►
From YouTube: Governance and Risk Meeting #136
Description
Introduction
@LongForWisdom: Hosting, Introduction, Agenda
Weekly Updates
Governance - @Gov-Facilitators + Contributors
Smart Contracts - @Smart-Contracts
Oracles - @Oracles
Risk - @Risk
Real World Finance - @SebVentures
RWA-001 Update - @mrabino1
Operational Support - @operational-support
MIPs - @MIP-Editors
Procedural
MIPs Submission Review - @Gov-Facilitators
Segments
Recent Governance Issues - @LongForWisdom
Real World Asset Parameters - @SebVentures
Website: https://makerdao.com
Twitter: https://twitter.com/makerdao
Forum: https://forum.makerdao.com/
Chat: https://chat.makerdao.com/home
Email: info@makerdao.com
Governance and Community Events Calendar:
https://calendar.google.com/calendar/u/0/r?cid=bWFrZXJkYW8uY29tXzNlZmhtMmdoaXBrc2VnbDAwOWt0bmlvbWRrQGdyb3VwLmNhbGVuZGFyLmdvb2dsZS5jb20
A
Hello,
everyone
and
welcome
to
the
make
it
out
scientific
governance
and
risk
meeting
number
136
taking
place
on
thursday
april
8th
1700
utc.
My
name
is
long
for
wisdom,
I'm
the
governor's
facilitator
for
mcdowell.
At
the
moment,
I'm
joined
by
by
nearly
fifty
making
people,
some
of
whom
you
have
well.
If
you
follow
these
meetings,
some
of
whom
you've
heard
before
I've
heard
before
all
right,
we've
got
our
usual
agendas
to
go
through.
Today.
A
A
Also,
hopefully,
gonna
have
a
presentation
from
seb
talking
about
that's
in
the
real
world
assets
new,
some
of
the
first
royal
assets
and
standard
some
of
the
parameters.
The
governance
needs
to
consider
when
onboarding
everyone
assets
to
start
off.
Though
I
will
do
our
usual.
I
can
update
for
governance.
A
So,
regarding
polls
this
week
we
had
we
had
the
surplus
buffer
poll
to
increase
the
system
service
buffer
that
passed
with
the
25
burn
option
having
a
majority
so
that
will
move
to
an
executive
once
we're
kind
of
closer
to
like
the
buffer
is
close
to
full,
because
that
kind
of
makes
it
easier
for
us
to
set
it
up.
So
it
burns
25
of
the
mpl,
so
we'll
see
action
in
an
executive
on
that
soon,
but
not
immediately.
A
A
A
Does
we've
been
working
with
sorcerer's
to
kind
of
cover
the
the
grants
and
like
the
the
payouts
kind
of
now
that
the
knowledge
of
alpha
we're
taking
over
managing
that,
as
opposed
to
the
foundation's
grants
program,
we
spent
quite
a
lot
of
time
at
the
end
of
last
week
on
the
liquidation,
2.0
parameter,
documentation
which
we
did
manage
to
to
more
or
less
finish
still
rough
into
places.
It
could
be
more
complete,
but
we
did
manage
to
get
something
written
for
every
parameter.
A
A
B
Thank
you,
hello,
everyone.
My
name
is
eli
and
I'll
be
doing
forum
at
a
glance
we've
rebranded
for
you
this
week.
So
first
up
a
three-point
summary.
What
do
I
need
to
know
as
an
mkr
holder?
Well,
I
think
it's
fair
to
say
that
we're
firing
on
all
cylinders
the
protocol
reached
a
new
all-time
high
of
total
value
locked
this
week
at
8.2
billion
dollars,
the
die
supply
rose
to
3.17
billion
dollars,
and
the
system
surplus
is
now
at
22
million
dollars
onto
announcements.
B
Following
the
call
last
week,
members
of
the
mkr
compensation
working
group
will
soon
be
selected.
You
can
apply
using
the
links
provided
in
form
at
a
glance
we're
looking
for
a
community
member
holding
no
to
little
mkr,
a
large
mkr
holder
representative,
a
third
party
representative,
a
proposed
core
units
representative
and
lastly,
a
current
core
units
representative
on
to
the
active
discussions.
B
Thirdly,
a
discussion
by
el
progreso,
who
discusses
reusing
the
mkr
requirement
to
initiate
an
emergency
shutdown
and,
lastly,
an
ongoing
discussion
by
immio,
who
proposes
launching
a
maker
dial
discord
channel.
All
of
the
links
can
be
found
in
the
forum
at
a
glance
forum
thread
and
that's
it
for
me.
Thank
you
very
much.
A
A
C
Today,
so
hey
everybody
chris
from
smart
contracts.
So
I
wanted
to
call
out.
We
hadn't
done
any
work
on
the
collateral
onboarding
priority
sheet
in
a
while,
and
so
we
sent
naz
over
to
that
and
he
reviewed
all
of
the
line
items
in
the
sheet
and
added
entries.
So
so,
at
least
on
the
smart
contracts
or
in
our
domain.
Those
should
like
sort
and
find
a
priority,
no
collateral
assessments.
C
This
week
I
we
still
have
pax
g
in
covan,
and
I
just
wanted
to
sort
of
send
out
a
reminder
that
it's
there
and
that
people
should
review
it
or
anyone
that
needs
to
integrate
with
it
should
feel
free
to
do
so
and
and
then
a
note
on.
So
we
we
sent
ns2
drp,
which
was
the
mip
22
collateral
that
that
we're
about
to
push
to
covan.
C
For
the
token
so,
and
so
actually
I'll
just
hop
into
that
right
now.
So
we
deployed
all
of
the
mip
22
centrifuge
new
silver
contracts
to
mainnet
yesterday,
and
you
know
with
that
token
id
and
all
of
the
pieces
that
we
need
so
now.
The
spell
that
is
going
to
execute
that-
and
you
know,
put
it
on
main
net
or
in
the
protocol
is-
is
being
crafted.
So
so
that's
a
another
big
milestone.
C
So,
with
regards
to
liquidations
liquidations
2.0,
we
did
indeed
slide
the
date
one
more
week.
So
the
main
net
release
will
be
not
this
friday,
but
next
friday
we
I
just
want
to
be
super
safe
and
we're
going
through,
and
you
know,
as
we
keep
hitting
items,
we
find
more
things
and
we've
been
writing
lots
of
like
simulation
tests
and
whatnot
to
make
sure
that
we
get
that
just
prior
to
this
call.
