►
Description
*Decentralized Voter Committee*
February 28th, 2023
*Description*
_The Decentralized Voter Committee (DVC) call is an ongoing series of open meetings where various elements of the Pregame and Endgame phases, Maker Constitution, and future direction of the DAO are clarified and discussed._
*Agenda and Timestamps*
0:00 Intro
2:43 MIP105: The Real-World Asset Collateral Scope Framework
9:45 MIP106: The Ecosystem Scope Framework
14:02 MIP113: The Arbitration Scope Framework
19:51 MIP104: The Decentralized Collateral Scope Framework
24:13 MIP102c2-SP1: MIP Amendment Subproposals
36:59 MIP106: The Ecosystem Scope Framework
49:02 MIP104: The Decentralized Collateral Scope Framework
*Links*
MIP105: The Real-World Asset Collateral Scope Framework https://forum.makerdao.com/t/mip105-the-real-world-asset-collateral-scope-framework/19688
MIP106: The Ecosystem Scope Framework https://forum.makerdao.com/t/mip106-the-ecosystem-scope-framework/19691
MIP113: The Arbitration Scope Framework https://forum.makerdao.com/t/mip113-the-arbitration-scope-framework/19700
MIP104: The Decentralized Collateral Scope Framework https://forum.makerdao.com/t/mip104-the-decentralized-collateral-scope-framework/19685
MIP102c2-SP1: MIP Amendment Subproposals https://forum.makerdao.com/t/mip102c2-sp1-mip-amendment-subproposals/19703
*Disclaimer*
_This communication is provided for information purposes only. The views and opinions expressed in this meeting are those of people involved and do not reflect the official policy or position of MakerDAO or any of its contributors, Core Units, or affiliates. This communication makes no representations about the enduring accuracy of the information or its appropriateness for a given situation. This content is provided for informational purposes only and should not be relied upon as legal, business, investment, financial, or tax advice. You should consult your own advisers as to those matters. References to any digital assets and the use of finance-related terminology are for illustrative purposes only and do not constitute any recommendation for any action or an offer to provide investment, financial, or other advisory services._
https://mips.makerdao.com
https://forum.makerdao.com
https://chat.makerdao.com
A
Welcome
everyone
to
DVC
call
number
one
of
the
week.
It's
February
28th,
the
second
to
last
chance
before
the
freeze
deadline
for
the
Constitution
and
Frameworks
that
are
looking
to
enter
the
March
cycle.
As
always,
we're
joined
by
room
to
lead.
The
discussion
today
I
believe
we're
diving
into
the
ecosystem,
scope,
I'm,
not
sure
if
we're
starting
with
that,
but
the
floor
resources
are
in.
Please
take
it
away.
B
So
it's
not
all
done
yet.
There's
still
a
few
things
that
that
needs
to
be
done
in
the
documents
that
will
be
done
tonight
and
then
tomorrow,
Frozen
period
begins.
What
is
it
I
think
one
out?
Well,
I!
Guess
it's
midnight
UTC
tomorrow,
right
so
slightly
or
slightly
later
here.
Actually
indoor
and
yeah
I
mean
if
it
comes
to
it,
I'll
have
to
sit
up.
B
You
know
all
the
way
until
the
last
second
and
try
to
optimize
the
pieces
that
still
aren't
totally
clear,
but
in
the
end
I
mean
the
approach
of
the
documents.
Now
is
really
just
that
it
just
needs
to
work
for
April
and
then
basically
and
I
still
need
to
make
this
right,
but
I'm
going
to
immediately
during
in
this
RFC
window,
going
to
submit
another
made
the
102
sub
proposal.
B
Yeah,
so
with
that
I
guess,
I
will
I
will
share
my
screen
and
go
to
The
Forum
and
then
just
like
go
through
the
different
bits
and
pieces
of
final
edits
and
stuff.
That
still
needs
to
be
done
right.
So
first,
we
just
have
the
this
is
actually
not
really
a
like
I
just
want
to
show
it,
but
I've
updated
the
real
estate
framework
to
be
in
line
with
the
stability
and
liquidity
scope,
which
so
stability
liquidity.
B
We
did
go
through
that
quite
a
while
ago,
but
I
want
to
show
like
how
I've
implemented
these
Alm
tiers
in
here
in
6.3,
because
that's
pretty.
