders
are
like
losing
f,
I
mean
for
nothing.
B
The
system
gets
nothing,
they
get
nothing
and
I
realized
there's
going
to
be
a
lot
of
pent
up
energy
on
this,
and
so
I
started
a
forum
thread.
You
know-
and
this
is
just
me
sort
of
thinking
about
the
system
from
lots
of
different
people.
You
know
not
just
the
people
working
the
system
and
you
know
doing
it
as
a
job,
but
the
die
holders,
the
vault
owners.
B
You
know
the
defy
ecosystem,
that's
using
the
die,
and
so
you
know
it's
kind
of
my
big
deal
and
then
it
seems
like
maker,
is
kind
of
using
me
as
an
advertisement,
because
you
know
we
made
a
billion.
I
mean
I
watch
maker,
go
from
150
million
down
to
under
100
million
on
black
thursday
and
then
eat
6
million
and
have
to
struggle
to
kind
of
recover
from
that.
B
And
then
here
we
are
like
you
know
what
a
year
and
a
half
two
years
later
year
and
a
half
and
we're
six
billion
in
pushing
you
know.
So
I
see
the
next
logical
step
as
a
trillion
and
the
real
question
is:
how
do
you
get
there,
because
I
do
the
analysis
on
this
and
it's
like
unless
crypto
becomes
100
trillion
maker?
Getting
you
know
one
to
five
percent.
You
know
of
it
has
like
one,
maybe
two
percent
of
ethereum
and
ten
percent
of
usdc
and
like
10
of
or
a
good.
B
You
know
close
to
10
percent
of
of
bitcoin
that
it's
like.
Where
do
you
get
it
from
and
then
how
do
you
do
this?
In
a
way?
That's
kind
of
secure
for
everybody
and
and
grows
the
ecosystem,
because
the
way
you
get
from
2.2
trillion
right
now,
which
is
pretty
much
all
crypto
I
mean
hardly
any
of
that's
real
world
assets-
is
to
bring
on
real
world
assets
and
other
stuff.
Somehow
we
have
to
grow
and
it
can't
just
be
by
organic
money.
B
Growth
pouring
into
crypto
that'd
be
great
for
everybody,
but
I
just
don't
see
that
as
the
real
path
forward
to
diversification,
portfolio
strategy,
you
know
and
my
big
ideas
and
I'm
I
I've
pushed
these
before
and
not
gotten.
A
lot
of
traction
is
that
you
know
I
looked
at
what
happened
with
dye
in
the
ecosystem
and
you
know
we
were
pushing
a
high
peg.
A
lot
of
people
were
arbitraging
that,
or
you
know
trading
that,
and
you
know
we
did
the
psms.
It's
like.
I
don't
know
different
people.
B
Credit
me
with
the
idea
with
psm,
because
I
was
one
that
suggested.
We
use
usdc
as
an
emergency
measure
to
back
die
during
black
thursday
because
we
had
nothing
else,
and
so
you
know
we
it's
it's
just
trying
to
look
forward
in
terms
of
how
we
do
things.
One
of
the
things
I
wanted
to
once
compound
came
online,
and
that
was
the
farming
was
the
reason
why
dye
peg
went
so
high.
B
I
was
kind
of
like
let's
raise
rates
and
throw
our
throw
some
of
our
dye
that
we're
getting
into
these
farming
solutions,
so
we
can
chew
on
the
return
chew
them
down,
but
everybody's
like
no.
We
got
a
mint,
more
die,
okay
and
I
think
we
should
compete
there.
I
I
think
we
should
do
a
maker,
our
reward
you
know
and
and
use
that
as
another
kind
of
vehicle
to
communicate
with
vault
holders
and
potentially
to
give
negative
rates.
Should
we
ever
need
it
in
the
future.
B
B
So
when,
with
maker
it's
always
been
a
struggle
maker
can
really
consume
time
and
I
hope
someday.
We
can
get
compensation
for
delegates.
You
know
people,
people
working
the
system
should
be
compensated
reasonably.
You
know,
and
this
system
really
requires
a
lot
of
headspace
and
power
and
difference
of
opinion
honestly
different
people
with
different
views,
different
backgrounds,
to
help
kind
of
grow,
the
system
to
that
one
trillion,
because
I
don't
see
really
any
other
way
that
we
can
get
kind
of.
I
wouldn't
say
a
world
bank
but
kind
of
a
world
currency.
B
That's
completely
transparent,
I
mean
maker,
is
completely
blockchain,
transparent
and
die,
isn't
it's.