C
All
of
us
were
in
a
session
where
we
were
viewing
the
spell
together
and
the
spells
looking
pretty
good.
I
think
we're
gonna
reconvene
in
the
afternoon
and
then
do
all
of
the
tests
the
sort
of
simulation
tests-
and
you
know,
continue
to
go
through
that
and
then
hopefully
covan
deploy
will
happen
by
the
end
of
the
day.
So
so
that'll
be
in
covant
and
when
it
is
we'll
we'll
post
the
update
in
the
collateral
onboarding
updates
channel,
let's
see
so
so.
C
C
So
as
well
as
the
dss
interfaces
and,
let's
see
we
also
are
working
on
these
sort
of
mip
45,
covan,
description
updates
and
so
we're
waiting
on.
I
think
pwc
is
going
to
review
a
bunch
of
the
updates
that
we're
making
to
the
mip
just
to
make
sure
that
they're
accurate
so
we're
even
getting
like
an
audit
on
the
like
mip,
45,
update
and
and
then
we're
also
gonna
construct
or
have
begun
to
construct
a
audit
review.
So
basically
like
an
audit
debrief.
C
So
you
know
taking
everything
that
we
got
out
of
the
audits
and
just
sort
of
you
know
casually
discussing
that
with
the
community,
and
you
know
which
actions
we
took
and
which
ones
we
didn't
and
why
and
whatnot
so
that'll
land
in
the
forums
at
some
point
so
and
also
we're
waiting
on
for
security.maker
dao.
The
actual
audit
reports
to
be
posted,
there's
a
pr
that
that's
there
now
with
a
couple
of
the
reports
and
I
think
we're
waiting
to
hear
pwc
can
post
their
report.
C
You
know
obviously
they're
like
a
big
auditing
firm,
and
this
is
not
a
not
a
typical
like
path
for
pwc
to
like
publicly
release
audits
and
so
we're
we're
trying
to
bring
them
into
the
21st
century
and
they're
trying
to
accommodate
us
so
yep
and
there's
no
updates
this
week
on
the
optimism
l2
progress.
But
there
is
a
sort
of
exciting
like
forum
post,
an
announcement.
C
D
E
So
this
will
allow
a
maker
to
basically
inject
a
die
liquidity
into
secondary
markets,
which
is
a
you
know,
it's
a
little
bit
of
a
shift,
but
I
think
it's
kind
of
a
cool
addition
where
we
can
act
more
like
a
decentral
bank
and
sort
of
lend
to
sec.
Let
provide
a
liquidity
for
secondary
markets
for
them
to
sort
of
do
the
more
commercial
side.
So
it's
a
shift
and
you
know
people
like
vote.
Whichever
way
you
want
to
vote
lots
of
discussion
to
be
had,
but
I
think
it's
an
interesting
proposal
from
ave.
C
Yeah
and
and
then
I'll
just
mention
that
there's
background
work
happening
in
the
community
for
for
the
like,
okrs
and
whatnot.
That
derek
has
been
working
on.
So
I
think
that's
everything
unless
anyone
on
the
smart
contracts
team
thinks
I
skipped
something
I
like
kind
of
didn't
linearly
go
through
my
list.
I
was
sort
of
like
scatter
shot
all
over
it.
So
if
I
missed
something,
please
call
it
out
and
also,
if
there's
any
questions.
B
F
C
G
Nick
yeah,
fairly
fairly
quick
today
right
so
the
I
think
it
was
mentioned
earlier.
The
d5
saver
kind
of
light
feed
pulling
boat
passed.
So
that's
that's
good
to
see.
I'm
sure
they'll
be
they'll,
be
very
happy
to
hear
that
that's
not
going
to
go
in
this
friday's
executive
because
we
still
need
to
set
up
their
their
feed
infrastructure
on
on
their
end.
So
presumably
that
would
go
into
the
executive
next
week,
so
so
super
happy
to
to
have
them
on
board.
G
So
hopefully
we
can
get
that
out
quite
soon
and
at
that
point
we
would
probably
also
or
or
not
probably,
but
we
we
would
also
redeploy
the
existing
uniswap
lp
oracles
to
conform
to
the
the
the
changes
that
that
were
made.
Most
of
the
most
of
the
changes
are
are
a
little
bit
kind
of
styling
based,
but
some
of
the
important
ones
that
that
curt
was
like
instrumental
in
doing
were
some
significant
gas
improvements.
G
So
I
think
we
made
like
over
12
percent
cur.
I
don't
know
if
you
want
to
china,
and
I
think
we
made
12
percent
gains
on
gas
relative
to
what
we
have
deployed
on
chain
and
for
those
of
you
who
are
a
little
more
technical
minded
of
the
remaining
gas
that
there's,
you
know,
quote
unquote
left
to
optimize.
I
think
like
90,
I
believe
it
was
like
94
95
percent
of
it
is
just
storage
operations
which
are
extremely
kind
of
difficult
to
to
to
kind
of
sever
around.
G
G
So
so
that's
all
fun.
The
patched
version
of
ssb,
which
I'm
sure
you're
all
sick
of
hearing
me
talk
about
by
now.
It
is
running
well
in
staging
we've
pushed
the
state
size
of
that
quite
considerably
and
it's
it's
been
stable,
so
we're
probably
looking
to
release
that
into
production
in
the
next
couple
weeks.
G
So
that
will
be
you
guys,
don't
really
see
how
much
of
a
pain
that
is
or
how
much
of
a
pain
it's
been.
But
right
now,
we've
been
having
to
kind
of
frequently
migrate
the
protection
system
every
every
month
or
two
because
of
the
state
size
issue,
and
this
is
going
to
ultimately
just
relieve
us
of
of
that
issue,
so
very
kind
of
happy
to
to
get
that
out.
The
door.
D
So
I
believe
smart
contracts
team
has
solved
the
issue
with
pax
gold
transfer
fees
and
we
have
a
task
to
evaluate
our
past
risk
assessment,
which
was
done
in
october
and
have
this
asset
then
on
board
that
in
the
in
the
upcoming
weeks,
we
also
updated
the
collateral
onboarding
sheet
to
see
which
collectors
are
interesting
to
have
or
have
high
benefits
to
add
next,
but
yeah.
It
really
depends
on
the
other
teams
how
much
capacity
they
have
currently
to
again
start
onboarding
more
more
collaterals.