This
is
pretty
significant,
that
we
have
these
definitions
of
of
the
the
allocations
right
of
so-called
yield
collateral,
because
this
gives
us
you
know
a
directly
kind
of
like
I
mean
yeah
a
formula
that
can
be
directly
calculated
like
immediately
to
figure
out
exactly
how
much,
how
many
assets
can
we
out
calculate
like?
B
After,
like
all
fees
and
everything
is
applied,
which
is
a
massive
amount
of
money,
right,
yeah,
4.3
percent
of
2
billion-
that
is
something
like
86
million
in
additional
Surplus,
so
that
is
really
I
mean
more
than
anything
else.
This
is
just
like.
This
is
the
thing
that
will
have
an
immediate
massive
impact,
because
it
will
just
give
us
so
much
money
right,
we'll
cover
you
will
not
just
cover
the
budgets.
B
It
will
take
us
into
significant
having
a
significant
Surplus
and
be
able
to
begin
accumulating,
MPR
liquidity,
tokens
and
all
of
it
good
stuff.
So
I'll
just
walk
through
like
how
they
think
you
know
so.
There's
this
and
I
don't
know.
Maybe
we'll
find
some
better
way
to
describe
this.
Let's
say
to
not
have
to
repeat
this:
I
usually
called
split,
but
I
think
that's
a
little
I
just
like
it's
better
to
just
make
up
some
totally
made
up
words,
so
it's
clear
what
we're
talking
about
typical.
B
Right
is
you'll,
have
the
different
protectors
and
then
you'll
look
at
what
kind
of
yields
they
give
and
what
kind
of
risk
they
they
are
exposed
to
and
how
much
Junior
Capital
they
have,
and
then
this
model
or
sort
of
routinely
rebalance
between
the
different
ones
and
move
from
the
bad
ones
to
the
good
ones,
basically,
but
also
be
sort
of
biased
towards
diversification
in
general.
But
then,
during
the
the
pregame
we
just
fixed
at
the
evenly
split
between
the
particular
devices.
So
it's
50
50
right.
So
it's
so.
B
That
means
this
protector
advisor
Reserve
allegation
is
50,
and
then
you
go
down
here
and
you
can
calculate
so
if
you
want
to
calculate
Alm
tier
one,
which
is
like
everything
that
could
go
under
a
protect
your
advisor
right.
This
is
all
like.
This
is
the
like
all
the
yo
collateral,
because
the
yo
collateral
makes
up
80.
B
So
that's
40
percent,
which,
at
the
current
dice
of
light,
gives
us
something
like
yeah,
2
billion,
actually
I
think
40
of
5
billion
yeah.
Well,
someone
had
like
that
right,
but
and
then
you,
you
say:
minus
everything
that's
already
allocated.
Basically,
so
this
is
just
like
I
mean
what's.
This
is
just
like
the
debt
ceiling
concept
right
that
whatever's
like
if
you're
allowed
to
allocate
500
million,
total
and
you've
already
allocated
400
million.
Then
there's
100
million
left
for
you
right
and
then
the
final
piece
is
like
all
this
thing.
B
All
this
stuff
called
the
protocol
allocation.
So,
basically,
when
the
protocol
itself
has
like
allocation
outside
of
these
of
these
protector
advices,
then
it
just
sort
of
split
across
the
protected
devices.
So
then
you
take
it
whatever
the
protocol
is
directly
exposed
to
and
then
times
the
the
relative
allocation
and
basically
the
product
allocation
is
right.
B
Now
makes
up
two
things:
it's
the
Legacy
Rebel
assets
and
then
it's
the
variable
rate
Cobalts
and
it,
and
when
you
calculate
this,
you
end
up
with
something
like
that
right
now,
monticellulars
can
still
allocate
750
million
to
money.
Market
funds
and
block
tower
will
be
able
to
allocate
1.25
billion
to
my
refunds
for
a
total
of
two
billion
and
very
large
income
to
us.
B
So
that's
great,
that's
the
really
the
most
important
thing
to
get
right,
so
we
can
execute
on
that
as
far
as
I'm
concerned
and
then
we'll
move
to
the
I'll.
Just
copy
I
should
remove
the
ecosystem
scope
a
little
bit
of
that
budget.
Sarah
right.
So
we
were,
we've
been
talking
about
this
a
lot
now,
it's
actually
in
there.
B
B
B
So
right
now
we
got,
we
got
Phoenix
laps
is
in
there.