It
represents
a
claim
on
collateral
and
there's
no
other
currency,
that's
kind
of
like
that.
I
mean
we
can
debate
it
and
discuss
it,
and
maybe
there
are
some
things
out
there.
But
when
you
look
at
the
landscape
of
the
world
of
countries
printing
their
currency-
and
you
know
what
is,
is
it
a
claim
on?
I
mean
dollars
used
to
be
backed
by
gold
and
silver.
B
B
And
and
I'd
like
to
be
a
part
of
it,
you
know
and
and
be
here
to
help
make
that
happen.
So
that's
kind
of
my
platform,
I'm
gonna
turn
it
over
for
questions
and
discussion,
but
that's
the
basic
deal
and
that's
where
I'm
coming
from,
and
I
hope
I
can
solicit
some
of
the
maker
players
out
there
to
put
some
weight
behind
me
so
that
I
can
have
some
weight
with
my
views
and
people
have
people
listen
and
maybe
get
some
things
done.
A
Excellent,
I
appreciate
you
giving
us
that
rundown
for
people
here
in
the
meeting.
I
have
posted
the
delegate
good
platform
for
getting
the
word
there.
Sorry
in
our
chat,
we'll
try
to
make
sure
that
gets
included
on
video
descriptions
and
forum
write-ups
as
well,
but
yeah
as
maker
man
said
we're
going
to
open
it
up
to
general
questions
here.
I've
got
a
list
of
ones
I
can
pull
from.
Should
there
be
a
lull,
but
I
definitely
want
to
open
it
up
to
the
people
attending
here.
First.
C
Go
ahead
and
start
us
with
a
question:
asap,
hey
makerman!
Thank
you
for
taking
the
time
to
do
this.
First
of
all
sure
I
really
like
what
you
have
to
say
about
keeping
an
eye
towards
both
the
microcosms
and
macrocosms
and
all
of
the
different
stakeholders
in
the
world
of
maker
dao,
and
I'm
curious
like
as
you
as
you
kind
of
look
at
this
top
level.
Are
there
any
areas
where
you
see
weaknesses
that
you're
particularly
concerned
about.
B
I
see
this
as
a
general
dow
thing
which
is
related
to
quality
of
work,
or
you
know
you
know
basically
people
contributing
to
the
dow
and
either
getting
compensated
too
much
or
too
little
right
and
and
how
that
can
burn
people
out
or
or
make
it
so
that
they
get
so
much.
They
can
just
walk
away
right.
It's
it's
like
how
do
you
make
a
dow
sustainable
right,
so
the
microcosm
of
the
dao
is
how
that
evolves.
It's
a
real
dynamic
space
right
now
and
people
are
approaching
it.
B
I
really
wanted
to
finish
my
work
rewards
and
a
thing,
because
I
have
a
completely
different
model
that
can
encompass
all
the
different
models
that
I
want
to
unveil,
but
I
just
I
have
not
had
time
to
do
it.
There's
too
many
things
going
on
in
my
life
to
throw
that
one
out,
and
then
I
threw
out
two
other
ones.
This
was
in
one
hive.
B
I
haven't
really
pulled
him
over,
because
maker
is
actually
uniquely
suited
to
this
is,
I
think,
dow
networks
is
kind
of
going
to
be
the
new
future,
which
is
where
one
dow
basically
cross
invests
into
another
dow
right
and
the
dows
are
actually
the
unsymbol
entity
that
can
really
band
together
in
groups.
I
mean
you
can't
just
make
a
website
and
a
token
I
mean
you
can
throw
a
lot
of
this
stuff
up,
but
you
can't
really
make
a
real
community
in
a
real
dynamic
ecosystem.
A
B
B
In
conjunction,
you
know,
that's
the
macrocosm
and
defy
and
then
even
the
greater
space
of
traditional
finance
right
and
then
the
microcosm
of
like
how
do
you
nurture
and
sustain
the
individuals
within
the
communities
in
terms
of
sort
of
right,
sustainable,
just
fair,
you
know
rewards
these
are
all
tricky
topics,
they're
all
very
deep
topics,
so
I
think
they're
all
important.
I
think
it's
a
it's
a
tough
space
and
I
hope
I
can
some
point.
B
B
That's
to
think
about
what
work
is,
and
once
you
wrap
your
head
around
that
or
understand
the
idea
you
can
get
the
rest
of
it
really
easily
and
I'm
kind
of
protecting
it
because
I
feel
like
it
has
value,
but
I
don't
know
how
to
reap
that
value,
and
I
also
want
to
finish
it.