D
Now
we
still
need
to
propose
stipulation,
2.0
parameters
for
other
assets
and
we
are
proceeding
with
wifi
right
after
link
and
then
we
have
them
delivered
for
it
and
red
bitcoin
and
then
for
smaller
assets,
and
I
think
the
idea
was
to
do
them.
Lastly,
for
unil
peace
I
may
propose
to
to
have
liquidations
2.0
parameters
implemented
for
uni
lps,
maybe
a
bit
sooner,
and
that's
because
we
just
recently
proposed
higher
debt
ceilings
on
uni
lps,
and
I
think
the
aggregate
debt
ceiling
for
for
union
is
now
over.
D
200
million,
so
liquidations
2.0
are
are
really
needed
for
your
nlp
as
soon
as
possible,
and
this
brings
me
to
next
topic,
which
is
the
the
latest
proposal
that
was
released
yesterday.
So
it's
now
called
parameters
changes
proposal,
so
this
group
that
used
to
managed
that
used
to
manage
race
also
proposed
in
a
separate
past,
to
have
a
mandate
of
not
only
proposing
rate
changes
but
also
changes
related
to
debt
ceilings
and
die
savings
rate.
D
So
this
week
we
already
proposed
changes
to
both
rates
and
debt
ceilings
in
this,
in
my
opinion,
will
make
garments
much
more
agile,
especially
when
it
comes
to
you
know,
reacting
to
changes
needed
to
depth
ceilings
and
for
the
proposal
itself.
We
this
time
we
didn't
propose
any
rate,
change
or
rate
increase
for
largest
two
volts.
D
We
also
proposed
a
few
changes
to
both
rates
and
debt
ceilings
for
other
smaller
worlds.
This
is
mostly
related
to
either
better
or
worse,
call
it
collateralization,
metrics
or
volts
or
again,
better,
worse,
liquidity,
metrics
of
of
underlying
assets,
and
this
liquidity
metric
is
kind
of
becoming
more
and
more
important
factor
now
with
limitations
2.0
and
then
we
finally,
as
I
said,
propose
a
few
debt
ceiling
increases
for
unilps,
still,
perhaps
a
bit
conservative
than
than
what
model
suggested.
D
But
that
is
because,
as
I
said,
we
still
may
need
few
more
weeks
to
implement
calculations
2.0
for
unilps.
I'm
also
personally
a
bit
more
optimistic
about
faster
migration
of
lp
liquidity
from
v2
to
v3,
and
this
would
make
maker
universe
unwind
faster
than
expected
and
yeah.
We
would
lose
a
lot
of
this
demand
in
in
a
you
know,
short
time
if
this
truly
happens
faster,
so
we'll
we'll
see
about
that,
it's
not
really
much
to
do
until
we
have
unisof
v3,
volts,
supported
maker
and
yeah.
D
That's,
I
think,
everything
from
my
side
next
week,
we'll
probably
spend
more
time
on
on
various
topics
and
forum.
As
was
mentioned,
there
was
one
post
that
required
simples
from
us
inputs
from
from
our
site,
and
I
think
it
was
regarding
cavead
implementation,
which
is
interesting.
One
and
there's
also
one
about
increasing,
to
make
a
threshold
for
foreign,
emergency
shutdown
and
yeah
we're
still
evaluating
what
the
proper
recommendation
is
so
stay
tuned.
A
H
A
I
Sure
so
long
awaited
the
documentation
for
putting
together
the
trust
structure
is
imminently
about
to
be
released.
We
did
have
a
speed
bump
in
the
middle,
which
is
what's
caused
so
much
of
the
delays,
but
basically
starting
either
tonight
or
tomorrow.
We're
going
to
be
I'll,
be
posting
the
effect
equivalent
of
a
table
of
contents
and
starting
to
populate
with
the
core
due
diligence,
material
of
all
the
legal
structures
involved
and
working
our
way
forward
from
diligence
to
documentation,
probably
finalizing
with
the
trust
agreement.
I
Whenever
that
one
is
finalized,
it
is
not
finalized,
but
it's
work
in
progress,
but
it's
approaching
a
stage
now
where
the
community
needs
to
get
involved,
or
at
least
be
aware,
have
time
to
digest
the
diligence
behind
it,
and
I
can
explain
kind
of
what
the
status
of
what
happened.
What
the
speed
bump
was
probably
on
the
unrecorded
section
of
the
call.
B
J
Yeah
today
is
a
little
bit
longer
than
most
ones.
So
in
case
you
haven't
seen
the
post
already
excited
to
finally
announce
that
juan
and
I
have
been
a
little
bit
quiet
on
our
development
of
our
core
unit
operational
support,
because
we've
been
working
on
a
merger
with
voucher
score
unit,
and
this
new
core
unit
is
called
sustainable.
Ecosystem
scaling
juan
will
go
into
more
details
about
the
the
core
unit
like
an
overarching
kind
of
view,
but
I'll
kind
of
give
an
update
from
what
this
means
for
operational
support
from
our
side.
J
The
biggest
change
is
that
the
s-s-s-e-s
will
continue
to
incubate
a
selected,
limited
kind
of
number
of
core
units
because
there's
a
function,
that's
an
incubator,
whereas
we've
been
kind
of
covering
all
of
the
core
units
and
that
it,
this
core
unit
will
not
kind
of
cover
like
dow
wide
operational
support.
In
this
traditional
sense,
so
things
like
dao
resource
accounting
and
reporting
and
so
on.
J
There's,
if
you
look
on
the
link,
we
outline
a
little
bit
more
detail
into
a
lot
of
the
projects
that
we've
been
working
on
as
operational
support,
and
a
lot
of
that
will
be
actually
moving
into
the
merger.
But
we
will
continue
to
support
these
in
the
next
upcoming
months,
so
not
to
worry
that
they're
gonna
get
dropped
or
anything
like
that
in
terms
of
people
juan
will
be,
he
will
be
kind
of
onboarding
as
a
facilitator
into
ses.
J
So
he
has
also
put
forth
that
link
and
then
voucher
will
be
the
core
unit
team
lead
for
that
group
and,
as
for
me,
it's
pretty
cool
to
kind
of
come
full
circle.
I'm
kind
of
handing
in
my
facilitator
hat
and
going
back
to
where
I
was
like
two
years
ago
and
how
I
started
into
maker,
which
is
back
as
a
contributor
and
I'll
be
joining
ses
as
a
contributor
to
that
unit.
K
Yeah,
thank
you.
So
I
want
to
be
quick
because
this,
these
updates
are
already
taking
a
little
bit
too
long
and
we'll
do
a
specialized
call
for
this.