Then
we've
got
Viridian
which
covers
monetalis
and
then
actually
so
one
of
the
things
I
need
to
add
is
language
that
basically
connects
the
ratification
of
Viridian
with
manitalis
s
like
with
beryllium
as
a
as
a
as
an
onboarded
protector
advisor
team.
B
B
Basically,
like
they'll
use
the
ability
to
control
the
money,
that's
provided
to
them
down
here
and
then
they'll
use
that
to
pay
them
out
up
here,
but
with
a
kind
of
I
mean
with
with
some
checks
and
balances
in
in
case
in
in
most
of
the
cases,
obviously,
depending
on
how
it's
defined
here,
yeah
but,
for
instance,
like
the
Phoenix
Labs.
Lump
sum
payout
doesn't
happen
until
they
actually
pass
this
governance
poll.
That's
going
to
happen
because
of
this
stuff
up
here
and
same
goes
for
yeah.
There's.
B
Okay,
so
we're
talking
there's
a
question
from
what's
the
difference
between
these
budgets
and
CU
budgets.
So
the
difference
is
basically
that
CU
budgets
become
this
sort
of
interim
transition
measure
that
can
they
continue
to
be
in
effect,
but
they
cannot
be
renewed,
so
they've
run
out
and
eventually
all
the
CU
budgets
will
run
out
and
then
the
mips
are
defined
as
once
the
once
all
the
budgets
of
the
Korean.
We
have
to
run
out
the
coordinate
Maps
just
get
deleted.
B
So
basically,
the
core
units
are
some
kind
of
like
interim
measure
that
we
keep
using
when
when
we
can
and
then
when
it
runs
out,
we
transition
it
over
to
the
scope,
Frameworks
and
that's
actually
kind
of
what
you
can
see
in
action
down
here
also
so
so.
This
is
like
where
this
is
a
new
place,
where
this
sort
of
in
some
sense,
this
article
here
is
taking
over
the
function
of
the
of
the
coordinate,
mips
and.
B
You
know
the
the
the
end
game,
the
mega,
Constitution
mipset
will
sort
of
reject.
You
know
a
budget
updates
for
this
cycle
right,
so
instead
they're
added
in
here
and
then
their
budget
is
just
put
in
here
and
then
as
long
as
I
mean
you
basically
for
this
stuff
to
work.
All
you
actually
need
is
you
need
an
ethereum
address
and
you
need
some
numbers
and
then
you
actually
you've
got
enough
information
to
like
do
the
payouts,
so
it's
very
efficient
in
essence
right.
B
It's
really
just
need
to
be
need
to
be
explained
that
when
it
says
when
it's
in
the
map,
then
we
need
to
to
do
what
it
says.
Basically
and
then
this
is
how
we
can
record
these
really
important
things,
but
later
on,
of
course,
sort
of
optimize
the
access
to
iteration
and
just
streamline
it
more.
But
it's
sort
of
the
power
of
of
what
we've
built
with
the
governance
framework
in
the
maps.
B
Then
this
thing
down
here
is
like
the
thing
that
this
is
replaces.
Let
me
see
if
it's
a
like
so
right
now
in
all
the
scope,
Frameworks
there's
this
thing
down
here
called
you
know
these
components
related
to
responsible,
facilitator
stuff,
and
so
that's
going
to
get
deleted.
All
of
that
by
the
time.
B
I
think
maybe
even
now,
maybe
perhaps
this
one
will
stay,
but
these
two
will
be
deleted
and
then,
instead,
the
list
of
like
like
who's
responsible
for
what
goes
here
and
then
there's
like
two
types
of
kind
of
like
entities,
ecosystem
actors
in
this
list
right
and
so
on
one
hand
you
have
these
like
code
names
for
coordinates.
You
have
ACS
all
over
the
place
right
because
they're
sort
of
I
mean
again
the
coordinates.
B
B
And
then,
in
some
cases
you
have
like
a
real
kind
of
in-game
compatible
facilitator.
So
when
it's
an
in-game
compatible
facilitator,
then
it's
like
an
actual
like
yourself
describing
a
company
or
describing
a
useless
and
so
for
decentralized
collateral.
That's
that's
block
analytica,
which
is
the
company
behind
risk,
and
then
fabrication
is
gov
Alpha,
which
is
the
the
organization
behind
yeah,
well
Clubhouse,
and
this
it
might
change
that.
We
also
put
take-ups
in
here
I
think
that's
one
of
the
budgets
that
are
still
missing
right
now.