You
know
so
because
I
think
it's
important
and
at
some
point
either
somebody's
going
to
find
it
or
I'm
going
to
reveal
it.
B
But
that's
you
know,
I
see
those
as
all
important
topics
and
that's
why
you
know
I
go
micro
to
macrocosm,
because
I
have
a
tendency.
It's
just
my
thing
that
I
I
you
can
look.
You
can
look
very
myopically
at
one
thing.
You
know
like
the
people
in
the
space
or
something
or
just
what
maker
does.
But
if
you
don't
look
at
what
makers
doing
in
d5
or
traditional
finance
in
terms
of
growing
you
kind
of
miss
you
miss
the
bigger
picture
and
maker
could
just
go
away.
B
If
you,
if
you
miss
these
pictures
or
if
you
don't
pay
attention
to
the
microcosm,
you
can
have
your
people
go
away
and
just
go
somewhere
else,
and
those
are
you
can't
have
that
we
want
to
maker
is
an
important
piece
of
this,
and
we
kind
of
want
to
keep
this
together
and
and
leverage
our
positives
and
diminish
our
negatives
so
that
we
can
become
the
major
player.
You
know
we're
already
one
of
the
major
players,
but
to
be
the
major
player
with
dye
in
the
space.
C
C
Like
you
know,
whenever
you
put
money
out
there
and
say
come
get
it
like
people
will
come
and
you
can
quickly
get
into
a
situation
where
you
have
a
lot
of
people
trying
to
make
really
low
effort
contributions,
and
I
thought
com
dev
did
a
really
good
job
of
sort
of
helping
either
just
you
know
say
no
to
those
or
help
people
find
places
where
they
could
create
value,
and
so
yeah
very
much.
Looking
forward
to
this,
this
new
scheme
that
you're
cooking
up
that
sounds
like.
B
Yeah,
I
know
I
I've
talked
about
it
and
everybody's
like
where
is
it
you
bastard
and
I'm
like
it's
sitting
on
this
sitting
in
my
computer
waiting
for
me
to
finish
the
math
and
do
the
edge
cases
and
make
sure
make
sure
that
what
I'm
going
to
present
is
going
to
work.
So
it's
been
30
years,
I'm
like
what's
more
one
more
year
I
mean
I've.
B
B
You
can
have
one
person
that
literally
can
just
be
so
anti
everything,
but
yet
they
think
they're
doing
the
right
thing.
So
they're
not
malicious,
but
they
just
totally
zap
together.
They
just
crush
the
energy
of
that
community
and-
and
those
are
real
hard
issues
like
when
to
know
that
you're,
just
not
being
a
positive
contributor
in
the
community
and
to
move
on
right.
B
It's
one
of
the
hardest
issues,
both
personally
as
well
as
for
a
community,
and
so
I
I
think
all
these
are
interesting
things
and,
and
I've
always
been
interested
in
the
space
and
and
I've
spent
a
lot
of
personal
time
traveling
to
just
see
what
other
people
were
doing
and
and
and
to
get
a
handle
on.
What
are
the
issues
by
actually
participating
materially,
and
it
was
one
of
the
reasons
why
I
came
to
makers.
B
I
just
I
thought
it
was
an
interesting
space
and
and
as
I
had
time
I
will
I
could
contribute
right
and
you
know
in
the
end,
you
really
want
it
to
become
something
material
so
that
you
can
spend
your
life
doing
something
that's
interesting
and
material
and
also
be
compensated
appropriately
for
it,
and
at
some
point
I
was
just
like
I'm
not
getting.
My
wife
was
just
you're,
not
getting
anything
from
maker,
you're
frustrated,
you
know,
you're
upset,
take
a
break,
you
know
I
mean
and
and
you're
not
being
with
us,
it's
like.
B
Why
are
you
doing
all
this
taking
time
from
us
and
getting
nothing
and
getting
frustrated?
And
so
I
see
all
these
issues
in
a
big
way
and
it's
not
a
it's
just
kind
of
was
my
real
space
and
you
know
so
at
some
point
I
got
burned
out
on
maker
and
took
a
break
and
kind
of
tried
to
do
some
other
things
and
got
some
ideas
by
doing
that.
So
it's
sometimes
it's
important
to
take
those
breaks
and
it's
important
for
a
dow
to
actually
make
room
so
that
people
can
have
that
space.