But
to
add
a
bit
on
what
amy
was
saying.
This
is
aligned
with
our
mandate
or
what
our
mandate
was
and
it's.
We
feel
that,
with
voucher
and
and
the
whole
team
that
we're
on
boarding,
we
will
reach
a
whole
new
level.
So
that's
really
good
and
yeah
just
just
for
the
for
why.
We
think
that
this
coin
is
important.
K
It's
we
feel
that
that
dye
has
already
established
itself
as
a
decentralized
stable
coin.
So
that's
great,
and
now
we
have
the
second
big
challenge,
which
is:
how
do
we
grow
and
scale
in
a
decentralized
ecosystem
which
is
mainly
uncharted
territory
as
of
now?
So
we
think
that
if
we
have
a
coordinate,
that's
mainly
asked
in
research
and
on
on
very
hands-on
applications.
We
can
have
this
kind
of
circle
of
of
continuous
improvement
and
having
the
the
governance
and
the
forum
to
be
both
the
input
and
the
output.
K
What
the
problems
are
and
the
risk
prioritize
them
and
then
we'll
kind
of
do
the
full
circle
find
the
talent,
incubate
them
and
well.
We
went
to
the
the
sponsorship
part.
We
believe
that
that's
very
important
to
get
things
going
very,
very
fast
and
finally,
to
complete
the
circle.
We
want
to
to
be
very
axe
on
the
advisory
part,
so
have
this
continuous
improvement,
self-accountability
and
auditing
and
transparency
and
best
practices
for
that.
For
for
us,
that's
super
important.
K
We
want
to
do
it
both
for
ourselves
and
then
we
want
to
kind
of
set
a
standard
for
every
other
core
unit
to
to
follow
that
standard,
and
we
also
want
to
be
the
trusted
third
party.
So
in
case
we
need
to
do
something
like
a
dark
spell
or
something
kind
of
manage
that
process
and
be
able
to
safeguard
and
keep
the
protocol
safe.
K
So
I
think
that's
good
for
a
very
quick
introduction.
We
have
posted
the
the
mips
set
in
the
forum
and
the
on
github,
so
we
we
are
waiting
for
your
feedback.
Please
read
it
and
let
us
know
what
you
think.
We
also
have
a
discord
channel.
That's
open
and
if
people
are
more
interested
in,
I
don't
know,
joining
or
or
helping
or
or
seeing
what's
happening,
you're
welcome
to
join
and
then
yeah.
K
J
Oh
actually,
I'm
gonna
also
include
our
regularly
scheduled
updates.
If
you
scroll
down
to
our
post
too.
I
just
want
to
point
out
that
there's
a
know.
Your
mip
number
seven
tomorrow
with
for
eurodi,
so
highly
recommend
attending
that,
and
then
the
there's
a
few
there's
a
coordinate,
launch
pad
session
coming
up
for
govcoms.
J
There's
the
recordings
for
the
frame
mkr
compensation
framework,
as
well
as
the
community
call
about
grants.
All
recordings
are
up
on
youtube
as
well.
A
few
teams
have
gone
into
formal
submission,
which
I
believe
charles
will
go
through
as
well
as
this
new
kind
of
core
unit
that
has
just
moved
into
rfc,
including
in
our
interes
interesting
topics
of
conversation.
I
would
recommend
checking
out
some
of
these
posts
around.
J
There
was
one
that
yasik
from
the
dye
foundation,
plus
maker,
fun
maker
foundation
about
kyc
and
aml
legal
kind
of
regulatory
areas
that
are
happening
as
well
as
the
bd
team
and
the
growth
bd.
Slash
growth.
Core
unit
wants
to
kind
of
increase
the
communications
with
maker,
so
that
post
is
a
really
great
way
to
encourage
this
kind
of
conversation
around
what
they've
been
working
on
and
what
you'd
like
to
see
and
so
on.
J
A
L
L
There
are
total
of
16
proposals
formerly
submitted
this
month.
Actually
all
of
them
were
sub
proposals,
so
no
unique
mips
this
month
and
today
we're
going
to
have
long
for
wisdom
perform
that
a
typical
governance
cycle,
submission
review
to
determine
which
of
the
proposals
are
in
accordance
with
guidelines
and
follow
the
framework
as
well
as
which
one
should
be
included
in
the
inclusion
polls
that
come
next
monday.
L
So,
looking
at
the
formal
submissions
this
month,
we
had
four
core
units
be
proposed,
so
this
includes
three
proposals:
the
core
unit
overview
or
manifesto
the
budget
and
the
facilitator
onboarding.
For
it
we
had
growth,
content
production
maker,
dow
shop
and
protocol
engineering
all
be
put
forward.
Otherwise,
there's
three
proposals
for
amendments.
There's
a
proposal
to
update
mips
zero,
mip,
four
and
mip
nine
so
definitely
check
those
out.
And,
lastly,
we
had
the
declarations
of
intent
for
euro
die
and
that's
it
for
this
month.
L
L
L
L
L
The
last
one
is
mip50
the
direct
deposit
module,
as
sam
mentioned
earlier.
This
proposal
is
a
smart
contract
implementation
for
a
direct
deposit
module
for
maker
with
ave
and
the
other
two
core
units
that
propose
over
the
past
couple
weeks
are
the
strategic
marcom
score
unit
and
the
governance
communications
coordinates,
so
that's
by
kathleen
admaker
and
david
utrow,
who
we
all
know
as
well.
L
A
Today,
great
thanks
charles
yeah
I'll
just
confirm
that
all
those
approvals
are
fine
to
move
into
inclusion
polls
next
week
as
before,
we'll
kind
of
group
the
courier
proposals
into
kind
of
so
we
vote.
We
have
one
poll
for
the
three
facilitator
mandates
and
budget
parts
just
to
kind
of
save,
save
everyone
voting
on
16,
different
things
or
16.,
half
different
half
the
same
things.
A
I
just
want
to
kind
of
remind
people,
the
authors
to
kind
of
add
the
required
like
budget
implementations
so
like,
including
like
a
payment
address
and
like
when
payments
are
kind
of
expected
right
for
the
queens
if
everything
passes
just
because
hey
absolutely
those
are
public,
because
otherwise
I
have
to
kind
of
chase
up
with
you
afterwards
and
then
we
just
put
something
in
the
executive.
Open
governance
doesn't
know
if
it's
correct
or
not.
A
Something
like
that,
I
think
it's
fine,
I'm
like
we're,
not
gonna.