B
Well,
yeah
I'll
just
rest
it
here
over
a
second,
so
people
can
have
a
chance
to
look
at
this
in
case.
There's
something
that
looks
amazing
here,
but
I
mean
basically
as
long
as
all
of
these
are
covered.
Then
we
should
be
good
as
long
as
we
have
a
responsible
facilitator
for
for
for
each
of
the
Scopes,
then
the
yeah
I
mean
that's
what
it
was
about
right.
B
We
could
get
stuck
if
somehow
we
forgot
to
name
a
responsible
facility
of
one
of
these,
and
maybe
I
won't
even
have
time
to
put
in
some
kind
of
fallback
process
so
that
there's
some
language
that
says
something
like
I
mean.
If
there's
no,
if
there's
a
scope
with
no
responsive
facilitator,
then
the
others
decide
who
it
is
then,
or
maybe
it
becomes.
Maybe
it's
like
I,
don't
know
ranked
so
it
like
like.
D
B
So
this
is
mostly
just
to
show
well,
first
of
all,
is
to
show
the
like
how
we
implement
this
like
I
mean-
and
the
thing
of
course
is.
This
is
like
very
much
step
by
step.
It's
very
slow
motivation,
so,
first
it
looks
kind
of
wonky
with
how
we
do
a
lot
of
the
stuff
right,
but
so
so
blog
I
mean
it's
actually.
First
of
all,
I
edited
this
thing
up
here.
So
basically
this
1.2.2,
that's,
usually
the
place
where
it
says.
B
B
So
what
that
means
is
blog
analytics
are
set
up
both
as
a
facilitator
and
arbitration,
as
we
just
saw,
and
then
they're
also
set
up
here
as
the
advisory
council
member
and
then
down
here,
we've
got
budget
for
them.
So
this
means
that
because
they're
the
facilitator,
they
will
be
able
to
control
this
budget
and
because
they
are
the
advisor
council
member
they'll
be
able
to
pay
out
this
budget
to
themselves.
B
B
That
is
this
question.
What
happens
with
improved
mips
with
MPR
Investing
For
coordinates
so
those
all
keep
running
they
just
can
be
renewed
and
then
later
on,
when
we've
got
time,
we're
gonna
we're
gonna,
replace
them
with
something
directly
in
the
scope
Frameworks,
but
to
all
coordinates,
keep
running,
but
recurring
budgets
have
been
turned
off
and,
and
you
can't
make
new
budgets
and
you
can't
make
new
coins
foreign.
D
B
B
B
So
this
is
like
you
can
yeah,
so
this
this
would
like
if
this
would
implement
this
like
reduced
budget
proposal
that
you
by
this
I
mean
this
number
comes
from
the
reduced
budget
proposal
that
you
proposed
and
then
there
is
this
thing
about
merging
in
Data
Insights,
which
still
hasn't
been
added,
but
that
needs
to
be
added
so
so
there
might
so,
then
that
might
result
in
in
a
high
budget
right.
That
would
then
enable
blog
analytica
to
hire
people
from
Data
Insights
that
they
need.
B
D
B
This
kind
of
thing
it's
like
superseding
component
at
the
bottom,
which
has
then
been
defined
in
Memphis
you're.
Also,
this
is
the
thing
you
can
do
just
to
make
it
completely
clear.
There
will
be
no
ambiguity
with
that,
so
they
sort
of
they're
set
to
kind
of
like
self-disable,
so
they
kind
of
left
without
they're,
not
really
they're,
not
really
being
amended
to
make
them
more
coherent,
because
we
don't
plan
to
rely
on
these
for
too
long
right
like
very
quickly.
B
We
will
completely
get
rid
of
the
core
units
and
we
will
switch
entirely
to
scope
Frameworks
for
budgets
and
same
goes
for
well,
then,
there's
also
the
this
one
right,
51
and
then
there
is
also
there's
a
special
purpose
fund,
which
is
also
the
same
thing
like
a
short-term
temporary
thing.
That's
kind
of
that's
amended
through
this
type
of
component
at
the
bottom.
B
B
Little
bit
to
see
if
there
are
more
questions
and
stuff
and
then
I'll
think
prosecutive.
If
there's
some
important
thing,
then
I
failed
to
highlight
yet
I
mean,
and
this
like
I
said,
there's
still
some
budgets
that
are
missing,
including
tech-ups,
it's
one
of
them.