B
You
know
if
long
for
wisdom
gets
totally
beat
up
that
guy's
so
great.
I
want
him
to
have
three
months
off
or
be
able
to
do
that
right,
so
he
can
kind
of
recover
and
maybe
come
back
and
if
he's
gonna
go
somewhere
else
well,
then
we
have
a
model
where
other
people
can
step
up
and
he
can
move
on
right
and
they're
just
all
interesting
issues,
so
I
will
leave
it
there,
my
daughter,
what
are
you
doing.
A
Well
appreciate
you
making
time
to
share
these
thoughts
with
us.
I
haven't
seen
any
other
question.
Things
said
your
last
response,
flew
kind
of
close
to
something
that
was
on
our
our
sheet,
which
is
thinking
about
protocol
expenses
right.
You
know,
as
our
revenues
have
tipped
a
little
due
to
rates
cuts
and
and
a
few
other
factors
and
we're
on
boarding
more
and
more
core
units.
Obviously
our
expenses
are
quickly
catching
up
with
with
our
revenues.
A
B
No,
that's
actually
a
good
question,
because
I
mean
every
maker's
still
kind
of
new
and
it's
definitely
growing
massively.
You
know
one
of
the
big
things
that
I
was
pushing
for
for
a
long
time
was
a
kind
of
treasury.
You
know
I
wanted
to
pull
dye
out
of
the
surplus
and
just
set
it
aside,
both
as
a
secondary
surplus
as
a
contingency
for
the
primary
surplus.
So
you
know
the
next
time
we
had
to
eat
6
million.
B
We
could
pull
it
out
of
the
secondary
surplus
right
potentially,
but
then
also
to
have
that
secondary
surplus
or
treasury
or
whatever
you
want
to
call
it
be
the
thing
that's
there.
That,
basically,
is
the
is
the
expense
pad
right.
It's
the
money
that
you
have
that
when
you
make
contracts,
you
know
with
your
contractors
that
they
know
that
they're
basically
going
to
have
income
into
the
future.
You
know-
and
I
still
I
still
stand
behind
that
I
still
you
know.
B
B
I'm
willing
to
let
them
do
that
for
a
good
chunk
into
the
future,
because
there
might
be
a
point
here
where
we
gotta
go
rate
zero
and
then
we're
gonna
have
nothing
coming
in,
and
we
better
make
sure
that
we
got
a
way
to
pay
these
people
and,
in
the
end
the
reality
is.
I
kinda
wanna
segregate
bonuses
from
salaries
right
now.
The
way
the
setup
is
is
they're
coupled,
and
so
we
have
a
real
expense.
That's
huge
when
you
think
about
adding
maker
into
salaries
as
a
additional
salary
comp.
B
You
know
compensation
thing
and
like
when
you
look
at
those
numbers,
I
think
we're
very
close
to
kind
of
tipping
the
scale
here.
It's
like
what's
prioritized
the
key
people,
you
know
it's
ultimately
the
cus
that
I'm
going
to
want
to
have
manage
that
their
teams
and
how
and
dealing
with
the
money
and
inherently
it's
operations.
First,
I
mean
you
literally
got
to
have
people
out
people
around
who
are
watching
the
system.
You
don't
have
to
grow
when
you
don't
have
revenue,
because
it's
if
we're
sf0
growing
doesn't
mean
anything.
B
Unless
you
get
sf
on
that
right,
you
got
to
get
fees
and
otherwise
your
growth
means
just
time
and
productivity.
That's
eaten
for
nothing.
Now
you
could
go
well,
it's
future
growth
sure,
but
you
know
what
to
prioritize.
It's
like.
I
always
come
down
on
operations.
You
know
if
you
got
to
pull
in
you
pull
in
on
kind
of
the
growth
side
and
you
basically
make
sure
that
you're
flat
covered
one
way
or
another
by
hook
or
by
crook.
B
Even
if
we
have
to
sell
maker,
you
know
that
we
got
to
make
sure
our
operations
are
covered
and
things
are
secure
and
then
you
know
the
other
side.
Is
you
really
do
want
to
grow,
but
also
you
need
to
bank
that
surplus,
because
the
way
I
see
maker
runs
is
it
runs
hot
and
then
it
runs
cold,
and
so
somehow
you
got
to
figure
out
a
straight
line.