I
don't
think
we're
gonna
force
people
to
go
through
them.
Like
the
do
the
budget
move
again
to
change
the
address.
Okay,
it
should
just
be
posted
publicly
like
if
it's
changing
or
like
posting
the
thread
saying
we
need
to
change
this
to
this.
For
this
reason
right
and
then
we'll
update
them
in
things.
A
You've
noticed
recently
in
the
I
guess
with
like
the
the
kind
of
executive
process,
so
we
kind
of
discussed
this
a
little
bit
like
the
other
week
in
relation
to
the
monthly
governance
cycle,
but
we're
kind
of
just
generally
finding
it's
it's
starting
to
look
like
it's
becoming
more
and
more
difficult
to
get
enough
mkr
to
pass
executive
proposals
like
we
haven't
thus
far
had
any
weeks
where
we've
not
passed
it
before.
We
reach
friday
need
to
put
up
the
next
one.
A
It's
looking
like,
we
might
hit
that
this
week,
given
that
it's
like
kind
of
thursday
and
it's
only
got
27k
on
it
and
it
needs
like
50k
yeah,
we're
saying
no
in
recent
memory,
yeah,
so
we're
kind
of
thinking
about
possibilities
to
kind
of
mitigate
the
issue,
because
there
are
kind
of
security
aspects
with
relationships
like
they're
having
too
low
and
there's.
Obviously
like
governance
efficiency
issues.
If
we
can't
pass
things
effectively.
A
A
One
of
them
is
to
kind
of
bring
forward
the
kind
of
governance
rules
or
staking
rewards
proposal
and
to
try
and
encourage
people
to
leave
mki
in
the
governor's
contract
and
the
other
possibility.
We're
considering,
is
some
form
of
like
delegation
right,
we
kind
of
discussed.
I
mean
delegation's,
always
been
planned
in,
like
the
ss
go,
but
this
it's
probably
doable
for
estimates
like
a
kind
of
good
and
dirty
version
faster
than
dss
golf.
F
Yeah
so
I'll
just
mention
that
dss
gov
is
kind
of
the
the
next
big
project.
We're
planning
to
tackle
on
the
smart
contracts
end.
So
it's
coming,
but
we
don't
you
don't
have
a
time
frame
for
that.
We
might
want
to
try
and
get
some
of
these
little
things
like
the
the
vox
and
the
flash
knocked
out
before
that.
Just
for
some
quick
wins,
but
I
I
think
I
think
it's
possible
that
we
might
need
a
shorter
term
solution
just
to
to
getting
things
done.
I
If
that
means
an
intermediate
solution
or
something
that's
more
flexible
and
easier
to
extend
over
time
with
modules
and
we
can
add,
features
piecemeal.
You
know,
I
think,
we're
at
this
point
kind
of
considering
all
options
of
what
what
makes
the
most
sense
to
solve
the
problems
with
in
a
good
time
frame.
E
It
uses
the
iou
token,
so
it
doesn't
require
dss
gov
and
additionally,
because
the
revenues
are
so
high
recently,
we
can
actually
offer
pretty
high
apy
to
people
locking
maker
into
the
chief
like,
for
example,
if
they're
sort
of
like
10
deposited
into
this
contract,
which
is
higher
than
what
is
voting
right
now,
apoys
will
be
about
33,
which
is
you
know,
it's
not
as
high
as
maybe
some
of
the
farming
yields.
But
it's
like
it's
it's
comparable
considering
how
safe
it
is.
A
E
All
right
yeah,
this
would
be
redirecting
the
entire
burner,
but
you
know
these
are
rates
that
are
high
enough.
That
may
attract
some
of
the
maker,
that's
currently
sitting
in
ave,
which
is
getting
more
and
more
dangerous.
It's
currently
at
like
about
85
of
the
hat,
which
is
being
which
is
like
available
for,
like
boro
being
borrowed,
which
is
pretty
dangerous
in
my
opinion,
and
I
think
we
can
start
chipping
away
at
that
with
higher
yields
than
zero.
E
C
Yeah
yep,
so
I
and
I'm
sure
this
code,
that
I
I
read
some
code
like
way
back
when
we
were
in
osaka
that
I
kind
of
abandoned
while
we
were
in
osaka.
But
the
idea
is
that
you
could
use
the
vote
proxy
that
we
have,
which
has
the
sort
of
hot
and
cold
wallet
to
to
act
as
a
type
of
delegate
so
like,
instead
of
just
locking
into
your
own
vote
proxy.
C
You
can
also
like
take
those
iou
tokens
and
you
could
do
something
with
them
or
make
the
proxy
itself
the
the
thing
that
does
something
yeah.
So
I
think
that
was
generally
it.
I
I
don't
know.
I
think
at
the
time.
I
think
I
was
thinking
of
like
a
vote
proxy
like
individually,
but
I
you
know
like
per
delegate
or
something
but
and
that
might
be
the
methodology
that
we're
thinking
of.
C
You
know
you
don't
want
to
get
trapped
in
a
situation
where,
like
a
bunch
of
people,
show
up
to
sort
of
you
know,
farm
the
rewards
and
then
they
like
drop
their
mkr
on
the
on
on
a
hat,
a
hat.
They
pass
one
executive
and
then
no
one
really
cares
at
that
point.
Like
they're
just
you
know
sitting
there
farming
rewards,
and
so
we
can
never
pass
another
executive.
C
That
I
mean,
I
think
we
we
very
much
want
to
think
of
like
what's
the
problem
we're
trying
to
solve
here
and-
and
it
is
it's
pretty
much
like
you
know,
government's
participation,
you
know
we
need.
We
need
people
to
actually
like
be
participating
every
week
and
you
know
deciding
whether
or
not
they
want
an
executive
to
go
through
and
so
that
that
would
just
be
these
mechanism.
Designs
can
get
really
hairy
and
yeah.
That's
that's
my
only
caution
when
we're
thinking
about
this.
E
C
E
I
To
change
yeah
the
danger
is
the
50
000
maker,
that's
sitting
on
the
proposal
back
in
december.
That
hasn't
been
moved.
That's
currently
where
the
hat
is
right
now
and
if
people
just
put
mkr
in
the
most
recent
hat
and
just
earned
those
rewards
to
set
it
and
forget
it,
we
may
want
just
as
a
spitballing.
E
A
Yes,
so
that's
that
is
one
advantage
of
having
like
the
staking
rewards.
Just
because
you
know
you
have
people
who
have
make
mk
are
locked
up
in
the
chief
they're.