Possibly
then
there's
some
some
sub-dial
related
things
that
are
missing.
D
B
But
okay,
the
last
thing
is
that
I
plan
to
make
a
few
changes
to
oh
wait.
What
we're
talking!
Let
me
answer
this
question.
Okay,
what
will
be
the
process
for
FCS?
Is
there
anyone
free
to
propose
whatever
they
want?
So
the
same
thing
is
coordinates,
so
you
can't
propose
a
new
one
and
by
the
time
the
existing
one
like
once
the
existing
ones
they
run
out,
so
they
will
remain
in
effect,
but
when
they
run
out,
you
can't
propose
new
ones
as
a
result.
B
So
it's
also
this
kind
of
very
temporary
thing,
but
we
want
to
get
rid
of
and
I
mean
I
actually
have
no
idea
what
the
activist
BFS
are,
and
so
it
might
be
that
when
we
have
more
time
in
a
couple
of
months,
we
will
discover
that
there
are
some
of
them
that
are
still
active
and
we
just
think
they're
useless,
and
then
we
may
sort
of
actively
disable
them
on
the
Fly.
Just
like
we
may
actively
transition
core
units
right.
So
we
may
say
that
this
coordinate
should
be
like.
B
B
This
would
be
like
a
big
shared
budget
controlled
by
SES,
because
SES
is
the
the
rebel
asset
facilitator
in
this
new
setup,
and
then
this
external
legal
budget
will
can
then
be
given
to
some
of
like
the
protector
advisors,
the
ranges
or
whatever,
if
there's
some
big
new
legal
structure
that
need
to
be
built
from
scratch,
so
that
I
mean
if,
if
one
of
the
protector
advisors
built
a
completely
new
legal
structure,
you
know
that
then
they
will
all
benefit
from
it.
So
it
makes
sense.
D
B
For
instance,
right
we
will
specify
there's
like
rebranding
effort
of
in-game
and
preparing
for
it
and
for
governance,
security,
they'll,
maybe
I,
will
also
add
a
little
bit
extra,
but
this
is
like
yeah
they're
like
none
of
them
will
they
will
be
extremely
short
and
I.
Guess
like
a
single
article
or
something
and
then
I
will
I
need
to
make
tonight
there's
more.
B
B
Okay,
you
know
I,
think
that's
enough
for
today.
Actually
because
then
I
just
want
to
get
back
to
doing
a
little
bit
more
of
the
last
mile
working
so
looking
through,
all
of
it
to
make
sure
everything
works
and
then
tomorrow
the
my
plan
is,
we
will
start.
We
will
start
I
mean
tomorrow
by
the
time
we
have
this
call.
B
Everything
should
be
totally
done,
and
maybe
there
will
be
some
questions
then,
and
we
might
we'll
see
how
it
actually
goes
right,
but
I'm,
confident
that
I
can
get
it
into
the
final
State
and
maybe
there'll
be
a
few
questions.
But
it's
a
done
deal
and
we're
clear
about.
What's
going
to
happen
in
April
and
then
what
I
will
talk
about
is
like
the
really
big
picture
of
like
the
really
like
what
I
call
in-game
before
right.
So
all
these
like
changes
that
I
have
been
sort
of
hinting
it
and
but
there's
not.
B
It's
not
really
been
clear.
What
the
sort
of
this
final
kind
of
synthesis
of
all
the
different
bits
and
pieces
of
the
different
versions
of
the
Indian
plan
and
how
that's
gonna,
how
how
I
plan
to
kind
of
roll
it
out
once
we
we
I
mean
once
we
have
the
really
short-term
stuff
figured
out
like
the
money
market,
funds
and
the
budgets
and
so
on
right,
then
we
can
begin
this
phase
of
starting
to
I
mean
the
sort
of
the
real
purpose
of
the
pregame,
which
is
to
start
preparing
for
the
really
long.
B
One
right
and
yeah
I
got
some
really
exciting
things
too.
To
talk
about
that
front
in
particular
like
Ai,
and
now
we
can
use
that
which
I
think
is
like
that's
a
really,
but
it's
it's
like
that's
going
to
be,
to
a
large
extent
to
be
the
silver
bullet
and
trying
to
explain
like
what's
going
on.
What
are
we
doing
with
with
all
this
stuff
and.
B
I'm
more
like
that's,
because,
basically,
that
is
the
tool
that
makes
it
possible
to
access
this.