B
B
B
I
also
want
to
isolate
future
expenses
against
past,
because
there
are
people
who
are
asking
for
stuff
in
the
past,
like
let's
just
blanket
this
in
two
different
ways
versus
mixing
it
up,
and
then
I
really
want
to
isolate
what
do
we
need
and
die
as
a
salary
to
be
competitive,
and
then
I
want
maker
compensation
as
as
a
bonus
and
and
I've
been
working
on.
This
is
what
I
want
it
to
be
is
in
relation
to
the
amount
of
dye
the
protocol
earns
as
a
net
profit.
B
And
then
everybody's
gonna
ask
for
compensation
and
they'll
have
all
these
approved
packages.
Let's
say
that
totals
nine
grand
a
year
and
you
only
made
five
grand
a
maker.
Well
then
you
portion
out
five
grand
a
maker
into
the
nine
grand
or
request
so
that
way
it's
actually
sustainable
and
then,
when
you
bank
more
maker,
let's
say
the
ask
was
nine
for
compensation.
You
made
20k
you
bank,
that
maker.
So
then
you
can
kind
of
dole
it
out.
B
B
I
really
want
to
trust
the
cus,
I'm
really
big,
on
giving
people
authority
and
responsibility
and
seeing
if
they
can
manage
the
deal
and
then
looking
at
the
whole
cus
as
our
kind
of
secondary
bank
of
dye,
because
they're
going
to
build
reserves
for
to
manage
their
people
into
the
future.
That's
all
I
got
there.
A
B
Oh,
that's
a
good
one,
so
I
actually
have
in
my
delegate
platform.
Let
me
find
it
and
read
it
because
it
was
kind
of
a
it's
an
important
point.
What
did
I
say
something
like
yeah
without
compensation
at
levels?
Above
my
current
employee,
my
ability
to
work
will
be
limited
to
what
is
strictly
necessary
to
steward
steward
over
the
maker
system.
B
B
Wealthy
I'd
be
here,
and
I
would
just
manage
my
time
according
to
whatever
my
time
goes
into,
but
I
have
to
think
about
it
in
terms
of
my
salary.
So
for
me
it's,
like
you,
know
tim.
We
were
talking
a
little
bit
with
the
in
our
you
know.
Private
chat.
I
like
this
idea
that
you
know
a
delegate
kind
of
is
a
part-time
job
that
really
the
real
demand
shouldn't
be
more
than
a
couple
days
a
week
and
I
think
there's
a
number
of
us
delegates.
A
B
B
I
really
spend
a
lot
of
time
on
stuff
that
I
want
to
finish,
but
I'm
just
like
son
of
a
this
is
going
to
be
a
full-time
job
and
I'm
not
going
to
get
a
full-time
anything
out
of
it,
and
so
it
just
makes
me
it
it.
It
leaves
me
in
a
tough
place
because
I
really
want
to
do
more,
but
then
I'm
just
like
oh
the
hell
with
that.
I
don't
want
to
burn
out
and
I
really
want
to
be
compensated
in
an
appropriate
level.
B
If
I
do
that
kind
of
stuff-
and
I
just
don't
know
how
to
handle
it,
because
I
don't
want
to
be
a
delegate
who
goes
to
a
cu
and
says
I'm
not
accepting
your
plan
because
I
think
there's
a
better
one.
I've
done
this
in
the
past
and
then
they're
like
well,
then
reveal
your
better
plan.
My
friend,
you
know,
and
I'm
like
you
want
me
to
put
in
another
40
hours
to
do
your
job.
I
mean
you
know
and
that's
a
real
hard
place
and
a
real
hard
thing
to
deal
with,
and
I.
B
D
B
Us
was
cheap,
you
know
and
he's
right
and
then
basically
for
leading
the
committee,
you
know
and
compensation
it's
like
yeah
120
hours
and
50
an
hour.
It's
like
all
of
those
were
way
more
than
that,
but
you
know
like
I
said:
I've
done
a
lot
of
free
time
in
a
lot
of
places
just
to
try
and
help
things
be
better,
and
so
I
kind
of
look
at
that
view,
but
you
know
there.
B
B
D
A
B
C
I
can
throw
out
a
question
yeah.
I
say
I
ask
everybody
else,
I'm
curious
to
get
your
thoughts
on
delegation.
So,
like
I
keep
thinking
about
that
story,
I
was
heard
in
grade
school.
I
don't
know
if
it's
true
or
not
that
george
washington
said
something
about
had
some
warning
about
against
political
parties
and
and
all
of
that-
and
I
keep
thinking
about
that
with
the
launch
of
delegation,
and
so
I
guess
I'm
curious.
Do
you
have
any
concerns
about
the
implementation
of
delegation?