Also
getting
some
like
amount
of
dying
right
for
voting
for
them
is
now
like
there's
much
like
a
there's,
a
much
smaller
barrier
of
entry
to
voting,
then
just
because
they
already
have
empire
on
the
chief.
You
know
they're
getting
comps
some
amount
of
die
for
that,
so
that
makes
the
kind
of
gas
costs
a
lot
easier
to
swallow
right.
A
Loads
to
come
out
what
chris
said,
though,
like
that
there
are
definitely
like
risks
around
doing
like
rewarding
staking
right,
like
we
can
end
up
with
ourselves
locked
out.
We
can
end
up
like
bringing
in
a
bunch
of
mkr
that
only
is
only
interested
in
rewards
and
will
always
vote
for
more
rewards
and
nothing
else
like
there
are
a
couple
of
like
failure
cases
we
need
to
be
careful
of
and
consider
before
doing.
A
Yeah
I
mean
like
this
is
the
thing
if
we
can't,
if
we
can't
pass
like
this
week's
executive,
then
like
putting
up
another
one,
probably
isn't
gonna
help
so
like
we
have
to
presumably
have
to
skip.
So
if
we
can't
pass
last
week's
executive,
we
should
really
have
to
skip
this
week's,
which
then
pushes
back
like
everything
else
right
so
yeah.
It's
something
we
need
to
resolve
pretty
urgently
like,
even
apart
from
like
the
issues
around
the
hat
right.
F
I
don't
know
if
there's
a
smart
way
to
cap
that
or
if
it's
just
kind
of
us,
realizing
that
hey
that's
going
to
be
a
risk
that
we're
going
to
have
to
tinker
with
that
in
order
to
promote
this
or
or
what.
But
I
felt,
like
a
large
amount
of
the
criticism,
could
kind
of
be
looped
into
that
kind
of
taking
a
tax
advantage
structure,
making
it
non-tax
advantaged
and
then
potentially
messing
up
the
entire
incentive
structure
for
mkr
holders.
E
It's
definitely
a
concern,
but
I
mean
like
I
don't
really
want
to
be
like
messing
around
with
like
worrying
about
taxes
when
we
have
sort
of
like
an
existential
threat
here,
so
you
know,
maybe
we
can
come
up
with
some
better
tax
strategy
later,
but
right
here
and
right
now.
I
think
we
need
to
do
something
like
be
a
delegation
or
governor
wards
or
whatever.
H
C
Yeah,
it
is
yeah.
Can
I
ask,
is
this
does
it
you
know
if
I'm
thinking
about
like
going
all
the
way
back
to
psy
and
and
whatnot
like
we
had
many
executives
that
that
didn't
pass
back
in
those
days
and
obviously
like
the
curse,
prevented
us
from
passing
a
bunch
of
things
as
well?
It
feels
like
it's
been
about
a
year,
maybe
a
little
bit
longer,
since
we've
really
had
something
that
we
haven't
been
able
to
pass.
Does
this
time
feel
different
like?
Are
we
already
at
the
like?
A
So
that's
kind
of
hard
to
judge
right,
because
you
know
there's
no
guarantee
that
this
is
a
participation
issue
right.
It
might
just
be
that,
for
whatever
reason
people
don't
like
this
executive,
I
I
personally
think
it's
unlikely,
because
some
of
it's
kind
of
already
been
signed
off
in
terms
of
the
the
core.
A
You
know
budgets,
the
kind
of
other
things
that
just
kind
of
regular
debt
ceiling
increases,
the
only
like
possibly
contentious,
one
is
increasing
the
psm
debt
ceiling
by
like
one
billion
die
so
like
it
could
be
that
people
just
really
don't
want
that,
but,
like
we
had
the
poll
for
that
previously
as
well,
and
that
fast
rate,
so
it's
it's
kind
of
hard
to
to
say,
like
that's.
Definitely
the
reason.
A
A
I
Have
like
a
there
are
there
are
ways
you
can
do
it
right
now
right.
You
just
have
a
record
of
the
transactions,
and
you
know
you
have
whoever
you
know
someone.
You
know
you
can
say
meant
die
out
of
the
executives
into
like
some
merkle
claim
contract
or
have
some
designated
third
party
sending
the
die
or
whatever
you
want.
So,
yes,
it's
certainly
possible
to
try
to
reimburse
gas
costs.
I
Yeah
going
to
go
on
a
limb,
but
somebody
who
has
25
000
maker
if
they're
worried
about
12,
we
have
other
issues.
Yeah
yeah.
I
think
voter
apathy
is
probably
a
big
problem
as
well,
but
it
it's
a
good
point.
It's
like
it's
hard
to
measure
exactly.
Why
aren't
more
people
voting
like
it'd
be
good
to
try
to
get
a
read
on
that
like?
What's
the
mkr
rated
weighted
reason
for
not
voting.
E
G
So
take
everything
I
say
with
a
grain
of
salt
because
I'm
one
of
those
people
that
has
their
their
mkr
navi,
but
the
amount
of
mkr
on
ave
is
not
that
much
with
respect
to
the
outstanding
supply
of
mkr.
So
there
is
a
ton
of
mkr
out
there.
That
is
one
not
voting
and
two
not
being
used
to
yield
farm
through
ave.
G
So
in
terms
of
like
for
me,
the
focus
is
delegation
right.
There
are
people
out
there
who
have
mgr,
who
are
not
voting.
Who
may
or
may
not
be
comfortable
delegating
that
mkr.
And
if
we
can
answer
that
question
like
then,
I
think
we're
in
good
shape
and
then
we
also
don't
have
to
spend
like
a
ton
of
money
from
the
surplus.
E
I
To
me,
some
of
the
real
question
here
is
just
a
hurdle
like
right
now,
there's
27
000
some
odd
makers
supporting
the
most
recent
proposal,
but
it
has
to
get
to
50
because
of
the
of
the
mkr,
that's
blocking
it,
the
hat
from
whatever
it
was
in
december.
I
mean
the
shortest
term
path
that
I
see
that
would
allow
us
to
break
through.
This
is
to
have
you
know.
A
hat
can
only
be
the
governing
proposal.
If
it's,
you
know
less
than
120
days,
something
that
keeps
it
fresh.
I
But
that,
what's
the
difference
that
that's
where
I'm
getting
at
is
that
if
27
000
is
the
security
threshold,
then
that
that
should
be
the
number.
It
should
be.