This.
You
know
these
things
that
we're
we're
creating
here,
yeah
and
other
things,
trigonomics
subtitles
all
that
stuff.
It's
it's
kind
of
my
dear!
That
will
I
have
this
like
a
bigger
picture
conversation
tomorrow.
B
B
I
mean
I
think
what
you're
I
guess:
Nadia
you're-
probably
referring
to
yourself
with
this
right,
but
so
as
I
understand
it
right
now,
you're
covered
under
the
growth
core
unit,
so
you
will
simply
continue
to
be
paid
through
the
growth
core
unit.
I
mean
there's
been
this
whole
thing
with
spark
protocol
and,
of
course,
which
is
that
we
need
a
sort
of
a
complete
we
want
to.
You
know
we
need
to
make
it
public
what
the
actual
budget
is,
when
you
also
count
Sam
and
Nadia
and
maybe
even
count
some
some.
B
Like
auditing
work
and
so
on,
that
could
fall
under
other
budgets,
but
that's
like
we
can
do
I
mean
that's
something
we
can
do.
That's
that's
only
information,
that's
not
like
practical
implementation,
because,
as
long
as
the
budget
is
available
from
the
coordinates
we
can
just
use
it,
pe's
budget
runs
out
next
month.
So
basically,
next
month
would
be
you
know.
P
will
will
be
also
like
rolled
over
into
this
and
so
very
quickly.
E
My
question
was
more
like
generic
generic
question
like
red
knob,
for
example,
you're,
including
risk
per
unit
budget
inside
the
decentralized
collateral
scope.
So
my
question
is:
if
we
make
maker
holders
approve
that
scope.
That
means
that
budget
is
also
approved
if
I'm,
if
I
understood
correctly,
but
at
the
same
time
yeah
right
but
for
ecosystem
actors
is
different,
because,
if
I
understood
well,
if
the
ecosystem
scope
is
approved,
like
the
ecosystem,
actor
bot
just
won't
be
approved,
and
it
will
require
another
voting
process
right.
B
E
B
Yeah-
and
this
is
like
I-
mean
I-
it's
completely
formality
as
far
as
I'm
concerned
right
because
I
mean
I
think
anyone
that
wrote
for
this.
They
will
vote
for
all
of
these
as
well,
but
the
it's
still
very
important,
because
I
mean
these.
These
they're
they're
kind
of
they're
they're
I
mean
these
like
brand
new
companies
that
we're
creating
from
scratch
and
I
think
once
they're
sort
of
in
here
and
there's
an
overview
of
them.
B
B
Like
it's
gonna,
it's
gonna
set
the
right
creates
of
the
right
alignment
right
that
that
the
the
Scopes
aren't
kind
of
introducing
something
completely
brand
new
that
that
is
is
sort
of
like
a
a
kind
of
what
they
call
like
a
new
initiative
that
I
mean,
of
course,
all
of
this
has
been
this
I
mean,
has
been
sort
of
prepared
and
described
and
and
for
a
long
time
right,
but
still
I
think
it's
just.
This
will
give
the
best
possible
stuff
right.
This
means
that
ones
that
individual
vote
has
succeeded.
B
B
B
So
there's
basically
some
cases
where
yeah
it's
separate
in
some
cases
where
it's
combined
together,
yeah
and
so
in
some
cases
we
have
and
I
think
there
actually
are
some
cases
where
there's
MPL
budget
that's
run
out,
but
not
die
budget,
but
in
in
some
cases
it's
been
die
budget
running
out,
but
not
impure
our
budget
and
then
that's
what
it's
supposed
to
reflect.
So
basically,
the
core
unit
budgets
will
remain
in
place
for
something
like
mkr
and
then
in
some
cases
the
die
budget
has
been
put
here.
B
And
you
know
ultimately
also
there
will
be
some
kind
of
like
basically
like
very
far
like
what
you
call
it,
the
very
broad
article,
probably
here
in
the
ecosystem-
scope
that
will
say
that
basically
SES,
so
they
use
System
Scope
the
uses.
The
facilitators
can
trigger
like
a
vote,
to
add
a
budget
at
any
time,
simply
because
in
case
something's
been
missed
right.
So
there's
something
that
just
doesn't
that's
supposed
to
be
paid
out
and
certainly
doesn't
because
they
counted
on
something
with
the
coordinate
and
then
that
has
now
been
blocked.