B
You
can
see
the
reasons
for
it
right
for,
in
terms
of
like
how
voting
works,
right
and
and
that's
kind
of
what
leads
to
party
formation
right
is.
How
do
you
actually
get
governance
things
to
pass,
and
so
you
know,
ideally
our.
I
had
an
idea
a
long
time
ago,
sort
of
creating
a
different
system
where
basically
there
was
parties
were
not
allowed.
B
Inherently
that
you
had
to
stand
on
your
own
platform
as
a
person
right
and
then
all
you
had
to
do
was
get
enough
support
to
be
able
to
be
considered
as
a
delegate
or
for
a
political
position
right,
and
if
you
got
that
sufficient
support,
you
basically
were
in,
and
so
inherently
it
didn't
matter.
What
mattered
more
was
what
your
platform
was
versus,
whether
you
were
going
to
gang
up
with
a
whole
bunch
of
people
and
have
a
political
power.
B
I
mean
in
one
hive,
there's
a
swarm
idea
that
anybody
can
kind
of
do
anything
and
that's
powerful
in
some
ways,
but
it
also
has
its
own
issues
and
in
maker
you
know
delegates
I
think,
are
there
to
tap
on
the
breaks
and
to
be
the
responsible
system,
quality
assurance
right.
It's
not
our
job
necessarily
to
make
the
case
to
sell
something.
That's
a
facilitator's
job
or
a
stakeholder
who
has
an
interest
in
that
weak.
B
A
delegate
can
do
that
and
there's
a
number
of
delegates
that
are
kind
of
also
in
the
cus
right
and-
and
I
wonder
about
that,
whether
it
has
its
own
conflicts
of
interest,
but
right
now
I
don't
see
issues
with
it,
but
I
just
think
these
are
interesting
ideas
to
think
about
in
terms
of
parties.
I
got
god,
I
hope
we
don't
have
make
or
delegate
parties.
You
know
like
the
r's
and
the
d's.
I
just
that
will
sadden
me.
Yeah
I'll,
be
an
independent.
I
think
and
that's
the
way
I've
always
been.
B
I
might
have
a
view
and
a
lot
of
information.
It
might
look
like
a
belief
you
throw
enough
data
and
arguments
at
me.
I
can
totally
change
that
view
and
I
think
that's
what's
sorely
lacking
in
politics
and
in
general,
is
people
who
have
a
backbone
can
actually
look
at
data,
stand
up
with
real,
tangible
logical
arguments,
but
also
be
willing
to
change
in
the
face
of
new
data
and
better
arguments
straight
up.
A
B
I
hope
you
guys
will
delegate
some
maker
to
me.
You
know
the
few
that
are
actually
here.
You
know
spread
the
word,
and
this
is
a
good.
This
is
a
good.
You
know.
I
have
my
own
video
now,
thank
you
peyton
and
baker.
You
know
so
that
people
can
actually
look
at
and
listen
to
me
and
and
my
platform
and
decide
whether
they
want
to
delegate
maker
to
me-
and
I
hope
you
do
and
to
that
end
like
if
I
can
see
what's
coming
up.
I
keep
thinking
about
this
delegate
thing.
B
It's
like
what
I
really
want
to
do
is
kind
of
post
my
thoughts
on
votes
before
they
come
up
so
that
if
anybody
that's
delegating
to
me,
you
know
in
my
delegate
thread
they
can
kind
of
make
an
argument.
Give
data
right,
if,
if
they
think
of
you,
needs
to
be
changed
and
I'm
sure
we'll
do
that
in
threads.
A
B
Okay,
well,
it's
in
my
platform,
so
there's
different
ways
to
get
a
hold
of
me
is
in
rocket
chat,
a
maker
man
in
the
forum
I
make
her
man
and
then
I
had
because
I
couldn't
get
maker
man
on
email.
I
have
die
maker
man
dai
right,
double
pun
right
and
you
know
so
it's
in
the
forums
it's
in
rocket
chat
or
by
email.
So.
A
Excellent
well,
thanks
again-
and
I
appreciate
everyone
attending
that'll-
probably
close
us
out
here
and
yeah
by
the
time
you're
watching
this
on
the
youtubes
make
your
man's
delegate
platform
should
be
live
on
our
voting
portal.
So
if
you
wish
to
delegate
some
of
your
mkr
to
do
that,
it
should
be
easygoing
for
you
thanks
again
for
attending,
and
I
hope
everyone
has
a
great
rest
of
the
day.