Something
that
keeps
the
keeps
people
should
want
to
put
their
mkr
there
and
I'm
not
disputing
what
you
said
nick
about
the
the
governing
and
the
allocation
of
it
or
whether
or
not
we
should
have
rewards.
I
think
we
should
have
all
of
it.
The
real
question
is
just
what's
the
shortest
critical
path
that
can
help
break
through
the
log
jam.
F
I
mean
we
do
we
just
have
to
address
the
fact
that,
like
investors,
don't
want
to
work
for
their
money
right,
they
want
their
money
to
work
for
them,
and
so
a
lot
of
people
just
buy
expecting
their
tokens.
You
know
tokens
be
burned,
connect
the
you
know
collect
the
the
gains
from
that.
Like
I
think
long
term,
the
the
solution
is
is
automating
as
much
of
this
as
possible
so
that
we
don't
have
to
to
rely
so
much
on
that,
but
in
the
short
term
I
would.
F
I
And
to
address
to
address
your
point
that
you
outlined
a
moment
ago,
though,
about
nuking
the
protocol
sam,
I
mean,
I
think,
in
parallel
to
any
type
of
suggestion,
changing
the
structure
I
was
outlining
of
the
hat.
I
would
it's
a
question
of
what
the
forum
posts
whenever
we
get
some
consensus
at
some
point,
but
raising
the
emergency
shutdown
threshold
from
50
000
to
something
significantly
more
material,
I
do
believe,
is
in
line.
A
H
A
H
H
It's
short
term
real
estate
bridge
loans,
the
mips
submission
was
on
july
2020
and
the
pool
is
already
live
for
months
now
and
there
will
be
more.
There
is
more
than
three
million
committed
to
it
and
there
is
a
13
underlying
loan.
So
it's
already
active
already
used.
You
can
see
the
drop
which
is
in
the
trench,
the
one
we
will
invest
in
and
the
tin
trench,
which
is
the
equity
portion
of
of
the
this
pool.
H
H
So
you
have
the
anastrogenitors
that
put
assets
and
tokenize
them
on
the
teammate
pool.
Some
investors
are
buying
drop
and
tin
token
directly
from
from
the
teenage
pool.
Mip
22
is
doing
the
coordination,
and
what
is
done
is
that
when
there
is
some
cash
needed
up
to
the
debt
ceiling,
that
we
suggest,
the
mid-2
will
ask
maker
to
get
the
money,
and
if
there
is
some
reimbursement
or
some
new
drop
investors
that
put
money
inside
the
teenage
pool
as
the
money
will
flow
to
reimburse
the
loan
as
soon
as
possible.
H
H
We
can
elucidate
at
any
time,
and
that
will
be
the
reason,
although
for
the
mid-21
is
that
we
need
a
placeholder
token
for
emergency
shutdown,
because
the
drop
is
a
security,
so
it's
not
possible
to
give
it
to
people
that
will
only
die
at
emergency
down.
So
we
will
use
a
placeholder
token
just
like
success
to
be
given
to
people.
If
there
is
a
need
for
the
regarding
the
smart
contract
team,
only
meet
21
is
in
the
perimeter
of
mika
mib.
H
H
For
the
liquidation,
so
liquidation
like
for
success
is
liquid
is
triggered
by
governance,
but
there
can
be
two
reasons
to
regulate
one,
a
covenant
into
which
we
would
see
what
are
the
covenants
later.
So
this
will
be
monitored
by
the
real
world
finance
core
unit,
and
the
second
attorneys
will
make
a
dial
governance
in
general.
One
stops
the
investment
for
any
reason,
so
liquidation,
actually
what
it
does.
It
doesn't
serve
the
drop
token
on
the
market,
because
there
is
no
market
for
that.
H
It
will
just
ask
for
redemption
of
the
drop
token
and
what
how
it
works
is
that
in
lake,
when
someone
wants
to
redeem
their
drop
token,
if
there
is
any
cash
flow
that
is
coming
to
the
teenage
pool,
it
will
go
to
redeem
the
drop
token
be
forced
into
current
and
before
making
new
investment
and
the
average
maturity
of
the
portfolio
with
13
months.
So
it
will
take
around
30
months
to
to
get
most
of
the
money
back.
H
H
This
is
the
mid-22
part,
and
then
we
can
call
the
hard
liquidation,
which
called
the
curve
functions,
and
the
only
difference
here
is
that
it
deprecates
the
remaining
part
of
the
dialogue
using
the
surplus
buffer.
I
will
explain
a
bit
later
after
the
soft,
the
liquidation.
We
can
get
money
back
from
the
teenage
pool.
H
H
H
H
H
H
H
Continue
so
to
to
formalize
the
right
to
have
an
audit
on
new
silver.
We
will
I
made
a
drop
subscription
into
the
the
teen
leg
pool,
so
you
can.
You
will
be
able
to
see
this
drop
subscription
because
in
mid
21
there
is
one
parameters
which
is
linked
on
ipfs
and
you
will
have
all
the
listing
of
all
the
rights
and
obligation
of
the
drop
investor
and
maker
is
not
contractually
dropped
investors,
but
as
it
use
the
same
smart
contracts
that
other
drop
investors.
H
There
will
also
be
a
side
letter
that
is
already
signed
to
formalize
the
audit
right
that
real
world
finance
have
on
the
on
this
pb.
So
we
have
access
to
all
the
underlying
data,
all
the
bank
financial
statement
and
stuff
like
that,
and
we,
we
will
add
citadel
spv,
which
is
an
spv
service
provider
to
be
appointed
as
an
opponent
director,
so
why
that
is
currently
ns
pool
is
managed
by
the
same
people
than
new
silver.
So
obviously,
if
new
silver
goes
bankrupt,
it's
unlikely
that
someone
will
continue
to
manage
the
spv
it's
possible.
H
But
let's
say
the
worst
case
and
new
silver
can
can
ask
new
and
spool
lc
can
ask
for
voluntary
bankruptcy,
and
we
don't
want
to
do
that.
So
the
independent
director,
his
main
task,
will
be
to
to
say
no
to
any
voluntary
brand
crops,
failing
which
is
not
a
very
hard
task,
but
still
something
important
to
be
sure
that
there
is
a
real
bankruptcy
remoteness
from
new
silver
to
nsp,
and
the
opponent
creator
will
also
be
able
to
clean
a
little
bit
the
mess
if
there
is
a
need
to
to
do
that.