B
E
One
last
one
last
question,
because
it
didn't
very
clear
for
me,
like
what's
I,
know
that
Korean
net
batches,
like
won't,
exist
anymore,
because
we
won't
have
any
more
any
more
Korean.
We
will
have
more
care
units
but
like
for
me
at
least
it
looks
like
it's
the
same,
like
ecosystem
actors
will
be
getting
like
a
monthly
budget
that
looks
like
a
about
a
Korean
budget.
I,
don't
know
if
there's
like
another,
like
real
difference
between
Korean
Nets
or
ecosystem
actors,
more
than
just
like
the
the
label.
B
B
It's
specifically
it's
you
know
it's
going
to
be
a
system
where
somehow-
and
maybe
we'll
actually
change
it
entirely,
but
but
right
now
the
kind
of
The
Proposal
is
that,
like
somehow
in
these
areas
up
here,
there'll
be
some
kind
of
I
mean
you
know
one
way
to
think
about
it.
Is
that
like
this,
if
we
Define
sort
of
the
the
like
these
very
clear
metrics
that
we
want
to
see
and
then
and
then
add
some
I
mean
add
as
much
detail
as
possible
up
here
around,
how
do
you?
B
Not
it's
not
easy
to
do.
It's
gonna
take
take
a
while
to
figure
that
out
and
really
get
it
done
properly,
but
the
idea
is
that
we
want
to
avoid
that
the
process
of
like
picking
and
choosing
these
as
well
as
setting
their
Milestones,
that
we
want
to
avoid
that
becoming
a
kind
of
a
political
process
controlled
by
NCAA
modelers,
because
then,
sooner
or
later,
we'll
have
him
care
holders
like
voting
in
their
own
portfolio
companies
to
be
just
to
be
here
right
and
then
get
some
really
easy.
B
You
know
Free
Rider
job
right,
so
we
want
this
to
be
the
facilitator.
That
actually
does
this,
but
then
does
it
based
on
a
bunch
of
best
practices
defined
up
here
that
are
so
well
defined
that
you
can
kind
of
invalidate
decisions
made
out
here
made
down
here
in
case
that
that
it's
sort
of
that
this
you
know
this,
the
the
the
free
ride
situation
occurs,
but
that
is
extremely
true.
B
I
mean
that's
a
huge
Challenge,
and
but
we
just
have
to
to
kind
of
sort
of
slowly
move
in
that
direction
and
and
on
the
road
there
I
mean
one
tool
we'll
always
have
available.
Is
that
cvcs
can
just
directly
offload
these
through
a
scope
framework
change
as
it
currently
stands?
There's
there's
not
really
a
restriction
against
that
later
on
there
Will
there
would
be
even
something
like
that
should
be
protected
against
already.
D
B
D
B
What
that
really
ends
up,
meaning
is
that
they're
not
really
they're
not
really
different
from
coins.
Yet
in
terms
of
that,
it's
still
this
kind
of
political
process
that
sets
in
place.
You
know
money
streaming
in
every
month,
nice
and
comfortably,
but
if,
like
I
mean
the
expectation,
is
that
there's
going
to
be
this
move
towards
measurable
results
and
I?
Think
in
general
the
message
is
pretty
clear:
right
that
we
don't.
B
We
don't
intend
to
tolerate
lack
of
results
right
as
we
as
we
go
forward
and
as
we
get
basically
more
focus
on,
what's
actually
the
important
stuff,
then
eventually
we'll
be
able
to
you
know,
sooner
or
later
it
will
be
and
I'm
thinking
this
at
the
time.
I
believe
it's
about
three
months.
It
will.
You
know
the
low
hanging.
Fruit
will
be
to
really
dig.
C
B
B
Do
some
work
to
improve
that
particular
punch,
and
then
there
will
actually
give
you
multiple
I
mean.
Then
we
might
actually
onboard
additional
advisory
councils
council
members
and
then
ask
all
of
them
to
be
like
who's
got
us.
Who
can
give
us
the
best
deal
for
spending.
You
know
a
month
doing
a
you
know,
intensive
project
to
vastly
improve
the
section
about
whatever
it
is.
B
B
B
Oh
yeah,
that's
also
heroes
right.
Basically,
this
thing
that
the
advisory
Council
can
actually
also
use
their
funding
to
do
other
tasks
related
to
the
central
instrumental
scope.