H
H
H
H
H
H
To
go
back
on
the
level
of
collateralization
that
we
will
using
in
this
this
collateral,
so
they
will
be
most
will
be
enforced
by
team
nick
and
will
be
controlled
by
the
real
world
finance
clinic
every
month,
because
we
will
look
on
the
loan
tape.
Every
loan
add
the
value
of
each
loan
and
see
if
there
is
a
zero
if
the
parameters
are
still
okay,
so
the
spv
collateral
ratio.
So
here
on
the
bottom,
you
have
all
the
underlying
loans.
H
H
As
this
light,
clear
area,
which
is
the
underlying
loan,
will
be
inside
the
spv.
It's
one
of
the
assets
of
the
sp
to
finance
those
loans.
The
spv
will
have
some
equity,
which
is
the
tin
tranche
and
we'll
have
some
debt
which
will
be
the
drop
trench
on
the
drop
trench.
In
the
light
blue,
you
will
have
the
drop
owned
by
other
people,
not
makeup
people
and
on
the
middle
of
blue.
You
will
have
what
is
what
is
used
to
borrow
against
the
microvolt
and
again
the
makerbot.
H
So
the
spv
criteria's
ratio,
craterial
ratio-
is
the
great
light
gray
area
divided
by
the
bottom
of
the
blue
blue
section
and
should
be
always
above
one
of
a
108
percent
actually
neck
on
for
something
a
bit
bigger.
But
in
any
case,
if
it
goes
a
bit
below
we
let
a
little
threshold
in
curve
and
the
mean
volt
criteria,
the
collateralization
ratio
is
105
percent,
which
is
the
blue
line.
H
H
So
we
have
updated
our
dashboards
that
we
have
prepared
earlier
this
week
this
year
with
the
actual
data,
because
we
have,
we
are
lucky
that
the
pool
is
already
live,
so
we
are
already
have
some
loans
to
to
work
on.
So
you
can
see
that
the
spv
collateral
ratio
is
above
108
percent.
It's
quite
above
that.
H
So
that's
good,
so
other
parameters
doesn't
for
currently
because
we
haven't,
they
haven't
borrowed
anything
yet
so
that
doesn't
work.
Obviously
the
co-investor
ratio
is
a
100
percent,
because
we
haven't
invested
anything
you
can
see
below
the
different
other
correct,
the
other
covenants
soft
government
that
we
have
have
added
to
the
risk
assessment,
and
you
can
see
that
the
no
borrower
has
a
loan
above
500
thousand
dollars
as
a
maximum
borrower.
H
Exposure
for
score
and
low
fecal
score
are
respected
and
we
have
the
state
exposure
which
is
respected
as
well,
but
as
you
can
see,
it's
currently
respected
because
they
still
have
a
quite
good
reserve
of
cash
that
is
used
in
this
metric
but
is
not
used
in
this
nice
chart
below
that.
Show
you.
What
are
the
states
where
the
loan
are
made
and
currently
a
lot
of
loans
are
made
in
florida?
H
K
A
F
I
Sorry
sebastian
hi
hi,
everyone
hi
karen
sorry.
This
is
kirill
from
new
silver.
I'm
sorry,
I
was
late
and
yeah.
I
just
wanted
to
answer
peyton's
quite
the
last
question
here.
As
far
as
the
is
as
long
as
far
as
I
understood
so,
let's
say
we
go
bankrupt.
New
silver
goes
bankrupt.
The
collateral
is
assigned
to
the
spd,
which
is
bankruptcy
remote.
So
it's
going
to
have
the
independent
director,
so
the
collapse,
the
you
know,
the
vault
is
still
collateralized
by
the
loans.
I
I
Even
in
that
case
I
don't
know,
but
you
know,
I
think
that
there
is
a
chance
that
the
borrower
could
default
on
the
loan
to
us,
and
then
we
have
various.
You
know
various
mechanisms
to
collect
and
at
the
end
of
the
collection,
which
you
know
only
is
about
five
percent
or
so
all
of
the
loans
that
default.
We
could
go
to
foreclosure,
which
you
know
just
means
that
there
is
a
delayed
collection,
but
but
we
still
collect
it,
does
not
go
to
zero.
H
Yeah
and
inside
the
spv,
the
operating
agreement
say
that
as
soon
as
the
spv
gets
some
money
from
the
loans,
it
is
obliged
to
put
it
in
that
in
a
pool
and
that
in
a
pool
is
it
is
a
smart
contract.
So,
even
if
there
is
no
contract
contractual
obligations,
the
smart
contract
will
do
what
the
smart
contract
will
do,
which
is
the
art
collect
and
which
means
repay
every
doubt
for
the
upholders.
F
Gotcha,
that
makes
sense,
so
it's
just
the
kind
of
practical
function
of
we
need
to
mark
it
down,
because
all
these
legal
processes
could
take
a
while
for
us
to
get
paid
back,
so
we
just
write
it
as
a
total
loss
and
then,
whatever
collateral,
we're
able
to
scrape
back,
gets
added
back
into
the
the
buffer
yeah
exactly
got
it.
Thank
you.
That
was
really
helpful.
H
And
yeah,
so
I
just
checked
today
just
to
to
look
at
the
spvs
that
were
used
during
subprime
and
the
level
of
safety
of
this
spv
is
quite
similar
to
to
the
real
estate
market
mortgage-backed
securities.
During
the
the
crisis
and
during
the
crisis,
the
loss
was
on
so
problem.
It
was
less
than
one
percent
and
on
the
not
none
sub
prime,
it
was
two
percent
which
was
actually
a
bit
more
because
the
number
are
not
the
same.
I
H
H
A
A
I
What
what
kate
wrote
in
the
chat?
Sorry
long
to
interrupt
you,
that's
right.
We
do
have
we.
We
are
planning
a
community
call
focused
around
centrifuge
that
we
hope
to
discuss
this
in
more
detail,
and
I
will
definitely
also
post
it
on
the
forum
and,
I
think,
seb
you're
attending
as
well
right.
So
that
would
be
also
a
good
place
to
ask
questions
and
understand.
L
K
Yeah,
a
quick,
very
quick
comment:
tomorrow
we
have
the
euro
die
with
the
with
tim,
shoopy
and
well
also
seb.
So
anyone
interested
it's
at
1pm
utc,
so
a
little
bit
earlier
for
the
americas-
maybe
but
hopefully
you
can,
you
can
make
it
and
and
yeah.
It's
a
know,
your
mip
session,
I
think
number
six
and
it's
going
to
be
great.
I
think
so.
Come
join
us.