So
it's
also
meaningless
that
so
right
now,
the
advisor
account
is
just
being
used
totally
as
a
core
unit
which
is
not
supposed
to
be
in
the
long
run
right,
there's
supposed
to
be
like
two
types
of
ecosystem
interests,
kind
of
keeping
each
other
in
check.
So
the
advisory
Council
makes
the
rules
and
then
there's
a
could
be
a
different
type
of
ecosystem
actor.
B
Like,
let's
see
this
okay,
so
there's
this
there's
I
mean
here's
a
sort
of
an
example
of
this
kind
of
stuff.
Where
there's
something
about
like
every
periodically.
The
responsible
facilitator
must
do
like
check
something
and
then
possibly
decide
to
off-board
equilateral
right
and
then
this
job
of,
like
checking
that
thing
that
could
be
a
job
that
becomes
this
kind
of
recurring
project,
for
instance,
and
then
how
to
carry
out
the
job.
That's
the
thing
that
is
supposed.
B
There's
also
I
mean
actually,
this
is
yeah
I'm,
not
sure
if
you
defined
it
better
in
your
in
your
edits
yet,
but
this
here
would
likely
have
something
like
I
mean
a
process
for
like
evaluating
and
then
setting
these
parameters
correctly
and
I.
Guess
even
more
importantly,
like
I
think
we're
the
most
recurring
work
of
all
is
is
going
to
be
down
just
in
this
one
of
like,
like
monitoring,
what's
happening
with
the
ddms
and
then
adjusting
risk
parameters.
B
Accordingly,
it's
certainly
not
I
mean
there's
no,
there's
no
rush
to
to
to
put
Advanced
formulas
in
place
for
this
stuff.
Just
yet
so.
I
kept
it
very
simple
for
now,
but
but
I
I
expect
that
the
kind
of
the
language
here
will
get
very
complex
and
then
it
will
involve
these
like
recurring
kind
of
jobs
related
to
data
or
or
analysis
or
something
like
this,
and
then
it's
kind
of
like
where
the
job
is
described.
B
That's
where
you
put
the
budget
for
doing
that
job,
and
then
you
also
put
sort
of
the
you
know.
You
want
to
create
as
much
as
possible
a
kind
of
an
open
market
for
for
the
best
possible
company
to
do
the
work
as
cheap
as
possible
for
maker
and
then
have
a
kind
of
a
competitive
process
between
the
different
companies
right.
But
do
it.
C
B
Yes
and
that's
because
we're
keeping
map
24.
so
map
24,
which
is
like
the
emergency
mode,
remains
in
in
place,
it
does
I
mean
I,
actually,
apparently,
I
think
it's
always
working
this,
but
it
does
require
the
arbitration
facilitators
to
sort
of
agree
to
the
emergency.
But
on
the
other
hand,
arbitration
facilitator
is
always
needed
for
executive
votes.
B
B
In
fact,
it
might
even
be
that
in
arbitration
scope
we
could
put
some
language
that
says
this
very
generally.
Facilitators
are
tasked
with
dealing
with
emergencies
and
can
basically
take
whatever
action
they
think
is
necessary
to
to.
You
know,
to
mitigate
some
kind
of
of
urgent
risk
or
emergency
right,
because
we
don't
ever
want
to
be
in
a
situation
where
something
bad
happens
and
then
we're
like
you
could
have
done
something,
and
then
people
like
the
rules,
the
bureaucracy
didn't,
allow
us
right.
C
Okay,
maybe,
like
you
know
like
the
last
thoughts
which
I
have,
is
that
we
kind
of
you
know
hope
that,
in
in
the
context
of
budget
that
we
propose
right,
we
kind
of
hope
that
Community
will
give
us
the
the
previous
full
budget,
which
is
not
reduced.
Just
you
know,
because
there
is,
you
know
like
a
lot
of
additional
stuff.
B
What's
the
other
types
of
work
right,
maybe
the
advice
I
mean,
maybe,
as
we
just
go
about
the
advisory
Council,
where
it's
actually
it's
it's
it
like
ends
up
being
like
a
much
bigger
and
more
expensive
project
where
in
three
months,
if
we
get
these
resources,
then
we
can
accomplish
all
this
stuff
and-
and
you
know
I-
think
that's
that's
the
right
way
to
approach
it
right
because
it
it's
not
even
I
mean
this
whole
thing
of
like
what
should
the?
What
should
the
monthly
budget
be?